Results for “atmospheric processing” — Page 11

DOE OSTI2026

BNF Radar b1 Data Processing Report: Spring 2025

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) User Facility supports atmospheric science through an integrated network of fixed and mobile observatories. These facilities collect continuous and campaign-based observations of atmospheric properties, with the goal of improving the representation of clouds, aerosols, precipitation, and radiation in Earth system models. The Bankhead National Forest (BNF) site, established as an ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) on 1 October 2024, is situated in a forested region of northern Alabama. Its strategic location in a southeastern U.S. environment characterized by complex terrain, diverse land cover, and frequent convective storms provides a valuable opportunity to examine coupled land-atmosphere processes under natural variability.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

NASA NTRS1986

The Jovian Atmospheres

A conference on the atmosphere of Jupiter produced papers in the areas of thermal and ortho-para hydrogen structure, clouds and chemistry, atmospheric structure, global dynamics, synoptic features and processes, atmospheric dynamics, and future spaceflight opportunities. A session on the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune was included, and the atmosphere of Saturn was discussed in several papers.

Allison, Michael↗

NASA NTRS1987

Voyager 2 at Uranus - A synopsis of atmospheric science results

Knowledge of the Uranian atmosphere took a quantum leap when the Voyager 2 spacecraft made a close approach in January 1986. Among the highlights of the early results are measurements of the atmospheric composition (He mole fraction = 0.15; Ch4 mole fraction = 0.02), rotation period of the deep interior (17.24 h), thermal structure and dynamics (the planet is coldest at midlatitudes; retrograde equatorial winds are inferred), and upper-atmosphere processes (a phenomenon called electroglow is only partly understood and is recognized as an important process n all the major-planet atmospheres examined by Voyager).

West, Robert A.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The SPARC-Reanalysis Intercomparison Project: Summary of Phase 1 and Plans for Phase 2 (S-RIP2): Chemical Reanalyses & Air Quality, Tropospheric Circulation, Extreme Events, and More

Reanalysis datasets are widely used to understand numerous atmospheric processes. Different reanalyses may give very different results for the same diagnostics. The Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (SPARC) Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP, https://s-rip.github.io/) is a coordinated activity to compare key diagnostics among available reanalyses, identify differences among reanalyses and their underlying causes, provide guidance on appropriate usage of reanalyses in scientific studies, and contribute to future improvements in the reanalysis products via collaborations with reanalysis centers and data users. S-RIP Phase 1 (completed in early 2022) focused primarily on the upper troposphere through the middle atmosphere and processes linking these regions to the troposphere and surface. We look forward to broadening our efforts in Phase 2 (S-RIP2), with new foci including studies of tropospheric circulation, extreme weather events, and their links to the stratosphere, and focusing on evaluation of chemical reanalyses, both those with a stratosphere / upper troposphere focus and those that focus on air quality applications. This presentation will provide a summary of Phase 1 results and discussion of future directions for S-RIP2, emphasizing applications to composition and chemistry studies as well as fostering capacity building for Early Career Scientists.

Jonathan S Wright↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Broadening Systematic Reanalysis lntercomparisons in the SPARC-Reanalysis lntercomparison Project Phase 2 (S-RIP2): Chemical Reanalyses & Air Quality, Tropospheric Circulation, Extreme Events, and More

Reanalysis datasets are widely used to understand numerous atmospheric processes. Different reanalyses may give very different results for the same diagnostics. The Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (SPARC) Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP, https://s-rip.github.io/) is a coordinated activity to compare key diagnostics among available reanalyses, identify differences among reanalyses and their underlying causes, provide guidance on appropriate usage of reanalyses in scientific studies, and contribute to future improvements in the reanalysis products via collaborations with reanalysis centers and data users. S-RIP Phase 1 (completed in early 2022) focused primarily on the upper troposphere through the middle atmosphere and processes linking these regions to the troposphere and surface. We look forward to broadening our efforts in Phase 2 (S-RIP2), with new foci including studies of tropospheric circulation, extreme weather events, and their links to the stratosphere, and focusing on evaluation of chemical reanalyses, both those with a stratosphere / upper troposphere focus and those that focus on air quality applications. This presentation will provide a summary of Phase 1 results and discussion of future directions for S-RIP2, emphasizing applications to composition and chemistry studies as well as fostering capacity building for Early Career Scientists.

