Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “excavator”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

OceanWATERS Lander Robotic Arm Operation

Ocean Worlds Autonomy Testbed for Exploration Research and Simulation (OceanWATERS) is an open-source simulator for developing onboard autonomy software for robotic exploration of ocean worlds, such as Europa, Enceladus, and Titan, built on the Robot Operating System (ROS) and Gazebo simulation environment. Inevitable ground communication delays increase demand for a high degree of autonomy during excavation, collection and transfer of samples to scientific instruments for in-situ analysis. This paper offers a detailed discussion of the robotic arm design and operation for such autonomous surface exploration, taking as reference the Europa Lander mission. The lander arm, which is designed primarily to acquire icy surface and subsurface samples within the arm’s workspace, is a 6-degree-of-freedom manipulator with two end effectors: a sample excavation tool and a trenching end-effector. The robotic arm’s modes and operations can be summarized as follows: stowed arm, intended as the lander arm default configuration characterized by zero-power consumption; un-stowed arm, target arm configuration after its first deployment; selection and deployment of the end-effector to use next; guarded move, to detect ground level at the desired trenching location; drill ice using the grinder; dig trench at a particular location using the scoop; deliver sample to the sample transfer dock; discard redundant samples. The motion planning tool used for the lander arm is MoveIt, a ROS package. MoveIt uses sampling-based planning and collision checking libraries to determine safe paths. The Rapidly Exploring Random Trees* (RRT*) has been chosen as default planning algorithm as it provides optimal plans with an exponential speed and is guaranteed to find a solution, if feasible solutions exist. Furthermore, this work quantifies and discusses the energy requirements for excavating and collecting samples. In OceanWATERS, force feedback from the terrain, which influences the arm dynamics, is modelled using a discrete element method (DEM) simulation. The DEM and Gazebo software run in parallel and communicate through a co-simulation plugin. This paper presents an analysis and comparison of three DEM open source software (YADE, ESyS-Particle, Project Chrono) for implementation in OceanWATERS and motivates the choice of YADE as most suitable candidate.

Damiana Catanoso↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Helium-3: Mining Concepts, Extraction Research, and Potential ISRU Synergies

The M-3 miner was designed to excavate 1258 tonnes/hr with a bucket wheel excavator and process 556 tonnes/hr (during the lunar daytime) of <100 μm regolith through a 12 MW solar concentrator powered heat pipe heat exchanger(HPHX). The HPHX was designed to heat the regolith up to 700°C to release the implanted solar wind volatiles and recuperate 85% of the input heat. Considering a 20 ppb 3He concentration in the regolith, 66kg of 3He would be captured in onboard storage tanks over the course of one year.This mining effort would also result in the release hundreds of tonnes of other valuable volatile by-products, including water and hydrogen, that could be used to support sustainable lunar exploration.In the more near term, a mining operation to demonstrate the ability to collect 15 tonnes water for liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen propellant from 5% water rich regolith may require ~400 tonnes of regolith to be excavated. This type of pilot scale operation could also demonstrate the ability to extract about 6 g of 3He, assuming the 3He concentration in permanently shadowed regions on the Moon is similar to that of equatorial regions.

Aaron D.S. Olson↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Uncrewed Lunar Surface Operations and Support Activities

