Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Spaceflight operations”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development and Initial Validation of HFBP-EM Short-Form Surveys

The Human Factors and Behavioral Performance Exploration Measures (HFBP-EM) suite includes self-report surveys designed to assess Behavioral Medicine (BMed) and Team risks for future exploration class missions. Survey data was collected during the Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) Campaign 4 (C4), HERA Campaign 5 (C5), and during SIRIUS19 missions in the Russian Ground Based Experiment Complex, NEK. Crew time in spaceflight analogs and in spaceflight is typically limited. Extensive self-report surveys can be a significant burden to participants and are not operationally acceptable for spaceflight. The purpose of this project was to comprehensively assess the reliability and validity of the standard-length HFBP-EM surveys, identify acceptable short forms to administer during HERA C6, examine initial validation evidence for the proposed short form measures, and identify key measurement gaps in HFBP-EM coverage. In this presentation, we will report reliability and validity metrics of standard form data, describe the proposed new short forms, and present initial psychometric analyses supporting the use of these short forms.

S T Bell↗
NASA NTRS2011

Making Human Spaceflight Practical and Affordable: Spacecraft Designs and their Degree of Operability

As we push toward new and diverse space transportation capabilities, reduction in operations cost becomes increasingly important. Achieving affordable and safe human spaceflight capabilities will be the mark of success for new programs and new providers. The ability to perceive the operational implications of design decisions is crucial in developing safe yet cost competitive space transportation systems. Any human spaceflight program - government or commercial - must make countless decisions either to implement spacecraft system capabilities or adopt operational constraints or workarounds to account for the lack of such spacecraft capabilities. These decisions can benefit from the collective experience that NASA has accumulated in building and operating crewed spacecraft over the last five decades. This paper reviews NASA s history in developing and operating human rated spacecraft, reviewing the key aspects of spacecraft design and their resultant impacts on operations phase complexity and cost. Specific examples from current and past programs - including the Space Shuttle and International Space Station - are provided to illustrate design traits that either increase or increase cost and complexity associated with spacecraft operations. These examples address factors such as overall design performance margins, levels of redundancy, degree of automated failure response, type and quantity of command and telemetry interfaces, and the definition of reference scenarios for analysis and test. Each example - from early program requirements, design implementation and resulting real-time operations experience - to tell the end-to-end "story" Based on these experiences, specific techniques are recommended to enable earlier and more effective assessment of operations concerns during the design process. A formal method for the assessment of spacecraft operability is defined and results of such operability assessments for recent spacecraft designs are provided. Recent experience in applying these techniques to Orion spacecraft development is reviewed to highlight the direct benefits of early operational assessment and collaborative development efforts.

Crocker, Alan R.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Designing for Astronaut-Centric Planning and Scheduling Aids

We have investigated and evaluated a novel concept of operations for human spaceflight: allowing astronauts to manage and schedule their own timeline. In order to evaluate this self-scheduling concept of operations, we have designed, implemented, and field-tested astronaut-centric planning and scheduling aid. Our mobile-based software aid, Playbook, has been used in a variety of Earth analogs as well as onboard the International Space Station. We will demonstrate the unique Playbook features that we have developed based on research findings during field testing that facilitate planning and scheduling in extreme environments.

planning and scheduling↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Quiet Spacecraft Cabin Ventilation Fan Development: Motivation and Context

It is important to control acoustical noise aboard crewed space vehicles and space habitats to provide a satisfactory environment for voice communications, alarm audibility, and restful sleep, and to minimize the risk for hearing loss and annoyance. As with most noise control efforts, it is best to control the noise at the source, and for spaceflight vehicles these are typically the fans associated with the Environmental Control and Life Support system. These include cabin ventilation fans and intermodule ventilation fans, among others. Throughout the history of crewed spaceflight, there have been issues with noise from ventilation fans, going back to Apollo. And, with the spaceflight vehicles and habitats currently being developed, there are again concerns with noise from ventilation fans. To address this problem, NASA is working to leverage the technology developed in its Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, specifically at the Glenn Research Center, to design highly efficient and quiet fans for reducing community noise levels from civilian aircraft. This paper will discuss the need for transfer of this technology to spaceflight use, and will discuss the potential benefits, which are significant and will be crucial for the successful development and operations of future spaceflight vehicles, space suits, and habitats.

