Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Kinetic Energy”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2014

The Flux of Large Meteoroids Observed with Lunar Impact Monitoring

The flux of large meteoroids is not well determined due to relatively low number statistics, due mainly to the lack of collecting area available to meteor camera systems (10(2)-10(5) km2). Larger collecting areas are needed to provide reasonable statistics for flux calculations. The Moon, with millions of square kilometers of lunar surface, can be used as a detector for observing the population of large meteoroids in the tens of grams to kilogram mass range. This is accomplished by observing the flash of light produced when a meteoroid impacts the lunar surface, converting a portion of its kinetic energy to visible light detectable from Earth. A routine monitoring program at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center has recorded over 300 impact flashes since early 2006. The program utilizes multiple 0.35 m (14 inch) Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes, outfitted with video cameras using the 1/2 inch Sony EXview HAD CCDTM chip, to perform simultaneous observations of the earthshine hemisphere of the Moon when the lunar phase is between 0.1 and 0.5. This optical arrangement permits monitoring of approximately 3.8x10(6) km2 of lunar surface. A selection of 126 flashes recorded in 266.88 hours of photometric skies was analyzed, creating the largest and most homogeneous dataset of lunar impact flashes to date. Standard CCD photometric techniques outlined in [1] were applied to the video to determine the luminous energy, kinetic energy, and mass for each impactor, considering a range of luminous efficiencies. The flux to a limiting energy of 2.5x10(-6) kT TNT or 1.05×10(7) J is 1.03×10(-7) km(-2) hr(-1) and the flux to a limiting mass of 30 g is 6.14×10(-10) m(-2) yr(-1). Comparisons made with measurements and models of the meteoroid population indicate that the flux of objects in this size range is slightly lower (but within the error bars) than the power law distribution determined for the near Earth object population by [2].

Cooke, W. J.↗
DOE OSTI2026

Activation of methane by U + studied by guided ion beam tandem mass spectrometry and quantum chemistry

Reaction pathways of all products formed in the U + + CH 4 (CD 4 ) reaction were explored as a function of kinetic energy using guided ion beam tandem mass spectrometry and quantum chemical calculations. UH + , UC + , UCH + , UCH 2 + , and UCH 3 + (and their perdeuterated analogues) are formed in endothermic reactions. In both systems, the UCH 2 + (UCD 2 + ) dehydrogenated product was the dominant product in the low-energy region, whereas the UH + (UD + ) hydride product became predominant at high energies. The kinetic energy behavior of the various products is consistent with a common intermediate of H–U + –CH 3 (D–U + –CD 3 ). Here, the kinetic energy dependence of all product cross sections was modeled to obtain experimental bond dissociation energies at 0 K (in eV): D 0 (U + –H) = 2.42 ± 0.10, D 0 (U + –C) = 3.95 ± 0.12, D 0 (U + –CH) = 4.91 ± 0.09, D 0 (U + –CH 2 ) = 4.11 ± 0.04, and D 0 (U + –CH 3 ) = 2.41 ± 0.09. Quantum chemical calculations using the UCCSD(T) and UB3LYP approaches with the cc-pwCVXZ-PP basis set with MDF-60 pseudopotential for U + and the aug-cc-pCVXZ and aug-cc-pVXZ (X = T, Q) basis set for carbon and hydrogen, respectively, validate the experimental bond dissociation energies and outline the potential energy surface for all reactions observed. In addition, spin–orbit corrections of the bond energies for all products were calculated at a CASSCF-CASPT2-RASSI level.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Modified Energy Span Analysis Reveals Heterogeneous Catalytic Kinetics

Mechanistic modeling is a cornerstone of catalyst development generally conducted with microkinetic models or density functional theory-based energy profiles. We extend the energy span model of homogeneous catalysis to heterogeneous systems by introducing the modified energy span analysis (MESA) model by implementing collision theory and gas-phase concentration effects. We determine analytically turnover frequencies, coverages, rate-determining steps, apparent activation energies, and reaction orders in agreement with microkinetic and kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. The model applies to discrete catalyst state systems, including single-atom catalysts, homogeneous systems, and microporous materials. A generalizable rate expression is derived for reactor modeling or mechanistic insights from solely experimentally measured reaction orders. Here, we illustrate MESA on three published mechanisms and reveal unexpected phenomena absent in traditional energy span profiles.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
NASA NTRS1986

Effects of eddy initial conditions on nonlinear forcing of planetary scale waves by amplifying baroclinic eddies

The previous study of Young and Villere concerning growth of planetary scale waves forced by wave-wave interactions of amplifying intermediate scale baroclinic eddies is extended to investigate effects of different eddy initial conditions. A global, spectral, primitive equation model is used for the calculations. For every set of eddy initial conditions considered, growth rates of planetary modes are considerably greater than growth rates computed from linear instability theory for a fixed zonally independent basic state. However, values of growth rates ranged over a factor of 3 depending on the particular set of eddy initial conditions used. Nonlinear forcing of planetary modes via wave-wave coupling becomes more important than baroclinic growth on the basic state at small values of the intermediate-scale modal amplitudes. The relative importance of direct transfer of kinetic energy from intermediate scales of motion to a planetary mode, compared to baroclinic conversion of available potential energy to kinetic energy within that planetary mode, depends on the individual case. In all cases, however, the transfer of either kinetic or available potential energy to the planetary modes was accomplished principally by wave-wave transfer from intermediate scale eddies, rather than from the zonally averaged state. The zonal wavenumber 2 planetary mode was prominent in all solutions, even in those for which eddy initial conditions were such that a different planetary mode was selectively forced at the start. General characteristics of the structural evolution of the planetary wave components of total heat and momentum flux, and modal structures themselves, were relatively insensitive to variations in eddy initial conditions, even though quantitative details varied from case to case.

