Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “facility capabilities”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Effect of Processing Pressure on Isolated Pore Formation during Controlled Directional Solidification in Small Channels

Directional solidification experiments were performed, using succinonitrile saturated with nitrogen gas, to examine the effects of in-situ processing pressure changes on the formation growth, and evolution of an isolated, cylindrical gaseous pore. A novel solidification facility, capable of processing thin cylindrical samples (I.D. < 1.0 mm), under controlled pressure conditions, was used for the experiments. A new experimental method for growing the isolated pore from a seed bubble is introduced. The experimental results indicate that an in-situ processing pressure change will result in either a transient change in pore diameter or a complete termination of pore growth, indicating that pressure changes can be used as a control parameter to terminate bubble growth. A simple analytical model has been introduced to explain the experimental observations.

Cox, Matthew C.↗

Vegetable Production System (Veggie)

The Vegetable Production System (Veggie) was developed by Orbital Technologies Corp. to be a simple, easily stowed, and high growth volume yet low resource facility capable of producing fresh vegetables on the International Space Station (ISS). In addition to growing vegetables in space, Veggie can support a variety of experiments designed to determine how plants respond to microgravity, provide real-time psychological benefits for the crew, and conduct outreach activities. Currently, Veggie provides the largest volume available for plant growth on the ISS.

Vegetable↗

One Giant Leap to Protect All Mankind: An Overview of the Lunar Receiving Laboratory

Motivation. In 1961, President John F. Kennedy charged the nation "to land a man on the moon and return him safely to Earth." Eight years later, the Apollo 11 astronauts splashed down in the Pacific Ocean after this first 8-day journey to the moon. As humans had never ventured to another extraterrestrial body, the U.S. government noted the great uncertainty associated with the unknown exposures related to this historic mission. Overview. With this uncertainty in mind, a newly formed Interagency Committee on Back Contamination (ICBC) was established to review the potential for lunar contaminants and establish the prevention of their escape into the biosphere during crew and sample recovery operations from the floating command module to the mobile quarantine facility on the recovery ship and return to the Johnson Space Center. Significance. As a result of the ICBC recommendations, in 1966 NASA planned and built the Lunar Receiving Laboratory (LRL) at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. The LRL served a great role in service of human space exploration to quarantine Apollo crewmembers, their space vehicles, and the lunar samples collected. Almost an afterthought in the space race to the Moon, the 83,000-square-foot LRL was designed and completed in 1967 for $7.8 million. The core purpose of the LRL was "to protect the public's health, agriculture, and other living resources; to provide lunar sample distribution to approved scientific investigators; and to preserve the scientific integrity of the lunar samples at all times." Its layout was comprised of three major zones: a quarantined Crew Area, a separate but also quarantined Sample Operations Area, and a Support and Administration Area outside the controlled biological barrier. This facility required trained personnel to live and perform within it for several weeks post-flight, to include astronaut crewmembers, flight surgeons, scientists, and vehicle recovery engineers. The LRL holds memories of these historic events but has since been repurposed for NASA's medical and environmental sciences activities, in what is now known as Building 37. As we approach its 50th anniversary, the LRL story will end in demolition as NASA advances its facilities for the next steps in human exploration of space. Learning Objectives: 1. To capture the historical relevance of the NASA Lunar Receiving Laboratory 2. To understand the requirements of receiving crew and samples from the moon for the first time 3. To describe the facility capabilities in protection of public health.

Hayes, Judith↗

Update on the NASA Glenn PSL Ice Crystal Cloud Characterization (2016)

NASA Glenn's Propulsion Systems Laboratory (PSL) is an altitude engine research test facility capable of producing ice-crystal and supercooled liquid clouds. The cloud characterization parameter space is fairly large and complex, but the phase of the cloud seems primarily governed by wet bulb temperature. The presentation will discuss some of the issues uncovered through four cloud characterization efforts to date, as well as some of instrumentation that has been used to characterize cloud parameters including cloud uniformity, bulk total water content, median volumetric diameter and max-diameter, percent freeze-out, relative humidity, and an update on the NASA Glenn PSL Ice Crystal Cloud Characterization (2016).

