Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “HFIR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10

Volume 4: Detection Systems and Ultra-Cold Neutrons

As part of the Sustaining and Enhancing Nuclear Science (SENSe) initiative at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), the prospect of adding new detection systems to support High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) operations and to advance scientific research has prompted many ideas and discussions regarding potential features, configurations, locations, and applications. A working group of ORNL staff members was organized to further develop the concepts and recommending one or more configurations to best support future HFIR operations and scientific capacities and to provide order-of-magnitude cost estimates and timing. The areas of investigation included fast access detection systems, non-scattering beamline instruments, shielded detection instruments, and an ultracold neutron source. In each case, the focus was to develop world leading capabilities that would be unmatched by any other facility.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Analysis of WIRE-21 SPND and Optical Fiber Sensor Measurements

The Wireless Instrumented RB Experiment 2021 (WIRE-21) was a highly instrumented experiment designed to test prototype wireless temperature and pressure sensors developed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (WEC) in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). In addition to these sensors, a suite of other sensors was also integrated into the experiment capsule, including various types of distributed optical fiber sensors and self-powered neutron detectors (SPNDs). This report presents an analysis of the data generated by the SPNDs and optical fiber sensors that were tested under the highest reported neutron flux. The distributed optical fiber sensor results demonstrate that F-doped optical fibers, particularly those inscribed with fs fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs), are capable of surviving fast neutron fluences on the order of 1021 n fast /cm 2 at temperatures relevant to light-water reactors (between 200 and 400°C). However, a significant blue-shift in the optical spectra of these sensors was observed over the course of irradiation which cannot be explained based on the current understanding of radiation-induced compaction in fused silica glass. A mechanistic understanding of this drift has not yet been developed and is proposed as future scope under the Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation program. Of the four SPNDs, only one appeared to operate normally during three cycles of irradiation. A radiation transport model of the experiment in HFIR was used to determine time-dependent neutron flux in this SPND and to calculate the neutron sensitivity of the device. Results showed a cycle averaged sensitivity of 1.5 ×10 -22 and 1.4 ×10 -22 A/nν for the first and third cycles of irradiation, respectively. Additional details pertaining to the optical fibers and SPNDs are included herein.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Mixing Study for the Modification of H-Canyon Tank 31 and 32 Recirculation Lines Via M-Star®

As a part of the Accelerated Basin De-Inventory (ABD) program Tanks 31 or 32 will be re-purposed to support increasing the number of annual Material Test Reactor (MTR) and High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) dissolutions. The proposed plan will allow Tanks 31 or 32 to be used as the dissolver cold chemical solution makeup tank and storage tank. The dissolver cold chemicals are 50% nitric acid, process water, mercuric nitrate, and gadolinium nitrate. Tanks 31 and 32 are 9 ft. (outer diameter) x 36 ft, horizontal, and can hold approximately 56,000 liters (15,000 gallons) each. One full volume of Tanks 31 or 32 can support 4 HFIR 6.4D equivalent batches. Both tanks are equipped with liquid level instrumentation. Tank 31 is equipped with 1 pump used for transfer and recirculation while Tank 32 is equipped with two pumps, one for transfer and the other for recirculation. Each of the pumps is equipped with sample taps. The tanks do not have specific gravity instrumentation, an agitator, or a sampler. Piping modifications will also be performed to supply the tank with cold chemicals. The current dissolver chemical composition is 5.0 -8.5M HNO3 and ~0.2 g Gd/L. The recirculating pump connected to Tank 31 is rated for a flowrate 175 gpm while the pump connected to Tank 32 is rated for a flowrate 50 gpm.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

High Flux Isotope Reactor Uncertainty Factors

This report provides a brief summary of the uncertainty factors used for High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) steady-state heat transfer analyses. These factors are mainly used in the HFIR Steady-State Heat Transfer Code (HSSHTC) to perform core thermal margin evaluations that determine safe reactor operation. The attempt to classify these factors stems from the assumption that the current approach is characterized by an excess of conservatism, thereby restricting reactor performance. The work documented herein was of a limited scope and pertained mainly to factors’ description and initial grouping based on their functional use. Suggestions are provided for further evaluation for the low-enriched uranium (LEU) to the uranium silicide dispersion fuel (U 3 Si 2 -Al).

