Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Genesis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10

TEM Characterization of Solar Wind Effects on Genesis Mission Silicon Collectors

The Genesis Discovery Mission passively allowed solar wind (SW) to implant into substrates during exposure times up to ~853 days from 2001 to 2004. The spacecraft then returned the SW to Earth for analysis. Substrates included semiconductor wafers (silicon, sapphire, and germanium), as well as a number of thin films supported by either silicon or sapphire wafers. During flight, subsets of the SW collectors were exposed to one of 4 SW regimes: bulk solar wind, coronal hole solar wind (CH, high speed), interstream solar wind (IS, low speed) or coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Each SW regime had a different composition and range of ion speeds and, during their collection, uniquely changed their host SW collector. This study focuses on bulk vs IS SW effects on CZ silicon.

Allums, K. K.↗

The Genesis Mission: A Unique Opportunity for Scientific Collaboration

The Genesis Solar Wind Sample Return was flown with the goal of creating a baseline of elemental and isotopic solar photospheric composition from solar matter (not rocks!) for use in cosmochemical modeling. No uses for the samples outside of Cosmochemistry were advertised, and for good reason. In these days of limited funding, there is an overwhelming tendency to look inward instead of recognizing that the best outcomes of science tend to be interdisciplinary. So, below, we suggest two radical acts of collaboration that we believe will accelerate the advancement of science.

A. J. G. Jurewicz↗

Genesis failure investigation report

On January 7, 2001, the Genesis spacecraft lifted off from Cape Canaveral. Its mission was to collect solar wind samples and return those samples to Earth for detailed analysis by scientists. The mission proceeded successfully for three-and-a-half years. On September 8, 2004, the spacecraft approached Earth, pointed the Sample Return Capsule (SRC) at its entry target, and then fired pyros that jettisoned the SRC. The SRC carried the valuable samples collected over the prior 29 months. The SRC also contained the requisite hardware (mechanisms, parachutes, and electronics) to manage the process of entry, descent, and landing (EDL). After entering Earth’s atmosphere, the SRC was expected to open a drogue parachute. This should have been followed by a pyro event to release the drogue chute, and then by a pyro event to deploy the main parachute at an approximate elevation of 6.7 kilometers. As the SRC descended to the Utah landing site, helicopters were in position to capture the SRC before the capsule touched down. On September 8, 2004, observers of the SRC’s triumphant return became concerned as the NASA announcer fell silent, and then became even more alarmed as they watched the spacecraft tumble as it streaked across the sky. Long-distance cameras clearly showed that the drogue parachute had not deployed properly.

UNKNOWN↗

Trajectory design for the Genesis backup orbit and proposed extended mission

In September 2004, the Genesis spacecraft will return to Earth with its collection of solar wind samples. If for some reason there are any difficulties with returning the samples to Earth during the nominal entry sequence, a contingency plan is in place for a second chance at a successful recovery. This paper will detail the processes used to generate possible backup trajectories, and provide a comparison of the contingency options examined through the course of the study.

Chung, Min-Kun J.↗

Human safety analysis for the Genesis Sample Return mission

The Genesis sample return capsule (SRC) was NASA's first high-profile ballistic re-entry over the United States. Because of the delta-V-imprarting nature of the SRC release sequence, the SRC was targeted to various points in Northeast Nevada and Northwest Utah. Its final target was the Utah Test and Training Range, which is operated by the US Air Force.

Wahl, Tom↗

Earth return maneuver strategies for Genesis and Stardust

As part of NASA's Discovery Program, Genesis and Stardust will be the first missions since the Apollo Program to return samples collected in deep space. To constrain costs of recovery, entry requirements must be much tighter than those imposed on Apollo. Spacecraft designs were also greatly simplified to limit costs, giving rise to a variety of operational limitations and constraints. In light of these considerations, approach to Earth presents a challenge in terms of both mission planning and navigation. This paper discusses strategies for trajectory correction during the Earth return phases of both missions.

Williams, Kenneth E.↗

Martian B Storm Genesis and Evolution: Initial Analysis of Thermal Datasets.