Sean M Davis↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Broadening Systematic Reanalysis Intercomparisons in the SPARC-Reanalysis Intercomparison Project Phase 2 (S-RIP2): Chemical Reanalyses & Air Quality, Tropospheric Circulation, Extreme Events, and More

Reanalysis datasets are widely used to understand numerous atmospheric processes. Different reanalyses may give very different results for the same diagnostics. The Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (SPARC) Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP, https://s-rip.github.io/) is a coordinated activity to compare key diagnostics among available reanalyses, identify differences among reanalyses and their underlying causes, provide guidance on appropriate usage of reanalyses in scientific studies, and contribute to future improvements in the reanalysis products via collaborations with reanalysis centers and data users. S-RIP Phase 1 (completed in early 2022) focused primarily on the upper troposphere through the middle atmosphere and processes linking these regions to the troposphere and surface. We look forward to broadening our efforts in Phase 2 (S-RIP2), with new foci including studies of tropospheric circulation, extreme weather events, and their links to the stratosphere, and focusing on evaluation of chemical reanalyses, both those with a stratosphere / upper troposphere focus and those that focus on air quality applications. This presentation will provide a summary of Phase 1 results and discussion of future directions for S-RIP2, emphasizing applications to composition and chemistry studies as well as fostering capacity building for Early Career Scientists.

Sean M Davis↗

NASA NTRS1993

MAMS: High resolution atmospheric/surface properties

The Multispectral Atmospheric Mapping Sensor (MAMS) has been used for a number of investigations over the last 8 years. It has served as the basis for retrieval technique development, for atmospheric process studies, and to retrieve geophysical parameters at the surface (land and ocean). It was used most recently to collect high resolution visible and infrared imagery for the CaPE and STORMFEST experiments during FY91 and FY92. The Wildfire spectrometer (similar to MAMS but with different infrared channels) was also used during STORMFEST. The goals of MAMS during CaPE were: (1) to collect MAMS data to support the overall CaPE science objectives; (2) refine techniques for the retrieval of atmospheric moisture and surface geophysical parameters; (3) map the moisture distributions associated with the sea breeze front over Florida with MAMS ancillary satellite data on a case study basis; (4) identify surface features which may serve as local sources of heat and moisture and influence preferential convective regions over Florida, and (5) process MAMS data and derived relevant geophysical parameters to support other CaPE investigators. For STORMFEST both the MAMS and Wildfire spectrometers were used to collect unique multispectral data to study atmospheric processes. The Wildfire objectives were: (1) to collect high quality Wildfire data in conjunction with other in situ and remote measurements available during the STORMFEST field phase (1 February - 15 March 1992); (2) to develop algorithms to retrieve total ozone content and compare with those from TOMS and HIRS (IR); and (3) along with water vapor imagery, use the ozone data to better understand the 3-dimensional structure and dynamics of jet streaks and frontal systems in a case study investigation. The MAMS objectives were: (1) collect MAMS data to support a GSFC investigation of gravity waves; and (2) process the MAMS data to locate gravity wave features, and produce various moisture products in support of the gravity wave investigation. The research activities over the last year are presented and they focused on analyzing the CaPE data sets and collecting and starting preliminary analysis of the STORMFEST MAMS and Wildfire data.

Jedlovec, Gary J.↗

DOE OSTI2026

Experimental Report: Multi-Instrument Comparison of AAF Size Distribution Instruments

Aerosols are particles suspended in the atmosphere, ranging in size from nanometers to micrometers. Their size distribution affects key atmospheric processes, including nucleation, coagulation, scavenging, activation, and radiative properties (Seinfeld and Pandis 2016). Aerosol size distribution is a critical parameter in atmospheric science, influencing processes such as cloud formation and radiative forcing. Accurate representation of aerosol size distributions is essential for understanding their impact on climate, air quality, and human health. However, aerosol size and composition vary significantly across time and space due to meteorological conditions and natural or anthropogenic sources. (Wu and Boor 2021). Various instruments are used to measure aerosol size distributions, each with distinct principles, advantages, and limitations. This report begins with an in-depth overview of aerosol size-distribution comparison studies, focusing on the passive cavity aerosol spectrometer probe (PCASP), portable optical particle spectrometer (POPS), ultra-high-sensitivity aerosol spectrometer (UHSAS), aerodynamic particle sizer (APS), and scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS). All of these instruments are used by the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Aerial Facility (AAF), which commissioned this comparison and report. The report evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of these instruments, highlights their applications, and discusses efforts to merge data from multiple instruments for comprehensive analysis.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2022

Evaluation of assumptions made by Hygroscopic Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer inversion routines

