A treatise on the Surveyor lunar landing dynamics and an evaluation of pertinent telemetry data returned by Surveyor I
Dynamic behavior of Surveyor landing system and surface material during lunar landing
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Dynamic behavior of Surveyor landing system and surface material during lunar landing
Centaur AC-6 nose fairing separation tests
Mechanical design and properties of Surveyor star tracking guidance system and Scanner project dual radiometer
The extemal temperatme extremes of the lunar swjace dictated that a means be found to control the two electronic compartments on the Surveyot soft lunar landing vehicle within a narrower temperatme band to assure satisfactory component pmjonnance. Accordingly, thermal switches were developed to conduct heat away from temperature-sensitive components while heat-generating components were operating during the lunar day, and to retain heat at night when the equipment was off. Future equipment required to vary thermal conductivities, should this principle be employed, can benefit greatly from the results of the many problems encountered and studies made.
Test program evaluation and modifications for Surveyor radar altimeter and Doppler velocity sensor system
Lunar surface mechanical properties determined by landing impacts, telemetry data from Surveyor III, and comparison of data collected by Surveyor I and Surveyor III
Photographic and backscattering instrumental data from Surveyor V soft touchdown on lunar surface on mechanical, magnetic, and chemical properties of surface
Methodology used to implement high reliability objectives for Surveyor pressure vessels, tabulating burst test results
Lunar surface, temperature, mechanical properties, and geological observations from Surveyor 5 spacecraft soft landing
Mission description and postflight performance analysis of Surveyor 6 spacecraft
Photometric properties of lunar surface target areas from high resolution TV pictures received from Surveyor 1 spacecraft
Mission description and performance of Surveyor 7 spacecraft
Surveyor 3 spacecraft TV camera surface discoloration patterns caused by lunar soil blown by Apollo 12 exhaust
The mechanisms of the TV camera and surface sampler retrieved from the Surveyor 3 spacecraft during the Apollo 12 mission are discussed. Data are presented showing the performance of these mechanisms before and after operation for one lunar day and storage for 2-1/2 years on the surface of the moon. An analysis of the critical component materials is also given.
Postflight analysis of parts from Surveyor 3 spacecraft, lunar material, and photographs brought back on Apollo 12 flight
Four samples were studied as part of the evaluation of the component parts of the material recovered from the Surveyor 3 spacecraft. Before analyzing the samples, a calibration sample was obtained. The distribution of lunar fines on painted and polished surfaces is presented.
Two pieces of the Surveyor 3 spacecraft recovered during the Apollo 12 mission were examined for secondary lunar ejecta and micrometeorite impacts. One piece was section E of the aluminum strut; the other was the nickel-coated beryllium television camera mirror.
During the Surveyor program spacecraft were successfully landed at five widely separated lunar locations. Recent computer simulations of each landing have provided more comprehensive data on the mechanical properties of the lunar surface than have been obtained previously by this method of analysis. Results show that the variations in surface bearing pressure observed at the various lunar sites are probably due to surface slope effects and do not necessarily indicate differences in soil properties at these sites. Estimates of cohesion at two sites give almost identical results and further support the conclusion that the soil properties at all sites are probably very similar. Surface pressures that resist horizontal (plowing) motion are largely due to cohesion, and density and gravitational contributions are small. It is concluded that the lunar surface bearing strength is essentially zero at the surface and, for zero surface slope, increases with penetration depth at a rate of 1.87 (plus or minus 0.33) N/cu cm. The cohesion of the lunar soil is estimated to be between 0.11 and 0.17 N/sq cm.