Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Transonic”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2015

Comparison of the NASA Common Research Model European Transonic Wind Tunnel Test Data to NASA Test Data

Experimental aerodynamic investigations of the NASA Common Research Model have been conducted in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility, the NASA Ames 11-ft wind tunnel, and the European Transonic Wind Tunnel. In the NASA Ames 11-ft wind tunnel, data have been obtained at only a chord Reynolds number of 5 million for a wing/body/tail = 0 degree incidence configuration. Data have been obtained at chord Reynolds numbers of 5, 19.8 and 30 million for the same configuration in the National Transonic Facility and in the European Transonic Facility. Force and moment, surface pressure, wing bending and twist, and surface flow visualization data were obtained in all three facilities but only the force and moment and surface pressure data are presented herein.

Rivers, Melissa↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel Airstream Oscillator System

This paper presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model of the flow in the NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) with the Airstream Oscillator System (AOS) in operation. The TDT is a continuous-flow, closed circuit wind tunnel with a 16- by 16-foot slotted test section with cropped corners. The tunnel was originally built as the 19-ft Pressure Tunnel in 1938, but it was converted to the current transonic tunnel in the 1950s, with capabilities to use either air or heavy gas (R-134a) as the test medium. The TDT was also fitted with an AOS which can be used to create a gust field in the test section. To date, no computational analyses of the TDT involving the AOS have been performed. In this study, experimental data acquired of an oscillating airstream in the tunnel will be used to calibrate the computational analyses. A significant motivation of this work is to attempt to compare computational gust velocities to those recorded in the TDT literature. In addition to a validation of this model with experimental data, it may also be possible to supplement the experimental data with computational data. The experimental data is rather sparse and at only a few Mach numbers. Computational results may be able to expand the AOS data set. Another motivation for this work is that the Integrated Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation (IAWTM) semi-span model of the high-aspect-ratio CRM with 10 trailing edge control surfaces is currently being fabricated and will be delivered to the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) for testing in late 2020. Among tests to be conducted, gust load alleviation (GLA) will be demonstrated at transonic conditions using the AOS.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transonic Flutter Dips of the AGARD 445.6 Wing

The AGARD 445.6 configuration is the most popular validation test case for transonic flutter predictions, but the actual extent of truly nonlinear transonic flow for this case is unclear, due to the sparsity of the experimental data, and the thin profile of the wing. This work utilizes a combination of mesh adaptation and the linearized frequency-domain method to obtain high-quality viscous and inviscid flutter predictions; these solutions show a double flutter dip through the transonic Mach range driven by complex shock growth across the wing. A single experimental flutter point lies in this flutter dip area, which is not enough to assess the accuracy of these transonic flutter predictions. Modeling the boundary layer of the wind tunnel wall (as opposed to the commonly-assumed symmetry wall assumption) appears to have a large impact on the predicted flutter boundary, but true mesh convergence of this scenario is a challenge.

Bret K Stanford↗
NASA NTRS2015

An Investigation of Transonic Resonance in a Mach 2.2 Round Convergent-Divergent Nozzle

Hot-wire and acoustic measurements were taken for a round convergent nozzle and a round convergent-divergent (C-D) nozzle at a jet Mach number of 0.61. The C-D nozzle had a design Mach number of 2.2. Compared to the convergent nozzle jet flow, the Mach 2.2 nozzle jet flow produced excess broadband noise (EBBN). It also produced a transonic resonance tone at 1200 Herz. Computational simulations were performed for both nozzle flows. A steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulation was performed for the convergent nozzle jet flow. For the Mach 2.2 nozzle flow, a steady RANS simulation, an unsteady RANS (URANS) simulation, and an unsteady Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) were performed. The RANS simulation of the convergent nozzle showed good agreement with the hot-wire velocity and turbulence measurements, though the decay of the potential core was over-predicted. The RANS simulation of the Mach 2.2 nozzle showed poor agreement with the experimental data, and more closely resembled an ideally-expanded jet. The URANS simulation also showed qualitative agreement with the hot-wire data, but predicted a transonic resonance at 1145 Herz. The DES showed good agreement with the hot-wire velocity and turbulence data. The DES also produced a transonic tone at 1135 Herz. The DES solution showed that the destabilization of the shock-induced separation region inside the nozzle produced increased levels of turbulence intensity. This is likely the source of the EBBN.

