SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Sonic Boom”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS1990

An Euler code prediction of near field to midfield sonic boom pressure signatures

A new approach is presented for computing sonic boom pressure signatures in the near field to midfield that utilizes a fully three-dimensional Euler finite volume code capable of analyzing complex geometries. Both linear and nonlinear sonic boom methodologies exist but for the most part rely primarily on equivalent area distributions for the prediction of far field pressure signatures. This is due to the absence of a flexible nonlinear methodology that can predict near field pressure signatures generated by three-dimensional aircraft geometries. It is the intention of the present study to present a nonlinear Euler method than can fill this gap and supply the needed near field signature data for many of the existing sonic boom codes.

Siclari, M. J.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Status of sonic boom methodology and understanding

In January 1988, approximately 60 representatives of industry, academia, government, and the military gathered at NASA-Langley for a 2 day workshop on the state-of-the-art of sonic boom physics, methodology, and understanding. The purpose of the workshop was to assess the sonic boom area, to determine areas where additional sonic boom research is needed, and to establish some strategies and priorities in this sonic boom research. Attendees included many internationally recognized sonic boom experts who had been very active in the Supersonic Transport (SST) and Supersonic Cruise Aircraft Research Programs of the 60's and 70's. Summaries of the assessed state-of-the-art and the research needs in theory, minimization, atmospheric effects during propagation, and human response are given.

Darden, Christine M.↗

NASA NTRS2020

How Loud is X-59's Shaped Sonic Boom?

NASA’s X-59 Quiet SuperSonic Technology low boom flight demonstrator aircraft is designed to produce a shaped sonic boom or “sonic thump” of 75 dB Perceived Level (PL) at the ground. One communication challenge that NASA’s Low Boom Flight Demonstration Mission faces is how to describe the sonic thump to the public, most of whom have never heard a sonic thump or a sonic boom. Furthermore, the public is unfamiliar with the acoustic metrics such as PL used to describe impulsive sounds. One technique to describe unfamiliar sounds using words and graphics only is to put them in the context of more familiar sounds, both in terms of acoustical level and in terms of sound type (continuous vs. impulsive). In this work, a database of recordings of familiar impulsive noise sources at known distances and their associated PL values was assembled and is available online. The comparison of these sounds can be framed as a “thermometer” of acoustic levels. An example acoustic thermometer graphic is presented. Additionally, the impulsive sounds’ one-third octave band sound pressure levels and sone spectra are compared to that of a simulated X-59 ground waveform. These show the origin of differences in the PL of each sound.

sonic boom↗

NASA NTRS1992

Atmospheric effects on sonic boom: A program review

The program goals were determined after consideration of the weaknesses in our understanding of atmospheric effects on sonic boom waveforms left in the wake of the cancellation of the U.S. SST in the 70's and the advancements in acoustics and atmospheric science since that time. For example, a considerable body of knowledge on molecular absorption has built up in the acoustics community over the last 15 years and this has not been incorporated into the sonic boom theory. Further, it was felt that the understanding of atmospheric turbulence had also advanced considerably during that time period. Therefore, key elements of the current program are the development of an improved atmospheric absorption model and an improved atmospheric turbulence model. The advances made in computer power over the last 15 years were also considered, and will be utilized to remove restrictions on the analytical model for turbulence effects on sonic boom waveforms. Although the majority of disturbing sonic booms will not occur at focuses or caustics, it was felt that this was an area that required further understanding, thus it will be looked into. Finally, in order to insure that the current effort, which is basically analytical in nature, retains a firm grasp on reality, a data base of sonic boom waveforms and associated weather data is being compiled, and a set of scale model experiments is being planned to guide the overall efforts.

