Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “URANIUM CARBIDE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

168 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Intentional Uranium Tagging for Material Provenance and Pathway Forensics (LA19-Intentional-Forensics-NDD3Bb) (Annual Report for FY21)

This report describes the outcomes of the third and final year of a project to research the feasibility of tagging uranium materials, especially nuclear fuels. The experimental focus remained on metallic uranium forms under prospective surface and bulk tagging scenarios. Overall, the results showed that the tags could be successfully imparted and characterized in both as-built and degraded conditions. This was in line with expectations coming into this project, indicating promise for both surface and bulk tagging of metallic forms of uranium. Multiple surface tagging techniques and detection strategies were explored in FY21, with an emphasis on improving tag quality, readability, and detection in the field. Non-radioactive materials were used as a testbed. Selective deposition via laser beam was determined to be successful in imparting a readable titanium deposit on a stainless steel base plate, and can be read with high resolution characterization techniques (e.g., scanning electron microscopy) and field capable tools (e.g., eddy current testing). Other deposition techniques, such as selective deposition via electron beam and photoluminescent tags, were explored in FY21, and while success for these techniques would be dependent on additional work, these techniques showed potential for surface tagging applications. To survey bulk taggant elements for bulk uranium metal, 16 tagging elements were spread among 18 depleted uranium castings (4 baseline, 3 mix, 1 dilution, and 10 recycle). Most of these were made and characterized in FY21. Taggant acceptability was based upon manufacturability, detectability, and persistence from the standpoint of two detection options: bulk chemical analysis (for “chemical taggants”) and microstructural analysis (for “second phase taggants”). Taggant detection in both up-front manufacturing and in the face of “degradations” such as dilution, mixing, and recycling was generally good. Two independent laboratories carried out chemical analysis on most of the castings, and often at several locations within a casting, and the results are discussed. Scanning electron microscopy+EDS microanalysis revealed the second phases mostly contained the expected tagging elements. The shapes and 2 spatial distributions of these micron-sized carbides, oxides, and intermetallic particles offers opportunities for further science-based investigation and tagging optimization. Overall, V and Co currently appear as the best choices for chemical taggants while Al, Ti, Mn, Co, Pd, and Tb all look good as second phase taggants. The other elements considered here – Sc, Ni, Ge, Nb, Ce, Ta, W, Ir, and Au – while not being ruled out, require more study to become viable options. It is of special note that in the recycling study only one of the 12 elements fell out of detection even after 10 meltings, demonstrating their persistence. An Appendix tabulates all chemical analysis results to enable more quantitative and statistical studies of detection opportunities and limitations, as a part of a related project.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Microstructural-Level Fuel Performance Modeling of U-Mo Monolithic Fuel

As the physics that governs the microstructural evolution of nuclear fuel span various time and spatial scales, to fully understand the fuel behavior inevitably involves atomic to mesoscale resolution that can be difficult to determine experimentally. Microstructural-level modeling and simulations can be used to develop physics-based materials models that can provide physical understanding to inform fabrication process control, as well as a valuable feedback mechanism between post-irradiation examination (PIE) results and fabrication parameters. In accordance with the program schedule, the primary goals of the microstructure modeling effort are to: 1. Address critical microstructural questions and provide practical guidance to the fabricator via the fuel product specification; 2. Provide mechanistic inputs for the existing fuel performance code to improve its descriptive and predictive capability at the macroscopic scale. In fiscal year (FY)-21, the work scope consisted of six main facets: (1) the effect of carbides on fuel performance; (2) gas diffusivity in different phases; (3) integration of microstructural fuel performance modeling; (4) property degradation; (5) irradiation creep; and (6) historical analysis of microstructure data. Brief summaries of each are included below.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

