Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “TECHNICAL DETAILS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Execution of Targeted Experiments to Inform BISON for ATF Materials: An Advanced Approach to Tube Burst Testing

This report describes a new, advanced experimental approach for testing tube specimens loaded by internal pressure. The approach allows conventional tube burst testing to be performed and employs digital image recording and analysis for conducting noncontact optic strain measurements. Section 1 provides a brief introduction and motivation for the project. Section 2 describes the selected approach and provides technical details regarding the modified experimental tube burst system: a commercial infrared furnace redesigned to support this work by adding two 50-mm- diameter optic ports to make the specimen visible during the burst tests, and a digital camera used to record specimen images, lens, and optic filters. Section 3 briefly analyzes a typical burst test and the digital image correlation dataset, recorded during the experiment, and discusses the experiment outcome including local strains along the tube specimen. Additionally, section 3 focuses on the issues influencing the in situ strain measurement accuracy and final results and suggests changes in the experimental scheme to improve data quality and reliability. The conclusion summarizes the work performed to date and discusses possible future activity.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Improving Fission Products at CARIBU: Near Field Detection (Q3/FY19 Quarterly Progress Report)

In the last quarter, Miguel Bencomo joined our group as a postdoc. Miguel got his PhD degree from Texas A&M University last December, where he was working on precision beta decay measurements, using techniques similar to the approach we use to measure branching ratios. We have been training him on how to use our analysis and simulation tools, as well as bringing him up to speed on the technical details of our experiment. The analysis and writing the manuscript for 95 Zr has been completed and are waiting for a feedback from Texas A&M collaborators. This process has been slightly delayed due to vacations and their obligations to other experiments at Texas A&M. We have begun working with Benjamin Schroeder (PhD student from Texas A&M), he is currently learning our analysis tools and looking at decay data of 95 Zr. Ben has just finalized his Master thesis and is very well positioned to start working with us, by first learning our analysis technique on 95 Zr proof-of-principle data, and next be responsible for analysis 156 Eu data that we plan to take later this year.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Advanced Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Circuit Simulation (Final Report LDRD 2016-0845)

This report summarizes the methods and algorithms that were developed on the Sandia National Laboratory LDRD project entitled "Advanced Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Circuit Simulation", which was project # 173331 and proposal # 2016-0845. As much of our work has been published in other reports and publications, this report gives an brief summary. Those who are interested in the technical details are encouraged to read the full published results and also contact the report authors for the status of follow-on projects.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Exploring Advanced Embedded Uncertainty Quantification methods in Xyce

This report summarizes the methods and algorithms that were developed on the Sandia National Laboratory LDRD project entitled "Polynomial Chaos methods in Xyce for Embedded Uncertainty Quantification in Circuit Analysis", which was project 200265 and proposal 2019-0817. As much of our work has been published in other reports and publications, this report gives a brief summary. Those who are interested in the technical details are encouraged to read the full published results and also contact the report authors for the status of follow-on projects.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Crystal Chemistry of Toxic Metal Sequestration in Rock-Forming Minerals (Final Report)

This document is a narrative describing research and publications enabled by 25 years of Department of Energy funding under grant DE-FG02-89ER14074. This narrative is intended to be readable by scientifically literate members of the public and our federal government. Technical details of this research are described fully in the publications cited at the end. If all of this work can be boiled down to a single question, it would be this: Can common minerals in soil and rock absorb and stop toxic and radioactive metals in groundwater? The simplistic answer is Yes, but the question and its many implications are far too complicated to answer with a single word. Although my colleagues and I have completed this research, the many new questions raised by the project should provide fertile soil for researchers of a new generation.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2019