Christopher S. Allen↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Use of Mechanical Heat Switch to Speed up TVAC Transitions on Flight Hardware Below 200K

Spaceflight hardware that operates at temperatures well below room temperature usually require being well isolated from their warmer environment in order to manage thermal parasitics adequately. This is especially true for spaceflight systems that rely on passive cooling such as a radiator. During ground testing, this design configuration can be problematic for TVAC cycling between operational temperature extremes, since the hardware temperatures may move extremely slowly and lengthen the duration of an already expensive and heavily staffed system-level TVAC campaign. One of the challenges of using an external means of speeding up temperature transitions is that a TVAC campaign usually also requires the simulation of flight-like environments to validate the design, and introducing a test feature to speed up transitions can disrupt the system such that flight-like environments are not achievable. Such an approach was used for the L’Ralph instrument level TVAC test. L’Ralph is a passively cooled instrument on the Lucy mission with planned flyby’s of the Trojan asteroids around 5.5 AU. The optics and visible detector are cooled below 190K, and the IR detector is cooled below 110K. During instrument TVAC qualification testing, a mechanical motor-controlled heat switch uses clamping pressure via a vise-grip mechanism to achieve faster temperature transitions by increasing the conduction to a cold sink. The heat switch system then disengages and employs zero-Q controls to achieve flight-like thermal environments for thermal balance plateaus. Results from stand-alone testing of the heat switch are discussed, including correlated on/off ratios and the expected conductance across its operational temperature range. Test data from an instrument level TVAC that successfully utilized the heat switch are also shown.

Daniel G Bae↗
NASA NTRS2015

Defining Operational Space Suit Requirements for Commercial Orbital Spaceflight

As the commercial spaceflight industry transitions from suborbital brevity to orbital outposts, spacewalking will become a major consideration for tourists, scientists, and hardware providers. The challenge exists to develop a space suit designed for the orbital commercial spaceflight industry. The unique needs and requirements of this industry will drive space suit designs and costs that are unlike any existing product. Commercial space tourists will pay for the experience of a lifetime, while scientists may not be able to rely on robotics for all operations and external hardware repairs. This study was aimed at defining space suit operational and functional needs across the spectrum of spacewalk elements, identifying technical design drivers and establishing appropriate options. Recommendations from the analysis are offered for consideration

Alpert, Brian K.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Modeling the Risk of U.S. Offshore Oil & Gas Exploration-Well Drilling, Commercial Nuclear Plants, and Human Spaceflight

Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) has been applied in different industries for many years. Each industry and technology area presents varying challenges and priorities, and the risk models therefore need to be somewhat different. This paper compares aspects of risk modeling of offshore drilling, nuclear plant operation, and human spaceflight. Risk models in all three technology areas have certain high-level similarities: (1) they employ redundancy and diversity in their means to prevent or mitigate risk, including a mix of active and passive systems designed to respond to off-normal evolutions; (2) they are affected by human reliability; (3) their models require consideration of coupling between scenario structure and scenario phenomenology. But in examining the models in more detail, one sees important differences in methodology and emphasis. For purposes of comparison, this paper discusses aspects of a risk model of an offshore drilling operation in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, focusing on where such a development differs in important ways from models of commercial U.S. nuclear plants and models developed for human spaceflight.

Boyer, Roger L.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Highlights of NASA's Special ETO Program Planning Workshop on rocket-based combined-cycle propulsion system technologies

A NASA workshop on rocket-based combined-cycle propulsion technologies is described emphasizing the development of a starting point for earth-to-orbit (ETO) rocket technologies. The tutorial is designed with attention given to the combined development of aeronautical airbreathing propulsion and space rocket propulsion. The format, agenda, and group deliberations for the tutorial are described, and group deliberations include: (1) mission and space transportation infrastructure; (2) vehicle-integrated propulsion systems; (3) development operations, facilities, and human resource needs; and (4) spaceflight fleet applications and operations. Although incomplete the workshop elevates the subject of combined-cycle hypersonic propulsion and develops a common set of priniciples regarding the development of these technologies.

Escher, W. J. D.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Networks consolidation program

Progress in the networks consolidations program (NCP) to combine the resources of the two NASA ground spacecraft tracking networks (the Deep Space Network, operated by JPL, and the ground spaceflight tracking and data network, operated by Goddard) into one consolidated network is reported. Management, design, and implementation activities occurring between August 1981 and April 1982 are addressed, with special emphasis on planning and budgeting activities.

Yeater, M. L.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Demonstration of Navigation Doppler Lidar Capabilities Onboard the First Commercial Lunar Lander

Landing on the Moon safely, softly, and precisely is still an extremely difficult task to achieve. Navigation Doppler Lidar (NDL) was designed to provide a solution to spaceflight landing vehicles in achieving this task. NDL is a high-performance, compact, and cost-effective velocity and altitude measurement instrument that has been developed, tested and improved over many years. Testing has now culminated with NDL’s successful operation on two spaceflight vehicles this year: Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander and Intuitive Machines’ Odysseus lunar lander. Odysseus became the first U.S. vehicle to land successfully on the Moon since Apollo 17. The performance data obtained by NDL during the Intuitive Machines mission is exceptional, and this mission fully demonstrated NDL’s ability to produce critical velocity and altitude data for future robotic and human exploration missions to the Moon and other planetary bodies. This paper will give an overview of NDL briefly describing its history, architecture, and theory of operation. NDL’s system checkout on Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander is then discussed followed by NDL’s performance during the Intuitive Machines Odysseus lunar lander mission. A description of how the data acquired by NDL is then used to perform trajectory reconstruction and animation is then provided. Finally, this paper concludes with potential uses of NDL’s acquired mission data to future applications.

