Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “TRANSONIC FLUTTER”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1986

Unsteady hybrid vortex technique for transonic vortex flows and flutter applications

The well developed surface panel method is extended by adding a volume integral term allowing calculation of the full effect of compressibility. The full effect of compressibility is calculated by using mixed type finite difference scheme consistent with the mixed nature of transonic flow. The solution is obtained through successive iteration cycles for subcritical flows and for critical flows the solution is obtained through satisfying the Rankine-Hugoniot relations across the captured shock in addition to the captured shock. The method is applied to airfoils in subcritical and critical flows and the results are in good agreement with the experimental data and finite-difference solutions of the full-potential and Euler equations.

Kandil, Osama A.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Transonic aeroelasticity of wings with active control surfaces

Transonic aeroelasticity of wings with active control surfaces is studied by using the unsteady-small disturbance transonic aerodynamic equations coupled with modal structural equations of motion. The aerodynamic and structural equations of motion are simultaneously integrated by a time-accurate numerical scheme. A procedure of synthesizing active controls with unsteady transonics is presented. Flutter suppression in the transonic regime using active controls is demonstrated for a rectangular wing. Characteristics of a selected control law in the transonic regime are studied. The results from this study are useful in the design of active control systems in the transonic regime.

Guruswamy, Guru P.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Application of the CAP-TSD unsteady transonic small disturbance program to wing flutter

The application and assessment of a computer program called CAP-TSD (Computational Aeroelasticity Program - Transonic Small Disturbance) for flutter predictions are described. Flutter calculations are presented for two thin swept-and-tapered wing planforms with well-defined modal properties. One planform is a series of 45-degree swept wings and the other planform is a clipped delta wing. Comparisons are made between the results of CAP-TSD using the linear equation and no airfoil thickness and the results obtained from a subsonic kernel function analysis. The calculations cover a Mach number range from low subsonic to low supersonic values, including the transonic range, and are compared with subsonic linear theory and experimental data. It is noted that since both wings have very thin airfoil sections, the effects of thickness are minimal.

Bennett, Robert M.↗
NASA NTRS1993

High accuracy computation of fluid-structure interaction in transonic cascades

A coupling strategy for simulating fluid-structure interaction phenomena is formulated and applied to the prediction of flutter in transonic cascades. The flow is governed by the Euler equations and discretized using a finite volume flux-splitting scheme. The structure is modeled using an isoparametric finite element formulation. The coupling strategy successfully reconciles these two formulations at the fluid-structure interface by enforcing both kinematic and kinetic boundary conditions. In particular, the conservation laws applicable to the combined fluid-structure system are preserved across the interface. Since the primary mechanism driving aeroelastic phenomena involves energy exchange occurring at the interface, this highly accurate coupling mechanism is believed to improve the predictive capability of the scheme. The coupled equations are advanced simultaneously in time using an implicit time integration method. Results obtained using the coupling method are presented for cascade geometries operating in transonic flow.

Boschitsch, Alexander↗
NASA NTRS1989

Flutter of a Low-Aspect-Ratio Rectangular Wing

A flutter test of a low-aspect-ratio rectangular wing was conducted in the Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT). The model used in this flutter test consisted of a rigid wing mounted to the wind-tunnel wall by a flexible, rectangular beam. The flexible support shaft was connected to the wing root and was cantilever mounted to the wind-tunnel wall. The wing had an aspect ratio of 1.5 based on the wing semispan and an NACA 64A010 airfoil shape. The flutter boundary of the model was determined for a Mach number range of 0.5 to 0.97. The shape of the transonic flutter boundary was determined. Actual flutter points were obtained on both the subsonic and supersonic sides of the flutter bucket. The model exhibited a deep transonic flutter bucket over a narrow range of Mach number. At some Mach numbers, the flutter conditions were extrapolated using a subcritical response technique. In addition to the basic configuration, modifications were made to the model structure such that the first bending frequency was changed without significantly affecting the first torsion frequency. The experiment showed that increasing the bending stiffness of the model support shaft through these modifications lowered the flutter dynamic pressure. Flutter analysis was conducted for the basic model as a comparison with the experimental results. This flutter analysis was conducted with subsonic lifting-surface (kernel function) aerodynamics using the k method for the flutter solution.

Cole, Stanley R.↗
NASA NTRS1959

Experimental Investigation of Flutter of Buckled Curved Panels Having Longitudinal Stringers at Transonic and Supersonic Speeds

Panel-flutter tests have been made at transonic and supersonic speeds With particular reference to buckled curved panels with longitudinal stringers. Other panel configurations were also tested in an attempt to determine effects of skin thickness, curvature, stringers, buckling, pressure differential, and Mach number on the dynamic pressure necessary to start flutter. For buckled curved panels with longitudinal stringers, the dynamic pressure required to start flutter was increased by increasing the skin thickness and increasing the pressure differential across the panel. There was no apparent effect of Mach number variation from 1.3 to 2.0. None of the curved panels failed because of flutter although the dynamic pressure at the start of flutter was exceeded by a factor of 3 in many cases. curved panels and four flat panels failed because of flutter. The flat panels fluttered at lower dynamic pressures than the curved panels and four flat panels failed because of flutter.

