SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Module”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Technical Opportunities for Improving PV Modules and Systems ? The Path to a 50 yr Module.
Abstract not provided.
Improving energy yield in photovoltaic modules with photonic structures
When installed outdoors, Si solar cells typically operate 20 – 30 K above ambient conditions. These elevated operating temperatures lead to diminished performance, reducing efficiency by ~0.4%/K for crystalline Si cells and decreasing module lifetime. Since much of the elevated temperature of the modules derives from parasitic absorption of sub-bandgap sunlight by the contacts, encapsulants, or other materials, reflectors that remove the sub-bandgap radiation from the module before it is absorbed promise to reduce the operating temperature. However, there are many competing strategies to reject this light: selective reflectors could be integrated into the outer module glass, at the textured Si-encapsulant interface, or on the rear. Furthermore, many of these approaches are complex and expensive to fabricate. The issue of heating can be even more critical in bifacial modules: high fractions of rear irradiance can lead to higher operating temperatures. Prior to this project, relatively little was known about the optical strategies for temperature reduction in bifacial modules. The goal of this project was to quantitatively assess optical strategies for improving the energy yield via a combination of improved anti-reflection and sub-bandgap light rejection. We studied two complementary concepts: the performance of ideal structures to determine the upper limits to performance, and low-complexity structures made from standard materials as cost-effective implementations. We also studied the performance of these reflectors in different types of modules, including Al BSF, PERC, and bifacial. Here we build from our prior accomplishments in developing mirror optimization techniques, and make use of simulation methods that accurately capture the optical properties of the modules throughout the visible and near-infrared spectrum. We connect these optical properties to energy yield under realistic, outdoor conditions. We also experimentally fabricated mirrors, incorporated them into mini-modules, and performed outdoor testing of performance at NREL. We found definitively that spectrally-selective mirrors on the outside of the module cover glass offer the best performance, both under ideal conditions and for realistic, low- complexity mirrors. Mirrors at the Si cell/encapsulant interface are limited by the multiple reflections needed to remove sub-bandgap light. Mirrors at the cell surface and mirrors on the rear also cannot remove all the sub-bandgap light, since parasitic absorption also occurs in the cover glass, encapsulant, and front contacts, depending on the module configuration. Also, cell texturing places higher demands on any cell-surface mirror because multiple interactions with the mirror are required to reject sub bandgap light which compounds losses. For bifacial modules, mirrors on the back do provide additional cooling and energy yield improvements, and the mirrors can have the same structure. In the monofacial case up to 3.3K of cooling is possible for mirrors on the front, compared to 2.2K at the cell surface and 1.2K at the rear. For bifacial modules, up to 2.4K of cooling is possible when mirrors are included at both the front and back. Our realistic designs utilize 4 – 6 layers of common photovoltaic materials such as SiO 2 , TiO 2 , and SiN x , making them more cost effective. Finally, we used our models to study thermal management in bifacial modules with different back lamination materials, finding that glass-glass laminated modules operated hotter than equivalent glass-polymer backsheet modules, due solely to the increased absorption of light incident from the rear of the module. Improving the energy yield by 2%, which is achievable with these realistic designs, would lead to LCOE reductions of $0.03/kWh by 2030. These benefits make photovoltaic panels more accessible to the public and may reduce associated maintenance costs.
