Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “nuclear data”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Using Whisper-1.1 to Guide Improvements to Nuclear Data Evaluations

Along with the latest release of the general purpose Monte Carlo radiation transport code, MCNP6.2, came the first officially released version of Whisper, version 1.1, a statistical analysis code used for nuclear criticality safety (NCS) validation. The Whisper software package is primarily used to calculate the upper subcritical limit (USL) of a particular application case along with components of the margin of subcriticality (MOS). In the calculation of the MOS due to nuclear data uncertainties, Whisper uses the generalized linear-least-squares (GLLS) approach to obtain adjusted nuclear data uncertainties which are then propagated to estimate the nuclear data uncertainties in the k eff of the application. Due to the fact that Whisper contains the simulated and measured k eff values for over 1100 benchmarks, nuclear data sensitivity profiles for each benchmark along with the nuclear data covariance matrices, all of which are used in the GLLS method, it is possible to easily utilize these data available to help guide improvements to nuclear data evaluations. In the present work, the Whisper data and the GLLS method are used together to suggest an adjusted nuclear data cross section evaluation specifically for 233 U such that the agreement between the calculated and experimental k eff measurements of the relevant benchmarks are improved. With this adjusted nuclear data available, feedback to the theoretical and experimental nuclear data community is provided.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2017

Using Whisper-1.1 to guide improvements to nuclear data evaluations

Along with the latest release of the general purpose Monte Carlo radiation transport code, MCNP6.2, came the first officially released version of Whisper, version 1.1, a statistical analysis code used for nuclear criticality safety (NCS) validation. The Whisper software package is primarily used to calculate the upper subcritical limit (USL) of a particular application case along with components of the margin of subcriticality (MOS). In the calculation of the MOS due to nuclear data uncertainties, Whisper uses the generalized linear-least-squares (GLLS) approach to obtain adjusted nuclear data uncertainties which are then propagated to estimate the nuclear data uncertainties in the k{sub eff} of the application. Due to the fact that Whisper contains the simulated and measured k{sub eff} values for over 1100 benchmarks, nuclear data sensitivity profiles for each benchmark along with the nuclear data covariance matrices, all of which are used in the GLLS method, it is possible to easily utilize these data available to help guide improvements to nuclear data evaluations. In the present work, the Whisper data and the GLLS method are used together to suggest an adjusted nuclear data cross section evaluation specifically for {sup 233}U such that the agreement between the calculated and experimental k{sub eff} measurements of the relevant benchmarks are improved. With this adjusted nuclear data available, feedback to the theoretical and experimental nuclear data community is provided. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

United States Nuclear Data Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2024

The US Nuclear Data Program (USNDP) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2024 (FY24) summarizes the work of USNDP for the period of October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024, with respect to the Work Plan for FY24 that was prepared in 2022. The Work Plan and Final Report for USNDP are prepared for the DOE Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics. The support for the nuclear data activity from sources outside the nuclear data program is described in the staffing table and in Appendix A. This leverage amounts to about 14.8 FTE scientific, to be compared with 13.9 FTEs at USNDP units funded by the DOE Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics. Since it is often difficult to separate accomplishments funded by various sources, some of the work reported in the present report was accomplished with nuclear data program support leveraged by other funding.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2026

United States Nuclear Data Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2025

The US Nuclear Data Program (USNDP) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2025 summarizes the work of USNDP for the period of October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025, with respect to the Work Plan for FY 2025 that was prepared in 2024. The Work Plan and Final Report for USNDP are prepared for the DOE Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics. The support for the nuclear data activity from sources outside the US Nuclear Data Program is summarized in the staffing table and Appendix A. This leverage amounts to about 22.8 FTE scientific, to be compared with 21.9 FTEs at USNDP units funded by the DOE Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics. Since it is often difficult to separate accomplishments funded by various sources, some of the work reported in the present report was accomplished with nuclear data program support leveraged by other funding. FY 2025 was the 25th year in which the USNDP has operated under a Work Plan developed by the program participants. The program continued to carry out important work in support of the DOE mission. The work balances the ongoing collecting, analyzing, and archiving of nuclear physics information critical to basic nuclear research and to the development and improvement of nuclear technologies with the electronic distribution of this information to users in a timely and easily accessible manner. The present section of the report consists of activity summaries for the major components of the USNDP. This is followed by an updated staff level assignment table that reflects the final distribution of effort among the tasks carried out during FY 2025. Then, we continue with the detailed status of work performed during FY 2025.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Nuclear Data Adjustment for Nonlinear Applications in the OECD/NEA WPNCS SG14 Benchmark—A Bayesian Inverse UQ-Based Approach for Data Assimilation