Calibration↗

LTN Inlets and Nozzles Branch Overview; NASA GE - Methods Development Review

LTNInlets and Nozzles Branch Overview to be presented to GE during method review meeting. Presentation outlines the capabilities, facilities and tools used by the LTN Branch to conduct its mission of developing design and analysis tools and technologies for inlets and nozzles used on advanced vehicle concepts ranging from subsonic to hypersonic speeds.

Nozzles↗

Marshall Space Flight Center Technology Capabilities for Use in Space Situational Awareness Activities

Marshall performs research, integrates information, matures technologies, and enhances science to bring together a diverse portfolio of products and services of interest for Space Situational Awareness (SSA) and Space Asset Management (SAM), all of which can be accessed through partnerships with Marshall. Integrated Space Situational Awareness and Asset Management (ISSAAM) is an initiative of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center to improve space situational awareness and space asset management through technical innovation, collaboration, and cooperation with U.S. Government agencies and the global space community. Marshall Space Flight Center provides solutions for complex issues with in-depth capabilities, a broad range of experience, and expertise unique in the world, and all available in one convenient location. NASA has longstanding guidelines that are used to assess space objects. Specifically, Marshall Space Flight Center has the capabilities, facilities and expertise to address the challenges that space objects, such as near-Earth objects (NEO) or Orbital Debris pose. ISSAAM's three pronged approach brings together vital information and in-depth tools working simultaneously toward examining the complex problems encountered in space situational awareness. Marshall's role in managing, understanding and planning includes many projects grouped under each prong area: Database/Analyses/Visualization; Detection/Tracking/ Mitigation/Removal. These are not limited to those listed below.

Gagliano, Larry↗

Challenge and Opportunity of Advanced Materials and Chemistries for Electrochemical Energy Storages Development of NASA Future Missions

The energy demanding for NASA's future missions, and the challenges and opportunities to achieve these energy goals will be presented. The research capabilities, facilities and activities at NASA Glenn Research Center will also be discussed. The opportunity for university faculty and students to participate in NASA energy-related programs will be discussed at well.

Wu, James J.↗

Piloted Full-Motion Simulation with Simulink®

A recent experiment at NASA Ames Research Center’s Vertical Motion Simulator (VMS) successfully combined a real-time, human in-the-loop architecture with the flexibility of operating in the Simulink® graphical model-based engineering environment. The VMS is a large amplitude flight simulator designed to be adaptable to provide rapid integration and development of a wide variety of vehicles and support diverse aeronautical investigations. Math models are often programmed in Simulink. Typically, to run Simulink models in real time, they are converted to C code. However, the conversion and integration process can be time consuming and cumbersome. Thus, the VMS facility capabilities were expanded to allow a Simulink vehicle math model to run in the MathWorks’ MATLAB environment during a piloted full-motion simulation experiment. The MATLAB Simulink based approach to driving the VMS was found to decrease development time by allowing quick integration of math model changes and providing the ability to run the same version of the model on researcher’s desktop computers. This accomplishment demonstrated that the development ease of the graphical Simulink environment could be retained, while working within the real-time environment of the VMS architecture and maintaining the unique flexibility of the VMS.

hardware in-the-loop↗

Piloted Full-Motion Simulation in Simulink®

A recent experiment at NASA Ames Research Center’s Vertical Motion Simulator (VMS) successfully combined a real-time, human in-the-loop architecture with the flexibility of operating in the Simulink® graphical model-based engineering environment. The VMS is a large amplitude flight simulator designed to be adaptable to provide rapid integration and development of a wide variety of vehicles and support diverse aeronautical investigations. Math models are often programmed in Simulink. Typically, to run Simulink models in real time, they are converted to C code. However, the conversion and integration process can be time consuming and cumbersome. Thus, the VMS facility capabilities were expanded to allow a Simulink vehicle math model to run in the MathWorks’ MATLAB environment during a piloted full-motion simulation experiment. The MATLAB Simulink based approach to driving the VMS was found to decrease development time by allowing quick integration of math model changes and providing the ability to run the same version of the model on researcher’s desktop computers. This accomplishment demonstrated that the development ease of the graphical Simulink environment could be retained, while working within the real-time environment of the VMS architecture and maintaining the unique flexibility of the VMS.