Integrated Solutions for Optimized Performance (ISOP) Final Technical Report

The goal of this project was to demonstrate technical feasibility of an integrated approach for deep energy retrofits by packaging innovative technologies with smart communicating controls that represent the next generation of energy efficiency. The integrated solutions for optimized performance (ISOP) package integrates (i) advanced lighting and plug load controls; (ii) intelligent daylight harvesting through automated self-powered shades and window films; (iii) advanced HVAC controls sequences (ASHRAE Guideline (GDL) 36); and (iv) fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) and continuous commissioning (CCx) using advanced analytics. These technologies address energy use across multiple building end uses that represent more than 60% of the energy consumption in all commercial buildings. The project was structured to be implemented over three budget periods: Budget Period 1 scope included site selection, project design, site-specific customization of technology packages, procurement of technologies, initiation of installation of technologies, the development of a measurement and verification plan and collection of pre-retrofit data collection. The first year go/no-go decision was based on securing host sites representing 250,000 sq. ft. of occupied operational spaces, savings analysis, technology procurement and initiation of installation. Budget Period 2 planned to complete technology installations and initiate data collection of post-retrofit performance data. The second year go/no-go was to be the completion of technology installations and commissioning, metering and data collecting to support the requirements laid out in site specific M&V plans. Budget Period 3 planned to collect and analyze post-retrofit performance data and provide data and reporting to support energy efficiency rebate programs. After the team completed activities planned for Budget Period 1, the team reached a Go/No-Go Decision Point. At that point, TRC recommended that DOE discontinue the project without prejudice due to challenges with securing demonstration sites to meet the full 250,000 sf of occupied operational spaces and DOE concurred. In Budget Period 1, the TRC team developed criteria to recruit and evaluate potential demonstration host sites. TRC worked with Princeton University, the project demonstration partner, to identify buildings on their campus as potential candidates for the demonstration. Following the selection of demonstration sites, the TRC team customized energy technology packages according to the needs and characteristics of each site. TRC defined technology specifications, identified vendors, and conducted analysis to estimate energy and cost savings potential. The project team then developed schedules for technology procurement processes and scheduled for installation at all selected demonstration sites. The project team worked with Princeton University and DOE to develop an approach to verify energy savings achieved through measurement and verification (M&V) 2.0 methods. Princeton University initiated open bids to procure the necessary materials and installation contractors. Bid results came back higher than estimates due to a couple of factors – lack of familiarity of the bidders with the proposed technologies and lack of local trained installers to execute the installation of these new measures. Due to the higher bids, projects no longer met the internal cost-effectiveness criteria used by Princeton to proceed with procurement of the full suite of technologies as proposed in ISOP. Princeton had already procured parts of the ISOP package as part of a campus-wide initiative for FDD and lighting retrofits, but with the higher costs for other ISOP components, Princeton could no longer commit to the full ISOP package on the selected sites. Based on this, the team reached the Go/No-Go decision point, where they decided not to proceed with the project. Princeton is separately installing portions of the ISOP package where they individually meet Princeton’s payback criteria but on a different schedule than would have been needed for the DOE ISOP project. The team has learned several lessons from project progress in the first budget period. The team will utilize these lessons in future projects, as should any team which proceeds with a project around the ISOP technology. The first lesson is that more information about the proposed sites is required earlier in the process (perhaps even at the proposal stage) in order to have a successful demonstration. Technical details not evident earlier in the process (such as the TLED limitations for ALCS) can derail project execution. The second lesson is that pricing of emerging technologies is highly variable due to lack of familiarity of local installers and distributor with the proposed technologies as well as alternate bids using products they were more familiar with, but that cost more than the ones proposed by TRC. Finally, the last major lesson is that the host site’s internal project criteria is of critical importance. Based on these higher installed costs and lack of an informed installer base for the products proposed for this project, the project does not meet Princeton’s simple payback goals of five years.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2019

Preparation for the Beam Energy Scan II at RHIC in 2020

RHIC will provide Au-Au collisions at beam energies of 5.75, 4.59 GeV/nucleon for physics program in 2020, and at beam energy of 3.85 GeV/nucleon for physics program in 2021 as part of the BeamEnergy Scan II (BES-II). The oper- ational experience gained in the first year (2019) of BES-II operation will be applied toward operations in the coming years. This article will present some technical details and the outlook of the BES-II operations in the coming years.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Performance Assessments of Demand Flexibility from Grid-Interactive Efficient Buildings: Issues and Considerations

