SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Task Force”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2018

Optimizing the LSST Observing Strategy for Dark Energy Science: DESC Recommendations for the Deep Drilling Fields and other Special Programs

We review the measurements of dark energy enabled by observations of the Deep Drilling Fields and the optimization of survey design for cosmological measurements. This white paper is the result of efforts by the LSST DESC Observing Strategy Task Force (OSTF), which represents the entire collaboration, and aims to make recommendations on observing strategy for the DDFs that will benefit all cosmological analyses with LSST. It is accompanied by the DESC-WFD white paper (Lochner et al.). We argue for altering the nominal deep drilling plan to have $>6$ month seasons, interweaving $gri$ and $zy$ observations every 3 days with 2, 4, 8, 25, 4 visits in $grizy$, respectively. These recommendations are guided by metrics optimizing constraints on dark energy and mitigation of systematic uncertainties, including specific requirements on total number of visits after Y1 and Y10 for photometric redshifts (photo-$z$) and weak lensing systematics. We specify the precise locations for the previously-chosen LSST deep fields (ELAIS-S1, XMM-LSS, CDF-S, and COSMOS) and recommend Akari Deep Field South as the planned fifth deep field in order to synergize with Euclid and WFIRST. Our recommended DDF strategy uses $6.2\%$ of the LSST survey time. We briefly discuss synergy with white papers from other collaborations, as well as additional mini-surveys and Target-of-Opportunity programs that lead to better measurements of dark energy.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2019

FY19 Progress of EBS International Collaborations

The SNL EBS International activities were focused on two main collaborative efforts for FY19 — 1) Developing analytical tools to study and better understand multi-phase flow and coupled process physics in engineered barrier materials and at the interface between EBS materials and host media, and 2) Benchmarking of reactive transport codes (including PFLOTRAN) used for chemical evolution of cementitious EBS components. Topic 1 is being studied as part of the SKB EBS Task Force, while Topic 2 is being pursued as a collaboration with researchers from Vanderbilt University and NRG in the the Netherlands.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Strategizing an electric energy policy and regulatory framework in Puerto Rico. Final report to identify specific economic, financial and insurance considerations that may impact PREPA’s privatization

This report summarizes recommendations and options for the Government of Puerto Rico to consider when evaluating future energy policy and utility regulatory frameworks. Content is derived from the Southern States Energy Board, its project partners, and Blue Ribbon Task Force members.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

DOE OSTI2019

Dark Energy Survey’s Observation Strategy, Tactics, and Exposure Scheduler

The Dark Energy Survey is a “stage III” dark energy experiment, performing an optical imaging survey to measure cosmological equation of state parameters using four independent methods. The scope and complexity of the survey, originally scheduled for 525 nights of observing spread over five years and combining a 5000 degree wide survey with a 10 field weekly time-domain survey, introduced complex strategic and tactical scheduling problems that needed to be addressed. We begin with an overview of the process used to develop DES strategy and tactics, from the inception of the project, to task forces that studied and developed strategy changes over the course of the survey, to the nightly pre-observing meeting in which immediate tactical issues were addressed. We then summarize the strategic choices made for each sub-survey, including metrics, scheduling considerations, choice of time domain fields and their sequences of exposures, and wide survey footprint and pointing layout choices. We go on to describe the detailed process that determined which specific exposures were taken at which specific times. We give a chronology of the strategic and tactical peculiarities of each year of observing, including the proposal and execution of a sixth year. We give an overview of obstac, the implementation of the DES scheduler used to simulate and evaluate strategic and tactical options, and automate exposure scheduling; and describe developments in obstac for use after DES. Appendices describe further details of data quality evaluation, t, and teff; airmass calculation; and modeling of the seeing and sky brightness. The significant corpus of DES data indicates that the simple scaling relations for seeing as a function of wavelength and airmass derived from the Kolmogorov turbulence model work adequately for exposure planning purposes: deviations from these relations are modest in comparison with short time-scale seeing variations.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Southeast Offshore Storage Resource Assessment (SOSRA) (Final Technical Report)

