Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “advanced reactor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Thermal Extraction and Delivery from Advanced Reactor Systems

This document presents preliminary thermodynamic analysis of thermal extraction and delivery from advanced nuclear reactors. Light-water, high temperature gas, sodium fast, and molten salt reactors are templated and analyzed for thermal extraction from nominal steam production conditions. Uncontrolled, controlled, and partial admission steam extraction methods are described and analyzed to show the differences in system impact from the various methods. Thermal delivery modeling results show comparisons that have become possible through the computational capabilities of the thermal delivery model. Due to the significant degrees of freedom of the problem, specific cases are used to compare the thermodynamic costs of heat transport using various heat transfer fluids. All this work is done using Modelica models, allowing for the future application of models in dynamic analyses beyond the steady-state calculations presented in this report. Appendices describe additional capabilities and methods that can help users analyze complex problems using HYBRID models developed in Modelica.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Complete Evaluation on Advanced Reactor Machine Learning Subversion Attacks (Final)

Navigating through the world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in nuclear reactors and their Instrumentation and Control (I&C) systems demands a careful, deliberate journey. AI’s capability to manage massive datasets and streamline control systems has indeed carved out a significant role in various sectors, including nuclear energy. However, while AI, and particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), bring a lot to the table in terms of operational efficiency and anomaly detection, they also expose the sector to a new breed of cybersecurity threats, like Inference Attacks, Adversarial Attacks, and Trojan Attacks. This guide is designed to be a straightforward manual, diving deep into the intertwining worlds of AI and cybersecurity within nuclear reactors, and tailoring insights for three crucial audiences: I&C Vendors/Developers, Nuclear Regulators, and Nuclear Reactor Operators and Cyber Defense Teams. (1) Section 2, directed at I&C Vendors/Developers, will provide a clear and focused look at several cybersecurity attacks, offering practical recommendations and detailed scenarios related to AI cybersecurity. This section isn’t just about identifying problems but also about giving solid, usable solutions. (2) Section 3, meant for Nuclear Regulators, gets straight to the point about regulations, policy suggestions, and guidelines that are needed to lay down a robust, secure, and ethical foundation for the application of AI in nuclear operations. The focus is on making sure that everything adheres to international standards and laws while being practicable and clear-cut. (3) Section 4, aimed at Nuclear Reactor Operators and Cyber Defense Teams, offers an exhaustive exploration and technical reports, with clear recommendations and scenario analyses vital to protect operational environments and guarantee the secure application of AI in nuclear reactor operations. The goal is simple: as we step into an era where AI becomes a fundamental element of our technological and energy infrastructures, this guide is here to act as a clear, direct handbook, ensuring that AI is implemented within the nuclear sector in a manner that is secure, responsible, and practical. It’s about striking a balance – optimizing the undeniable benefits offered by AI while securing and shielding against potential cyber threats as we move through this new and complex landscape.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Modularity-at-scale for advanced reactors presentation

Modularity options have been limited for traditional nuclear energy deployment due to the conventional light water reactor (LWR) safety requirements, such as high pressure retaining heavy and robust containment structures. However, a relatively new regulatory approach called ‘Functional Containment’ has potential to allow less expensive and more flexible designs for non-LWRs. Functional containment provides flexibility in design and deployment based on risk-informed and performance-based criteria, so that reactors are not over-designed. Non-nuclear industry has successfully used modular design approaches in automotive, aerospace, chemical processing, building construction, and ship building. These industries have shown that modular construction reduces construction time by around 30% - 50% compared to the conventional stick-built approach. The nuclear industry can use similar approaches to reduce construction time and costs, balanced with safety requirements, using the functional containment approach. This paper discussing the background of modularity in nuclear energy, examples of less learned, modularity approaches in non-nuclear industries and the potential of cost and schedule savings through the emerging regulatory design flexibilities potentially enabling combination of modular deployment at different scales.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Mapping thermal energy storage technologies with advanced nuclear reactors