DES↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

System Noise Technology Roadmaps for a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing and Peer Conventional Configuration

A system noise assessment is performed for a Boeing-designed Transonic Truss-Braced Wing, resized using NASA tools in order to estimate the performance of the configuration relative to NASA noise goals. For comparison, a conventional configuration with comparable mission requirements, technology assumptions, and design assumptions is also assessed. Following the baseline noise assessments, a noise reduction technology roadmap is developed from technologies expected to mature to an appropriate technology readiness level by the targeted entry into service date. Noise prediction of both baseline configurations shows a 4.7 EPNdB cumulative certification advantage for the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing. Both configurations fall short of the mid term NASA noise goal, even with application of the noise reduction technologies in the roadmap. The roadmap provides 7.3 EPNdB of noise reduction for the conventional configuration and 7.8 EPNdB for the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing.

system noise assessment↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of the High Reynolds Number Ascent Wind Tunnel Test of the Space Launch System at the National Transonic Facility

Transonic, high Reynolds number wind tunnel testing for the Space Launch System (SLS) ascent flight environment was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the NASA Langley Research Center from December 2019 to April 2021. The test was sponsored by the SLS Program and the NASA Engineering & Safety Center with the ob- jective of assessing and characterizing Reynolds number effects on the ascent aerodynamics of the SLS launch vehicle. The cryogenic test article was a 1.75%-scale representation of the SLS Block 1 Cargo configuration that was fabricated mostly out of stainless steel, but with several additive-manufactured components including the Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) attach brackets and the SRB nozzles. This was the first use of additive manufacturing on structural components of a cryogenic model in the NTF, therefore post-fabrication material testing and inspections were performed to satisfy safety requirements. Force & moment and surface pressure data were acquired for Mach numbers between 0.50 and 0.95 over a range of Reynolds numbers based on core stage diameter between 2x10^6 and a maximum of 40x10^6 corresponding to 45% of flight Reynolds number. Additionally, flow visualization data using Pressure Sensitive Paint were acquired with a focus on the SRB forward attach area, which is susceptible to Reynolds number sensitivity at transonic speeds. This pa- per provides an overview of the test campaign including details on the unique test article and the experimental setup and test execution. General test findings and observations are also presented, but the majority of the test results and data analyses are provided in a companion paper.

Space Launch System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of the High Reynolds Number Ascent Wind Tunnel Test of the Space Launch System at the National Transonic Facility

Transonic, high Reynolds number wind tunnel testing for the Space Launch System (SLS) ascent flight environment was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the NASA Langley Research Center from December 2019 to April 2021. The test was sponsored by the SLS Program and the NASA Engineering & Safety Center with the ob- jective of assessing and characterizing Reynolds number effects on the ascent aerodynamics of the SLS launch vehicle. The cryogenic test article was a 1.75%-scale representation of the SLS Block 1 Cargo configuration that was fabricated mostly out of stainless steel, but with several additive-manufactured components including the Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) attach brackets and the SRB nozzles. This was the first use of additive manufacturing on structural components of a cryogenic model in the NTF, therefore post-fabrication material testing and inspections were performed to satisfy safety requirements. Force & moment and surface pressure data were acquired for Mach numbers between 0.50 and 0.95 over a range of Reynolds numbers based on core stage diameter between 2x10^6 and a maximum of 40x10^6 corresponding to 45% of flight Reynolds number. Additionally, flow visualization data using Pressure Sensitive Paint were acquired with a focus on the SRB forward attach area, which is susceptible to Reynolds number sensitivity at transonic speeds. This paper provides an overview of the test campaign including details on the unique test article and the experimental setup and test execution. General test findings and observations are also presented, but the majority of the test results and data analyses are provided in a companion paper.