Lunar Landing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Demonstration of Navigation Doppler Lidar Capabilities Onboard the First Commercial Lunar Lander

Landing on the Moon safely, softly, and precisely is still an extremely difficult task to achieve. Navigation Doppler Lidar (NDL) was designed to provide a solution to spaceflight landing vehicles in achieving this task. NDL is a high-performance, compact, and cost-effective velocity and altitude measurement instrument that has been developed, tested and improved over many years. Testing has now culminated with NDL’s successful operation on two spaceflight vehicles this year: Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander and Intuitive Machines’ Odysseus lunar lander. Odysseus became the first U.S. vehicle to land successfully on the Moon since Apollo 17. The performance data obtained by NDL during the Intuitive Machines mission is exceptional, and this mission fully demonstrated NDL’s ability to produce critical velocity and altitude data for future robotic and human exploration missions to the Moon and other planetary bodies. This paper will give an overview of NDL briefly describing its history, architecture, and theory of operation. NDL’s system checkout on Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander is then discussed followed by NDL’s performance during the Intuitive Machines Odysseus lunar lander mission. A description of how the data acquired by NDL is then used to perform trajectory reconstruction and animation is then provided. Finally, this paper concludes with potential uses of NDL’s acquired mission data to future applications.

Lunar Landing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Task Load Management in Earth Independent Medical Operations

BACKGROUND: Medical care in spaceflight carries a high task load and can easily overwhelm a small crew. Present day operations in low Earth orbit (LEO) offload most medical tasks to ground teams in mission control. This team includes dozens of flight surgeons, specialists, and engineers and supports the on-orbit crew in monitoring environmental systems, tracking medications, guiding procedures, providing expert advice, and many other tasks. However, the physical limitations of the speed of light and technical limitations of bandwidth, channel capacity, and signal processing mean that missions beyond LEO cannot rely on this level of telemedical support. The further we travel from Earth the more these tasks will fall on the shoulders of the crew and the greater the risk of task saturation to the wellbeing of the crew and the success of the mission. Exploration class space crews will need progressively more robust systems for managing task load as they progress further out in space. OVERVIEW: Medical task management systems will need to assist with two broad categories of tasks; cognitively intensive tasks and procedure execution tasks. In both cases the goal is for the systems to operate in the background with minimal human-in-the-loop intervention. To accomplish this such systems will need to be designed with careful consideration for human factors and human systems integration to maximize efficiency, minimize alarm fatigue, and avoid inadvertently increasing task loads. Finally, the key domains of space medicine tasking can be used to map present day and near future technologies to the areas where they are best suited to support and identify gaps which can be targeted for research and development. DISCUSSION: Task load is a major challenge for Earth Independent Medical Operations to overcome. It will require careful coordination between experts in a variety of fields paying attention to human factors and human systems integration as well as technical and medical expertise. If done well medical task management systems can handle many of the tasks currently run by humans in mission control and enable human crews to maintain terrestrial standards of care in the extraterrestrial environment.

Dana Levin↗
NASA NTRS2014

Autonomous Mission Operations Roadmap

As light time delays increase, the number of such situations in which crew autonomy is the best way to conduct the mission is expected to increase. However, there are significant open questions regarding which functions to allocate to ground and crew as the time delays increase. In situations where the ideal solution is to allocate responsibility to the crew and the vehicle, a second question arises: should the activity be the responsibility of the crew or an automated vehicle function? More specifically, we must answer the following questions: What aspects of mission operation responsibilities (Plan, Train, Fly) should be allocated to ground based or vehicle based planning, monitoring, and control in the presence of significant light-time delay between the vehicle and the Earth?How should the allocated ground based planning, monitoring, and control be distributed across the flight control team and ground system automation? How should the allocated vehicle based planning, monitoring, and control be distributed between the flight crew and onboard system automation?When during the mission should responsibility shift from flight control team to crew or from crew to vehicle, and what should the process of shifting responsibility be as the mission progresses? NASA is developing a roadmap of capabilities for Autonomous Mission Operations for human spaceflight. This presentation will describe the current state of development of this roadmap, with specific attention to in-space inspection tasks that crews might perform with minimum assistance from the ground.

Mission Operations↗
NASA NTRS2011

Making Spaceflight Practical and Affordable: Spacecraft Designs and Their Degree of Operability

As we push toward new and diverse space transportation capabilities, reduction in operations cost will become increasingly important. Achieving affordable and safe human spaceflight capabilities will be the mark of success for new programs and new providers. This paper reviews NASA s history in developing and operating human rated spacecraft, reviewing the key aspects of spacecraft design and their resultant impacts on operations phase complexity and cost. Specific examples from current and past programs are provided to tie together early program requirements, design implementation and resulting real-time operations experience into a complete "story" of design decisions and operational results. Based on these experiences, recommended techniques are outlined to enable earlier and more effective assessment of operations concerns during the design process.

Crocker, Alan R.↗