The Hygroscopic Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (H-TDMA) measures the hygroscopicity of atmospheric particles, and many atmospheric processes that change this hygroscopicity also change the atmospheric size distribution. Two assumptions made during H-TDMA inversion create spurious hygroscopic trends as a function of the changing inlet size distribution. These two assumptions—that the particles exiting the first Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA1) are singly charged and that the inlet size distribution has a slope of zero (flat)— generate Multi-Charge Dispersion (MCD) bias and Slope bias, respectively. First, we use a model, named TAO, to show that the inlet size distribution could theoretically change the measured ammonium sulfate hygroscopicity by 10%–20% as a function of diameter or experimental time with no change in relative humidity. Secondly, we show experimentally that aerosol emitted from the flaming combustion of grass creates MCD bias. Here, in this experiment, we measure the CPC response of the first three charges and invert these responses using a new routine named Junior. Junior's inversion of each charge shows that one growth factor distribution describes all measured diameters (no growth dependence on diameter). As in the modeling study above, previous publications of this aerosol system, using traditional inversion assumptions, report a decrease in hygroscopicity as DMA1 diameter increases. Unlike traditional inversions, Junior's inversion does not assume the particles are singly charged nor does it make the flat inlet size distribution assumption. Instead, both the inlet size distribution and each charge's CPC response are measured quantities. Thus, the discrepancy between our inversion results and previous publications is likely due to the traditional inversion routine assumptions. This underscores the importance for accounting for Slope and MCD bias during inversions. Experimental results should be carefully analyzed when reporting hygroscopic trends with respect to diameter or experimental time when using the traditional inversion assumptions.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2015

Atmospheric pressure plasma enhanced spatial ALD of silver

The authors have investigated the growth of thin silver films using a unique combination of atmospheric process elements: spatial atomic layer deposition and an atmospheric pressure surface dielectric barrier discharge plasma source. Silver films were grown on top of Si substrates with good purity as revealed by resistivity values as low as 18 μΩ cm and C- and F-levels below detection limits of energy dispersive x-ray analysis. The growth of the silver films starts through the nucleation of islands that subsequently coalesce. The authors show that the surface island morphology is dependent on surface diffusion, which can be controlled by temperature within the deposition temperature range of 100–120 °C.

42 ENGINEERING↗

NASA NTRS2013

Atmospheric Research 2012 Technical Highlights

This annual report, as before, is intended for a broad audience. Our readers include colleagues within NASA, scientists outside the Agency, science graduate students, and members of the general public. Inside are descriptions of atmospheric research science highlights and summaries of our education and outreach accomplishments for calendar year 2012.The report covers research activities from the Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Laboratory, the Climate and Radiation Laboratory, the Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, and the Wallops Field Support Office under the Office of Deputy Director for Atmospheres, Earth Sciences Division in the Sciences and Exploration Directorate of NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center. The overall mission of the office is advancing knowledge and understanding of the Earths atmosphere. Satellite missions, field campaigns, peer-reviewed publications, and successful proposals are essential to our continuing research.

Climate↗

NASA NTRS2014

Atmospheric Research 2013 Technical Highlights

Welcome to the Atmospheric Research 2013 Atmospheric Research Highlights report. This report, as before, is intended for a broad audience. Our readers include colleagues within NASA, scientists outside the Agency, science graduate students, and members of the general public. Inside are descriptions of atmospheric research science highlights and summaries of our education and outreach accomplishments for calendar year 2013.This report covers research activities from the Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Laboratory, the Climate and Radiation Laboratory, the Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, and the Wallops Field Support Office under the Office of Deputy Director for Atmospheres (610AT), Earth Sciences Division in the Sciences and Exploration Directorate of NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center.

Atmospheric Research↗

NASA NTRS2022

Atmospheric Research 2021 Technical Highlights

Welcome to the 2021 Atmospheres Highlights report. Here, we summarize research and scientific communication/outreach accomplishments from the portion of atmospheric science activities at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) that comprises the Earth Science Division’s Atmospheres organization. As in previous years, this report is intended for a broad audience, including colleagues within NASA, scientists outside the Agency, science graduate students, and members of the public. Organizationally, the report covers research activities under the Office of Deputy Director for Atmospheres (610AT), which is within Earth Sciences Division (Code 610) in the Sciences and Exploration Directorate (600). Laboratories and office within 610AT include: Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Laboratory (612), Climate and Radiation Laboratory (613), Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory (614), and the Wallops Field Support Office (610.W). As of this writing, the 266 personnel in Code 610AT consist of 53 civil servants and 213 cooperative agreement associates, postdoctoral fellows and contractors.

Annual Report↗

NASA NTRS1999

Earth Observing System: Present Capabilities and Promises for the Future

The Earth Observing System (EOS) is a space-based observing system comprised of a series of satellite sensors by which scientists can monitor the Earth, a Data and Information System (EOSDIS) enabling researchers worldwide to access the satellite data, and an interdisciplinary science research program to interpret the satellite data. During this year 5 EOS science missions are scheduled for launch, representing observations of (i) total solar irradiance, (ii) Earth radiation budget, (iii) land cover & land use change, (iv) ocean processes (vector wind, sea surface temperature, and ocean color), (v) atmospheric processes (aerosol and cloud properties, water vapor, and temperature and moisture profiles), and (vi) atmospheric chemistry (both tropospheric and stratospheric). In succeeding years many more satellites will be launched that will contribute immeasurably to our understanding of the Earth's environment. In this presentation I will describe how scientists intend to use MODIS, an earth-viewing cross-track scanning spectroradiometer to be launched on the Terra satellite in summer 1999, for the remote sensing of cloud and aerosol properties. MODIS will scan a swath width sufficient to provide nearly complete global coverage every two days from a polar-orbiting, sun-synchronous, platform at an altitude of 705 km. In addition, I will describe key elements of other instruments recently launched or planned for flight in the coming months. Finally, I will lay out a plan for the future space-based observing system being planned by NASA and its partners.