Space Launch System↗
NASA NTRS2003

Control of Interacting Vortex Flows at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds Using Passive Porosity

A wind tunnel experiment was conducted in the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) 8-foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel (TPT) to determine the effects of passive surface porosity on vortex flow interactions about a general research fighter configuration at subsonic and transonic speeds. Flow- through porosity was applied to a wind leading-edge extension (LEX) mounted to a 65 deg cropped delta wind model to promote large nose-down pitching moment increments at high angles of attack. Porosity decreased the vorticity shed from the LEX, which weakened the LEX vortex and altered the global interactions of the LEX and wing vortices at high angles of attack. Six-component forces and moments and wing upper surface static pressure distributions were obtained at free- stream Mach numbers of 0.50, 0.85, and 1.20, Reynolds number of 2.5(10(exp-6) per foot, angles of attack up to 30 deg and angles of sideslip to plus or minus 8 deg. The off-surface flow field was visualized in selected cross-planes using a laser vapor screen flow visualization technique. Test data were obtained with a centerline vertical tail and with alternate twin, wing-mounted vertical fins having 0 deg and 30 deg cant angles. In addition, the porosity of the LEX was compartmentalized to determine the sensitivity of the vortex- dominated aerodynamics to the location and level of porosity applied to the LEX.

NATO FURNISHED↗
NASA NTRS1972

Hypersonic and transonic buzz measurements on the lower pitch flap of the M2-F2 lifting entry configuration

Free-oscillation damping measurements at hypersonic and transonic Mach numbers are presented for the lower pitch flap of the M2-F2 reentry vehicle. For the flow and model conditions tested, the damping measurements indicate the absence of hypersonic buzz instability for flap rotation frequencies of 47.3 Hz, 153 Hz, and 360 Hz, the presence of transonic buzz for 47.3 Hz flap, and the absence of transonic buzz for a 115 Hz flap. There are not enough flap damping data for an error estimate based on repeatability, but a partial damping calibration is presented in which an analog computer simulation of random flap response for a known flap damping is fed into the autocorrelation computer and filter combination used for most of the damping measurements.

Warner, R. W.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Calculative techniques for transonic flows about certain classes of wing body combinations

Procedures based on the method of local linearization and transonic equivalence rule were developed for predicting properties of transonic flows about certain classes of wing-body combinations. The procedures are applicable to transonic flows with free stream Mach number in the ranges near one, below the lower critical and above the upper critical. Theoretical results are presented for surface and flow field pressure distributions for both lifting and nonlifting situations.

Stahara, S. S.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Calculative techniques for transonic flows about certain classes of wing-body combinations, phase 2

Theoretical analysis and associated computer programs were developed for predicting properties of transonic flows about certain classes of wing-body combinations. The procedures used are based on the transonic equivalence rule and employ either an arbitrarily-specified solution or the local linerization method for determining the nonlifting transonic flow about the equivalent body. The class of wind planform shapes include wings having sweptback trailing edges and finite tip chord. Theoretical results are presented for surface and flow-field pressure distributions for both nonlifting and lifting situations at Mach number one.

Stahara, S. S.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Tests of a mixed compression axisymmetric inlet with large transonic mass flow at Mach numbers 0.6 to 2.65

A 38.8-cm (15.28-in.) capture diameter model of a mixed-compression axisymmetric inlet system with a translating cowl was designed and tested. The internal contours, designed for Mach number 2.65, provided a throat area of 59 percent of the capture area when the cowl was retracted for transonic operation. Other model features included a boundary-layer removal system, vortex generators, an engine airflow bypass system, cowl support struts, and rotating rakes at the engine face. All tunnel testing was conducted at a tunnel total pressure of about 1 atm (a unit Reynolds number of about 8.53 million/m at Mach number 2.65) at angles of attack from 0 deg to 4 deg. Results for the following were obtained: total-pressure recovery and distortion at the engine face as a function of bleed mass-flow ratio, the effect of bleed and vortex generator configurations on pressure recovery and distortion, inlet tolerance to unstart due to changes in angle of attack or Mach number, surface pressure distributions, boundary-layer profiles, and transonic additive drag. At Mach number 2.65 and with the best bleed configurations, maximum total pressure recovery at the engine face ranged from 91 to 94.5 percent with bleed mass-flow ratios from 4 to 9 percent, respectively, and total-pressure distortion was less than 10 percent. At off-design supersonic Mach numbers above 1.70, maximum total-pressure recoveries and corresponding bleed mass flows were about the same as at Mach number 2.65, with about 10 to 15 percent distortion. In the transonic Mach number range, total pressure recovery was high (above 96 percent) and distortion was low (less than 15 percent) only when the inlet mass-flow ration was reduced 0.02 to 0.06 from the maximum theoretical value (0.590 at Mach number 1.0).