Lewis, Emily K.↗

Airframe and Engine Icing

This is both a presented version of NASA's in-flight icing training aids, and a brief discussion of NASA Glenn's two icing-capable facilities that simulate the airframe and engine icing environments. This presentation has been adapted for a Kent State University Aviation Safety Day. The original version was developed in 2006 time frame, and has been presented to both pilots and engineers.

pilot↗

Explore NASA Partnerships: NASA Ames Research Center

This is a NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) Code DI outreach booklet that briefly describes what Technology Transfer, Strategic Agreements, and SBIR/STTR do. Along with Ames capabilities, facilities, and recent accomplishments. The purpose of this book is to inform the public of what each partnership branch offers and how to get in contact with the partnerships offices.

Puranen, Angeline M.↗

High Fidelity Aerospace Simulations at NASA Ames SimLabs

NASA Ames SimLabs is home to unique simulation facilities capable of a wide range of aerospace systems research. This presentation will focus on the Vertical Motion Simulator with thoughts on future AR/VR applications and research.

simulation↗

Hot Structure and High-Temperature Material Capability

This presentation give an overview of NASA Langley Research Center capability in the technical area of structures and high-temperature materials. Included is an overview of the capability, test facilities, analysis capability, and recent work.

Thermal↗

Additive Manufacture of Refractory Metals for Aerospace Applications

High temperature refractory metals are required for a number of high temperature propulsion applications. Refractory metals are expensive, difficult to manufacture with high buy-to-fly ratios, and few vendors. Additive manufacture (AM) is used to produce C103, Molybdenum (Mo), and Tungsten (W) reaction chamber and thrust stand-off as well as Iridium ultra-fine lattice catalysts for integration into 1 N green propulsion thrusters. Refractory AM is in development and like traditional AM alloys requires substantial post-processing to include powder heat treatment, surface finish enhancement, inspection, and machining before placed in service. The combination of limited feedstock sources, high temperature processing, oxygen sensitivity, fracture prone nature, and need for elevated temperature mechanical testing limit the number of qualified facilities capable of post-processing AM refractory materials, which add to cost and schedule constraints. However, properly implemented refractory metal AM can overcome existing manufacture limitations by greatly increasing design flexibility, new material options, reduced price, decreased lead-time, and leverage the ever growing AM commercial supply base.

Refractory metal additive manufacture↗

Additive Manufacture of Refractory Metals for Aerospace Applications

High temperature refractory metals are required for a number of high temperature propulsion applications. Refractory metals are expensive, difficult to manufacture with high buy-to-fly ratios, and few vendors. Additive manufacture (AM) is used to produce C103, Molybdenum (Mo), and Tungsten (W) reaction chamber and thrust stand-off as well as Iridium ultra-fine lattice catalysts for integration into 1 N green propulsion thrusters. Refractory AM is in development and like traditional AM alloys requires substantial post-processing to include powder heat treatment, surface finish enhancement, inspection, and machining before placed in service. The combination of limited feedstock sources, high temperature processing, oxygen sensitivity, fracture prone nature, and need for elevated temperature mechanical testing limit the number of qualified facilities capable of post-processing AM refractory materials, which add to cost and schedule constraints. However, properly implemented refractory metal AM can overcome existing manufacture limitations by greatly increasing design flexibility, new material options, reduced price, decreased lead-time, and leverage the ever growing AM commercial supply base.