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

The ORNL Moderator Test Station Science Case

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) hosts two world-leading slow neutron sources, the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), and is currently developing the technical design for a Second Target Station (STS) for the SNS. Upon completion of the STS project, ORNL will be uniquely positioned to optimize each of its three neutron sources, the SNS First Target Station (FTS), the STS, and HFIR, in a complementary way. Among the essential aspects of a re-imagined FTS and the current STS design are high-brightness parahydrogen moderators—moderators which are optimized for high per-unit-area neutron brightness rather than integrated-across-large-area neutron intensity. The high-brightness moderators proposed for the STS will, for the brightness metric, significantly outperform the coupled moderators currently on the FTS for appropriately optimized neutron beamlines, provided the moderating hydrogen is converted to near-equilibrium levels of parahydrogen (approximately 99.8% at 20 K). The original FTS moderators, by contrast, were conservatively designed to be relatively insensitive to the exact ortho:para ratio, with a consequent loss in performance. As a result, a redesign of the FTS moderators assuming fully converted parahydrogen could result in significant performance improvements on the FTS coupled moderators, and more consistent performance over time for all hydrogen moderators. This “parahydrogen problem” is a long-standing challenge for the effective implementation of hydrogen cold moderators at high-power neutron sources. In addition, the development of new moderator concepts, whether based on previously unused materials, structured heterogeneous arrays, or even simply on changes in overall shape and size is significantly restricted at a large-scale production facility intended to use the resulting neutron beams. Accordingly, moderators for production neutron sources are often designed in a very conservative, low-risk fashion, even though this compromises the absolute neutronic performance. Advanced moderator concepts worthy of study include features that could not be tested without redesigning and redeploying the entire existing reflector, shielding, and neutron beamline installation, making such development efforts far more expensive than building a stand-alone test facility.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Qualification of an Additively Manufactured Irradiation Capsule for the High Flux Isotope Reactor

As part of the Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies (AMMT) Program’s work package Component Manufacturing and Demonstrations from AM 316 SS, irradiation capsules have been additively manufactured (AM) from 316H stainless steel for insertion into the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The irradiation capsules (commonly referred to as “rabbits”) have been successfully designed, fabricated, pressure tested, qualified, and inserted into the HFIR for irradiation and post-irradiation evaluation. Each rabbit consists of an AM housing and two standard AM end caps. The design is simple and amenable to geometric and material customization. This demonstration helps pave the way for acceptance of AM safety-critical components for nuclear energy applications.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Report on the Integration of Experimental and Modeling Data for Initial Equivalence Study of Mechanical Performance in Irradiated LPBF 316 Stainless Steel

To ensure the rapid development, deployment, and use of advanced nuclear technologies, faster qualification approaches are needed. Typically, the primary pathway uses traditional data packages consistent with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, which does not consider the environmental effects the material will experience such as corrosion and radiation damage. Examining radiation effects requires a significant amount of space in US facilities at the Advanced Test Reactor and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) and suffers from natural gradients in temperature and neutron flux profiles. Ion irradiation may enable rapid assessment of radiation-induced damage to a material and is proposed as part of an accelerated materials qualification framework through the Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies program. To enhance the utility of ion irradiation as an examination tool, this report provides the initial assessment of engineering-relevant properties of microstructures produced from ion irradiation in the near-surface volume. Nanoindentation, Vickers hardness, and known tensile properties were brought together with simple mathematical models and experimental data for an initial equivalence study of the mechanical performance of irradiated laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 316 stainless steels across length scales. Direct observation of the calculated ion irradiation yield stress and measured neutron irradiation yield stress at 2 dpa showed that both datasets exhibit the same trend with irradiation temperature and overlap within an acceptable band of stress values. Ion irradiations at 10 dpa serve as a prediction of properties to compare to postirradiation examination of HFIR-irradiated LPBF 316H further in the program. This work is a significant demonstration of the Licensing Approach with Ions and Neutrons, which uses ion irradiations to generate mechanical property information more rapidly than through neutron irradiations.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Design Report on the MiniFuel Instrumented Test Apparatus for Understanding Radiation Effects