Mcaninch, Gerry L.↗

NASA NTRS1973

Application of sonic-boom minimization concepts in supersonic transport design

The applicability of sonic boom minimization concepts in the design of large supersonic transport airplanes capable of a 2500-nautical-mile range at a cruise Mach number of 2.7 is considered. Aerodynamics, weight and balance, and mission performance as well as sonic boom factors, have been taken into account. The results indicate that shock-strength nominal values of somewhat less than 48 newtons/sq m during cruise are within the realm of possibility. Because many of the design features are in direct contradiction to presently accepted design practices, further study of qualified airplane design teams is required to ascertain sonic boom shock strength levels actually attainable for practical supersonic transports.

Carlson, H. W.↗

NASA NTRS1980

Status of knowledge of sonic booms

The effects of primary and secondary sonic boom carpets are reviewed with reference to waveform characteristics and audibility, role of the atmosphere, source characteristics, carpet measurements and predictions, effects of aircraft maneuvers, and sonic boom minimization. It is shown that primary booms which involve only propagation in the lower atmosphere are well predicted by means of current methods and are amendable to minimization.

Maglieri, D. J.↗

NASA NTRS1991

Design methodology for a community response questionnaire on sonic boom exposure

A preliminary draft questionnaire concerning community response to sonic booms was developed. Interviews were conducted in two communities that had experienced supersonic overflights of the SR-71 airplane for several years. Even though the overflights had ceased about 6 months prior to the interviews, people clearly remembered hearing sonic booms. A total of 22 people living in central Utah and 23 people living along Idaho/Washington state border took part in these interviews. The draft questionnaire was constantly modified during the study in order to evaluate different versions. Questions were developed which related to annoyance, startle, sleep disturbance, building vibration, and building damage. Based on the data collected, a proposed community response survey response instrument was developed for application in a full-scale sonic boom study.

Farbry, John E., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS1992

Sonic boom prediction and minimization using computational fluid dynamics

This paper describes the NASA ARC program in sonic boom prediction methodologies. This activity supports NASA's High Speed Research Program (HSRP). An overview of the program, recent results, conclusions, and current effort will be given. This effort complements research in sonic boom acceptability and validation being conducted at LaRC and ARC. The goals of the sonic boom element are as follows: to establish a predictive capability for sonic booms generated by High-Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) concepts; to establish guidelines of acceptability for supersonic overland flight; and to validate these findings with wind tunnel and flight tests. The cumulative result of these efforts will be an assessment of economic viability for supersonic transportation. This determination will ultimately be made by the aerospace industry.

Edwards, Thomas A.↗

NASA NTRS1968

Briefing on Sonic Boom and Aircraft Noise

This document is a presentation for a NAS-NRC committee on the SuperSonic Transport (SST) sonic boom. It consists of copies of the slides presented during the briefing. The topics covered in reference to Sonic Booms are: the result of sonic boom results on generation and propagation, the atmospheric effects, flight research and laboratory research and prediction theory developments, the structural responses, seismic responses and simulation and human factors from the recent research on the effects of sonic booms, Domestic SST, and evaluation of certain minimum boom concepts from advanced configuration studies. The topics covered in the aircraft noise section are studies on compressor noise reduction, acoustic treatment of nacelle ducts, some technical problems of airplane certification and studies relating to subjective responses.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1994

Experimental studies of loudness and annoyance response to sonic booms

The purpose of this paper is to summarize the most recent sonic boom laboratory studies performed at NASA-LaRC using the Sonic Boom Simulator. The first used synthesized idealized outdoor boom shapes which were filtered to represent booms heard inside a house. The test explored the efficacy of various metrics in assessing both loudness and annoyance responses to these booms. The second test investigated the effects of adding single reflections to idealized boom signatures, and the third compared booms recorded from real aircraft with idealized boom signatures to determine if subjects rated the real booms differently. In these studies, as in previous studies performed at NASA-LaRC, there was a continuing effort to evaluate metrics for predicting the subjective effects of sonic booms.

Sullivan, Brenda M.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Sonic boom generation propagation and minimization.

Consideration of the possibility of reducing sonic boom noise to a level acceptable in populated areas. A detailed study is made of the possibility of predicting sonic boom generation, taking into account the effect of atmospheric conditions, air turbulence, and the effect of the shape and condition of the ground where people are located. The relation between the shape of the sonic boom signature on the ground and the aircraft shape is shown to be an important factor governing the use of supersonic aircraft over populated areas.