Subsurface geologic storage of CO 2 can play a major role in offsetting greenhouse gas emissions in a manner that is safe, economical, and acceptable to the public. Due to legal advantages and potential vast resource capacity, offshore storage offers an attractive alternative to onshore storage. Indeed, the success of the Sleipner project in the North Sea demonstrates the technical feasibility of offshore storage as not only a viable option, but as an early opportunity for commercial deployment. Although the storage capacity of offshore reservoirs is expected to be vast, no comprehensive assessment of the offshore storage resource in the southeastern United States had been performed. In a preliminary analysis of a 10,000 mi 2 area of offshore Alabama and the western Florida Panhandle, Hills and Pashin (2010) suggested that about 170 Gt of CO 2 could be stored in Miocene sandstone and that at least 30 Gt could be stored in deeper Cretaceous formations. A task force convened by the Southern States Energy Board (SSEB) and the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC) found that no assessment had been made of the offshore storage resource potential in the shelf areas of the Atlantic seaboard and the eastern Gulf of Mexico in the southeastern US. Considering that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that about 40% of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions in the US are generated in the southeast, the lack of an offshore CO 2 assessment constitutes a major gap in understanding of the regional storage resource. In order to address this significant gap in knowledge of the regional storage resources and geologic capacity the Southern States Energy Board (SSEB) led a coalition of southern universities and technical experts to assess prospective geologic storage resources for carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in the State and Federal waters of three planning areas: The Mid-Atlantic; The South Atlantic; and The eastern Gulf of Mexico. The Southeast Offshore Storage Resource Assessment (SOSRA) project developed a high-level approximation of the amount of CO 2 that might be stored utilizing key geologic and environmental factors which influence the storage potential. The research included significant advances in knowledge and technology that will facilitate assessment and quantification of offshore CO 2 storage resources in the SOSRA region and provide a pathway toward commercialization.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2018

Final Action on ESS-Related Proposed Changes to the 2018 ICC International Codes that will Make Up the 2021 I-Codes. Energy Storage System Safety, Special Briefing Paper

The goal of the DOE OE ESS Safety Roadmap is to foster confidence in the safety and reliability of energy storage systems (ESSs). Three interrelated objectives support the realization of that goal: research, codes and standards, and communication/coordination. The objective focused on codes and standards is as follows: To apply research and development (R&D) to support efforts that are focused on ensuring that codes and standards are available to enable the safe implementation of ESSs in a comprehensive, non-discriminatory and science-based manner. The following activities support that objective and realization of the goal: a. Review and assess codes and standards that affect the design, installation, and operation of ESSs. b. Identify gaps in knowledge that require research and analysis that can serve as a basis for criteria in those codes and standards. c. Identify areas in codes and standards that potentially need revision or enhancement and can benefit from activities conducted under R&D. d. Develop input for new or revisions to existing codes and standards through individual stakeholders, facilitated task forces, or through laboratory staff supporting these efforts. The purpose of this special briefing paper is to support the above objective by providing information about current and upcoming efforts being conducted by U.S. standards and model code developing organizations, specifically code changes associated with the 2018 Group A International Codes (I-Codes) of the International Code Council (ICC) that are relevant to ESSs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2017

DOE OE Energy Storage Systems Safety Roadmap Focus on Codes and Standards - July 2017

The goal of the DOE OE ESS Safety Roadmap1 is to foster confidence in the safety and reliability of energy storage systems. There are three interrelated objectives to support the realization of that goal: research, codes and standards and communication/coordination. The objective focused on codes and standards is To apply research and development to support efforts that are focused on ensuring that codes and standards are available to enable the safe implementation of energy storage systems in a comprehensive, non-discriminatory and science-based manner. The following activities are intended to support that objective and realization of the goal: a. Review and assess codes and standards which affect the design, installation, and operation of ESS systems. b. Identify gaps in knowledge that require research and analysis that can serve as a basis for criteria in those codes and standards. c. Identify areas in codes and standards that are potentially in need of revision or enhancement and can benefit from activities conducted under research and development. d. Develop input for new or revisions to existing codes and standards through individual stakeholders, facilitated task forces, or through laboratory staff supporting these efforts. The purpose of this document is to support the above activities by providing information on current and upcoming efforts being conducted by U.S. standards developing organizations (SDOs) and other entities that are focused on energy storage system safety.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2018