Most nuclear fuels irradiations at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) over the past decade have been conducted using MiniFuel—a static capsule design employing subscale fuel specimens to collect separate-effects irradiated fuel performance data. Irradiation conditions for MiniFuel experiments are predicted pre-test using reactor physics, and thermal models are verified post-irradiation via SiC dilatometry and various spectrometry methods. Relevant fuel performance parameters are also observed post-irradiation in a hot cell, thereby providing a single data point for each parameter representing the cumulative effects of the irradiation conditions. Substantially more data can be harvested from a single test and within a shorter duration by instrumenting irradiation vehicles and measuring desired quantities in situ. This report presents the design and analysis of the MiniFuel INstrumented Irradiation Test Apparatus for Understanding Radiation Effects (MINITAURE)—an instrumented test rig based on the separate-effects MiniFuel concept that aims to capture fission gas release (FGR) and thermal conductivity degradation of fuel specimens during irradiation in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). MINITAURE will be integrated with the Materials Irradiation Facility (MIF) located in the HFIR building outside the reactor containment. The MIF will act as the instrumentation and control center for the experiment, enabling real-time feedback from in situ sensors and control of irradiation temperatures via a gas delivery system. Two unique capsule designs were developed to capture each phenomenon: the thermal conductivity capsule, which uses a thermopile method to estimate fuel specimen thermal conductivity, and the fission gas release capsule, which will have continuous flowing gas communication to high-purity germanium detectors that are housed in the MIF for monitoring FGR. This report details the reactor physics and heat transfer modeling activities that were used to inform the experiment design and predict capsule performance. It also describes out-of-pile activities conducted to stand up this new capability and verify the measurement techniques. Modeling efforts to date have demonstrated the feasibility of the in situ measurement techniques and supported the development of the MINITAURE assembly configuration. Out-of-pile testing of the thermal conductivity measurement shows promise in capturing relative changes in thermal conductivity. However, significant errors exist in the measured absolute value, posing a need for further refinement.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

High Flux Isotope Reactor Low-Enriched Uranium High Density Silicide Fuel Preliminary Design Update: System Transient Analysis

As a part of conversion efforts from highly enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel under direction of the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy, multiple proposed designs of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) have been created and assessed regarding reactor physics performance metrics, including designs utilizing uranium silicide dispersion fuel (U3Si2-Al). This report updates the previous analyses that evaluated the nuclear safety performance of LEU fuel designs with respect to selected accident events from the HFIR Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Both the Low Density (LD) and High Density (HD) Optimized designs’ reactivity initiated accident fuel performance improved relative to the HEU fuel, attributed to greater 238 U negative Doppler feedback. However, the thermal margins for primary coolant system accidents were reduced with some acceptance criteria unable to be met. The need to resolve reduced thermal margin, open modeling items, and unresolved assumptions was identified.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ROADRUNNER MiniFuel Experiment: Readiness for Insertion

The Research On ADvancing the peRformance of UraNium Nitrides in Extreme enviRonments (ROADRUNNER) campaign is a collaborative irradiation experiment designed to evaluate the performance of uranium nitride (UN) fuel fabricated with controlled variations in density and impurity content. Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s MiniFuel irradiation platform and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) are being used to irradiate six targets containing 36 UN miniature disks. These targets have been assembled to systematically investigate burnup and temperature effects under accelerated irradiation conditions. This report documents the finalized test plan, describes the experiment assembly and subcapsule integration process, and confirms the readiness of all ROADRUNNER targets for HFIR insertion. All targets have passed quality control procedures, and five have begun irradiation. The campaign will provide critical performance data to support fuel model validation and future UN qualification efforts.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ROADRUNNER MiniFuel Experiment: Readiness for Insertion