Introduction: Dust lifting on Mars likely occurs primarily as a result of the exchange of momentum between the atmosphere and the surface via saltation. During saltation, sand-sized particles are mobilized but do not enter into suspension. When these larger particles fall back to the surface, kinetic energy is transferred to smaller dust particles which are then lofted into suspension in the atmosphere. Depending on the altitude to which dust is lofted, it can have a significant effect on atmospheric temperatures. As a strong absorber and emitter in the infrared, dust can influence atmospheric heating and modify the global circulation and weather on Mars [1,2]. Although dust is present in Mars’ atmosphere throughout the year, the atmosphere is generally dustier during the second half of the year when Mars is near perihelion. Observations reveal that episodic global-scale dust storms and fairly regular regional-scale dust storms are superimposed on a well-defined and highly repeatable seasonal cycle of dust opacity and associated mid-level atmospheric temperature responses. Kass et al. (2016) used 50 Pa temperature observations from MRO/MCS to identify three highly repeatable time periods during which regional dust storms occur, and designated them the “A”, “B” and “C” storms. While “A” and “C” storms have been studied a fair amount to-date, “B” storms have not yet been investigated in detail. This study explores the generation and evolution of the annually recurring regional dust storm known as the “B” storm, which was identified and categorized by Kass et al. (2016) based on 25 km (50 Pa) temperature observations. The B storm is a southern-hemisphere (SH) phenomenon that originates at the cap edge just after perihelion and which reaches peak intensity during the SH summer solstice, Ls 270. It may originate from the cap edge storms that spawn near the edge of the seasonal CO2 cap during retreat, but the mechanisms for B storm genesis have yet to be determined definitively [1]. Methods: We will use observational data sets and a global climate model (GCM) to investigate “B” regional storms. The data analysis component will include the analysis of imagery from MGS/MOC and MRO/MARCI, and spectroscopic data sets of dust and temperatures from MGS/TES and MRO/MCS with the goal of fully characterizing the behavior of these storms. Both MGS and TES provide data well-suited for temperature analysis at 25 km. MCS measures atmospheric temperature, dust extinction, and water ice extinction at 5 km intervals from the surface to about 80 km. TES measured atmospheric temperatures, column dust and water ice opacities, and column water vapor abundances. Measurements made by TES extended from the surface to about 40 km [1]. At the 50 Pa (25 km) level, local dust events usually confined to shallower depths are effectively filtered out of the analysis leaving the regional dust events identifiable by their temperature signatures [1]. Our preliminary analysis makes use of the fact that the brightness temperature at 15 microns (T15 temperature) is a close approximation to observed temperature at 25 km. We first reproduce the zonal mean 50 Pa level temperature plots for MY 29-32 to establish a baseline for our procedures moving forward [1]. Expanding on Kass et al. (2016), we include recent MCS data from MY 33 and 34 as well. Preliminary Analysis: The daytime (3PM) T15 temperatures in Figure 1 indicate: in MY 29, a strong A storm at Ls 240, a B storm at high southern latitudes just after Ls 270, and a C storm at Ls 320; in MY 30, a B storm at Ls 270; in MY 31 & MY 32, a B storm just before Ls 270; in MY 33, a B storm at Ls 270; and in MY 34, a strong A storm in the northern hemisphere at Ls 210, and a B storm around Ls 270 although there is a data gap. For the B storms, each is indicative of lofted dust and resultant warming. The daytime temperature structure illustrates that the B storm occurs annually around Ls 270 and is confined to high southern latitudes. It reaches its peak intensity around SH summer solstice, Ls 270, consistently for all six MY assessed. Since direct solar heating is absent overnight, the nighttime T15 temperatures (Figure 2) are often useful for differentiating the heat signature of direct solar heating from the dynamical response to that heating. However, in the southern polar latitudes at perihelion the sun does not set and direct solar heating remains present throughout the night. Importantly for our study, dust lofted in the B storm experiences this direct heating day and night for the entirety of its lifetime. The B storm expands as far north as -60 latitude and decays in latitudinal extent more gradually than it grows. This feature is less obvious in the nighttime (3AM) T15 temperatures (Figure 2). The temperature signal is stronger at night for MY 30-33. The warm pool is larger in area relative to the background at night in these four cases. This more uniform warming masks the “tail” feature somewhat, such that it is barely noticeable during these years. Unfortunately, gaps in MCS data in MY 29 and 34 prevent confirmation of the tail feature during those years, however, the B storm temperature signature follows a very different pattern than that described for MY 30-33. MY 29 and 34 appear to show smaller centers of warming at night and larger centers of warming during the day. This is in opposition to that previously described for MY 30-33. Conclusions and Future Work: We will continue investigating the heat signatures of B storms by looking at the total column heating as recorded by TES. We will also look at lower altitudes for patterns that may describe the relationship between B storms and the cap edge storms that develop while the seasonal cap is retreating. In the future, we will use GCM simulations to determine the atmospheric and thermo-dynamic conditions associated with these storms.

Courtney Marylou Batterson↗

Pterodactyl: Coupled 6-Dof Integration of Guidance and Control Algorithms in Genesis

The NASA-funded Pterodactyl project seeks to advance the current state-of-the-art for entry vehicles by developing novel guidance and control technologies for Deployable Entry Vehicles (DEVs). This paper builds upon the Pterodactyl architecture that employed eight individually articulating flaps with two options for guidance, bank angle modulation with the Fully Numerical Predictor Corrector Entry Guidance technique (FNPEG) and angle of attack and sideslip modulation with FNPEG uncoupled range control (FNPEG URC). These, with a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller, had previously been presented in uncoupled 3-DOF trajectories. This work will show results from fully coupled 6-DOF simulations, leveraging recent advancements in trajectory simulation software, namely the Julia-based Genesis package. Preliminary results show good performance for angle of attack and sideslip modulation when using a controller designed at high dynamic pressure conditions.

range targeting↗