Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lunar Surface Instrument”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10

The Wizard Staff Mobile Tool for Human Exploration on the Lunar Surface

The Wizard Staff is a rechargeable, battery powered mobile tool with multiple uses for lunar surface exploration. It supports human activity as a surface survey tool, provides external illumination to enhance safety, delivers networking, communications, and navigation functions to remote sites, and assists crew rescue with an emergency beacon and rigid splint structure.

Wizard Staff↗

The Apollo gamma-ray spectrometer

A gamma-ray spectrometer has been flown on the Apollo 15 and 16 spacecraft to determine the lunar-surface composition and measure the cosmic gamma-ray flux. The instrument included a NaI(Tl) scintillation crystal coupled to a 7.6-cm photomultiplier tube, a plastic mantle for anti-coincidence rejection of charged particles, and 511 channels of analysis. Boom-mounted operation permitted a significant reduction in the background. The data were transmitted on an event-by-event basis. About 22% of the lunar surface was mapped and spectra of the cosmic gamma-ray flux over an energy range of 0.065-27.5 MeV have been obtained.

Harrington, T. M.↗

Report of geophysics working group

Lunar exploration program to determine surface and interior physical properties of moon - heat flow measurements, seismology, traverse logging, and instruments for deep probes and surface use

PHYSICAL PROPERTY↗

Optical Characterization of Laser Retroreflector Arrays for Lunar Landers

Laser Retroreflector Array for Lunar Landers (LRALL) is a small optical instrument designed to provide a target for precision laser ranging from a spacecraft in lunar orbit, enabling geolocation of the lander and its instrument suite and establishing a fiducial maker on the lunar surface. Here we describe the optical performance of LRALL at visible and near-infrared wavelengths. Individual corner cube reflectors (CCRs) within LRALL were tested for surface flatness and dihedral angle values. We also imaged the far-field diffraction patterns of individual CCRs as well as the entire retroreflector array over the range of possible incident angles to extract the optical cross section as a function of viewing angle. We also measured the optical properties of one of the CCRs over the lunar temperature range (100 K to 380 K) and found no significant temperature-dependent variance. The test results show LRALL meets the design criteria and can be ranged to from elevation angles above 30° with respect to the instrument base from an orbital laser altimeter such as the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). This work summarizes the test data and serves as a guide for future laser ranging to these retroreflector arrays.

Daniel R Cremons↗

Variable Pressure - Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP-SEM)

Variable Pressure (or Environmental) Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP-SEM) combined with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) is one of the most powerful methods for characterizing the sub-micron topography and chemical composition of uncoated samples. Terrestrially, VP-SEM is extensively used to non-destructively study geologic and manufactured materials with high spatial resolution (tens of nanometers) and large depth-of-field. An SEM offers a geologist a first survey of microscopic mineral phases via secondary electron imaging (SEI), which provides a topographic look at a sample, as well as backscattered electron (BEI) imaging, which contrasts the phases present based on their geochemistry (atomic number). A VP-SEM utilizes a gas in the sample chamber as a charge dissipation and signal amplification method, allowing analysis of a sample without preparation in the form of a conductive coating. A miniaturized VP-SEM operating in-situ on a lander or rover would be able to use the CO2-rich Martian atmosphere (e.g., Nier et al., 1976; Williams 2016) as an imaging medium for this purpose. Adaptation of a VP-SEM for in-situ Mars surface studies will provide a new imaging capability (via SEI) that is at least an order of magnitude higher resolution than the Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) on the Mars Science Laboratory (Williams et al., 2015), and equal to or better than the achieved resolution of the Atomic Force Microscope on the Phoenix Mars lander (Pike et al., 2011). In addition, the MVP-SEM is capable of BSI and simultaneous chemical analysis of the imaged region. In this sense, the MVP-SEM can be regarded as an instrument suite that will provide a new set of information not achievable by any other instrument. The Miniaturized Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscope (MVP-SEM) was designed, built, and benchtop tested by a team at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Jacobs Space Exploration Group, Applied Physics Technologies, Inc. (AP-Tech), and Creare LLC, working with a team of technical and science collaborators. Benchtop testing was successful, proving concept feasibility. To date, the MVP-SEM has achieved an imaging resolution of <100 nm in the lab, and with continued optimization, even better performance (~50 nm resolution) is possible. Use in-situ on the lunar or other planetary surfaces would require some redesign to optimize instrument performance, but such an instrument would be equally useful.

Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscopy↗

Miniature Variable Pressure - Scanning Electron Microscopy (MVP-SEM)

Variable Pressure (or Environmental) Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP-SEM) combined with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) is one of the most powerful methods for characterizing the sub-micron topography and chemical composition of uncoated samples. Terrestrially, VP-SEM is extensively used to non-destructively study geologic and manufactured materials with high spatial resolution (tens of nanometers) and large depth-of-field. An SEM offers a geologist a first survey of microscopic mineral phases via secondary electron imaging (SEI), which provides a topographic look at a sample, as well as backscattered electron (BEI) imaging, which contrasts the phases present based on their geochemistry (atomic number). A VP-SEM utilizes a gas in the sample chamber as a charge dissipation and signal amplification method, allowing analysis of a sample without preparation in the form of a conductive coating. A miniaturized VP-SEM operating in-situ on a lander or rover would be able to use the CO2-rich Martian atmosphere (e.g., Nier et al., 1976; Williams 2016) as an imaging medium for this purpose. Adaptation of a VP-SEM for in-situ Mars surface studies will provide a new imaging capability (via SEI) that is at least an order of magnitude higher resolution than the Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) on the Mars Science Laboratory (Williams et al., 2015), and equal to or better than the achieved resolution of the Atomic Force Microscope on the Phoenix Mars lander (Pike et al., 2011). In addition, the MVP-SEM is capable of BSI and simultaneous chemical analysis of the imaged region. In this sense, the MVP-SEM can be regarded as an instrument suite that will provide a new set of information not achievable by any other instrument. The Miniaturized Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscope (MVP-SEM) was designed, built, and benchtop tested by a team at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Jacobs Space Exploration Group, Applied Physics Technologies, Inc. (AP-Tech), and Creare LLC, working with a team of technical and science collaborators. Benchtop testing was successful, proving concept feasibility. To date, the MVP-SEM has achieved an imaging resolution of <100 nm in the lab, and with continued optimization, even better performance (~50 nm resolution) is possible. Use in-situ on the lunar or other planetary surfaces would require some redesign to optimize instrument performance, but such an instrument would be equally useful.

Variable Pressure Scanning Electron Microscopy↗

A program of data synthesis from the ALSEP/CPLEE ALSEP/SIDE, and Explorer 35 magnetometer to investigate lunar terminator and nightside particle fluxes and surface interactions

Lunar nightside electron fluxes were studied with the aid of the ALSEP/CPLEE and other instruments. The flux events were shown to be due to (a) electrons propagating upstream from the earth's bow shock, (b) electrons thermalized and scattered to the lunar surface by disturbances along the boundary of the lunar solarwind cavity, and (c) solar wind electrons scattered to the lunar surface by lunar limb shocks and/or compressional disturbances. These electrons were identified as a cause of the high night surface negative potentials observed in tha ALSEP/SIDE ion data. A study was also made of the shadowing of magnetotail plasma sheet electrons by interactions between the lunar body and the ambient magnetic field and by interactions between charged particles and lunar remnant magnetic fields. These shadowing effects were shown to modify lunar surface and near-lunar potential distributions.

