NASA NTRS2024
Low linear energy transfer (LET) ionizing radiations induce homogeneously distributed DNA damage at the cellular scale, while high LET ionizing radiations are well known to create complex biological damage including clustered double strand breaks (DSB). Clustered DSB are critical events that are difficult to repair, leading to increased biological outcomes compared to low LET radiation exposure. Recent studies have shown that DNA compaction, which can be actively modified by the cell to allow DNA repair, influences the yield of DSB [1]. The goal of this work is to determine the impact of DNA compaction on chromosome aberration formation, a biomarker of radiation-induced cancer risk. The RITRACKS track structure code [2], together with the RITCARD code [3], allow one to simulate the transport of high LET ions, calculate DNA damage and repair, and chromosome aberration formation, but does not include detailed geometrical models of DNA. The Geant4-DNA toolkit provides such detailed models with different levels of DNA compaction [1,4], but does not model chromosome aberration formation. In this work, these highly detailed DNA geometries are used to compute DNA breaks with Geant4-DNA and combine the results with the RITCARD tool to compute chromosome aberrations. As a first step, we compared the transport models used in RITRACKS and Geant4-DNA and newly released heavy ion model transport (G4DNARuddIonisationExtendedModel Geant4 v11.2) to ensure consistency between the physical stage of the two radiation transport codes. We compared energy deposition at the micrometric and nanometric scales for different ions (H 250 MeV, H 150 Me, He 250 MeV/n, C 290 MeV/n, O 350 MeV/n, O 55 MeV/n, Si 170MeV/n, Ti 300 MeV/n, Ti 300 MeV/n, Fe 600 MeV/n, Fe 450 MeV/n and Fe 300 MeV/n) with LET ranging from ~0.4 keV/μm up to 235 keV/μm. Excellent agreement is found for both microdosimetric and nanodosimetric spectra for all ion types and energies. The calculation of DNA breaks and their complexity with the Geant4-DNA is an ongoing work, and comparison with RITCARD will be presented based on result availability at the time of the conference. [1] Tang et al. (2019). Med. Phys., 46(3), 1501-1511. [2] Plante et al. (2008). NJP, 10(12), 125020. [3] Plante et al. (2019). Rad. Res., 192(3), 282-298. [4] Incerti et al. (2018). Med. Phys., 45(8), e722-e739.