This SEE Action Network report explains basic concepts and fundamental considerations for assessing the actual demand flexibility performance of buildings participating in demand flexibility programs and responding to time-varying retail rates. Demand flexibility is the capability of distributed energy resources (DERs) to adjust a building’s load profile across different timescales. Assessments determine the timing, location, quantity, and quality of grid services provided. The results can be used for financial settlements and to improve performance of demand flexibility, support its consideration in resource potential studies and electricity system planning, and contribute to cost-effectiveness evaluations. While practitioners and regulators regularly find opportunities to improve performance assessments of demand-related services, to a large degree current best practices are sufficient for basic service offerings as demand flexibility is implemented today. However, advances in assessment practices will be required in a future with grid-interactive efficient buildings (GEBs) that provide continuous demand flexibility by integrating multiple DERs and flexibility modes (load shed, load shift, modulate, and generate). Example practices include using new baseline constructs—including whether baselines are even required for certain building flexibility modes or configurations, deploying more advanced metering and analytics, further developing cybersecurity standards, improving communication standards for increased interoperability, and establishing performance metrics and assessment procedures for load modulation as it is more fully defined and implemented. This report provides information on prioritizing and designing performance assessment elements for demand flexibility programs and time-varying retail rates, assessment protocols, and research and development needs. Additional research sponsored by DOE’s Building Technologies Office offers more detailed technical information on assessing performance of demand flexibility, including definition of performance metrics.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
DOE OSTI2020

A Handbook for Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Successful Electric Utility Pilots

Since at least the late 1970s, electric utilities and their regulators have recognized the value of experimentation to motivate innovation. The industry has a long history of using pilots to help inform future decision making about electric utility rates, customer technology adoption and integration, and even changes to the utility’s regulatory or business model. Although utility pilots have become almost ubiquitous proving grounds for new rates, technologies, and alterations to the traditional utility regulatory and business model, some regulators are beginning to raise questions about what constitutes a “good” pilot. Much has been written about utility pilots over the years; however, what is missing from the literature is the identification of a comprehensive process for not only designing and evaluating a pilot, but also implementing, successful utility pilots that provide actionable outcomes upon which more informed decisions can be made. This report provides a step-by-step process that regulators, policymakers, and utilities can follow to help promote a more successful pilot, even if whatever is being tested fails to produce the intended or expected result(s). It is worth noting that this report is not intended to serve as a technical resource for those designing, implementing, and evaluating pilots. However, there are myriad references provided for those wishing to delve deeper into the technical details.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
DOE OSTI2020

2019 Site Environmental Report (Volume 1)

Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) is managed on behalf of the Department of Energy (DOE) by Brookhaven Science Associates (BSA), a partnership between the Research Foundation for the State University of New York on behalf of Stony Brook University and Battelle. For over 70 years, the Laboratory has played a lead role in the DOE Science and Technology mission and continues to contribute to the DOE’s missions in energy resources, environmental quality, and national security. BNL manages its world-class scientific research with particular sensitivity to environmental issues and community concerns. The Laboratory’s Environmental, Safety, Security, and Health (ESSH) Policy reflects the commitment of BNL’s management to fully integrate environmental stewardship into all facets of its mission and operations. BNL prepares an annual Site Environmental Report (SER) in accordance with DOE Order 231.1B, Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting. The report is written to inform the public, regulators, employees, and other stakeholders of the Laboratory’s environmental performance during the calendar year in review. Volume I of the SER summarizes environmental data; environmental management performance; compliance with applicable DOE, federal, state, and local regulations; and performance in restoration and surveillance monitoring programs. BNL has prepared annual SERs since 1971 and has documented nearly all its environmental history since the Laboratory’s inception in 1947. Volume II of the SER, the Groundwater Status Report, is also prepared annually to report on the status of groundwater protection and restoration efforts. Volume II includes detailed technical summaries of groundwater data and treatment system operations and is intended for regulators and other technically oriented stakeholders. A summary of the information contained in Volume II is included in Chapter 7, Groundwater Protection, of this volume.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Improving Fission Products at CARIBU: Near Field Detection (Q2/FY21 Quarterly Progress Report)