Advanced nuclear power plants (NPPs) will potentially need to operate in environments where power generation flexibility is more highly valued than the stability or baseload generation capability for conventional demand curves. Thermal energy storage (TES) systems would enable NPPs to respond nimbly to market variability and could also position advanced NPPs to participate differently in restructured markets, thus further enhancing their economic competitiveness. TES systems could also benefit the electric grid by eliminating the need for peaking plants, as well as by improving the economic performance of baseload NPPs. While TES technologies afford a unique opportunity to address many of these challenges, the applicability of these systems is also complicated by the fact that various advanced NPPs are designed differently, each with its own temperature range, size, operating fluids, and operating conditions. Hence, TES systems face significant barriers to investment, as more information on their compatibility and performance metrics is needed to quantify the advantages provided by each, as well as the challenges these technologies might face if coupled with a particular type of advanced NPP. This study explores the possibility of integrating a wide variety of TES technologies with various categories of advanced NPPs, based on their operating characteristics. To help decision makers, users and developers decide which TES technology is best suited to a particular category of advanced NPPs, this research present a Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) analysis of 10 TES systems that could potentially be coupled with advanced NPPs, which themselves are divided into nine categories based on their operating conditions. Then, each advanced NPP category is evaluated for compatibility with the 10 TES systems by assembling and discussing a database of information concerning 10 engineering questions, defined herein in as figures of merit (FOMs), such as: technology readiness level (TRL), temperature compatibility, energy density, size, cycle frequency, ramp time, realignment frequency, geographic needs, environmental impact, and interventions. By assembling a database of information concerning the TES technologies' compatibility with various advanced NPP systems, this study can help developers acquaint themselves with a particular TES technology before choosing to build a new integrated installation.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Design of a System Interface for Flexible Thermal Power Extraction from Two Advanced Reactors

This report presents the design of system interfaces enabling flexible thermal power extraction from two advanced nuclear reactor concepts: a sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) operating on a Rankine cycle, and a gas-cooled reactor (GCR) utilizing a Brayton cycle. The study addresses the dual challenge of ensuring reliable base-load electricity generation while meeting the variable high-temperature steam demands of industrial processes (IPs).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
NASA NTRS1973

Preliminary analysis of hot spot factors in an advanced reactor for space electric power systems

The maximum fuel pin temperature for nominal operation in an advanced power reactor is 1370 K. Because of possible nitrogen embrittlement of the clad, the fuel temperature was limited to 1622 K. Assuming simultaneous occurrence of the most adverse conditions a deterministic analysis gave a maximum fuel temperature of 1610 K. A statistical analysis, using a synthesized estimate of the standard deviation for the highest fuel pin temperature, showed probabilities of 0.015 of that pin exceeding the temperature limit by the distribution free Chebyshev inequality and virtually nil assuming a normal distribution. The latter assumption gives a 1463 K maximum temperature at 3 standard deviations, the usually assumed cutoff. Further, the distribution and standard deviation of the fuel-clad gap are the most significant contributions to the uncertainty in the fuel temperature.

Lustig, P. H.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Methodology and Tool for the Physical Security Analysis of Micro and Advanced Reactors