Reasoner, D. L.↗

Database of proposed payloads and instruments for SEI missions

A database of all payloads and instruments proposed for lunar and Mars missions was compiled by the author for the Exploration Programs Office at NASA's Johnson Sapce Center. The database is an outgrowth of the document produced by C. J. Budney et al. at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in 1991. The present database consists not only of payloads proposed for human exploratory missions of the Moon and Mars, but also experiments selected or proposed for robotic precursor missions such as Lunar Scout, Mars Observer, and MESUR. The database consists of two parts: a written payload description and a matrix that provides a breakdown of payload components. Each payload description consists of the following information: (1) the rationale for why the instrument or payload package is being proposed for operation on the Moon or Mars; (2) a description of how the instrument works; (3) a breakdown of the payload, providing detailed information about the mass, volume, power requirements, and data rates for the constituent pieces of the experiment; (4) estimates of the power consumption and data rate; (5) how the data will be returned to Earth and distributed to the scientific community; (6) any constraints on the location or conditions under which the instrument can or cannot operate; (7) what type of crew interaction (if any) is needed; (8) how the payload is to be delivered to the lunar or martian surface (along with alternative delivery options); (9) how long the instrument or payload package will take to set up; (10) what type of maintenance needs are anticipated for the experiment; (11) stage of development for the instrument and environmental conditions under which the instrument has been tested; (12) an interface required by the instrument with the lander, a rover, an outpost, etc.; (13) information about how often the experiment will need to be resupplied with parts or consumables, if it is to be resupplied; (14) the name and affiliation of a contact person for the experiment; and (15) references where further information about the experiment can be found.

Barlow, N. G.↗

Infrastructure and Process Improvements After LADEE

The purpose of the Lunar Atmosphere Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) mission was to measure the density, composition and time variability of the lunar dust environment. The successful mission launched Sept 7, 2013 and was de-orbited and impacted the moon's surface on April 17, 2014. The spacecraft had 3 primary science instruments, the Lunar Dust Experiment, Neutral Mass Spectrometer, and the Ultra Violet Spectrometer. The mission also had a Laser Communications payload that set a record download rate of 622 Mbps (megabits per second) from the moon orbit. The goal is to use the LADEE software base for upcoming smallsat missions. The onboard flight software for the mission was developed using a Model-Based Software methodology and agile software development practices. High level models were developed in Simulink, autocoded to C and layered on Core Flight Executive and Core Flight Software, VxWorks and required board support packages. Software package versions were frozen several years ago, and need to be brought to modern standards for future spacecraft missions. We are evaluating alternate Real Time Operating Systems and avionics architectures that comply with CubeSat form-factor and power limitations. In addition, the tool chain for the software development process has been improved. We will discuss the rationale, trades and implementation for the upgrade path after the LADEE mission.

Software Maintenance↗

Extreme Space Weather Events and Charging Hazard Assessments in Lunar Environments

The sunlit lunar surface charges to positive potentials with mean values of a few tens of volts where photoelectron currents dominate the charging process. In contrast, surfaces in darkness may charge to negative potentials on the order of a few hundred volts when the charging process is dominated by hot electron populations in the absence of solar photons. Recently, observations of electron beams measured by instruments on spacecraft in low lunar orbit have been interpreted as evidence for extreme lunar surface potentials exceeding a few kilovolts suggesting that lunar orbital and surface plasma environments may contain charging risks similar to geostationary orbit during extreme space weather conditions. Space system design for successful operation in a wide range of lunar environments will therefore require evaluation of charging hazards during extreme space weather conditions. We present results from a study of space weather environments conducted to obtained credible extreme charging environments for use in charging hazard assessments for lunar missions including extreme conditions encountered when the Moon is in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the Earth's magnetotail.

Minow, Joseph I.↗

Lunar and Asteroid Composition Using a Remote Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometer

Laboratory experiments simulating solar wind sputtering of lunar surface materials have shown that solar wind protons sputter secondary ions in sufficient numbers to be measured from low-altitude lunar orbit. Secondary ions of Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Mn, Ti, and Fe have been observed sputtered from sample simulants of mare and highland soils. While solar wind ions are hundreds of times less efficient than those used in standard secondary ion mass spectrometry, secondary ion fluxes expected at the Moon under normal solar wind conditions range from approximately 10 to greater than 10(exp 4) ions cm(sup -2)s(sup -1), depending on species. These secondary ion fluxes depend both on concentration in the soil and on probability of ionization; yields of easily ionized elements such as K and Na are relatively much greater than those for the more electronegative elements and compounds. Once these ions leave the surface, they are subject to acceleration by local electric and magnetic fields. For typical solar wind conditions, secondary ions can be accelerated to an orbital observing location. The same is true for atmospheric atoms and molecules that are photoionized by solar EUV. The instrument to detect, identify, and map secondary ions sputtered from the lunar surface and photoions arising from the tenuous atmosphere is discussed.