Refractory metal additive manufacture↗

Reflections on 20 Years of Research on the International Space Station

November 2, 2000 began an era of continuous human presence on the International Space Station (ISS). That first crewed expedition to the ISS had few scientific instruments and facilities to work with, yet managed to conduct 52research investigations. Today, crew oversee upwards of 300 investigations during their time aboard. Indeed, over the past 20 years the ISS has evolved into a robust laboratory with dozens of research facilities, capabilities for the autonomous monitoring and conduct of research, and a growing array of scientific tools available and observational instruments active. As a result, the station has hosted more than 3,000 research investigations generating more than 2,400 scientific publications across every major discipline of science. The ISS Program Science Forum is composed of senior science representatives across the station’s international partnership. It provides multilateral science leadership to the ISS Program. Indeed, ISS research has evolved to become a truly international activity encompassing the participation of more than 4,000 investigators from over 100 countries whose research has been completed or is ongoing. This paper provides an overview of the research and technology development conducted to date and reflects upon the accomplishments, impacts and future direction of ISS research from the perspective of the member organizations of the Program Science Forum. Research areas which have been a focus of ISS research to date and key implications both for future space exploration and scientific advancement are presented. Major Earth benefits derived from ISS research are discussed. Finally, the paper provides insight into areas of emphasis for future research including the maturation of technological capabilities needed for deep space exploration, including lunar exploration programs such as Artemis and future missions to Mars

International Space Station↗

Validation of Decompression Sickness Risk Mitigation Protocols for Planetary Spaceflight Missions

BACKGROUND: Apollo missions used a 100% O2 cabin atmosphere which effectively eliminated the risk of decompression sickness (DCS) during extravehicular activity (EVA) on the moon. NASA’s future missions to the moon and Mars are expected to use nitrox gas mixtures of up to 34% O2, 66% N2, which will reduce flammability risk compared with Apollo, but will necessitate Oxygen prebreathe prior to EVA to reduce DCS risk to acceptable levels. Prebreathe protocols used on the space shuttle and International Space Station are validated for microgravity EVAs, but the significantly increased risk of DCS during equivalent ambulatory EVAs make these protocols inapplicable to planetary EVA. An “exploration atmosphere” of 56.5 kPa (8.2 psia), 34% O2, 66% N2 has been recommended by NASA as a compromise that balances prebreathe duration, hypoxia, and flammability risk, assuming a 29.6 kPa (4.3 psi) spacesuit. However, this atmosphere may not be used for vehicles that do not support frequent EVA, and with commercial providers and international providers expected to provide landers, pressurized rovers, habitats, and spacesuits, different combinations of vehicle and spacesuit atmospheres are possible and will each require validated prebreathe protocols. OVERVIEW: Key components of a multi-year strategic roadmap include: 1) Establish hypobaric chamber facility capable of supporting 8-person EVA prebreathe validation tests at saturation atmospheres up to 36% O2; 2) validate an EVA physical workload simulation for use during prebreathe validation testing; 3) validate the recommended “exploration atmosphere” prebreathe protocol; 4) validate prebreathe protocols for additional atmospheric combinations that bound the most likely potential operating ranges of future vehicles and spacesuits; and 5) update DCS risk estimation models based on results of prebreathe validation studies. DISCUSSION: Details and data from completion of the first two steps of the strategic roadmap will be presented; the third step is currently underway, with pilot results provided in a companion presentation. Steps four and five will require a multi-year series of chamber tests; collaborations are being pursued.

Andrew F. J. Abercromby↗

Analysis of Supercooled Large Drop Velocity Measurement in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

An experiment was conducted in the Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) at the NASA Glenn Research Center to measure the velocity of supercooled large drops (SLD) in the test section of the tunnel. Previous experiments in the IRT suggested that supercooled large drops passing through the test section of the tunnel do not move at the same velocity as the surrounding air flow. The difference between drop velocity and tunnel air velocity is called slip velocity. The slip velocity is important for determining the exact nature of SLD icing simulation in the IRT. It can impact the ice growth process because of its effect on drop cooling rate during transit from the spray bars to the test section. It can also affect the amount of splashing that occurs upon impact. Slip velocity is an important flow parameter to determine how far the current facility capabilities can be extended into the SLD regime. Initial measurement data analysis of the drop velocities indicates that drops with diameter larger than about 100 to 200 µm experience velocity slip.

SLD↗