The Research On ADvancing the peRformance of UraNium Nitrides in Extreme enviRonments (ROADRUNNER) campaign is a collaborative irradiation experiment designed to evaluate the performance of uranium nitride (UN) fuel fabricated with controlled variations in density and impurity content. Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s MiniFuel irradiation platform and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) are being used to irradiate six targets containing 36 UN miniature disks. These targets have been assembled to systematically investigate burnup and temperature effects under accelerated irradiation conditions. This report documents the finalized test plan, describes the experiment assembly and subcapsule integration process, and confirms the readiness of all ROADRUNNER targets for HFIR insertion. All targets have passed quality control procedures, and five have begun irradiation. The campaign will provide critical performance data to support fuel model validation and future UN qualification efforts.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Development of a Target Rod Rabbit Holder Facility in the Large Removable Beryllium Position

A new facility, the removable beryllium-target rod rabbit holder facility (RB*-TRRH), was designed and fielded in the large removable beryllium (RB*) position in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). This facility supports three shortened target rod rabbit holders (sTRRHs), which allow for the irradiation of six axially stacked rabbit capsules per sTRRH. This will allow for the simultaneous irradiation of 18 rabbit capsules in the RB* position and will provide an alternative location for low-cost rabbit capsules to be irradiated in HFIR. The first capsules inserted into this facility are 18 perforated capsules that contain representative steel specimens of interest to the calandria of Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactors as part of a lifetime extension program with Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Moderator Test Station at ORNL

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) hosts two world-leading slow neutron sources, the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), and is currently developing the technical design for a Second Target Station (STS) for the SNS. Upon completion of the STS project, ORNL will be uniquely positioned to optimize each of its three neutron sources, the SNS First Target Station (FTS), the STS, and HFIR, in a complementary way. Among the essential aspects of a reimagined FTS and the current STS concept are high-brightness parahydrogen moderators—moderators which are optimized for high per-unit-area neutron brightness rather than integrated-across-large-area neutron intensity. The high-brightness moderators proposed for the STS will significantly outperform the coupled moderators currently on the FTS for appropriately optimized neutron beamlines, provided the moderating hydrogen is converted to near-equilibrium levels of parahydrogen (approximately 99.8% at 20 K). The original FTS moderators, by contrast, were conservatively designed to be relatively insensitive to the exact ortho:para ratio, with a consequent loss in performance. As a result, a redesign of the FTS moderators assuming fully converted parahydrogen could result in significant performance improvements on the FTS coupled moderators, and more consistent performance over time for all hydrogen moderators. This “parahydrogen problem” is a long-standing challenge for the effective implementation of hydrogen cold moderators at high-power neutron sources. In addition, the development of new moderator concepts, whether based on previously unused materials, structured heterogeneous arrays, or even simply on changes in overall shape and size is significantly restricted at a large-scale production facility intended to use the neutron beams so produced. Accordingly, moderators for production neutron sources are often designed in a very conservative, low-risk fashion, even though this compromises the absolute neutronic performance. Advanced moderator concepts worthy of study include features that could not be tested without redesigning and redeploying the entire existing reflector, shielding, and neutron beamline installation, making such development efforts far more expensive than building a stand-alone test facility. We propose a Moderator Test Station (MTS) at the SNS with which we will verify such performance gains and test new moderator concepts. These concepts include both high-brightness and large-volume parahydrogen moderators, as well as moderators with tailored ortho:para hydrogen levels, heterogeneous moderator concepts such as the convoluted moderator or pelletized moderators, and moderators made of materials like ammonia, ethane, and oxygen clathrates, which have not been widely tested let alone deployed at neutron source facilities.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Nuclear fuel irradiation testbed for nuclear security applications