Elphic, R. C.↗

Lunar Module Communications

This slide presentation reviews the Apollo lunar module communications. It describes several changes in terminology from the Apollo era to more recent terms. It reviews: (1) Lunar Module Antennas and Functions (2). Earth Line of Sight Communications Links (3) No Earth Line of Sight Communications Links (4) Lunar Surface Communications Links (5) Signal-Processing Assembly (6) Instrumentation System (7) Some Communications Problems Encountered

Interbartolo, Michael A.↗

Isotopic Analysis and Evolved Gases

Precise measurements of the chemical, elemental, and isotopic composition of planetary surface material and gases, and observed variations in these compositions, can contribute significantly to our knowledge of the source(s), ages, and evolution of solar system materials. The analyses discussed in this paper are mostly made by mass spectrometers or some other type of mass analyzer, and address three broad areas of interest: (1) atmospheric composition - isotopic, elemental, and molecular, (2) gases evolved from solids, and (3) solids. Current isotopic data on nine elements, mostly from in situ analysis, but also from meteorites and telescopic observations are summarized. Potential instruments for isotopic analysis of lunar, Martian, Venusian, Mercury, and Pluto surfaces, along with asteroid, cometary and icy satellites, surfaces are discussed.

Swindle, Timothy D.↗

Lunar atmospheric composition experiment

Apollo 17 carried a miniature mass spectrometer, called the Lunar Atmospheric Composition Experiment (LACE), to the moon as part of the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) to study the composition and variations in the lunar atmosphere. The instrument was successfully deployed in the Taurus-Littrow Valley with its entrance aperture oriented upward to intercept and measure the downward flux of gases at the lunar surface. During the ten lunations that the LACE operated, it produced a large base of data on the lunar atmosphere, mainly collected at night time. It was found that thermal escape is the most rapid loss mechanism for hydrogen and helium. For heavier gases, photoionization followed by acceleration through the solar wind electric field accounted for most of the loss. The dominant gases on the moosn were argon and helium, and models formed for their distribution are described in detail. It is concluded that most of the helium in the lunar atmosphere is of solar wind origin, and that there also exist very small amounts of methane, ammonia, and carbon dioxide.

Hoffman, J. H.↗

Construction and Resource Utilization Explorer (CRUX): Implementing Instrument Suite Data Fusion to Characterize Regolith Hydrogen Resources

CRUX is a modular suite of geophysical and borehole instruments combined with display and decision support system (MapperDSS) tools to characterize regolith resources, surface conditions, and geotechnical properties. CRUX is a NASA-funded Technology Maturation Program effort to provide enabling technology for Lunar and Planetary Surface Operations (LPSO). The MapperDSS uses data fusion methods with CRUX instruments, and other available data and models, to provide regolith properties information needed for LPSO that cannot be determined otherwise. We demonstrate the data fusion method by showing how it might be applied to characterize the distribution and form of hydrogen using a selection of CRUX instruments: Borehole Neutron Probe and Thermal Evolved Gas Analyzer data as a function of depth help interpret Surface Neutron Probe data to generate 3D information. Secondary information from other instruments along with physical models improves the hydrogen distribution characterization, enabling information products for operational decision-making.

in situ resource utilization (ISRU)↗

Characteristics of the lunar photoelectron layer in the geomagnetic tail.

The charged particle lunar environment experiment, a part of the Apollo 14 lunar surface package, is an ion-electron spectrometer capable of measuring ions and electrons with energies between 40 eV and 50 keV. The instrument, with apertures 26 cm above the surface, has detected a photoelectron gas layer above the sunlit lunar surface. No detectable flux above 200 eV has been observed. Experimental data for periods while the moon was in the earth's magnetotail for electrons with energies 40 eV less than or equal to 200 eV follow a power-law spectrum. In the absence of photoelectrons with E greater than 200, we assume that the surface potential is at least 200 V. The modulation of this potential in the presence of intense plasma-sheet fluxes has been observed. Also, a detailed history of the Feb. 10, 1971, total lunar eclipse, to determine the source distribution of high-energy solar photons, is presented.

Reasoner, D. L.↗