Reliability Evaluation of Bifacial and Monofacial Glass/Glass Modules with EVA and non-EVA Encapsulants
The market share for bifacial modules is projected to be doubled from 30% to 60% in the next ten years. For the monofacial crystalline silicon glass/backsheet (G/B) modules, extensive reliability data has been available for over 40 years. However, practically little/no long-term field or accelerated reliability test data is available for the new generation glass/glass (G/G) bifacial modules and glass/transparent (G/T) bifacial modules. Therefore, the primary motivation of this project was to identify the reliability strengths and weaknesses of new generation G/G modules compared to G/B modules. In this 3-year project, the goal was to objectively recommend the best construction materials for the new generation G/G (bifacial) modules through a systematic experimental approach with appropriate tasks including: Evaluation of field retrieved old-generation G/G modules; Inspection of new-generation G/G modules installed in the plants; Evaluation of new-generation G/G, G/B and G/T modules using EAST (Extended Accelerated Stress Testing), CAST (Combined Accelerated Stress Testing) and FAST (Field Accelerated Stress Testing); and, dynamic literature search and review. Major accomplishments and outcomes of this project are: Accomplishments: Evaluated more than 60 field retrieved modules and constructed and characterized more than 135 mini-modules with three substrate types (G, B, and T), two encapsulant types (EVA and POE), and two cell types (monofacial and bifacial) as well as evaluated more than 30 commercial G/G and G/B modules; Subjected all the modules to multitude characterization tests and various indoor and outdoor accelerated stress tests including FAST (Field Accelerated Stress Testing), EAST (Extended Accelerated Stress Testing), and CAST (Combined Accelerated Stress Testing) to identify and correlate the failure modes in both field and lab tests. Outcomes: Based on the accelerated test results and handling/mounting experience obtained in this project, the recommended best construction for the glass/glass modules is: “Framed GG modules with cut-cells and POE encapsulant (UVpass front; UVpass back).” However, from a statistical and manufacturing point of view (along with stakeholders surveys), the following cautionary notes are added to the above-mentioned recommendation: (i) Cut cells could introduce a higher level of manufacturing issues, including a higher number of cell interconnects; (ii) POE encapsulant is more expensive than EVA and could present a delamination risk and lower throughput during manufacturing due to lower adhesion strength. Other encapsulants, such as coextruded EPE (EVA/POE/EVA), are also recommended to be investigated. The potential public benefit of the proposed project is to present the strengths and weaknesses of glass/glass modules, so an informed procurement decision can be made.
Fabrication Status of ITER Central Solenoid Modules
The fabrication of the modules for the ITER Central Solenoid (CS) is in progress at General Atomics (GA) in Poway, California, USA. This purpose built facility has been established with the requisite tools and machines to fabricate the seven 110 tonne CS modules (six required plus one spare). GA’s project responsibility is completing the fabrication design, developing and qualifying the fabrication processes and tools, fabricating the seven modules, and testing the modules at 4.5 K with full current. The current schedule has the first module’s completing fabrication in 2018 followed by electrical and full current testing. Upon completion of testing, the modules will be shipped to the ITER site for assembly into the CS stack. GA has co mpleted the fabrication of a qualification coil, simulating all of the processes and exercising all of the tooling required to fabricate a production module. After completion, the qualification coil underwent a cool down cycle to 4.5K which served as the final commissioning step of the helium cooling system on the parallel flow paths of a module. In addition, other final test station systems and procedures were simulated to verify their functionality including simulated critical current sharing temperature (Tcs) measurements, DC switch operation to dump the energy from the coil, and a helium leak test on the coil at <10K. After warming the coil, Paschen tests were repeated prior to the coil being dissected to evaluate the quality of the vacuum pressure impregnation (VPI). Dissection is scheduled for early spring 2018 and the results showed full resin impregnation of all areas. In the production and testing of the qualification coil, many lessons were learned and the improvements incorporated into the module fabrication processes. GA currently has five production modules in fabrication, at different stages in the process. The first module is nearly ready for vacuum pressure impregnation. The second and third modules are currently in the insulation process and the 7 pancakes of the forth module are being joined together into a 110 tonne module. Module 5 is currently being wound. The qualification coil has been completed and dissected to evaluate the VPI. A description of the VPI process is provided. To verify the turn insulation of a module, unique impulse testing methods were developed to test the insulation between the 560 turns of a module. These methods are reported in this paper.