Ferri, A.↗

NASA NTRS2022

An Adaptation of ISO 11204 using Customized Correction Grades to Mitigate Ambient Noise Effects when Computing Sonic Boom Loudness Levels

A spectral-based correction adapted from ISO 11204 [1] is investigated here to mitigate the effects of ambient noise contamination of sonic booms recorded by noise monitors during field tests. The algorithm from sections 5.4.2 and 7 of ISO 11204 is customized using six nonstandard correction grades in addition to implementing the two standardized grades described in ISO 11204. The six nonstandard grades allow for more aggressive correction of the levels of the sonic boom spectrum when they are proximate to the ambient spectrum. Of the eight correction grades, the most aggressive custom correction grade, termed “Custom F” here, performed best under the conditions that were studied. Consequently, “Custom F” is recommended for use when processing in-field recordings of X-59 sonic booms. To evaluate the eight correction grades, mock X-59 acoustic recordings were generated using predicted ground-level X-59 sonic booms. These ground-level waveforms were created by Doebler [2] by propagating nearfield CFD solutions of the X-59 C612A configuration to the ground using PCBoom [3] (please see Acknowledgements and Refs. [4, 5, 2, 6]). To generate the mock acoustic recordings from those ground-level waveforms, they were further modified using turbulence filters developed during the NASA SonicBAT effort [7], post boom noise audio clips from the NASA SonicBAT tests [7], and ambient noise from the NASA QSF18 test [8, 9]. These mock acoustic recordings enabled evaluation of the ambient noise mitigation methods since the proper loudness levels of the X-59 waveforms in absence of ambient noise are known. Specifically, these known levels provide a benchmark against which the corrected loudness levels are compared, where the corrected loudness levels are computed when ambient noise is present within the waveforms. Importantly, similar analyses using in-field recordings are not possible since the proper loudness levels of the sonic boom waveforms in absence of ambient noise are unknowable when analyzing in-field recordings. Consequently, if additional analyses of ambient noise mitigation methods are needed, then use of mock recordings like those used here is recommended.

Sonic boom↗

NASA NTRS1992

Subjective loudness response to simulated sonic booms

A series of laboratory studies were conducted at LaRC to: (1) quantify the effects of sonic boom signature shaping on subjective loudness; (2) evaluate candidate loudness metrics; (3) quantify the effects of signature asymmetry on loudness; and (4) document sonic boom acceptability within the laboratory. A total of 212 test subjects evaluated a wide range of signatures using the NASA Langley Research Center's sonic boom simulator. Results indicated that signature shaping via front-shock minimization was particularly effective in reducing subjective loudness without requiring reductions in peak overpressure. Metric evaluations showed that A-weighted sound exposure level, Perceived Level (Stevens Mark 7), and Zwicker's Loudness level were effective descriptors of the loudness of symmetrical shaped signatures. The asymmetrical signatures were generally rated as being quieter than symmetrical signatures of equal calculated metric level. The magnitude of the loudness reductions were observed to increase as the degree of asymmetry increased and to be greatest when the rear half of the signature was loudest. This effect was not accounted for by the loudness metrics. Sonic boom acceptability criteria were determined within the laboratory. These agreed well with results previously obtained in more realistic situations.