AGR-5/6/7 Irradiation As Run Predictions Using PARFUME

The PARticle FUel ModEl (PARFUME), a fuel performance modeling code used for high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, was used to model the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR)-5/6/7 irradiation test using as-run physics and thermal data. The AGR-5/6/7 irradiation test consists of the combined fifth, sixth, and seventh planned irradiations of the AGR Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The AGR-5/6/7 test train is a multi-capsule, instrumented experiment that is designed for irradiation in the 133.4-mm diameter northeast flux trap position of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory. Each capsule contains compacts filled with uranium oxycarbide unaltered fuel particles. This report documents the calculations performed to predict the failure probability of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles during the AGR-5/6/7 experiment. In addition, this report documents the calculated fission product release fraction from the fuel. The calculations include modeling of the AGR 5/6/7 irradiation that occurred from February 2018 to July 2020 over nine ATR cycles, including six normal cycles and three power axial locator mechanism cycles, for a total of approximately 376 effective full power days (EFPD). The irradiation conditions and material properties of the AGR-5/6/7 test predicted zero fuel particle failures in Capsules 1, 3, and 4. Fuel particle failures were predicted in two of the compacts in Capsule 2 and one particle failure is predicted in each one of the compacts in Capsule 5. All compacts that exhibited fuel particle failures predicted by PARFUME were caused by localized stress concentrations in the silicon carbide (SiC) layer caused by cracking in the inner pyrolytic (IPyC) layer. In addition, shrinkage of the buffer and IPyC layer during irradiation resulted in formation of a buffer-IPyC gap. Compacts with a lower irradiation temperature and fluence experienced the smallest buffer-IPyC gap formation. Conversely, higher irradiated temperature compacts with a high fluence experienced the largest buffer-IPyC gap formation. Compact 3-6-3 experienced the largest buffer IPyC gap formation of just under 21.7 µm. The release fraction of fission products silver (Ag), cesium (Cs), and strontium (Sr) vary depending on capsule location and irradiation temperature. The maximum release fraction of Ag occurs in Capsule 3, reaching up to 59.5% for the TRISO fuel particles (compact 3-6-3). The release fraction of the other two fission products, Cs and Sr, are much smaller. A maximum Cs release fraction of 1.1% occurred in compact 3-4-3 and 4.4% for Sr in compact 3-6-3.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

USc 2 C 2 and USc 2 NC Clusters with U–C Triple Bond Character Stabilized Inside Fullerene Cages

The chemistry of f-block metal–carbon multiple bonds is underdeveloped compared to well-established carbene complexes of the d-block transition metals. Herein, we report two new actinide-rare earth mixed metal carbides and nitrogen carbide cluster fullerenes, USc 2 C 2 @D 5h (6)-C 80 and USc 2 NC@D 5h (6)-C 80 , which contain U–C bonds with triple bond character and were successfully synthesized and characterized by mass spectrometry, UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, single crystal X-ray diffraction, and DFT calculations. Crystallographic studies show that the two previously unreported clusters, USc 2 C 2 and USc 2 NC, are stabilized in the D 5h (6)-C 80 carbon cage and adopt unique trifoliate configurations, in which C 2 /NC units are almost vertically inserted into the plane defined by the U and two Sc atoms. Combined experimental and theoretical studies further reveal the bonding structure of USc 2 C 2 and USc 2 NC, which contain C=U(VI)=C and C=U(V)=N bonding motifs. The electronic structures of the two compounds are determined as U 6+ (Sc 2 ) 6+ (C 4– ) 2 @D 5h (6)-C 80 4– and U 5+ (Sc 2 ) 6+ (N) 3– (C) 4– @D 5h (6)-C 80 4– , respectively. Quantum-chemical studies confirm that the U–C bonds in both molecules show unprecedented multicenter triple-bond character. Furthermore, the discovery of this unique U–C multiple bond offers a deeper understanding of the fundamentals of uranium chemistry.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Alternate Methods for Cleaning Zirconium Plate