DOE OE Energy Storage Systems Safety Roadmap Focus on Codes and Standards - February 2018

The goal of the DOE OE ESS Safety Roadmap1 is to foster confidence in the safety and reliability of energy storage systems. There are three interrelated objectives to support the realization of that goal: research, codes and standards and communication/coordination. The objective focused on codes and standards is: To apply research and development to support efforts that are focused on ensuring that codes and standards are available to enable the safe implementation of energy storage systems in a comprehensive, non-discriminatory and science-based manner. The following activities support that objective and realization of the goal: a. Review and assess codes and standards which affect the design, installation, and operation of ESS systems. b. Identify gaps in knowledge that require research and analysis that can serve as a basis for criteria in those codes and standards. c. Identify areas in codes and standards that are potentially in need of revision or enhancement and can benefit from activities conducted under research and development. d. Develop input for new or revisions to existing codes and standards through individual stakeholders, facilitated task forces, or through laboratory staff supporting these efforts. The purpose of this document is to support the above activities by providing information on current and upcoming efforts being conducted by U.S. standards developing organizations (SDOs) and other entities that are focused on energy storage system safety.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2019

Energy Storage System Safety: ESS-Related Proposed Changes to the Group B 2018 ICC International Codes. Special Briefing Paper

The goal of the DOE OE ESS Safety Roadmap is to foster confidence in the safety and reliability of energy storage systems (ESSs). Three interrelated objectives support the realization of that goal: research, codes and standards, and communication/coordination. The objective focused on codes and standards is as follows: To apply research and development (R&D) to support efforts that are focused on ensuring that codes and standards are available to enable the safe implementation of ESSs in a comprehensive, non-discriminatory and science-based manner. The following activities support that objective and realization of the goal: a. Review and assess codes and standards that affect the design, installation, and operation of ESSs. b. Identify gaps in knowledge that require research and analysis that can serve as a basis for criteria in those codes and standards. c. Identify areas in codes and standards that potentially need revision or enhancement and can benefit from activities conducted under R&D. d. Develop input for new or revisions to existing codes and standards through individual stakeholders, facilitated task forces, or through laboratory staff supporting these efforts. The purpose of this special briefing paper is to support the above objective by providing information about current and upcoming efforts being conducted by U.S. standards and model code developing organizations, specifically code changes associated with the 2018 Group B International Codes (I-Codes) of the International Code Council (100)2 that are relevant to ESSs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2013

Preliminary Evaluation of Offshore Transport and Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide (Guidance Document for Offshore Sequestration of CO 2 )

The Preliminary Evaluation of Offshore Transport and Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide provides basic information and recommendations that will guide regulators, policy makers, legal professionals, and carbon-emitting industries in evaluating the potential for carbon dioxide storage in sub-seabed geological structures. The report explores geological and technical topics that should be considered to develop and apply a robust legal and regulatory framework that will facilitate the deployment of a successful offshore carbon dioxide storage project. The Southern States Energy Board and the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission convened an Offshore Task Force of experts in relevant fields to collectively prepare this report in support of the Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Program funded by the U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-05NT42590 and cost-sharing partners.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

DOE OSTI2021

Affordable Zero Energy K-12 Schools: The Cost Barrier Illusion

Interest in very low energy buildings is growing across the United States. California, for example, has adopted ZE targets for 50% of the floor area of existing state-owned buildings by 2025 and for all new or renovated state buildings beginning design after 2025. California has also set a target of making all new commercial buildings ZE by 2030. Several other states are considering similar measures and have established task forces to work on the issue.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