Smeltzer, D. B.↗
NASA NTRS1973

The application of general aerodynamic lifting surface elements to problems in unsteady transonic flow

A study was conducted to investigate the feasibility of using combined subsonic and supersonic linear theory as a means for solving unsteady transonic flow problems in an economical and yet realistic manner. With some modification, existing linear theory methods are combined into a single program and a simple algorithm is derived for determining interference between lifting surface elements of different Mach number. The method is applied to a wide variety of problems for which measured unsteady pressure distributions and Mach number distributions are available. By comparing theory and experiment, the transonic method solutions show a significant improvement over uniform flow solutions. It is concluded that with these refinements the method will provide a means for performing realistic transonic flutter and dynamic response analyses at costs which are compatible with current linear theory based solutions.

Cunningham, A. M., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Development of analytical methods of predicting the pressure distribution about a nacelle at transonic speeds: Exact solution

A computer program to predict the inviscid, transonic flow field about isolated nacelles was developed. The problem was to be formulated to solve Euler's equations without any approximation (such as small disturbances) and hence the terminology exact solution. The flow field was complicated by the presence of imbedded shock waves, an engine-inlet interface, and exhaust plumes. Furthermore, the transonic nacelles of interest had a very slender but blunt cowl lip. This created two distinct length scales, the length of the nacelle and the cowl lip radius that can differ by several orders of magnitude. These aspects of the flow field presented many numerical difficulties. The approach to the problem was to calculate the nacelle flow field using the method of time-dependent computations (TDC). Although at the time of the issuance of this contract, other approaches to transonic flow calculations existed, it was felt that TDC offered the most effective means of meeting the goals of the contract.

Grossman, B.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Numerical calculations of two dimensional, unsteady transonic flows with circulation

The feasibility of obtaining two-dimensional, unsteady transonic aerodynamic data by numerically integrating the Euler equations is investigated. An explicit, third-order-accurate, noncentered, finite-difference scheme is used to compute unsteady flows about airfoils. Solutions for lifting and nonlifting airfoils are presented and compared with subsonic linear theory. The applicability and efficiency of the numerical indicial function method are outlined. Numerically computed subsonic and transonic oscillatory aerodynamic coefficients are presented and compared with those obtained from subsonic linear theory and transonic wind-tunnel data.

Beam, R. M.↗
NASA NTRS1974

The application of Riegels' rule and time-like damping to transonic flow calculations

Finite difference relaxation solutions of the nonlinear small perturbation equations have proven reliable and successful in determining the transonic flowfields about thin airfoils. However, application of the small perturbation approach to thick airfoils usually results in an accuracy less than desirable. The incorporation of Riegels' Rule and time-like damping into the small perturbation approach and their application to thick and thin airfoils in transonic flow are discussed. Studies for thick and thin airfoils are presented. It is concluded that Riegels' Rule and damping should both be included in small perturbation transonic flow calculations.

Herron, D. L.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Transonic flutter study of a 50.5 deg cropped-delta wing with two rearward-mounted nacelles

Transonic flutter characteristics of three geometrically similar delta-wing models were experimentally determined in the Langley transonic dynamics tunnel at Mach numbers from about 0.6 to 1.2. The models were designed to be simplified versions of an early supersonic transport wing design. The model was an aspect-ratio-1.28 cropped-delta wing with a leadingedge sweep of 50.5 deg. The flutter characteristics obtained for this wing configuration indicated a minimum flutter-speed index near a Mach number of 0.92 and a transonic compressibility dip amounting to about a 27-percent decrease in the flutter-speed index relative to the value at a Mach number of 0.6. Analytical studies were performed for one wing model at Mach numbers of 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 by using both doublet-lattice and lifting-surface (kernel-function) unsteady aerodynamic theory. A comparison of the analytical and experimental flutter results showed good agreement at all Mach numbers investigated.

Sandford, M. C.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Relaxation methods for transonic flow about wing-cylinder combinations and lifting swept wings

The mixed elliptic-hyperbolic relaxation method for obtaining steady-state solutions to two-dimensional transonic potential equations is extended to the transonic small disturbance equation in three dimensions. In particular, transonic flow is considered both about nonlifting wing-cylinder combinations and over thin lifting wings with sweep and taper. The treatment is restricted to freestream Mach numbers less than one and to wings with subsonic trailing edges.

Bailey, F. R.↗