Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Plateau”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Plateau–Rayleigh instability with a grain boundary twist

We demonstrate using theoretical, computational, and experimental studies a morphological instability, in which a polycrystalline nanorod breaks up at grain boundaries (GBs) into an array of isolated domains. Our theoretical model is used to establish a neutral stability surface demarcating stable and unstable perturbations. It is shown that GBs play a destabilizing role in which the critical wavelength for the instability decreases with the increase in the GB energy. We carry out phase field simulations, which reveal accelerated pinch-off kinetics with the increase in the GB energy and predict temporal evolution of interfacial profiles in quantitative agreement with experimental observations.

Hussein, Omar↗

Contrasting growth responses of Qilian juniper ( Sabina przewalskii ) and Qinghai spruce ( Picea crassifolia ) to CO2 fertilization despite common water-use efficiency increases at the northeastern Qinghai–Tibetan plateau

Abstract Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) may enhance tree growth and mitigate drought impacts through CO2 fertilization. However, multiple studies globally have found that rising CO2 has not translated into greater tree growth despite increases in intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE). The underlying mechanism discriminating between these two general responses to CO2 fertilization remains unclear. We used two species with contrasting stomatal regulation, the relatively anisohydric Qilian juniper (Sabina przewalskii) and the relatively isohydric Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia), to investigate the long-term tree growth and iWUE responses to climate change and elevated CO2 using tree ring widths and the associated cellulose stable carbon isotope ratios (δ13C). We observed a contrasting growth trend of juniper and spruce with juniper growth increasing while the spruce growth declined. The iWUE of both species increased significantly and with similar amplitude throughout the trees’ lifespan, though the relatively anisohydric juniper had higher iWUE than the relatively isohydric spruce throughout the period. Additionally, with rising CO2, the anisohydric juniper became less sensitive to drought, while the relatively isohydric spruce became more sensitive to drought. We hypothesized that rising CO2 benefits relatively anisohydric species more than relatively isohydric species due to greater opportunity to acquire carbon through photosynthesis despite warming and droughts. Our findings suggest the CO2 fertilization effect depends on the isohydric degree, which could be considered in future terrestrial ecosystem models.

Wang, Wenzhi↗

Composite Analysis for Low Level Waste Disposal in the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site (FY2019 Annual Status Report)

In accordance with DOE M 435.1-1 requirements and as implemented by DOE/RL-2000-29, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office has prepared this annual summary for fiscal year (FY) 2019. Originally reported in PNNL-11800 and PNNL-11800, Addendum 1, the Hanford Site Composite Analysis was approved through issuance of a 2002 memorandum. As required by DOE/RL-2000-29, an annual evaluation of new information and data developed by a number of onsite programs was completed. The reporting period for this annual evaluation is FY 2019 (October 1, 2018, through September 30, 2019). The information provided in this evaluation includes activities performed in FY 2019 that are considered pertinent to the Hanford Site Composite Analysis - information that could change source terms considered, and monitoring, research, and development results.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Composite Analysis for Low Level Waste Disposal in the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site (FY20 Annual Status Report)

In accordance with DOE M 435.1-1 requirements and as implemented by DOE/RL-2000-29, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office has prepared this annual summary for fiscal year (FY) 2020. Originally reported in PNNL-118003 and PNNL-11800, Addendum 1 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Hanford Site Composite Analysis), the Hanford Site Composite Analysis was approved through issuance of a 2002 memorandum. As required by DOE/RL-2000-29, an annual evaluation of new information and data developed by a number of onsite programs was completed. The reporting period for this annual evaluation is FY 2020 (October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Composite Analysis for Low Level Waste Disposal in the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site (Annual Status Report, FY 2021)

In accordance with DOE M 435.1-1 requirements and as implemented by DOE/RL-2000-29, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office has prepared this annual summary for fiscal year (FY) 2021. Originally reported in PNNL-11800 and PNNL-11800, Addendum 1 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Hanford Site Composite Analysis), the Hanford Site Composite Analysis was approved through issuance of a 2002 memorandum. As required by DOE/RL-2000-29, an annual evaluation of new information and data developed by a number of onsite programs was completed. The reporting period for this annual evaluation is FY 2021 (October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Composite Analysis for Low-Level Waste Disposal in the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site (Annual Status Report FY 2022)

In accordance with DOE M 435.1-1 requirements and as implemented by DOE/RL-2000-29, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office has prepared this annual summary for fiscal year (FY) 2022. Originally reported in PNNL-11800 and PNNL-11800, Addendum 1 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Hanford Site Composite Analysis), the Hanford Site Composite Analysis was approved through issuance of a 2002 memorandum.5 As required by DOE/RL-2000-29, an annual evaluation of new information and data developed by several onsite programs was completed. The reporting period for this annual evaluation is FY 2022 (October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Composite Analysis for Low-Level Waste Disposal in the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site (Annual Summary Report (FY 2023))

In accordance with DOE M 435.1-1 requirements and as implemented by DOE/RL-2000-29, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office has prepared this annual summary for fiscal year (FY) 2023 for maintenance of the Hanford Site Composite Analysis reported in DOE/RL-2019-52 (hereinafter referred to as the updated Hanford Site Composite Analysis). This is the first annual summary report to transition from maintenance of the initial Hanford Site Composite Analysis reported in PNNL-11800 and PNNL-11800, Addendum 1 to maintenance of the updated Hanford Site Composite Analysis following DOE approval of that update.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