The 95 Zr manuscript describing our experimental approach to measure branching ratios of long-lived fission products has been completed and successfully published in NIM A. This article is an important milestone in this effort and will serve as a great reference in any future reports describing results of other measurements we plan to perform. We have also expended our team, and Daniel Hoff joined us as a postdoc. We have been training him on how to use our analysis and simulation tools, as well as bringing him up to speed on the technical details of our experiment.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

A White Paper on Design and Fabrication of SRF Deflecting Cavities for Elletra-2

Synchrotron Trieste (ST) operates an X-ray light source Elettra and plans to upgrade it to a low-emittance high-brightness X-ray source Elettra-2.0 based on a multi-bend achromat lattice. There is also a significant interest among Elettra users to pursue time-resolved studies of matter choosing the appropriate X-ray pulse duration in the range from 20 picoseconds to a few picoseconds FWHM. Recently, X. Huang (SLAC) and A. Zholents (ANL) performed a study sponsored by ST and proposed modifications to the Elettra-2.0 design that will allow production of picosecond x-ray pulses on many beamlines. They showed that two radio frequency deflecting cavities with slightly different frequencies can be installed in the ring’s sector 8 and produce time-dependent orbit deflection to a few dedicated electron bunches without affecting other regular bunches. These special bunches produce X-ray pulses in which transverse position or angle, or both, are correlated with time. The short X-ray pulse is then obtained by using a narrow slit positioned downstream in the beamline. Many technical details of the proposed modification to Elettra-2.0 are discussed in the supplemental report. We present here the design of a multicell superconducting deflecting cavity for the purpose of the ST Short Pulse X-ray (SPX) project.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

HYSPLIT/MACCS Atmospheric Dispersion Model Technical Documentation and Benchmark Analysis

The nuclear accident consequence analysis code MACCS has traditionally modeled dispersion during downwind transport using a Gaussian plume segment model. MACCS is designed to estimate consequence measures such as air concentrations and ground depositions, radiological doses, and health and economic impacts on a statistical basis over the course of a year to produce annualaveraged output measures. The objective of this work is to supplement the Gaussian atmospheric transport and diffusion (ATD) model currently in MACCS with a new option using the HYSPLIT model. HYSPLIT/MACCS coupling has been implemented, with HYSPLIT as an alternative ATD option. The subsequent calculations in MACCS use the HYSPLIT-generated air concentration, and ground deposition values to calculate the same range of output quantities (dose, health effects, risks, etc.) that can be generated when using the MACCS Gaussian ATD model. Based on the results from the verification test cases, the implementation of the HYSPLIT/MACCS coupling is confirmed. This report contains technical details of the HYSPLIT/MACCS coupling and presents a benchmark analysis using the HYSPLIT/MACCS coupling system. The benchmark analysis, which involves running specific scenarios and sensitivity studies designed to examine how the results generated by the traditional MACCS Gaussian plume segment model compare to the new, higher fidelity HYSPLIT/MACCS modeling option, demonstrates the modeling results that can be obtained by using this new option. The comparisons provided herein can also help decision-makers evaluate the potential benefit of using results based on higher fidelity modeling with the additional computational burden needed to perform the calculations. Three sensitivity studies to investigate the potential impact of alternative modeling options, regarding 1) input meteorological data set, 2) method to estimate stability class, and 3) plume dispersion model for larger distances, on consequence results were also performed. The results of these analyses are provided and discussed in this report.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