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety has proposed a benchmark exercise to assess the performance of current nuclear data adjustment techniques applied to nonlinear applications and experiments with low correlation to applications. This work introduces Bayesian inverse uncertainty quantification (IUQ) employing scientific machine learning surrogate models as a method for nuclear data adjustments in this benchmark, and compares IUQ to the more traditional methods of generalized linear least squares (GLLS) and Monte Carlo Bayes (MOCABA). Posterior predictions from IUQ showed agreement with GLLS and MOCABA for linear applications. Here, when comparing GLLS, MOCABA, and IUQ posterior predictions to computed model responses using adjusted parameters, we observe that the GLLS predictions failed to replicate the computed response distributions for nonlinear applications, while MOCABA showed near agreement, and IUQ used the computed model responses directly. We also discuss observations on why experiments with low correlation to applications can be informative to nuclear data adjustments and identify some properties useful in selecting experiments for inclusion in nuclear data adjustment. Performance in this benchmark indicates potential for Bayesian IUQ in nuclear data adjustments.

Bayesian calibration↗
DOE OSTI2012

Evaluating and adjusting {sup 239}Pu, {sup 56}Fe, {sup 28}Si and {sup 95}Mo nuclear data with a Monte Carlo technique

In this paper, Monte Carlo optimization and nuclear data evaluation are combined to produce optimal adjusted nuclear data files. The methodology is based on the so-called 'Total Monte Carlo' and the TALYS system. Not only a single nuclear data file is produced for a given isotope, but virtually an infinite number, defining probability distributions for each nuclear quantity. Then each of these random nuclear data libraries is used in a series of benchmark calculations. With a goodness-of-fit estimator, best {sup 239}Pu, {sup 56}Fe, {sup 28}Si and {sup 95}Mo evaluations for that benchmark set can be selected. A few thousands of random files are used and each of them is tested with a large number of fast, thermal and intermediate energy criticality benchmarks. From this, the best performing random file is chosen and proposed as the optimum choice among the studied random set. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

The MUSIC Critical Benchmark and Nuclear Data

The Measurement of Uranium Subcritical and Critical (MUSIC) experiment was a series of measurements of critical and subcritical configurations of bare highly enriched uranium. The goal was to compare measurement methods, analysis techniques, and simulation methods across regimes of criticality and to provide high-quality validation of 235 U nuclear data. A benchmark evaluation of the two critical configurations of the MUSIC experiments will soon be published in the release of the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook. The recent execution of the experiment aids in proper quantification of model simplifications and all uncertainties associated with the experiment. Historical benchmark evaluations are heavily relied on for uranium nuclear data validation despite the fact that the same level of documentation and comparable uncertainty analysis may not be present. The MUSIC evaluation is less likely to include “unknown unknowns” that could impede accurately modeling the system. Presented are both highly detailed and very simplified models, which represent the experimental configurations accurately, aiding the users of the benchmark for nuclear data or transport code validation. The sensitivities of k eff to nuclear data and nuclear data–related uncertainties are very similar between this experiment and previous bare uranium sphere experiments. In addition, the nuclear data uncertainties to any nuclides other than 235 U are small. For all these reasons, the recently evaluated MUSIC benchmark critical configurations could prove very useful for 235 U nuclear data validation. Currently, major libraries have good agreement with the experimental results, within 200 pcm for all nuclear data libraries, and within one standard deviation of the experimental result for most. Suggested nuclear data adjustments based on MUSIC and Lady Godiva are also presented, with posterior improvements to both the agreement in k eff and the uncertainty associated with the nuclear data.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Nuclear Data

PowerPoint presentation targeted for educational use. Nuclear data comes from a variety of sources and in many flavors. Understanding where the data you use comes from and what flavor it is can be essential to understand and interpret your results. This talk will discuss the nuclear data pipeline with particular emphasis on providing links to additional resources that can be used to explore the issues you will encounter.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Nuclear Data Adjustment for Nonlinear Applications in the OECD/NEA WPNCS SG14 Benchmark -- A Bayesian Inverse UQ-based Approach for Data Assimilation

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety (WPNCS) proposed a benchmark exercise to assess the performance of current nuclear data adjustment techniques applied to nonlinear applications and experiments with low correlation to applications. This work introduces Bayesian Inverse Uncertainty Quantification (IUQ) as a method for nuclear data adjustments in this benchmark, and compares IUQ to the more traditional methods of Generalized Linear Least Squares (GLLS) and Monte Carlo Bayes (MOCABA). Posterior predictions from IUQ showed agreement with GLLS and MOCABA for linear applications. When comparing GLLS, MOCABA, and IUQ posterior predictions to computed model responses using adjusted parameters, we observe that GLLS predictions fail to replicate computed response distributions for nonlinear applications, while MOCABA shows near agreement, and IUQ uses computed model responses directly. We also discuss observations on why experiments with low correlation to applications can be informative to nuclear data adjustments and identify some properties useful in selecting experiments for inclusion in nuclear data adjustment. Performance in this benchmark indicates potential for Bayesian IUQ in nuclear data adjustments.