The nuclear security community has long been interested in the identification and quantification of nuclear material signatures to understand a material’s provenance, use, and ultimate application. New forensics signatures and methods intended for non-traditional or advanced nuclear fuel applications require fuel irradiation experiments to demonstrate viability and validity. Integral fuel irradiations have historically required significant costs and long timelines to design, irradiate, and characterize. This paper describes how a recently developed nuclear fuel irradiation testbed can be used to provide a low cost, rapid turnaround, modular test environment for irradiation and evaluation of nuclear fuel specimens for nuclear security applications. The irradiation testbed houses six small ‘MiniFuel’ samples within hermetically sealed capsules inside targets that can be removed in between each ∼25-day operating cycle of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). As many as nine targets can be irradiated using a single irradiation position (reflector region) in HFIR, allowing for varying irradiation temperatures and burnups. A suite of hot cell capabilities have been established to perform post-irradiation examination for measuring performance (e.g., fuel swelling, fission gas release) and facilitating experiment disassembly for subsequent property measurements, microstructural analysis, or chemical assay. This new testbed allows fuel irradiations to be conducted on an accelerated timeframe to enable rapid proof of concept testing and to provide reference material for nuclear fuel security applications. Recent applications using this testbed include the testing of isotopic taggants in UO 2 fuel (intentional forensics), testing of U-10Mo fuel for down-conversion of highly enriched uranium–fueled reactors, and the production of irradiated UO 2 fuel material for signature analysis of its isotopic composition (plutonium, fission gases, etc.).

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

As-Built Simulation of the High Flux Isotope Reactor

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is an 85 MWt flux trap-type research reactor that supports key research missions, including isotope production, materials irradiation, and neutron scattering. The core consists of an inner and an outer fuel element containing 171 and 369 involute-shaped plates, respectively. The thin fuel plates consist of a U 3 O 8 -Al dispersion fuel (highly enriched), an aluminum-based filler, and aluminum cladding. The fuel meat thickness is varied across the width of the involute plate to reduce thermal flux peaks at the radial edges of the fuel elements. Some deviation from the designed fuel meat shaping is allowed during manufacturing. A homogeneity scan of each fuel plate checks for potential anomalies in the fuel distribution by scanning the surface of the plate and comparing the attenuation of the beam to calibration standards. While typical HFIR simulations use homogenized fuel regions, explicit models of the plates were developed under the Low-Enriched Uranium Conversion Program. These explicit models typically include one inner and one outer fuel plate with nominal fuel distributions, and then the plates are duplicated to fill the space of the corresponding fuel element. Therefore, data extracted from these simulations are limited to azimuthally averaged quantities. To determine the reactivity and physics impacts of an as-built outer fuel element and generate azimuthally dependent data in the element, 369 unique fuel plate models were generated and positioned. This model generates the three-dimensional (i.e., radial–axial–azimuthal) plate power profile, where the azimuthal profile is impacted by features within the adjacent control element region and beryllium reflector. For an as-built model of the outer fuel element, plate-specific homogeneity data, 235 U loading, enrichment, and channel thickness measurements were translated into the model, yielding a much more varied azimuthal power profile encompassed by uncertainty factors in analyses. These models were run with the ORNL-TN and Shift Monte Carlo tools, and they contained upwards of 500,000 cells and 100,000 unique tallies.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

An overview of the Kennedy Space Center robotics program

The KSC program has the ability to prove the soundness of a particular robotic concept on the ground before it is used in space. In this context, three (3) robotic systems are discussed: the tile robot (Tessellator); HFIR (High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) Filter Inspection Robot); and ARID (Automatic Radiator Inspection Project). The Tessellator is a semi-autonomous robotic system used to rewaterproof and inspect thermal protection system tiles on the underside of the orbiter. The HFIR is used for autonomous inspection of HEPA filters located at the top of the LC 39 payload changeout rooms. The ARID is designed for autonomous inspection of orbiter radiators for damage while in the orbiter processing facility.