Hotspot testing of glass/backsheet and glass/glass PV modules pre-stressed in extended thermal cycling
This paper investigates the effect of hotspot (HS) stress endurance of two of the latest designs of monocrystalline modules: a half-cell glass/backsheet (G/B) module and a full-cell glass/glass (G/G) module. These modules have already been pre-stressed in extended thermal cycling with 600 cycles per the IEC 61215 standard to represent field-stressed modules. This study differs from the other conventional studies wherein only fresh modules are subjected to hotspot endurance stress. The G/G module reached a maximum temperature of approximately 200 °C at a cell shading of 25 %, 55 °C higher than the maximum hotspot temperature of 145 °C in the G/B module. A significant burn mark, without glass shattering, was observed in the hotspot-stressed cell of the G/G module due to the current mismatch induced by partial shading. Most of the cells in the G/G module appear to be severely damaged (severe dark areas), as observed in the electroluminescence (EL) image, while the dark regions were rarely present in the G/B module. The EL image also illustrates multiple cell cracks that resist current flow and eventually contribute to the full-cell module degradation. About 8.3 % degradation in maximum power was observed for the G/G module and 1.3 % for the G/B module after the sequential stress tests. The lower degradation in the G/B module can potentially be attributed to its design, which comprises of two parallel strings, each having 72-half-cells and benefits from lower heat dissipation. Furthermore, this indicates that the half-cell design could potentially minimize the hotspot degradation and failures in crystalline-silicon modules.
A study of Cell Cracks Formation During Freight Shipping : Monitoring Shock and Temperature in Real-Time & Assessing Damages With Pre and Post-Transit Characterizations of PV Modules
The solar photovoltaic (PV) industry often experiences module damage during transportation. PV modules stacked horizontally and strapped on wooden pallets may develop failures impacting their efficiency (glass shattering, cracks, frame indentation, etc.), especially when modules are not packed by professionals. The appearance of failures during the shipment from one laboratory to another can be detrimental to research studies. In this study, we tested a reusable plastic pallet designed to ship modules vertically. Five technologies of commercial PV modules were shipped together from Arizona to Florida including: glass/glass bifacial modules (framed and frameless), glass/transparent backsheet bifacial modules and glass/white backsheet modules (framed). Each module technology has a different physical size. Some modules had pre-existing cell-cracks allowing for the study of cell-crack formation and propagation during shipment. Dark current-voltage (I-V), light I-V and electroluminescence characterization were performed before and after shipment. A datalogger was used to monitor shocks and ambient temperature throughout the shipment and identify when the modules were more susceptible to damage. The modules were tilted upon receipt and the pallet were damaged but with no shattered modules. Time series shock data provided by the datalogger were used to determine potential responsible events. Our results reveal a few new post-transportation cracks for some modules. Modules parameters before and after shipment are also compared regarding the module constructions and their position in the pallet.
Nondestructive Characterization and Accelerated UV Testing of Browned Field-Aged PV Modules
Encapsulant browning is one of the most common degradation modes found in crystalline silicon field-aged photovoltaic modules. Browning, usually undetected unless severe, reduces the short-circuit current (Isc) produced by a module. Therefore, field-aged browned modules have been subjected to accelerated UV testing to obtain true end-of-life activation energy for the encapsulant browning mechanism. A novel time- and resource-saving accelerated UV exposure testing method simultaneously allowing multiple module temperatures to be maintained in a single chamber run is presented. Six field-aged crystalline silicon modules of glass/backsheet construction (three each from BP Solar/Solarex MSX 60 and Siemens M55) with similar glass and encapsulant formulation were exposed to a UV dosage of 450 kWh/m2 . Through passive heating, the average module temperatures for the BP Solar/Solarex modules were 60 degrees C, 77 degrees C, and 85 degrees C and those of Siemens M55 were 75 degrees C, 80 degrees C, and 837 degrees C. To study UV browning, the modules were intermittently characterized through visual imaging, UV fluorescence imaging, electroluminescence imaging, quantum efficiency measurements, module, and cell-level light I-V measurements. An Isc decrease corroborated the increased extent of browning with increased module temperature. For the BP Solar/Solarex modules, the Low T, Mid T, and the High T modules showed a 1.37%, 2.48%, and 3.26% Isc drop, respectively. The Siemens modules showed a 4.11%, 5.65%, and 6.95% Isc drop. The multiple cell-level Isc data points obtained for each module temperature increased provided statistical significance. Activation energy for encapsulant browning was calculated as 0.44 and 0.72 eV for MSX 60 and M55 modules, respectively.