Sustained human presence on the surface of the Moon and future missions to Mars require increased independence from surface crews and Earth-based mission control to operate efficiently, safely, and reliably. The time for surface crews to perform tasks will be limited. Extravehicular activities by surface personnel are burdensome and time-consuming, even when a continuous human presence on the surface occurs. Identifying and balancing human/automation roles and tasks and infusing automation and autonomy practices early in a system’s lifecycle will be essential to achieve mission objectives. Among these objectives are attaining a sustained human presence, improving performance and mission effectiveness, reducing operations and maintenance (O&M) costs, and ensuring operations that are robust to communication delays. To achieve these objectives, an operational shift toward increased automation and autonomy with less reliance on humans is needed. Uncrewed lunar surface operations and support activities occur when surface crews are not present or are independent of surface crew timeline activities requiring no surface crew oversight or intervention. These uncrewed surface opportunities can also be planned to minimize crew workload that avoids routine maintenance and support tasks, thus maximizing crew exploration time. Uncrewed preparations such as staging and prepositioning equipment and materials before the crew arrives could improve crew task efficiency. Additional opportunities exist to conduct uncrewed science, exploration, and utilization. Uncrewed surface architecture functions can include science and exploration; habitation; launch and landing support; surface communication and navigation; surface power generation and distribution; human surface mobility; lifting, handling, manipulating; excavation, construction, and site preparation; logistics management; maintenance and repair; surface resource utilization; integrated site operations and shared support services (e.g., site scheduling/prioritization, dust mitigation/contamination control, and surface safety). Early robotic lunar surface campaigns will provide information on the availability of resources, such as oxygen and water, and demonstrate surface-based technologies. After the Artemis III human lunar return mission, a series of landers will deliver surface systems, cargo, supplies, science packages, spare parts, and commodities. A balance of crewed and uncrewed surface operations will enable a sustained lunar surface presence at the South Pole of the Moon at a site that will be known as the Artemis Base Camp (ABC). It is envisioned that base camp operations on and around the Moon will then help prepare for the mission durations and activities needed to support the first human mission to Mars. Before long-duration crew missions to the base camp can occur, the necessary surface infrastructure will be pre-deployed and verified operational. Surface assets will be teleoperated and remotely managed from Earth. Additionally, robotic and short-duration crewed missions to the ABC will ensure the site’s merit to achieve long-term science objectives, availability of usable resources, and that terrain, seasonal variations, and illumination conditions are acceptable. ABC will consist of different areas where specific functions and services are rendered, including: • Launch and Landing Area • Habitation Area • Power Production Area • Resource Areas Launch and Landing Area—The launch and landing area will support associated functions for the arrival and departure of vehicles, such as crewed landing and ascent and uncrewed cargo deliveries and offloading. It will evolve from an unimproved site at the beginning of the exploration campaign to a more sustainable landing and launch area that can support repeated arrivals and departures. Initial uncrewed Lunar Terrain Vehicle (LTV) surface operations may include emplacement of navigation beacons and communication equipment, real-time video and photography of landing/liftoff events, and element repositioning, such as portable utility power (PUP) (applicable for other landed assets at other areas). Site preparations, such as surface leveling, soil compaction, and berm/path construction, may be needed for a more sustainable launch and landing area capable of accommodating vehicles that are increasingly more reusable and reduce the effects of plume surface interactions and ejecta impacts on nearby surface assets. During the ABC missions, cargo and logistics will be delivered to the lunar surface via robotic cargo landers before the crew arrives. These shipments, which can arrive in pressurized logistics carriers, will deliver the logistics necessary to support a crewed mission and include items such as food, water, equipment spares, etc. Providing the capability to retrieve, offload, and transport the logistics closer to the ABC site before the arrival of the crew will increase the overall efficiency of crew operations once they arrive. In the sustained phase of exploration, other supporting services may be needed, such as lander propellant servicing, surface power services, commodity refreshes, and additional inspection, maintenance, and repair capabilities, to sustain a cadence of extended personnel stays and cargo arrivals and departures. Habitation Area—Uncrewed support to surface habitation could involve supporting activation and pre-entry operations of the habitat while the crew is in orbit at the Gateway outpost preparing for a surface landing. Surface Habitat (SH) uncrewed operations may include bringing the cabin environment to a habitable temperature and air mix and activating other critical crew support systems. Potential crop production uncrewed tasks in the SH could also include autonomous watering and tending. Additionally, when the crew departs, the SH enters dormancy for the long period of uncrewed operation. A logistical staging area could also be collocated near the SH. If so, staging operations for crew supplies, waste re-location, and recycling operations may be opportunities for uncrewed operations. Power Production Area—The Fission Surface Power (FSP) element and its supporting distribution equipment provide power to surface elements as needed across the ABC to supplement day-to-day operations and survive lunar nights. Uncrewed support of this power system includes any initial LTV-assisted deployments of cables and other distributed equipment, associated electrical connections, and system testing and activation operations. Robotically performing some inspections, maintenance, or repair tasks on the power distribution equipment could reduce the surface crew workload. Resource Area— Uncrewed resource prospecting, mapping, and characterizing possible resource sites is likely to be time-consuming and represents an opportunity for uncrewed operations between crewed missions. Uncrewed mobile equipment operations will be needed in the extreme environments of permanently shadowed locations where resource extractions occur. As In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) pilot plant operations begin, uncrewed surface support activities with available mobile and portable assets (LTV, PUP, etc.) will better support these operations. Any produced commodities can be stored at a centralized storage location for future use. Also associated with these operations is the use of mobile robotic excavators for resource acquisition and robotic/autonomous regolith processing. The waste tailings generated during excavation and regolith processing would also need to be transported and deposited at a dedicated location. Surface assets will continue operating between crew visits to maintain surface capabilities, conduct lunar surface science, technology demonstrations, and public outreach opportunities. Additionally, certain sustaining tasks that would consume valuable crew time could be performed before crew arrival, or after their departure. This capability may offer more affordable options to construct, activate, test, and maintain a broad set of surface assets. Telerobotically operated human surface mobility systems, such as the LTV and Pressurized Rover (PR), can be utilized for various tasks. Surface environmental conditions pose a distinct challenge for all these activities. Surface illumination and localized shadows are one such factor. Night-survival operations could consist of thermal management, battery pre-charging, and load shedding. Some surface systems may hibernate through the night and then awake and continue nominal operations. Uncrewed mobile assets may use a more adaptive approach to optimize their power and operations; one method is to follow the sunlight. Night-survival operations may be initiated remotely by teleoperation, automated, or accomplished by supervised autonomous operation. The ability to pre-deploy and control remote assets in orbit or on Mars before the arrival of the mission crew is a key capability that can be simulated on the moon. The base camp provides a venue where these advanced operational concepts, technologies, and autonomous methods and techniques, including the incorporation of time delays to simulate Earth-Mars latency can be replicated to help buy down future Mars mission risks. This paper will examine the evolution of uncrewed lunar surface operations and support activities. It will also discuss the lunar surface environmental conditions (thermal, lighting, terrain, topography, communications) along with the challenges they pose on uncrewed surface operations, and the performance of these activities with limited to minimal human interaction and/or teleoperation. Since lunar missions include Mars mission analogs, such investigation provides the framework for future uncrewed Mars mission support.