FOS: Computer and information sciences↗
DOE OSTI2020

ANDES (ARGONNE NUCLEAR DATA EXPLORATION SOFTWARE) - ndviz

The Argonne Nuclear Data Exploration Software (ANDES) is a collection of open-source C++ codes and ROOT scripts that enable the visualization of patterns emerging from nuclear data. From this global view, well-known phenomena such as major nuclear shell closures and pairing effects near N=Z nuclei, as well as more subtle features, such as quantum phase transition around the Zr isotopes or the charge radius staggering in the Hg isotopes, can be observed. This visualization tool apart from having pedagogic application can serve as a tool for discovering previously unknown phenomena in the nuclear chart.

Santiago-Gonzalez, Daniel↗
DOE OSTI2023

Nuclear Data: What is the big deal? [Slides]

This presentation begins with a look at the practical application: differential and integral data. It also includes a nuclear data evaluation: cross section formalisms, data processing and cross section library generation, computer tools, and criticality safety assessment: nuclear data. The presentation ends with some concluding remarks.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Key nuclear data for non-LWR reactivity analysis

An assessment of nuclear data performance for non-light-water reactor (non-LWR) reactivity calculations was performed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory that involved a thorough literature review to collect related observations made across different research institutions, an interrogation of the latest ENDF/B evaluated nuclear data libraries, and propagation of nuclear data uncertainties to key figures of merit associated with reactor safety for six non-LWR benchmarks. The outcome of this comprehensive study was published in a technical report issued by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This paper provides a summary of the study’s key observations and conclusions and demonstrates with two examples how the various methods available in the SCALE code system were used to identify key cross section uncertainties for non-LWR reactivity analyses.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Understanding the impact of nuclear-data covariances on various integral responses using adjustment

The EUCLID (Experiments Underpinned by Computational Learning for Improvements in Nuclear Data) project created a library of sensitivities for nine different integral responses with respect to nuclear data. These integral responses were obtained from measurements at LLNL (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) pulsed spheres, critical and sub-critical assemblies. At the same time, covariances for ENDF/B-VIII.0 were processed at LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory). The combination of these data allow us to study the impact of nuclear-data covariances on various integral responses, either by forward-propagating covariances via sensitivities, or by using nuclear data, integral responses, and sensitivities for adjustment. Here, we will present: the impact of 1 H, 9 Be, 12 C, 27 Al, 56 Fe, 235,238 U, and 239,240 Pu ENDF/B-VIII.0 covariances on simulated bounds of the following integral responses: LLNL pulsed-spheres neutron-leakage spectra, the effective neutron multiplication factor, reaction rates, and reactivity coefficients of ICSBEP critical assemblies. Also, adjustment results with the same nuclear-data covariances and responses will be discussed.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

EUCLID: Experiments Underpinned by Computational Learning for Improvements in Nuclear Data [Slides]

EUCLID will design validation experiments optimized to resolve compensating errors and adjust nuclear data to experiments. A big part of the success of the EUCLID proposal was due to previous work supported by NCSP (MCNP, nuclear data, and NCERC capabilities). The work performed under EUCLID will similarly benefit the NCSP mission. It will lead to new MCNP capabilities, improved nuclear data and nuclear data capabilities, and new methodology and tools that will have large impact on future NCERC experiments.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Definitions for Testing Whether Evaluated Nuclear Data Relative Uncertainties are Realistic in Size

This document describes various tests that can be used to check whether evaluated relative uncertainties stored in nuclear-data covariances are realistic. To be more specific, these tests check whether nuclear-data uncertainties could be either over- or under-estimated given the input that usually enters the evaluation of nuclear-data mean values and covariances. Warning and error messages on the reliability of nuclear-data uncertainties will result from these tests. If uncertainties of one specific nuclear-data observable trigger warning messages from multiple tests, an evaluator should counter-check the reliability of the relative uncertainties of this particular nuclear-data covariance matrix.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