Life Cycle Inventory of Current Photovoltaic Module Recycling Processes in Europe
With the rapid and accelerating growth of PV module installation and an increase of PV modules from the nineteen eighties and nineties reaching the end of their 30 year lifespan, their proper end of life treatment gets into focus. This report deals with the approaches, the environmental impacts and the recovered materials of PV module recycling. In this report, the environmental life cycle assessment of the current generation recycling of crystalline silicon (c-Si) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) PV modules is described. Due to the still limited waste stream today, c-Si PV modules are mainly treated in recycling plants designed for treatment of laminated glass, metals or electronic waste. Only the bulk materials glass, aluminium and copper are recovered, while the cells and other materials such as plastics are incinerated. CdTe PV modules have been treated in dedicated recycling plants for many years and life cycle inventories of this process have been published. The semiconductor is recovered in addition to glass and copper. Life cycle inventories of the recycling of current c-Si and CdTe PV modules are compiled following two modelling approaches related to recycling. The cut-off approach uses economic allocation to divide the total efforts of the recycling process between the treatment of the used PV module and the recovered products. The end-of-life approach considers the recycling process separately from the potentially avoided burdens due to recovered materials. The life cycle inventories of c-Si PV module recycling are based on data obtained from four European recyclers surveyed between 2015 and 2016. For CdTe PV module recycling, the life cycle inventories were established based on published data for the First Solar recycling facility in Germany. The life cycle impact assessment is done based on six environmental indicators previously identified as most relevant for PV electricity: particulate matter, freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity non-cancer effects, human toxicity cancer effects, mineral, fossil and renewable resource depletion and climate change. The life cycle inventories according to the cut-off approach can be applied to complement existing life cycle inventory data on PV systems. The environmental impacts of the recycling of c-Si PV modules are very small (maximum 1.1 %) compared to the impacts caused by the production of a 3 kWp residential PV system mounted on a slanted roof. In the case of CdTe PV module recycling, the treatment of the PV panels has the highest but still rather minor contribution in the indicator climate change (4.8 %). The life cycle inventories according to the end-of-life approach allow an assessment of the net environmental benefits of recycling. The recovery of glass, metals, and semiconductor material from c-Si and CdTe PV modules causes lower environmental impacts than the extraction, refinement and supply of the respective materials from primary resources. The highest potential benefits are observed in the indicator mineral, fossil and renewable resource depletion. The data quality of the recycling of c-Si PV modules is classified as fair since only limited information is available. In contrast, the data quality of CdTe PV module recycling is considered very good. The study was financed by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) and carried out in the framework of the Task 12 of the Photovoltaic Powers System Programme (PVPS) of the International Energy Agency (IEA).