Rhodes, Eric L.↗

Neutron Characterization for Additive Manufacturing

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is leveraging decades of experience in neutron characterization of advanced materials together with resources such as the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) shown in Fig. 1 to solve challenging problems in additive manufacturing (AM). Additive manufacturing, or three-dimensional (3-D) printing, is a rapidly maturing technology wherein components are built by selectively adding feedstock material at locations specified by a computer model. The majority of these technologies use thermally driven phase change mechanisms to convert the feedstock into functioning material. As the molten material cools and solidifies, the component is subjected to significant thermal gradients, generating significant internal stresses throughout the part (Fig. 2). As layers are added, inherent residual stresses cause warping and distortions that lead to geometrical differences between the final part and the original computer generated design. This effect also limits geometries that can be fabricated using AM, such as thin-walled, high-aspect- ratio, and overhanging structures. Distortion may be minimized by intelligent toolpath planning or strategic placement of support structures, but these approaches are not well understood and often "Edisonian" in nature. Residual stresses can also impact component performance during operation. For example, in a thermally cycled environment such as a high-pressure turbine engine, residual stresses can cause components to distort unpredictably. Different thermal treatments on as-fabricated AM components have been used to minimize residual stress, but components still retain a nonhomogeneous stress state and/or demonstrate a relaxation-derived geometric distortion. Industry, federal laboratory, and university collaboration is needed to address these challenges and enable the U.S. to compete in the global market. Work is currently being conducted on AM technologies at the ORNL Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) sponsored by the DOE's Advanced Manufacturing Office. The MDF is focusing on R&D of both metal and polymer AM pertaining to in-situ process monitoring and closed-loop controls; implementation of advanced materials in AM technologies; and demonstration, characterization, and optimization of next-generation technologies. ORNL is working directly with industry partners to leverage world-leading facilities in fields such as high performance computing, advanced materials characterization, and neutron sciences to solve fundamental challenges in advanced manufacturing. Specifically, MDF is leveraging two of the world's most advanced neutron facilities, the HFIR and SNS, to characterize additive manufactured components.

Watkins, Thomas↗

Codisposal Waste Package Loading Options for DOE SNF and HLW PPT

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for managing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) that is currently in, or will in the future come into, its possession. DOE must continue to safely store that SNF, transport it to an interim storage site or a repository, and dispose of it. These fuels come from a wide range of reactor types with various cladding materials and enrichments. Many of these reactors, now decommissioned, had unique design features, such as core configuration, fuel element and assembly geometry, moderator and coolant materials, operational characteristics, and neutron spatial and spectral properties, resulting in a large diversity of reactor and fuel designs. Because of the wide variety and conditions of SNF, a robust DOE Standard Canister was proposed that would confine radionuclides and preclude moderator. The DOE Standard Canister had four variations: 3.05-meter (10-foot) or 4.57-meter (15-foot) length, and 45.7-cm (18-inch) or 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter. For ultimate disposal in the Yucca Mountain Repository, these canisters were to be grouped with 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter high level waste (HLW) canisters in a 2.13-meter (84-inch) diameter co-disposal waste package. The smaller 45.7-cm (18-inch) diameter DOE Standard Canister could be placed in the middle of five HLW canisters. The larger 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter DOE Standard Canister would take the place of one of the five HLW canisters on the outer ring in the co-disposal waste package. No DOE Standard Canisters have been loaded. A preliminary evaluation has estimated the number of elements of a fuel type that can fit into the different sizes of the DOE Standard Canister, but no definitive loading configuration has been selected. Changing the loading configuration could impact the number of loadable DOE Standard Canisters and the number of co-disposal waste packages needed for eventual disposition. This paper conveys the ranges of DOE Standard Canisters and HLW canisters that may be produced under certain conditions. It also examines the differences in the estimated number of co-disposal waste packages produced for eventual disposal when using different loading strategies in the DOE Standard Canister for Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), Peach Bottom, and High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) SNF. Changing the loading configurations of ATR, Peach Bottom, and HFIR SNF slightly impacted the number of co-disposal waste packages that may be needed for ultimate disposal. The change in loading configuration was more impactful when a different canister was used, as opposed to varying the number of elements that could fit inside the same size canister. In one case, a reduction of co-disposal waste packages could be achieved by allowing mixing of short HLW canisters with long DOE Standard Canisters. The main conclusion from this analysis is that the ratio between HLW canisters and DOE Standard Canisters will drive the total number of co-disposal waste packages. If too many HLW canisters (i.e., more than five times the number of 18-inch DOE standard canisters) or DOE Standard Canisters are produced, some co-disposal waste packages may not have all positions filled. A co-disposal waste package may be filled with all HLW with no DOE Standard Canister, or a co-disposal waste package could be filled with a single DOE Standard Canister. A ratio that does not closely align to optimum could allow for the design of waste packages that hold just HLW canisters or just DOE SNF canisters.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