King, Michael D.↗

NASA NTRS1964

Loss process for helium ions in the upper atmosphere

Loss process for helium ions in upper atmosphere

UPPER ATMOSPHERE↗

DOE OSTI2015

Investigation of particle and vapor wall-loss effects on controlled wood-smoke smog-chamber experiments

Here, smog chambers are extensively used to study processes that drive gas and particle evolution in the atmosphere. A limitation of these experiments is that particles and gas-phase species may be lost to chamber walls on shorter timescales than the timescales of the atmospheric processes being studied in the chamber experiments. These particle and vapor wall losses have been investigated in recent studies of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation, but they have not been systematically investigated in experiments of primary emissions from combustion. The semi-volatile nature of combustion emissions (e.g. from wood smoke) may complicate the behavior of particle and vapor wall deposition in the chamber over the course of the experiments due to the competition between gas/particle and gas/wall partitioning. Losses of vapors to the walls may impact particle evaporation in these experiments, and potential precursors for SOA formation from combustion may be lost to the walls, causing underestimations of aerosol yields. Here, we conduct simulations to determine how particle and gas-phase wall losses contributed to the observed evolution of the aerosol during experiments in the third Fire Lab At Missoula Experiment (FLAME III). We use the TwO-Moment Aerosol Sectional (TOMAS) microphysics algorithm coupled with the organic volatility basis set (VBS) and wall-loss formulations to examine the predicted extent of particle and vapor wall losses. We limit the scope of our study to the dark periods in the chamber before photo-oxidation to simplify the aerosol system for this initial study. Our model simulations suggest that over one-third of the initial particle-phase organic mass (41 %) was lost during the experiments, and over half of this particle-organic mass loss was from direct particle wall loss (65 % of the loss) with the remainder from evaporation of the particles driven by vapor losses to the walls (35 % of the loss). We perform a series of sensitivity tests to understand uncertainties in our simulations. Uncertainty in the initial wood-smoke volatility distribution contributes 18 % uncertainty to the final particle-organic mass remaining in the chamber (relative to base-assumption simulation). We show that the total mass loss may depend on the effective saturation concentration of vapor with respect to the walls as these values currently vary widely in the literature. The details of smoke dilution during the filling of smog chambers may influence the mass loss to the walls, and a dilution of ~ 25:1 during the experiments increased particle-organic mass loss by 33 % compared to a simulation where we assume the particles and vapors are initially in equilibrium in the chamber. Finally, we discuss how our findings may influence interpretations of emission factors and SOA production in wood-smoke smog-chamber experiments.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

NASA NTRS1985

FGGE and atmospheric predictability

FGGE data and its analyses have made significant impact on the prediction community and its understanding of the atmosphere. The detail available from the FGGE data makes understanding of specific issues more precise and opens up new questions not previously recognized. The spectrum of issues to which FGGE data may be addressed includes time scales (stationary and transient), space scales (global versus local), regionality (tropics and oceans), specific weather phenomena (blocking and monsoons), and energetics. In addition to identifying and highlighting atmospheric processes, FGGE data can and were applied to improved atmospheric predictability. This was achieved through model initialization, improved parameterization of model forcing, and more thorough validation of model forecasts. Of particular interest is the increased understanding of the atmosphere and subsequently its predictability, which may be obtained through an assessment of the statistical characteristics of the FGGE data.

Baer, F.↗

NASA NTRS1981

Photochemistry in planetary atmospheres

Widely varying paths of evolutionary history, atmospheric processes, solar fluxes, and temperatures have produced vastly different planetary atmospheres. The similarities and differences between the earth atmosphere and those of the terrestrial planets (Venus and Mars) and of the Jovian planets are discussed in detail; consideration is also given to the photochemistry of Saturn, Uranus, Pluto, Neptune, Titan, and Triton. Changes in the earth's ancient atmosphere are described, and problems of interest in the earth's present troposphere are discussed, including the down wind effect, plume interactions, aerosol nucleation and growth, acid rain, and the fate of terpenes. Temperature fluctuations in the four principal layers of the earth's atmosphere, predicted decreases in the ozone concentration as a function of time, and spectra of particles in the earth's upper atmosphere are also presented. Finally, the vertical structure of the Venus cloud system and the thermal structure of the Jovian planets are shown graphically.

Levine, J. S.↗