Mark E Lewis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

System Modeling of a Lunar Molten Regolith Electrolysis Plant

Introduction: In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) is the process of extracting local resources to produce commodities for propulsion, life support systems, and off-planet construction rather than transporting consumables from Earth. Molten Regolith Electrolysis (MRE) is a novel ISRU method of extracting oxygen gas and metal alloy from lunar regolith. The MRE process involves placing lunar regolith between two electrodes, through which current is passed, to melt the regolith and reduce the metal oxide constituents by direct electrolysis (e.g. FeO, SiO2, MgO, Al2O3) into oxygen gas and metal alloys. The oxygen is liquefied and used as propellant for landers, while the metals (e.g. Ferro-alloys) are further processed and used in structural building materials and parts manufacturing. A system model was developed that accounted for the major processes of an MRE plant (from excavation of raw materials to storage of products) to assess the feasibility of a lunar MRE plant. The System Engineering and Integration (SE&I) ISRU Modeling and Analysis (SIMA) team utilized its previously documented system sizing model, the Mission Analysis and Integration Tool (MAIT) [1] as framework of the system model. MAIT uses MATLAB/Simulink to integrate subsystem models into a complete system model of the MRE plant. Total mass, volume, and power requirements were computed for numerous iterations of a MRE plant. System Model: Figure 1: MRE Plant Block Diagram The regolith excavation model determines the mass and power needed to excavate sufficient regolith. The preheating auger initiates the regolith heating process before regolith enters the MRE re-actor to reduce the energy required to turn the solid into a molten liquid. The MRE reactor is modeled in COMSOL Multiphysics and based on the research by Dominguez, Sibille, and Schreiner [2, 3, 4]. This preliminary reactor model provides an accurate calculation of thermal equilibrium during electrochemical operation of the reactor system to assess the optimal mass and power required to process the inlet flow of regolith. The model also computes the outlet flowrates of oxygen and molten products. For this analysis, the primary components of the metal alloy considered were iron and silicon. The oxygen is then purified using an Yttrium Stabilized Zirconia (YSZ) electrode, followed by liquefaction using a 90K cryocooler to be stored as liquid oxygen in insulated cylindrical tanks. In future iterations of the system model, the molten metal tapped from the MRE reactor will undergo additional processing or refinement. However, downstream handling of metals is currently a technology gap that is missing a high TRL subsystem model. Therefore, for this analysis, the accumulated metal alloy stream terminates after leaving the MRE reactor. Study Goals: This analysis investigates multiple input variables to the system to determine the sensitivity of a (near) complete plant at full-scale. This preliminary investigation ran parametric sweeps on the MRE reactor geometry, electrical current supply, layers of multi-layer insulation (MLI) on the reactor, size of the electrodes in the oxygen purification model, and regolith composition (based on landing site location). Three production targets of oxygen (1,000, 10,000, and 50,000 kg/yr) were investigated for this analysis. The parametric sweeps conducted in this analysis provide valuable insight into the expected impact of the various model inputs on plant size. This information can be used to identify the most critical components of the plant and guide future decisions on allocating funding for research and development, providing subsystem developers with appropriate interfaces with downstream and upstream processes, and assessing the overall feasibility of MRE when compared to other ISRU plants. References: [1] Carlson, A. et al. (2024) ICES, ICES-2024-53. [2] Dominguez, D.A., and Sibille, L. (2011) AIAA, AIAA-2011-700. [3] Schreiner, S.S. (2015) MIT, Dissertation. [4] Schreiner, S.S. et al. (2016) ASR, 57(7), pp.1585-1603.