Young, Richard E.↗
NASA NTRS1984

The structures and energetics of fully nonlinear symmetric baroclinic waves

Rotating baroclinic flow for Richardson number lower than about 1 is studied by means of a finite difference Navier-Stokes model assuming no variations except in the vertical plane that completely contains the density gradient vector. The horizontally infinite channel to which attention is given further assumes periodic boundary conditions at the vertical computational boundaries and no-slip conducting horizontal boundaries. Two configurations are considered. Symmetric baroclinic waves developed in the flows in a manner consistent with linear theory, and it is noted that the structures and energetics of the fully developed waves were dependent on the Prandtl number Pr. For Pr greater than 1, the conversion from potential energy to wave kinetic energy was direct, via temperature and vertical motion correlation, while for Pr of less than 1, conversion proceeded from potential energy to average kinetic energy by means of an induced meridional flow, and then to wave kinetic energy.

Miller, T. L.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Atomic oxygen testing with thermal atom systems - A critical evaluation

The use of thermal atom (kinetic energy near 0.04 eV) test methods as a materials selection and screening technique for LEO spacecraft is critically evaluated in this paper. The physics and chemistry of the thermal atom environments are shown to produce specific mass loss rates (mg/sq cm per min) and reaction efficiencies (Re) radically different from those produced in the LEO environment. A response surface study shows that specific mass loss rates change rapidly with plasma-asher parameters and seldom agree with flight data. FEP Teflon is shown to react by a different mechanism than Kapton, polyethylene, or graphite. The Re (Re = volume of material removed/oxygen atom) of Kapton, polyethylene, Mylar, Tedlar, FEP Teflon, and graphite measured in a flowing afterglow apparatus are 0.001 to 0.0001 those measured with high-energy atoms (kinetic energy 1.5 eV or greater) in beam systems or in LEO. The effect of sample temperature and atom impact energy on Re is discussed. A simple kinetic model describing the reaction of atomic oxygen with polymer surfaces is developed. Guidelines and recommendations for thermal atom testing and interpretation of test results are presented.

Koontz, Steven L.↗
NASA NTRS2014

Large Meteoroid Impact on the Moon on 17 March 2013

Since early 2006, NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center has observed over 300 impact flashes on the Moon, produced by meteoroids striking the lunar surface. On 17 March 2013 at 03:50:54.312 UTC, the brightest flash of an 8-year routine observing campaign was observed in two 0.35 m telescopes outfitted with Watec 902H2 Ultimate monochrome CCD cameras recording interleaved 30 fps video. Standard CCD photometric techniques, described in [1], were applied to the video after saturation correction, yielding a peak R magnitude of 3.0 +/- 0.4 in a 1/30 second video exposure. This corresponds to a luminous energy of 7.1 × 10(exp 6) J. Geographic Information System (GIS) tools were used to georeference the lunar impact imagery and yielded a crater location at 20.60 +/- 0.17deg N, 23.92 +/- 0.30deg W. The camera onboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), a NASA spacecraft mapping the Moon from lunar orbit, discovered the fresh crater associated with this impact by comparing post-impact images from 28 July 2013 to pre-impact images on 12 Feb 2012. The images show fresh, bright ejecta around an 18 m diameter circular crater, with a 15 m inner diameter measured from the level of pre-existing terrain, at 20.7135deg N, 24.3302deg W. An asymmetrical ray pattern with both high and low reflectance ejecta zones extends 1-2 km beyond the crater, and a series of mostly low reflectance splotches can be seen within 30 km of the crater - likely due to secondary impacts [2]. The meteoroid impactor responsible for this event may have been part of a stream of large particles encountered by the Earth/Moon associated with the Virginid Meteor Complex, as evidenced by a cluster of 5 fireballs seen in Earth's atmosphere on the same night by the NASA All Sky Fireball Network [3] and the Southern Ontario Meteor Network [4]. Assuming a velocity-dependent luminous efficiency (ratio of luminous energy to kinetic energy) from [5] and an impact velocity of 25.6 km/s derived from fireball measurements, the impactor kinetic energy was 5.4 × 10(exp 9) J and the impactor mass was 16 kg. Assuming an impact angle of 56deg from horizontal (based on fireball orbit measurements), a regolith density of 1500 kg/m(exp 3), and impactor density between 1800 and 3000 kg/m(exp 3), the impact crater diameter was estimated to be 8-18 m at the pre-impact surface and 10-23 m rim-to-rim using the Holsapple [6] and Gault [7] models, a result consistent with the observed crater.

Moser, Danielle E.↗