Tuovila, W. J.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Unsteady transonic small-disturbance theory including entropy and vorticity effects

Modifications to unsteady transonic small disturbance theory to include entropy and vorticity effects are presented. The modifications were implemented in the CAP-TSD (Computational Aeroelasticity Program - Transonic Small Disturbance) code. The code permits the aeroelastic analysis of complete aircraft configurations in the flutter critical transonic speed range. Entropy and vorticity effects were incorporated within the solution procedure to more accurately analyze flows with strong shock waves. The modified code includes these effects while retaining the relative simplicity and cost efficiency of the TSD formulation. Detailed descriptions are presented of the entropy and vorticity modifications along with calculated results and comparisons which assess the modified theory. These results are in good agreement with parallel Euler calculations and with experimental data. Therefore, the present method now provides the aeroelastician with an affordable capability to analyze relatively difficult transonic flows without having to solve the computationally more expensive Euler equations.

Batina, John T.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transonic Correction to Theodorsen's Theory for Oscillating Airfoil in Pitch and Plunge Toward Flutter

This paper presents a transonic correction method for an oscillating airfoil in pitch and plunge. The proposed method applies correction functions to the Theodorsen’s theory to capture the transonic nonlinear aero- dynamics. These correction functions apply necessary corrections to the amplitudes and the phase angles of the unsteady lift and pitching moment coefficients to account for transonic aerodynamics. The proposed method also postulates a correction for the motion of the aerodynamic center which could be induced by moving shocks. A series of unsteady RANS CFD simulations of the airfoil at the mean aerodynamic chord of the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing aircraft are conducted using FUN3D to provide data to construct these transonic correction functions. The computed responses of the unsteady lift and pitching moment coefficients using these transonic correction functions match the CFD simulation results very well even when the pitching moment coefficient is highly nonlinear. A flutter analysis of an airfoil in pitch and plunge illustrates the potential use of the proposed transonic correction method.

Transonic Flutter↗
NASA NTRS1987

Unsteady transonic algorithm improvements for realistic aircraft applications

Improvements to a time-accurate approximate factorization (AF) algorithm were implemented for steady and unsteady transonic analysis of realistic aircraft configurations. These algorithm improvements were made to the CAP-TSD (Computational Aeroelasticity Program - Transonic Small Disturbance) code developed at the Langley Research Center. The code permits the aeroelastic analysis of complete aircraft in the flutter critical transonic speed range. The AF algorithm of the CAP-TSD code solves the unsteady transonic small-disturbance equation. The algorithm improvements include: an Engquist-Osher (E-O) type-dependent switch to more accurately and efficiently treat regions of supersonic flow; extension of the E-O switch for second-order spatial accuracy in these regions; nonreflecting far field boundary conditions for more accurate unsteady applications; and several modifications which accelerate convergence to steady-state. Calculations are presented for several configurations including the General Dynamics one-ninth scale F-16C aircraft model to evaluate the algorithm modifications. The modifications have significantly improved the stability of the AF algorithm and hence the reliability of the CAP-TSD code in general.

Batina, John T.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Wing flutter calculations with the CAP-TSD unsteady transonic small disturbance program

The application and assessment is described of CAP-TSD (Computational Aeroelasticity Program - Transonic Small Disturbance) code for flutter prediction. The CAP-TSD program was developed for aeroelastic analysis of complete aircraft configurations and was previously applied to the calculation of steady and unsteady pressures. Flutter calculations are presented for two thin, swept-and-tapered wing planforms with well defined modal properties. The calculations are for Mach numbers from low subsonic to low supersonic values, including the transonic range, and are compared with subsonic linear theory and experimental flutter data. The CAP-TSD flutter results are generally in good agreement with the experimental values and are in good agreement with subsonic linear theory when wing thickness is neglected.

Bennett, Robert M.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Unsteady transonic small-disturbance theory including entropy and vorticity effects

Modifications to unsteady transonic small-disturbance theory to include entropy and vorticity effects are presented. The modifications have been implemented in the CAP-TSD (Computational Aeroelasticity Program - Transonic Small Disturbance) code developed recently at the NASA Langley Research Center. The code permits the aeroelastic analysis of complete aircraft configurations in the flutter critical transonic speed range. Entropy and vorticity effects have been incorporated within the solution procedure to more accurately analyze flows with strong shock waves. The modified code includes these effects while retaining the relative simplicity and cost efficiency of the TSD formulation. The paper presents detailed descriptions of the entropy and vorticity modifications along with calculated results and comparisons which assess the modified theory. These results are in good agreement with parallel Euler calculations and with experimental data. Therefore, the present method now provides the aeroelastician with an affordable capability to analyze relatively difficult transonic flows without having to solve the computationally more expensive Euler equations.

Batina, John T.↗