This work proposes a dynamic evaluation methodology to relax the conservatism in physical security evaluation, by leveraging an ongoing work in the Light Water Reactor Sustainability pathway. This methodology is implemented in a dynamic risk assessment tool named Event Modeling Risk Assessment using Linked Diagrams (EMRALD). The work extends EMRALD’s capability to support a sandbox feature where analysts can easily create attack scenarios and modify advanced/small modular reactor (A/SMR) security and safety features using templates. This approach saves time and cost since the analysis does not require creating detailed computer-aided design models, as is commonly required in commercial force-on-force software tools. EMRALD is completely free to use at https://emraldapp.inl.gov. We have developed basic templates including physical barriers, intrusion sensors, physical areas, and safety actions, that can be downloaded from EMRALD’s GitHub site: https://github.com/idaholab/EMRALD. These templates use generic data commonly used for training purposes, which do not reflect any actual operating nuclear reactor. Users may adjust the data in the templates with their own dataset and/or create new templates in EMRALD. The proposed methodology combines security and safety by assessing sabotage effects up to the radiological consequence to the public instead of merely the core damage state. This practice follows the industry standard for advanced non-light-water reactors currently proposed for endorsement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The combination of security and safety is expressed in an achievability-consequence chart. EMRALD can be used to generate data for this chart. A hypothetical case study using a representative sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) facility is presented in this report to demonstrate this methodology. This case study does not contain any actual nuclear plant information. This work will benefit A/SMR vendors and utilities to implement security by design during the reactor design iteration phase, such that they do not have to perform upgrades and retrofits to the reactor after it is installed to improve its physical protection system. The tool may also be used to analyze domestic or foreign reactor designs to support the International Nuclear Security Techniques for Advanced Reactors (INSTAR) bilateral missions. Future works are planned to implement the methodology on a reference SFR reactor and a reference high-temperature gas-cooled reactor to obtain insights and lessons-learned for the A/SMR community.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Recent Improvements in Pronghorn for Advanced Reactor Modeling

Pronghorn is a thermal-hydraulics computational tool developed using the Idaho National Laboratory's Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE). It is designed to support Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling, ranging from subchannel and porous media analysis to Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence modeling. As an integral part of the MOOSE-based suite of tools, Pronghorn seamlessly couples with other MOOSE-based applications to simulate a variety of physical phenomena. This article highlights recent significant enhancements to Pronghorn's CFD modeling capabilities and demonstrates their application to advanced nuclear reactor designs. The recent improvements in Pronghorn primarily focus on modifications to its turbulence modeling capabilities, near-wall corrections and numerical schemes. In terms of turbulence modeling, the two-equation $k-\epsilon$ and $k-\omega$ SST models have been implemented and validated with both equilibrium and non-equilibrium wall treatments. Additionally, corrections for wall roughness, and curvature, and wall-channeling in pebble beds have been introduced in the near-wall modeling. These developments enable more accurate simulations of advanced nuclear reactors. Two case studies are presented in this work: a pool-type Molten Chloride Reactor and a salt-cooled Pebble-Bed High Temperature Reactor. In both cases, the previous models in Pronghorn are compared with the new implementations, demonstrating the improved accuracy achieved with the updated models.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Idaho National Laboratory Advanced Reactor Technologies Quality Assurance Program Plan

This QAPP covers INL ART R&D, licensing, and program support activities. QA implementing procedures will be identified for all activities to ensure work is documented and the results are capable of successfully completing a technical review by DOE. For work performed by other organizations under contract or other agreements with INL, applicable requirements will be flowed down through the contract or other agreements, but the organizations will be responsible to implement the flowed down requirements through their own specific implementing procedures. This QAPP also covers implementation of software QA (SQA) requirements for software used exclusively by INL ART. Software that is used to support multiple INL programs/projects is not covered by this QAPP; the responsibility for implementing SQA requirements for that software resides with the owners and respective managers of the software. This QAPP does not cover activities for installing and operating experiments in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at INL, nor does it cover ATR facility modifications designed to meet INL ART testing needs (such as temperature, pressure, gas flow, and control systems). Those activities are controlled by the INL QAP and specific ATR implementing procedures. ATR facility management and INL ART management jointly approve experiment designs and functional system requirements. This QAPP does apply to INL ART R&D experiments that will be inserted into ATR and any support activities associated with those R&D activities. This QAPP does not cover activities for installing and operating general post irradiation examination (PIE) test equipment in Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) facilities. Those activities are controlled by the INL QAP and MFC implementing procedures. However, this QAPP does apply to MFC facility modifications designed to meet specific INL ART testing needs. It also applies to INL ART experiments that will have PIE performed on them and any support activities associated with the PIE activities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Embedding Neural Thermal Scattering (NeTS) Modules in SERPENT for Higher Fidelity Advanced Reactor Analysis