Reducing module soiling with scalable and robust photocatalytic coatings
The air-glass interface at the front of a photovoltaic (PV) module reflects approximately 4% of incident light, decreasing the potential power output of the module by the same amount. Today’s modules reduce this loss by adding a low-refractive-index (1.25-1.30) SiO2 coating to the sunward side of the module glass; this antireflection coating recovers approximately 3% of the 4% light that would otherwise be lost. While such antireflection coatings work very well on clean, new modules, they do not inhibit soiling—the accumulation of soilants such as dust, pollen, soot, or other foreign material—on the module glass, and soilants reflect and scatter incident light. An improved coating would serve provide not only an antireflection effect, but also an anti-soiling effect. The goal of this project was to develop such a coating and provide a path for it to be manufactured in the U.S. The project successfully designed and fabricated coatings that provided >3% transmittance gain compared to bare glass (matching the performance of commercial antireflection coatings) and displayed anti-soiling behavior in standard laboratory soiling effects. This was achieved by using a Swift Coat proprietary coating deposition technique, aerosol impact-driven assembly (AIDA), to control the porosity and thus refractive index of coatings of photocatalytic materials—such as TiO2—that would otherwise increase (instead of decrease) reflection. These combined antireflection/anti-soiling coatings passed PV industry standard module reliability tests as well as coating-specific abrasion tests, showing that they have the durability needed for decades in the field. Swift Coat scaled the AIDA hardware and deposition process to make mini-modules that were monitored for nearly two years during field tests administered by a third party, as well as demonstrated scaling to the widths of full-sized modules. The fielded mini-modules outperformed reference modules (with commercial antireflection coatings) in two locations, providing a 1% absolute average performance boost and larger increases during periods of heavier soiling. Swift Coat’s cost analysis indicated a coating manufacturing cost below the sales price of today’s antireflection coatings. More than five module manufacturers sampled and assessed the coatings, and three provided letters of support. The coating developed in this project increases the energy output of PV modules, thereby decreasing the cost per kilowatt-hour of solar energy generated. Cheaper solar electricity benefits the public by accelerating the transition to a stable, affordable, carbon-free energy economy. In addition, for select applications in which PV modules are highly visible—such as on residential rooftops—the coating provides an aesthetic benefit because it stays cleaner than today’s modules. Finally, Swift Coat and its prospective customers are U.S. companies, and successful commercialization of this technology will provide U.S. jobs and a secure solar supply chain.
Methodology to predict annual yield losses and gains caused by solar module design and materials under field exposure
Solar cells and modules are usually optimized separately under standard test conditions (STC). However, the actual performance under field exposure depends on module design, installation and environmental conditions. This work therefore presents a methodology to predict the annual yield of crystalline silicon solar modules for varying module configurations and environments using a time step simulation approach. We define and quantify 12 effects that affect the annual module performance, starting with solar cells in air under STC to a complete module under realistic conditions. We consider the interaction of optical, thermal and electrical effects in the module and combine it with an angular, spectral and time resolved light source. The model enables understanding the impact of the module environment, such as regions with high wind speeds or high diffuse light, on the annual output of a particular module type. We validate our model with measured power and temperature data for crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cell modules and find an agreement of the annual yield within 0.7%. We quantify the annual gains and losses for this module and identify that major losses are caused by elevated operating temperatures (2.3%) and reflection losses at the front glass (2.6%). Critically, the coupling gains at the cell surface increase significantly by 1.5% when considering angular light irradiance compared to normal incidence. To conclude, we apply our Cell-to-Module-Yield method to a 72-cell mono-crystalline PERC module, where the main annual yield losses are caused by reflection at the front glass and ohmic losses in the connector ribbons.
Comparative Analysis of Hotspot Stress Endurance in Pristine and Thermal Cycled Prestressed Glass–Glass Photovoltaic Modules
Hotspots pose a significant long-term reliability challenge in photovoltaic (PV) modules that can have a detrimental impact on the efficiency, safety, and financial viability of a PV system. This paper aims to evaluate the endurance of hotspot stress in pristine and prestressed glass–glass (GG) modules. The accelerated prestressing was conducted for 600 thermal cycles (TC600) to represent decades of field exposure. GG modules are quickly becoming an alternative to the traditional glass–backsheet (GB) modules that have been the industry standard. Unlike other conventional studies that subject only pristine modules to hotspot stress, this paper evaluates the performance of an accelerated/simulated field-aged GG module (using TC600) and a pristine GG module. Pre- and post-characterizations were performed before and after each test to determine changes in electrical performance and observe any defects in GG modules. During the hotspot test, an approximately 200 °C maximum cell temperature was observed with a cell shading of 25% (the worst-case shading ratio). After the hotspot test, electroluminescence imaging indicated that most cells in the prestressed GG module exhibited severe damage whereas no significant defects were evident in the pristine GG module where the prestressed GG module degraded 8.2% and the pristine GG module degraded 1.5% in maximum power. These findings are critical for the industry, considering that GG bifacial modules will dominate the market.