DOE OSTI2023

Enabling Dark Energy Measurements from DESI and LSST (Final Technical Report)

This grant enabled efforts to lead the Survey Validation of the Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) sample for DESI, entailing intensive work to prepare target samples, test their performance with DESI data, and validate that the requirements of the survey for this key sample are met. Luminous Red Galaxies represent the gold standard target class for Baryon Acoustic Observation experiments to study Dark Energy. It also funded work to co-leading the Follow-up Task Force within the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (LSST DESC), which is intended to help develop collaborations with external groups and to produce cross-working group proposals for telescope time, policy proposals and white papers as needed in order to help the collaboration obtain and make use of complementary data which will strengthen LSST Dark Energy constraints. The PI has been particularly engaged in efforts to obtain access to spectroscopic training sets for LSST photometric redshifts in the first years of the survey, which requires developing relationships with groups that are obtaining such data for other purposes. This group has evolved into an External Synergies working group within DESC, also co-led by the PI. These groups have developed white papers for Astro2020, letters of intent and white papers for Snowmass2021, and a response to a DOE-NASA RFI. It also has enabled smaller contributions to improving LSST DESC pipeline infrastructure for photometric redshifts.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Operation Dominic

A very tall (6’5”) Austin McGuire endured duty aboard the cramped confines of a submarine during World War II. After receiving a doctorate in physics from the University Rochester, he came to Los Alamos in 1954, later participating in the Koa shot of Operation Hardtack I. In 1962, he was appointed Deputy Commander of the Los Alamos task unit of Joint Task Force 8 (8.1.1) and sent to Christmas Island for Operation Dominic.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

DOE OSTI2022

Accelerator Frontier

In 2020-2022, extensive discussions and deliberations have taken place in corresponding topical working groups of the Snowmass Accelerator Frontier (AF) and in numerous joint meetings with other Frontiers, Snowmass-wide meetings, a series of Colloquium-style Agoras, cross-Frontier Forums on muon and electron-positron colliders and the collider Implementation Task Force (ITF). The outcomes of these activities are summarized in this Accelerator Frontier report.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Transmission Optimization with Grid Enhancing Technologies Fact Sheet

The Transmission Optimization with Grid Enhancing Technologies (TOGETs) project is funded by the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Electricity (OE) and Wind Energy Technologies Office (WETO). Idaho National Laboratory’s TOGET Task force consists of regulatory, utility, system operator, vendor, academic, and other industry participants, who will guide a two-pronged approach to fill in gaps on publicly available knowledge of GETs and conduct a full scale, multi-faceted field exercise. Ultimately the project aims to test, verify, and validate deployed GETs in a transmission system.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

DOE OSTI2023

Support for the 2022 US-EU Joint Transport Taskforce Workshop (Final technical report for DE-SC0022561)

This closeout report documents outcomes from the 2022 US-EU Joint Transport Task Force workshop, which was partially supported by this award. This workshop was held April 5-9, 2022 at the Hyatt Regency Sonoma Wine Country in Santa Rosa, California, and was co-located with the 2022 Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference. There were 127 registrants at this meeting (38 of whom were students, and 27 of whom were from foreign institutions), drawn in roughly equal measure from national laboratories, universities, and private industry. The meeting was primarily in-person, with talks streamed online to support remote viewing and Q&A session participation.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

DOE OSTI2023

Permanent Magnet E-beam/X-ray Horn

Presentation describing the patent for Permanent Magnet E-beam/X-ray Horn to the U of Chicago Joint Task Force Initiative (JTFI) Tech Showcase.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Generic EMT Modeling for IBR

In support of IEEE P2800.2, PNNL is developing an informative annex about “Generic EMT Modeling for IBR”. A literature review has been conducted, covering an IEEE Task Force, Cigre Working Group, IEEE standards, NERC reports, and research articles. In addition, the vendors of widely used simulation tools have been contacted to verify the availability of real-code models of inverters. Illustrative computer simulations will be conducted, once real-code models become accessible. If the simulation results of a real-code model are obtained, a comparative study will be performed.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