When a neutron born in fission thermalizes to the order of $k$ $B$ $T$, it’s de-Broglie wavelength and energy approach the order of inter-atomic spacing and elementary lattice oscillations, respectively. $S$($a,β,t$) or the scattering law, uuantify these temperature-dependent crystallographic contributions to total cross section (or reaction rate). In a Monte Carlo analysis, cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of $S$($a,β,t$) are loaded to memory from “A Compact ENDF” (ACE) files for stochastically selecting thermal scattered neutron trajectories. In this work, novel neural thermal scattering (NeTS) modules for $S$($a,β,t$) CDFs are designed, trained, serialized and embedded within SERPENT using Python’s limited C-API for on-the-fly deployment of crystalline graphite $S$($a,β,t$) sampling. Torchscript tracing and Numba just-in-time (JIT) compilation streamline neural inference on NVIDIA GPUs with CUDA libraries. Demonstrations of bare sphere thermalization of fast and thermal sources show excellent agreement between embedded NeTS in SERPENT and MCNP. With an explicit model of the reactor, NeTS can predict on-the-fly changes in TREAT neutron spectra as a function of local temperature, which can serve to improve transient and accident predictions in a multiphysics analysis framework. This framework can be further extended to account on-the-fly for changes in local graphitic microstructure to scattering cross sections, and outlines a novel coupling of modern machine learning with state-of-the-art reactor physics methods.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Contribution of IAEA coordinated research projects to light water reactors advanced technology fuel testing and simulation

The Fukushima-Daiichi accident in 2011 highlighted the pressing need for enhanced design and safety analysis of nuclear fuels, especially under accident conditions in nuclear power plants (NPPs). To address this need, the international nuclear fuel community has developed several concepts of Accident Tolerant and Advanced Technology Fuels (ATFs) for light water reactors. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), at the request of its Member States, has initiated a series of three Coordinated Research Projects (CRPs) to aid in the development and testing of these ATFs. Further, these projects, known as FUMAC, ACTOF, and ATF-TS, focus on the experimentation and simulation of ATFs under various accident conditions, including design basis accidents and design extension conditions. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the main activities, as well as the achieved or anticipated results of these three CRPs. The insights and advancements gained from these projects will enable IAEA Member States to further refine nuclear fission technology, thereby contributing to efforts aimed at mitigating climate change.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Degradation and Failure Phenomena of Advanced Reactor Fuel Concepts: Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Metallic Fuel

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is anticipating licensing applications and commercial use of new fuel types in advanced nuclear power reactors that would be designed and built in the United States. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is providing technical assistance to the NRC related to the newly proposed nuclear fuel and cladding designs that would be deployed in these reactors. This report focuses specifically on the metallic fuel that is being considered for sodium-cooled fast reactors and specifically on mechanisms that would cause damage or failure to the fuel under reactor operating conditions and design basis accident conditions. There is historic experience with both metallic and oxide fuels in experimental sodium-cooled fast reactors, but this report will focus solely on metallic fuel. Currently two U.S.-based reactor designers are engaged with the NRC in the application or pre-application review and considering a sodium-cooled fast reactor. TerraPower is engaged with NRC in pre-application review of its Natrium reactor. The current design for this fuel uses a sodium-bonded uranium-10wt% zirconium (U10Zr) fuel clad in HT9 stainless steel. ARC Clean Technology is engaged with NRC in pre-application review of its ARC-100 reactor. The current design for this fuel uses a sodium-bonded uranium-10wt% zirconium (U10Zr) fuel with steel cladding. This report will focus on this fuel system specifically, with broader information given regarding other metallic fuel systems with other stainless steel alloy claddings. To support the NRC’s readiness efforts, this report will identify and discuss degradation and failure modes of metallic fuel concepts for sodium-cooled fast reactors, including fuel performance characteristics that may not be addressed within existing regulatory documents.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