End-of-Life Management of Photovoltaic Panels: Trends in PV Module Recycling Technologies
Photovoltaic (PV) technology is one of the most promising technologies for improving energy security and mitigating climate change. The PV market is growing rapidly, and further market expansion is expected all over the world. In addition to its positive impacts on energy security and climate change, PV technology is also among the most environmentally friendly technologies of all energy and electricity generation technologies, particularly when evaluated from a life-cycle viewpoint, including end-of-life management. This means that proper end-of-life management is an indispensable issue for 'clean' energy technologies. All technologies eventually degrade to where they enter their end-of-life stage, eventually requiring replacement. PV modules have a useful lifespan of approximately 30 years. With PV deployment increasing exponentially, the number of PV modules that reach the end of useful life will also greatly increase after the time lag of operation, accumulating proportionately as waste. A report published by International Energy Agency Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme (IEA PVPS) Task12 and the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) in 2016 projected waste PV modules globally to amount to 1,7-8,0 million tons cumulatively by 2030 and to 60-78 million tons cumulatively by 2050. Generally, sustainable waste management offers opportunities known as the 3Rs: reduce, reuse, and recycle. When a product cannot be repaired or reused, recycling is the next preferable option before disposing as waste. In anticipation of the large volume of waste PV modules, and to retain PV's position as a clean energy technology, PV module recycling has become an important emerging topic, and various discussions and activities have been conducted and developed by governments, organizations, and companies. (Discussions on the topic of PV module reuse are considered to be less mature.) The EU Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive revised in 2012 (2012/19/EU) addresses the waste management of all electronics, including waste PV modules, in the EU member states. It requires 75%/65% (recovery/recycling rate) of waste PV modules by mass to be recycled through 2016, then increases to 80%/75% through 2018 and to 85%/80% thereafter. In addition to such a regulatory scheme, it is obvious that recycling technologies must be available to meet the increasing requirements of WEEE. Available recycling facilities that treat PV modules can meet current WEEE requirements; additional research and development (R&D) is required to meet subsequent WEEE requirements at reasonable cost. This report aims to provide an international survey of trends related to the development of PV module recycling technology from the perspective of both the private and public sectors. For the private sector, we review patents, as patent filing has been increasing since 2011. For the public sector, we review R&D plans and investments made by many countries active in PV module recycling technology development. Because it takes a long time to develop and commercialize new technologies, we hope that this report will accelerate technology development through transparent sharing of status and insight pertaining to the development of PV module recycling technologies. Managing end-of-life PV modules to recover valuable materials that can displace virgin ones is an important step toward meeting the challenge of sustainabiliy.