Leatherwood, Jack D.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nonnormality of Sonic Boom Loudness Metrics in the Turbulent Atmospheric Boundary Layer at Large Lateral Distances from the Flight Path

Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) turbulence causes variability of the sonic boom waveform at the ground. Recent numerical investigations of sonic boom propagation through kinematic velocity fluctuations indicate that loudness metric distributions are positively skewed relative to a normal distribution. This skewness depends on the propagation distance and turbulence intensity. Propagation simulations of N-waves and shaped booms through inhomogeneous ABL turbulence are presented. Meteorological conditions are varied to examine different daytime ABL conditions and their effect on sonic boom loudness distributions. Two outcomes are observed: 1) the loudness metric distributions become increasingly positively skewed as the propagation distance through the ABL increases, and 2) the distributions become increasingly positively skewed at the same lateral distance from the flight path as the convection level of the daytime ABL is increased. Thus, results indicate that ground level measurements of sonic boom loudness from flight tests performed at large lateral distances from the flight path may not be normally distributed, due to turbulence present in the ABL. (This research is supported by the Commercial Supersonic Technology Project of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. 80NSSC19K1685.)

sonic boom↗

NASA NTRS1999

1995 NASA High-Speed Research Program Sonic Boom Workshop: Configuration Design, Analysis, and Testing - Volume 2

The High-Speed Research Program and NASA Langley Research Center sponsored the NASA High-Speed Research Program Sonic Boom Workshop on September 12-13, 1995. The workshop was designed to bring together NASAs scientists and engineers and their counterparts in industry, other Government agencies, and academia working together in the sonic boom element of NASAs High-Speed Research Program. Specific objectives of this workshop were to: (1) report the progress and status of research in sonic boom propagation, acceptability, and design; (2) promote and disseminate this technology within the appropriate technical communities; (3) help promote synergy among the scientists working in the Program; and (4) identify technology pacing, the development C, of viable reduced-boom High-Speed Civil Transport concepts. The Workshop was organized in four sessions: Sessions 1 Sonic Boom Propagation (Theoretical); Session 2 Sonic Boom Propagation (Experimental); Session 3 Acceptability Studies-Human and Animal; and Session 4 - Configuration Design, Analysis, and Testing.

High-speed research↗

NASA NTRS1991

A study of loudness as a metric for sonic boom acceptability

A parametric study of loudness levels with respect to weight, altitude, and Mach number for sonic boom signatures generated by two Mach 2.0 conceptual configurations is presented and compared with a similar study for nose shock overpressure. This paper discusses the relative importance of the two sonic boom metrics and the implications of the trends shown. Of the two configurations considered in this study, one was designed for optimum aerodynamic performance and the second was designed to produce a constrained overpressure sonic boom signature at cruise flight conditions. Results indicate that reductions in both loudness and overpressure level are possible when the configuration is shaped to produce a low boom signature. Results also prove that the loudness metric is a more reliable measure of the disturbance due to sonic booms than nose shock overpressure, because the overpressure does not include the sometimes significant effects of embedded shocks which are often present in mid-field low boom signatures.

Needleman, Kathy E.↗

NASA NTRS1973

Research of the sonic-boom problem

Wind tunnel tests were conducted to determine the characteristics of sonic booms. A theoretical examination of nonlinear effects in near and far flow fields, as well as sonic boom shock strength, is reported. A study of the Mach lines and bicharacteristics in three dimensional flow was pursued. The direction derivatives if the bicharacteristics were calculated in a general three dimensional flow field. A second order theory for supersonic flow past slender bodies was developed. Formulas relating flow deflections to the Whitham F-function were derived, which permitted determination of the sonic boom strength from wind tunnel measurements fairly close to the body.

Drougge, G.↗

NASA NTRS1999

Sonic Boom Prediction Exercise: Experimental Comparisons

The success of a future High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) depends on the ability to accurately assess and, possibly, modify the sonic boom signatures of potential designs. In 1992, the Sonic Boom Steering Committee initiated a prediction exercise to assess the current computational capabilities for the accurate and efficient prediction of sonic boom signatures and loudness levels. A progress report of this effort was given at the Sonic Boom Workshop held at NASA Ames Research Center in 1993 where predictions from CFD and Modified Linear Theory (MLT) methods were given. Comparisons between the methods were made at near-, mid- and far-field locations. However, at that time, experimental data from wind-tunnel tests were not available. The current paper presents a comparison of computational results with the now available experimental data. Further comparisons between the computational methods and analyses of the discrepancies in the results are presented.

Tu, Eugene↗