ISRU↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of NASA's Break the Ice Lunar Challenge

This paper provides the background, status and ongoing plans by NASA’s CentennialChallenges Program (CCP) in developing “Break the Ice Lunar Challenge”. This challenge will enable the development of excavation technologies that can operate in the extreme conditions on the Moon. As a direct result of NASA’s Space Policy Directive 1 (To the Moon, then Mars”), CCP organized a kickoff meeting in October 2019 where Subject Matter Experts (SME) from various NASA centers got together and identified the technology gaps in the areas of Lunar Excavation, Manufacturing, and Construction. Following the kickoff meeting, CCP in partnership with external challenge consultants conducted in-depth interviews with experts from academia, industry, and NASA over a period of two months to further identify any technology gaps and the status of the current state of the art technologies in these areas. Through these activities, we determined that there is sufficient need and opportunity to move forward and develop this into a robust challenge. As a nextstep, CCP organized a workshop in February 2020 where experts from academia, industry, NASA, and other government agencies met to validate the specific technology need and prioritize those needs in such a way that the potential challenge can address the high priority needs. Since the completion of this workshop, a core challenge development team has been working on the challenge scenarios, rules, and requirements with the goal to open the challenge in Nov 2020.

Centennnial Challenges↗
NASA NTRS1974

Smooth plains and continuous deposits of craters and basins

Apollo 16 photographic data are analyzed which suggest that smooth plains are related in origin to large primary cratering events, and that the plains material is mainly the ejecta of local and regional primary impact craters with only minor contributions from distant craters and basins. This material, then, has been emplaced in its present location by secondaries of distant craters and directly by primary craters near the site. Calculations indicate that the material excavated from large primary craters typically excavates much larger amounts of material from local terrain when it impacts in the secondary crater field. There is a correlation between the extent of development of smooth plains inside large high-land craters and the erosional state of the crater rims and walls. It is incorrect to consider the continuous deposits to be solely basin ejecta.

Oberbeck, V. R.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Nevada Test Site craters used for astronaut training

Craters produced by chemical and nuclear explosives at the Nevada Test Site were used to train astronauts before their lunar missions. The craters have characteristics suitable for reconnaissance-type field investigations. The Schooner test produced a crater about 300 m across and excavated more than 72 m of stratigraphic section deposited in a fairly regular fashion so that systematic observations yield systematic results. Other features common on the moon, such as secondary craters and glass-coated rocks, are present at Schooner crater. Smaller explosive tests on Buckboard Mesa excavated rocks from three horizontal alteration zones within basalt flows so that the original sequence of the zones could be determined. One crater illustrated the characteristics of craters formed across vertical boundaries between rock units. Although the exercises at the Nevada Test Site were only a small part of the training of the astronauts, voice transcripts of Apollo missions 14, 16, and 17 show that the exercises contributed to astronaut performance on the moon.

Moore, H. J.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Impact flows and crater scaling on the moon

The axisymmetric distribution of stress, internal energy, and particle velocity resulting from the impact of an iron meteoroid with a gabbroic anorthosite lunar crust has been calculated for the regime in which shock-induced melting and vaporization take place. Comparison of impact flow fields, with phase changes in silicates taken into account, with earlier results demonstrate that in the phase-change case where the 15-km/s projectile has penetrated some two projectile radii into the moon, the peak stress in the flow is about 0.66 Mbar at a depth of 66 km, and the stress has decayed to about 66 kbar at a depth of 47 km. Rapid attenuation occurs because of the high rarefaction velocity of the high-pressure phases associated with a 35% (zero-pressure) density increase. This feature of the phase-change flow tends to concentrate strongly the maximum shock pressures along the meteoroid trajectory (axis) and makes the conical zone along which high internal energy deposition occurs both shallow and narrow. Examination of the gravitational energies required to excavate larger craters on the moon indicates the importance of gravity forces acting during the excavation of craters having radii in the range greater than about 2 to 140 km.

