NASA Software Working Group (SWG) supporting activities for the NASA Initiative for Software Safety and Quality
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
These are simple charts for the introductory comments to be made at the start of a panel session at the Ground System Architecture Workshop (GSAW2016). It is not meant as a formal paper, but rather contains information to prompt further discussion of the panel members and audience. The panel topic is: Embracing Change via the Use of Service-Based Frameworks and Products in an Enterprise.
No abstract available
Rocket bodies comprise a class of human-made space debris that are at the same time essential for launching every spacecraft from the Earth, but are also a significant source of debris both as intact objects, as well as fragmented debris. Unspent fuel has been long theorized as a potential cause of catastrophic rocket body break-ups. Given typical orbital speeds range from approximately 2-3 kilometers per second at Geosynchronous Orbit (GEO) and up to 15 kilometers per second in low Earth orbit (LEO), collisions with uncatalogued and undetected debris can also cause catastrophic breakups. Understanding break-ups is a necessary step in preventing them, and one key step in that process is to correlate and characterize daughter fragments with their parent bodies. Two very different methods include (1) conducting photometric surveys to correlate an object's motion and orbital elements to the parent body, and (2) characterizing what materials comprise the target to determine whether those materials are consistent with the parent body or like objects. With this in mind, photometric data were taken shortly after the breakup of one rocket body for short-term orbital studies, and a suite of spectral data were taken of rocket bodies that are fully intact to compare with debris, for characterization studies. Targets included Titan Transtage, Briz-M, and Ariane rocket bodies and debris. Spectra of each sub-class of rocket body were very similar within their rocket body type, but differed distinctly from one type to the next, supporting the effectiveness of this approach.
No abstract available
We present the results of single event effects (SEE) testing and analysis investigating the effects of radiation on electronics. This paper is a summary of test results.
This high level presentation is designed to introduce the UAS (Unmanned Aircraft Systems) in NAS (National Airspace System) project to the Penn State community.
We present the results of single event effects (SEE) testing and analysis investigating the effects of radiation on electronics. This paper is a summary of test results.
This review brings rigorous life cycle cost (LCC) analysis into discussions about COTS program costs. We gather publicly available cost data, review the data for credibility, check for consistency among sources, and rigorously define and analyze specific cost metrics.
This review brings rigorous life cycle cost (LCC) analysis into discussions about COTS program costs. We gather publicly available cost data, review the data for credibility, check for consistency among sources, and rigorously define and analyze specific cost metrics.
Contents: SLS Launch, 0:00-1:30; Ultrasonic Welding, 1:30-2:31; Solid Rocket Booster Test, 2:31-3:14; Modular Tooling, 3:14-4:45; Solar Flares, 4:45-5:28; Thermal Stir Welding, 5:28-5:51; RS-25 Engine Test, 5:51-6:21; Ultrasonic Weld, 6:21-7:13; Earth from Space, 7:21-8:24; Modular Tooling, 8:25-9:43; ISS (International Space Station) Fly Through, 9:43-10:55; Thermal Stir Welding, 10:55-11:21.
No abstract available