The United States High Performance Research Reactor Conversion Program identified the need to transition from highly enriched uranium fuel to lowly enriched uranium fuel for high power research and civil reactors. One of the fuel configurations selected for these reactors was a uranium (U) foil alloyed with 10% molybdenum (Mo). The U-10Mo fuel foil was then covered with a zirconium (Zr) interlayer and pressed into an aluminum cladding. Idaho National Laboratory prescribed a need to remove surface oxidation on the Zr prior to bonding it with U-10Mo fuel foil. To determine the best method of oxidation removal, a variety of polishing methods, including hand polishing with a diamond paste or Scotch-Brite™ pads, mechanically wet-polishing with abrasive belts, and chemical etching with hydrofluoric/nitric acid mixtures, were investigated on pre-polished Zircaloy 702 sheets purchased directly from the manufacturer. No change in surface roughness was detected using any of these methods relative to the as-received material. In fact, scanning electron microscopy detected grit from hand polishing with Amplex Grade 30 waste soluble diamond paste and Scotch-Brite™ pads. Visible staining was found, and fluorine detected via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy on the flash etching samples. These contaminants were not seen on the as-received material. In addition to the need to remove the oxide layer on the Zr prior to co-rolling, there are concerns that the Neolube debonding agent on the co-rolling can may contaminate the Zr surface after co-rolling. The experimental results found that zirconium in contact with Neolube coated steel plates was easily cleaning with ethanol wiping after heat treated and no carbide inclusions remained on the surface. Overall, all cleaning methods tested did not significantly change the surface roughness of the plates or reduce the oxide layer present on the zirconium. Carbon was found on all the samples, before and after cleaning, except for the flash etch samples which detected fluorine instead. The insignificant changes seen in the cleaned plates relative to the as received plates question the need for cleaning prior to rolling. Further investigation in the requirements for cleaning at this step is recommended. Current methods for cleaning the surface after hot rolling with alcohol appear sufficient. After hot rolling, if Neolube does peel off the can and onto the zirconium coated foil surface, a dry abrasive or diamond paste polish is not recommended due to the chance of abrasive being embedded into the surface. However, the ability of an etchant to lift the lubricant off the zirconium surface indicates that a spot etch method could work to clean specific spots where Neolube is present, if the need arises.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Casting and Characterization of U-50Zr

Uranium alloyed with 50 wt% zirconium (U-50Zr) is a proposed light water reactor (LWR) nuclear fuel by Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR). The proposed method for making the U-50Zr alloy is to arc-melt master alloys and then remelt in a vacuum induction melter (VIM) to consolidate the material and cast into an intermediate shape. After casting, the material will eventually need to be formed into a desired fuel shape. The work discussed in this report resulted from a joint effort between Ltbr and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNN) to investigate a 500g – 1kg scale casting process to produce the U-50Zr alloy in the desired δ-UZr 2 phase and characterize the impurities and microstructure that result from the casting process. Master alloys were fabricated in an arc melter, then five castings were carried out in a VIM with multiple inert coating and crucible materials to find an appropriate combination. Both ZrO 2 and graphite crucibles were used and different combinations of Y 2 O 3 , CaZrO 3 , and TiC to identify which would contain the molten metal with the least reaction. On each casting, the C, O, N, H impurities were analyzed as well as the phase by x-ray diffraction and microstructure. Of the five castings, two resulted in majority of δ-UZr 2 phase-pure material and had impurity levels within acceptable ranges. The two most successful castings utilized a graphite crucible with a TiC undercoating and a Y 2 O 3 overcoat. The O and N levels were below 1000 ppm and the C content was variable but did not result in measurable carbide formation. The highest success casting resulted in an average of 282 ppm C, 567 ppm O, 217 ppm N and 79 ppm H. This casting's crucible and inert coating material was repeated with slightly different casting parameters and resulted in higher C numbers but similar phase identification. The differences between each casting are discussed and recommendations are made for future experiments to better decide on a casting process to go forward with.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