Okeefe, J. D.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Some correlation of rock exposure ages and regolith dynamics

Exposure age information on lunar rocks and regolith turnover rates are correlated. If plotted in a cumulative fashion, the distribution of spallogenic noble-gas exposure ages is remarkably parallel to the rate at which various fractions of the regolith surface are cratered and/or excavated. It appears that the rate at which lunar rocks are excavated from within the regolith is strongly controlled by the impact environment. Some suggestions for future refinement of regolith dynamics are presented.

Horz, F.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Topographic domes on Ganymede - Ice vulcanism or isostatic upwarping

Two formation processes are considered for two gently sloping domeshaped features on the surface of Ganymede, lying on grooved terrain and having diameters of roughly 250 km: (1) water vulcanism, triggered by a major impact, and (2) the isostatic upwarping of a crater formed in a thin crust. Numerical simulations show the volume of the domes to be consistent with eruption through fractures created by an impact that excavates partly through a thin crust. Isostatic upwarp rates calculated as a function of effective crustal temperature indicate that upwarping could also create such a dome if the impact excavated to a depth where the crust was sufficiently warm and mobile. Morphologic evidence suggests that both processes may have been important and, if either of the proposed models is correct, it is strongly implied that grooved terrain formation occurred prior to the thickening and stiffening of Ganymede's crust.

Squyres, S. W.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Remote sensing studies of lunar dark-halo impact craters - Preliminary results and implications for early volcanism

A summary of the nature and origin of lunar dark-halo craters is presented. New remote sensing data for dark-haloed impact craters were obtained and interpreted. A variety of spectral, thermal, radar, and photogeologic data are presented which confirm the hypothesis that Copernicus H crater excavated mare basalt from beneath lighter deposits emplaced by the Copernicus impact event. Multispectral imagery suggests that analogous impact re-exposure of basaltic material on the ejecta blankets of other large Copernican and Eratosthenian craters resulted in the formation of other dark-halo craters. Preliminary analyses of near-infrared spectra of dark-haloed impact craters in the Schickard-Schiller region are consistent with the hypothesis that basaltic material was excavated from beneath light plains. These light plains may have been emplaced as a result of the Orientale impact event. Additional evidence is presented which suggests that both pre- and post-Orientale volcanic activity was more prevalent in this region than has previously been recognized.

Hawke, B. R.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Petrologic variations in Apollo 16 surface soils

Source rock, maturation history and intrasite variation data are derived for the Apollo 16 regolith by comparing modal analyses of 15 surface soils with rake and rock sample data. Triangular source rock component plots show that Apollo 16 soils have similar source rocks that are well homogenized throughout the site. The site can be divided into three soil petrographic provinces. Central site soils are mature, well homogenized, and enriched in glass. They are probably the most typical Cayley Plains materials present. North Ray soils are immature to submature, containing North Ray ejecta. South Ray soils are mature, but contain small amounts of fresh impact melts and plagioclase, due perhaps to the breakdown of blocky South Ray ejecta. The different compositions and physical properties of North and South Ray ejecta support the hypothesis that the latter event excavated Cayley material, while the former excavated Descartes materials.

Houck, K. J.↗
NASA NTRS1982

A summary of Viking sample-trench analyses for angles of internal friction and cohesions

Analyses of sample trenches excavated on Mars, using a theory for plowing by narrow blades, provide estimates of the angles of internal friction and the cohesions of the Martian surface materials. Angles of internal friction appear to be the same as those of many terrestrial soils because they are generally between 27 degrees and 39 degrees. Drift material, at the Lander 1 site, has a low angle of internal friction (near 18 degrees). All the materials excavated have low cohesions, generally between 0.2 and 10 kPa. The occurrence of cross bedding, layers of crusts, and blocky slabs shows that these materials are heterogeneous and that they contain planes of weakness. The results reported here have significant implications for future landed missions, Martian eolian processes, and interpretation of infrared temperatures.

