SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Solid electrolyte interphase”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Intrinsic chemical reactivity of solid-electrolyte interphase components in silicon–lithium alloy anode batteries probed by FTIR spectroscopy
Herein we report the solid reaction products from the chemical reaction of aprotic battery electrolyte and three purported components of the Si-based anode SEI : SiO 2 nanoparticles (NPs), lithium silicate (Li x SiO y ) powders, and Si NPs. We use FTIR and classical molecular dynamics/density functional perturbation theory to assess the solid products remaining with these model materials after exposure to electrolyte. The absence of electrochemical bias provides a view of the chemical speciation resulting from early-stage chemical reactivity during battery assembly as well as under open circuit storage conditions. We believe these species represent the initial stages of SEI growth and predict they likely drive subsequent chemical and electrochemical reactions by controlling molecular interactons at the Si active material interface. We find that nominally equivalent materials react differently even before any electrochemistry is performed (e.g., acidic SiO 2 dissolves whereas alkaline SiO 2 is relatively robust), and derive new understanding of the chemical species that could and could not form stable SEI components in Si-based anodes. These results can be used to inform how to passivate Si anode surfaces and potentially generate an artificially engineered SEI that would be stable and enable next-generation battery anodes.
Electrolyte decomposition and solid electrolyte interphase revealed by mass spectrometry
Not Available
Significance of a Solid Electrolyte Interphase on Separation of Anode and Cathode Materials from Spent Li-Ion Batteries by Froth Flotation
The separation of electrode active materials from spent Li-ion batteries (LIBs) by froth flotation is challenging due to the changes in surface properties of electrode active materials from cycling as well as the presence of organic binders. In this work, the froth flotation separation of aged anode and cathode composite materials from spent LIBs was systematically investigated after the materials were heat treated. The results show that aged anode and cathode materials from spent LIBs can be well separated from each other after a heating process in air at 400 degrees C and at which some of the PVDF binder remains intact. The underlying mechanism was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), contact angle measurements, and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The results from the XPS and contact angle measurements show that there is a hydrophilic and oxygen-rich layer on the surface of aged anode materials. This hydrophilic surface, associated with the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer, impacts the froth flotation process significantly. The results also show that both the SEI layers and PVDF binder residues on the surface are removed at 400 degrees C for an hour, restoring the hydrophobicity of the anode materials, which, in turn, benefits the separation of anode and cathode materials. The STEM/EDX elemental analysis data confirms that there are 20 nm-thick oxygen-rich SEI layers on the surfaces, which can be removed after a heating process. The present result illustrates the significance of the SEI layers in flotation separation of electrode materials and sheds new lights into the future development of the recycling processes for the separation of anode and cathode composite materials from spent Li-ion batteries.
Solid-state prealkylation of electrode architectures to tune solid electrolyte interphase composition
Efficient electrochemical cycling of certain Si anodes is limited by irreversible Li consumption to form and continually reform the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) due to Si expansion/contraction and fracture. Prelithiation can compensate for these losses; however, the starting open circuit potential (VOC) becomes highly reducing and, therefore, the electrolyte reduction chemistry that influences the SEI composition can change. Herein, we compare SEI formation for electrodes prelithiated using Solid State Prealkylation of Electrode Architectures (SPEAR) versus traditional electrochemically lithiated architectures (ECLAR), focusing on SEI compositional changes as a function of stoichiometry (0.28 ≤ x ≤ 1.38 in LixSi). Increasing SPEAR prelithiation decreased the initial VOC of Si anodes vs. Li/Li+ from ∼3 V (Li0.28Si) to < 0.5 V for Li1.38Si, enabling simultaneous competitive reduction of EC, EMC, and LiPF6 at low potentials. Ex situ7Li and 29Si cross-polarization NMR and XPS reveal that SPEAR drives thicker SEI formation with substantially increased P/F contributions and a predominantly inorganic insoluble SEI (71.4% inorganic for Li1.38Si), consistent with accelerated LiPF6-derived POx/LiPFx/LiF formation relative to ECLAR analogs which exhibit carbonate-rich organic SEI compositions. Symmetric-cell EIS further indicates SPEAR-specific impedance features consistent with pore reduction (filling) during LixSi formation. In full cells, SPEAR prelithiation increases the initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) and accelerates SEI formation and stabilization with Li1.38Si reaching 99.4% coulombic efficiency (CE) by cycle 2.
Role of Catalytic Conversions of Ethylene Carbonate, Water, and HF in Forming the Solid-Electrolyte Interphase of Li-Ion Batteries
Not Available
A Facile Potential Hold Method for Fostering an Inorganic Solid‐Electrolyte Interphase for Anode‐Free Lithium‐Metal Batteries
Abstract Anode‐free lithium batteries are regarded as an ultimate form of high‐energy‐density lithium‐ion batteries. Unfortunately, irreversible lithium loss during cycling plays a major role in degrading the overall cell performance in the anode‐free configuration. To alleviate the deterioration, building a robust solid‐electrolyte interface on an anode current collector is an indispensable requirement. Here, we present a facile in‐situ electrochemical method of a potential hold during the first charge to guide more salt‐derived (less solvent‐derived) decomposition on the anode interface. We show the distinctive decomposition potential of lithium salts and ether/carbonate solvents, where the Li‐solvation structures with salt contact‐ion‐pairs preferentially decompose to form LiF‐rich and less organic components, leading to enhanced lithium Coulombic efficiency in Li||Cu cells as well as mitigating the capacity fade of Cu||LiFePO 4 and Cu||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cells.
Impact of Salt Chemistry and Interlayer Architecture on Solid Electrolyte Interphase Composition and Performance
Reversible lithium metal anodes require interphases that are chemically stable, mechanically robust, and compatible with scalable processing. Here, we use slot-die-coated, salt-rich PEO interlayers to design SEI nanolayers on Cu current collectors and isolate how salt anion chemistry controls interphase composition and lithium plating/stripping behavior in architectures relevant to Li plating and anode-free cells. Mesoscale modeling shows that dendrite initiation at SEI defects is governed by a tradeoff among interphase thickness, ionic conductivity, and stiffness through defect-driven current focusing, motivating controlled formation from thin precursor layers. Using UHV-transferred XPS and ToF-SIMS depth profiling after controlled Li deposition, we find that fluorinated sulfonylimide salts (LiTFSI, LiFSI) form mixed inorganic/organic interphases containing LiF and PEO-derived alkoxides, with LiFSI producing a more LiF-dominant Li-facing surface than LiTFSI under identical conditions. In contrast, LiNO 3 -containing interlayers yield a comparatively thick nitrate-derived interphase that reduces upon Li contact to an N-rich inorganic layer (Li–N/N 3− , LiN x O y ). In Cu| |Li cells, these designed interlayers reduce interfacial resistance and improve Coulombic efficiency (CE) and critical current density (CCD) relative to uncoated controls, with LiFSI- and LiNO 3 -based interlayers providing the highest CE/CCD. Overall, the results demonstrate a manufacturing-relevant approach to engineer SEI nanolayers by salt chemistry, providing pathways to improve reversible lithium metal anodes while reducing reliance on LiTFSI.
Comparative performance of ex situ artificial solid electrolyte interphases for Li metal batteries with liquid electrolytes
Not Available
Expanding the cryogenic electron microscopy toolbox to reveal diverse classes of battery solid electrolyte interphase
Not Available
Solid Electrolyte Interphase on Native Oxide-Terminated Silicon Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries
Not Available
Generation and Evolution of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Not Available