A Methodological Overview of Seismic Analysis for Nuclear Event Detection

Underground explosions generate potentially detectable signatures, including energy waves that travel through the Earth’s subsurface (i.e., seismic waves), low-frequency sound waves (i.e., infrasound and hydroacoustic waves), and radioactive gases and/or particles that might leak from the test cavity (if the event was nuclear). There can also be intelligence indicators of a test, such as observations of modified patterns of life and activity at a suspected test site. If all of these detectable signatures and intelligence indicators are present and self-consistent, then analysts have high confidence in classifying a signature generating event as an explosion. However, because only partial information about an event is likely to be available, determining whether an event was natural (e.g., an earthquake or landslide) or manmade (e.g., a chemical or nuclear explosion) is much more challenging. This primer describes how one category of event signatures—seismic signatures—can augment event analyses. While universities and government organizations have generated detailed technical descriptions of seismic analytic techniques, we seek to translate seismic event analysis for a broad, non-technical audience. When the geologic conditions near an event are well-characterized, seismic data can be used to calculate critical information, such as event location and depth, with relatively high accuracy. Moreover, specific features within seismic datasets can help determine whether an event was an explosion. However, a key challenge in seismic analysis is that geologic site conditions are often poorly characterized, complicating the ability to discern the true nature of the event. To overcome this challenge, geologists answer a series of questions (discussed in section 1) to guide seismic event analysis and determine the most probable nature of an event. As more information is gathered during each analytic step, confidence grows regarding the nature of the event. Section 2 addresses uncertainties in seismic analysis and the vital nature of high-fidelity geologic data for accurate seismic event analysis.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Nuclear Energy in Long-Term System Models: A Multi-Model Perspective

Long-term energy system models–including electric sector capacity expansion models–are widely used tools for informing planning, technology assessment, and policy analysis. Recent decarbonization goals and rapid technological change have increased the need to appropriately represent economic characteristics and technical details of energy system resources, including variable renewable energy, energy storage technologies, carbon-capture-equipped capacity, and nuclear energy. Nuclear power represents about 20% of electricity generation and 50% of carbon-free electricity in the United States as of 2021. However, there are many perspectives on the role of existing and new nuclear in the future U.S. energy system, which is reflected in the broad range of potential contributions reported in the literature. This project aims to understand how issues central to nuclear energy are represented in long-term energy models. Building on earlier collaborations that focused on variable renewable energy and energy storage, this project convenes four modeling teams that use national-scale long-term energy system models from the Electric Power Research Institute, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the U.S. Energy Information Administration, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to share methods and data, update models, run coordinated scenarios, and identify research needs. Improving tools can provide more insightful analyses and ensure that methods are more transparent.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Enhancing Local Grid Resilience with Small Hydropower Hybrids: Proving the concept through demonstration, simulation, and analysis with Idaho Falls Power

Large hydropower, connected to the transmission system and typically possessing significant ability to balance grid frequency, has long been central to black start plans in regions where it is present. Small hydropower possesses most of the attributes required for black start but is often connected to distribution or sub-transmission systems and has less ability to balance grid frequency. Integrating energy storage such as batteries or ultracapacitors increases the combined asset’s ability to balance frequency. This asset integration enables a bottom-up grid restoration paradigm in which critical electric loads on the local distribution system can be powered even when the regional transmission system is down. This report presents a field demonstration conducted with Idaho Falls Power that proved this concept. The contribution of energy storage in restoring the small hydro-dominated distribution grid and its operational sensitivity across different control settings are further analyzed using high-fidelity simulations. Readers will learn about technical details on the field demonstration setup, energy storage contribution to black start, detailed simulation steps of islanded distribution grid restoration, and usage of field demonstration measurements for transient model refinements. Collectively this report points to a great opportunity for small hydropower to enhance resilience of local electric grids.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Second Target Station (STS) Project: Centaur (Technical Report)

CENTAUR will be the flagship general purpose small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) instrument for the Second Target Station of SNS. Based on an optimized and high-performance SANS instrument, it is capable of SANS/wide-angle neutron scattering and diffraction simultaneously filling the capability gap to cover structure scale from atomic scale to hundreds of nanometers for scientific needs ranging from polymers, biology, materials sciences, and quantum condensed matter. Additionally, with a high-speed chopper, it can be used as a direct geometry spectrometer to probe the dynamics in relatively large length-scale structures as an inelastic SANS spectrometer. The technical details of the CENTAUR instrument are presented in this document. As the project progresses, the initial details are subject to change based on feedback.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