Moore, H. J.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Bunte Breccia of the Ries - Continuous deposits of large impact craters

The 26-km-diameter Ries impact crater in south Germany and the mechanism of ejection and emplacement associated with its formation about 15 Myr ago are discussed in detail, and the implications of the findings for models of crater formation on earth, moon, and planets are considered. Field observations and laboratory tests on 560-m core materials from nine locations are reported. The continuous deposits (Bunte Breccia) are found to be a chaotic mixture resulting from deposition at ambient temperatures in a highly turbulent environment, probably in the ballistic scenario proposed by Oberbeck et al. (1975), with an emplacement time of only about 5 min. Further impact parameters are estimated using the 'Z model' of Maxwell (1977): initial radius = 6.5 km, excavation depth = 1650 m, excavation volume = 136 cu km, and transient cavity volume = 230 cu km. The interpretation of lunar and planetary remote-sensing and in situ evidence from impact craters is reviewed in the light of the Ries findings. Numerous photographs, maps, diagrams, and tables illustrate the investigation.

Horz, F.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Directional properties of circular Maria: Interpretation in the context of a testable gravitational capture model for lunar origin

Photogeologic study of circular lunar maria and mare-filled craters reveals that several of these features are either elliptical and/or asymmetrical. The ellipticity/asymmetry is interpreted as a directional property which may have genetic significance. Most maria indicate movement in easterly directions. The directional properties of these features are consistent with at least three models of mare basin formation: (1) mare basins were excavated by a swarm of fragments from a tidally disrupted planetary body impacting from a westerly direction; (2) mare basins were excavated by lunar satellites whose orbits decayed sufficiently to cause the satellites to impact onto the lunar surface from a westerly direction; and (3) basins were formed by the impact of large spheroids of lunar basalt onto the lunar surface from a westerly direction.

Malcuit, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Geomorphology and Geology of the Southwestern Margaritifer Sinus and Argyre Regions of Mars. Part 4: Flow Ejecta Crater Distribution

Flow ejecta craters - craters surrounded by lobate ejecta blankets - are found throughout the study area. The ratio of the crater's diameter to that of the flow ejecta in this region is approximately 40 to 45%. Flow ejecta craters are dominantly sharply defined craters, with slightly degraded craters being somewhat less common. This is probably indicative of the ejecta's relatively low resistence to weathering and susceptibility to burial. Flow ejecta craters here seem to occur within a narrow range of crater sizes - the smallest being about 4km in diameter and the largest being about 27km in diameter. Ejecta blankets of craters at 4km are easily seen and those of smaller craters are simply not seen even in images with better than average resolution for the region. This may be due to the depth of excavation of small impacting bodies being insufficient to reach volatile-rich material. Flow ejecta craters above 24km are rare, and those craters above 27km do not display flow ejecta blankets. This may be a result of an excavation depth so great that the volatile content of the ejecta is insufficient to form a fluid ejecta blanket. The geomorphic/geologic unit appears also to play an important role in the formation of flow ejecta craters. Given the typical size range for the occurrence of flow ejecta craters for most units, it can be seen that the percentage of flow ejecta craters to the total number of craters within this size range varies significantly from one unit to the next. The wide variance in flow ejecta crater density over this relatively small geographical area argues strongly for a lithologic control of their distribution.

Parker, T. J.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Mineralogical studies of lunar meteorites and their lunar analogs

The minerology and textural properties of three lunar meteorites (Yamato 791197, ALH81005, and Yamato 82192) were analyzed and compared with lunar surface rock samples. The chemical composition and textures of pyroxene and the occurrance of glass matrices were specifically addressed. The study of glass in the lunar meteorites suggests that the glass was not produced by a meteorite impact which excavated the mass into orbit towards the Earth. The glass had been devitrified on the lunar surface before the excavation, and new glass was not produced by the last impact.

Takeda, H.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Basalt depths in lunar basins using impact craters as stratigraphic probes: Evaluation of a method using orbital geochemical data

A rare look at the chemical composition of subsurface stratigraphy in lunar basins filled with mare basalt is possible at fresh impact craters. Mg/Al maps from orbital X-ray flourescence measurements of mare areas indicate chemical anomalies associated with materials ejected by large post-mare impacts. A method of constraining the wide-ranging estimates of mare basalt depths using the orbital MG/Al data is evaluated and the results are compared to those of investigators using different indirect methods. Chemical anomalies at impact craters within the maria indicate five locations where higher Mg/Al basalt compositions may have been excavated from beneath the surface layer. At eight other locations, low Mg/Al anomalies suggest that basin-floor material was ejected. In these two cases, the stratigraphic layers are interpreted to occur at depths less than the calculated maximum depth of excavation. In five other cases, there is no apparent chemical change between the crater and the surrounding mare surface. This suggests homogeneous basalt compositions that extend down to the depths sampled, i.e., no anorthositic material that might represent the basin floor was exposed.

Andre, C. G.↗