Understanding and Overcoming Water-induced Interfacial Degradation in Si Modules (Final Technical Report)
Moisture ingress is an established issue for photovoltaic module durability. Durability studies probing moisture effects typically evaluate performance losses at the module level, attributing global power losses to the overall humidity condition of the test environment while leaving local module behavior unknown. This project successfully develops an in situ short-wave infrared probe of moisture content in PV modules with demonstrated detection limits better than 100 ppm in EVA-encapsulated Al-BSF and PERC architectures (66 µg/cm3) and applicability across the range of terrestrial conditions. Combining this optical moisture quantification method (water reflectometry detection, WaRD) with peel testing of interfaces, biased photoluminescence imaging of performance, and first principles computation, we correlate module moisture content and cell performance over the course of accelerated damp heat tests. By performing multi-level humidity and thermal accelerated testing over thousands of hours (0, 65 and 85% RH and 25, 65, and 85°C), we are able to attribute effects of individual environmental stresses and the dependence on module architecture. Using first-principles computational chemistry, we find that the decomposition of EVA to acetic acid (Norrish II) is thermodynamically preferred over a pathway to acetaldehyde (Norrish I), elucidating the underlying chemistry of encapsulant degradation. We also find it is likely that water segregates to the stable interfaces of the cell, especially the SiNx/EVA interface. We find that moisture is strongly correlated with reduction in adhesion at the interfaces of the cells, particularly at Ag fingers. We show uniquely that the peel strength required to delaminate the encapsulant from the front of the cell depends not only on the exposure to a high heat and humid environment, but also to the moisture content during the mechanical testing, indicating an important interaction between when mechanical stresses are faced in terms of the moisture content of the module and its durability. We find that the background sheet resistance (that is, the sheet resistance rise not attributable to finger interruptions or cracks) is substantially higher in the backsheet mini-modules vs glass-glass packages when humidity and temperature are faced. This increase in power loss due to the background resistance increase over time in damp heat in glass-backsheet modules resulted in ~3-4% larger decrease in relative PCE compared to glass-glass modules. In glass-backsheet modules, the effect of the moisture dose alone is comparable or greater than that of the combined temperature and water term, suggesting that glass-backsheet modules are overall more susceptible to moisture induced performance loss. Finally, we show that thin film PV modules are amenable to WaRD measurement, based on the ability to detect moisture in POE encapsulants or in the cell stack itself. The ease of WaRD measurement and its few requirements on the bill of materials should enable broad applicability of this technique for studying the effects of moisture in PV.
Evaluation of bifacial module technologies with combined–accelerated stress testing
In view of the increasing interest and market share of bifacial cells and modules, suitable substrates such as glass and transparent backsheets along with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyolefin elastomer (POE) encapsulants were examined in combined-accelerated stress testing (C-AST) to evaluate and compare degradation modes. Testing with both monofacial and bifacial cells, we found glass-glass modules with monofacial cells led to greater grid finger breakage than those with polymeric backsheets. Furthermore, this is attributed to previous X-ray topography and modeling work showing higher stress in cells and interconnections in glass-glass modules than glass-backsheet modules. Consistent with the objectives of C-AST, which stresses modules at levels corresponding to the limits seen in the natural environment, we observed the UV-fluorescence signatures of modules tested in C-AST (considering the degradation associated with developing chromophores, moisture penetration and photobleaching effects) to be like those in fielded modules, more so than other chamber stress testing implemented for comparison. We found light-induced degradation (LID) in module types with regenerated (inactive) cells with C-AST, suggesting the possibility of LID destabilization in some field conditions. We could also distinguish potential-induced degradation (PID) on the back of the bifacial passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC) in C-AST. Confirming with ex-situ tests, we found polarization-type PID most prevalent in glass-glass modules with EVA as would be anticipated considering the greater leakage current through such module encapsulation. Unlike PID tests performed in the dark, which can lead to false positive PID test results, field-representative illumination is experienced by the modules on the front and back side while –1200 V system voltage is applied in C-AST, supporting the conclusion that this module type with glass-glass construction would be susceptible to PID in the field.
