Breakout Reconnection and Eruption in a Double Null-point Topology
Basic Question: Why are some eruptions successful while others remain confined? • We analyzed an eruption associated with a C-class flare in a null-point topology (fan-spine/embedded bipole configuration) within NOAA AR 11791, embedded within a large pseudostreamer between two coronal holes. • About 4 hours prior, interchange reconnection at the null produced a faint jet and a B-class flare without any filament eruption. • Continued reconnection below the filament built a flux rope (FR) that rose slowly and later generated the C1.4 flare. The flux rope reconnected with pseudostreamer flux near inner null, producing a remote (third) ribbon at the base of the fan and partial ejection of the flux rope. • Multiple plasmoids appeared in two places: above the rising flux rope in the breakout current sheet (the deformed null), and in a vertical flare current sheet below the flux rope (quasiperiodic flare reconnection). • Weak, narrow, coronal and interplanetary Type-III radio bursts were also detected, suggesting that electron beams from the null were ejected into the heliosphere. • The partial FR ejected from the inner system encountered the overlying arcade and null of the big pseudostreamer higher in the corona and oscillated, but did not escape. • EUV and coronagraph images revealed a wave and a faint ejection from the pseudostreamer that propagated laterally southward with ~270 km s-1. • We suggest that the main factors leading to the confined filament eruption are (i) lack of significant breakout reconnection between the rising flux rope and the overlying arcade due to an unfavorable relative orientation of these flux systems; and/or (ii) insufficient free energy of the flux rope to overcome the tension forces of the overlying arcades.