Severe Accident Research Directions after Fukushima
The accidents at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in March of 2011 renewed interest globally in the nature, causes, and health and economic consequences of severe accidents involving core damage and containment impairment. As a result of these accidents, research has been conducted into the modeling and phenomenological understanding of the accidents at Fukushima and the response and effectiveness of mitigating measures such as emergency water injection, primary system depressurization and containment venting actions. An important example of this is the jointly conducted OECD-NEA organized Benchmark of the Fukushima Accidents (BSAF project) where accident reconstruction analyses using computer codes such as MELCOR and MAAP are ongoing. Even prior to the Fukushima accidents, the Sandia/NRC sponsored State of Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) foreshadowed the accidents in Japan where long-term and short-term station blackout accidents in boiling water reactors with Mark-1 containment were analyzed showing striking similarities to the accidents at Fukushima. These analyses also highlighted important differences in our prior understanding, in particular the importance of suppression pool thermal stratification and the extraordinary operation of the Fukushima Unit-2 reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) system, prompting addition research into both of these areas. Additionally, the focus of the world's major computer codes on modeling the Fukushima accidents in the BSAF effort, led to several 'Crosswalk' comparisons between code predictions, highlighting subtle but important modeling differences between the codes and identifying areas where modeling improvements can be made. Collectively, these research areas are aimed at improving our understanding of severe accident progression and real-world response of safety related systems and components, and should lead to improved accident response and mitigation capabilities in the future. (authors)