Potential induced degradation in c-Si glass-glass modules after extended damp heat stress
Traditional Glass-Backsheet (GB) photovoltaic (PV) modules have been the industry standard for a long time, but the Glass-Glass (GG) modules are quickly rising in popularity. PV modules installed in hot-humid climates with high string voltages can undergo potential induced degradation (PID). So far, to the best of our knowledge, only fresh modules with strong interfacial adhesion have been investigated for PID. However, in reality, the PV modules have weak interfacial adhesion after a few years of field exposure. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate PV modules with weakened interfaces. In this study, we investigated the PID susceptibility of PV modules with weakened interfaces after subjecting them to 2000 hours of damp heat (DH2000) at 85°C/85% relative humidity (RH) in an accelerated environmental chamber. Fresh GG modules were also stressed for PID to compare with PID degradation of DH-stressed modules. Pre- and post-characterization tests were done before, between, and after each stress method to determine the changes in electrical performance, cell metallization properties, and hotspot properties. It is observed that fresh GG modules showed little/no degradation (less than 1%) in maximum power (Pmax), whereas the GG modules that underwent sequential DH and PID degraded by 11% to 12%. Potential mechanisms for these degradations are also presented. Furthermore, the results presented in this study are critical for the industry, considering that the bifacial modules with GG construction will be dominant in the next 10 years.
Polarization-type potential-induced degradation in bifacial PERC modules in the field
This study examines the susceptibility of bifacial glass/glass passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) modules to potential-induced degradation-polarization (PID-p) in the field. While there are several studies showing PID-p occurring on both front and back faces of bifacial PERC in accelerated tests, we address the yet unclarified behavior in fielded modules. We examine the effects of mounting configuration; specifically, comparing modules mounted near ground and in elevated ground rack configurations. Modules with the cell circuit in -1500 V system voltage configuration, whether mounted on racks about 30 cm above the ground or elevated 2 m high showed mean degradation of 4.5% to 6% in power under standard test conditions over about 2.5 weeks as measured from the front side of the module. This extent of degradation remained sustained for a duration of about 6 months analyzed. Average daytime temperatures of modules in the various mounting configurations were similar and therefore judged to be insufficient to be a primary influence for the modest PID-p rate differences that we observed among mounting configurations. Increased leakage current in the morning suggests morning dew was sustained longer on modules near the ground measured over six months which would be expected to increase the PID-p rate over the long term. However, the main difference seen between the modules on the various mountings during the initial period with up to 6% mean degradation by PID-p was the approximately two times the irradiance from albedo on the rear of modules mounted in elevated ground rack compared to those on the near ground rack. This difference in incident albedo led to a modestly reduced rate of the development of PID-p of the modules on the elevated ground rack. The difference is attributed to the dissipation of PID-p-causing electrical charge by the albedo incident on the module rear. The behavior could be modeled by a sigmoidal equation with consideration of the differences in the insolation on the module rear.
Degradation mechanisms and partial shading of glass-backsheet and double-glass photovoltaic modules in three climate zones determined by remote monitoring of time-series current–voltage and power datastreams
Degradation and partial shading impact the long-term reliability and power production of photovoltaic (PV) modules and power plants. Time-series power (P mp ) and current–voltage (I-V) curve datastreams from PV modules enable a remote diagnostic approach to quantify active degradation mechanisms and identify partial shading. We study three to nine years of these datastreams, including 3.6 million P mp I-V curves and 36 million values, from eight PV modules, four each of double-glass and glass-backsheet module architectures, located in three distinctly different Köppen-Geiger climate zones, to determine the module’s performance loss rates (PLR), identify active degradation mechanisms and power loss modes, along with partial shading by local objects. Considering both module architectures, PLR results indicate that the BSh climate zone is the most aggressive for module degradation, while the Alpine ET zone is the mildest climate. PLR of double-glass modules located in BWh and BSh climate zones are different due to the significantly greater uniform current loss (ΔP Isc ) for double-glass modules in BSh, at a 5% significance level. Power loss for four out of five modules located in the BWh and BSh climates are dominated by uniform current degradation. Statistical analysis of multistep I-V curves detects partial shading experienced by three studied modules with details of the shading profile, the shading Poynting vector diagram for the obstacle’s relative position, shading scenarios, and duration. Lastly, this work demonstrates how remote monitoring and diagnosis of P mp & I-V time-series of modules can provide quantitative operations and maintenance insights into system performance, degradation mechanisms, and shading.