Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “thrust vector control”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1994

VSTOL Systems Research Aircraft (VSRA) Harrier

NASA's Ames Research Center has developed and is testing a new integrated flight and propulsion control system that will help pilots land aircraft in adverse weather conditions and in small confined ares (such as, on a small ship or flight deck). The system is being tested in the V/STOL (Vertical/Short Takeoff and Landing) Systems research Aircraft (VSRA), which is a modified version of the U.S. Marine Corps's AV-8B Harrier jet fighter, which can take off and land vertically. The new automated flight control system features both head-up and panel-mounted computer displays and also automatically integrates control of the aircraft's thrust and thrust vector control, thereby reducing the pilot's workload and help stabilize the aircraft for landing. Visiting pilots will be encouraged to test the new system and provide formal evaluation flights data and feedback. An actual flight test and the display panel of control system are shown in this video.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2008

Dynamical Modeling and Control Simulation of a Large Flexible Launch Vehicle

This paper presents dynamical models of a large flexible launch vehicle. A complete set of coupled dynamical models of propulsion, aerodynamics, guidance and control, structural dynamics, fuel sloshing, and thrust vector control dynamics are described. Such dynamical models are used to validate NASA s SAVANT Simulink-based program which is being used for the preliminary flight control systems analysis and design of NASA s Ares-1 Crew Launch Vehicle. SAVANT simulation results for validating the performance and stability of an ascent phase autopilot system of Ares-1 are also presented.

Du, Wei↗
NASA NTRS1998

A Method for Integrating Thrust-Vectoring and Actuated Forebody Strakes with Conventional Aerodynamic Controls on a High-Performance Fighter Airplane

A method, called pseudo controls, of integrating several airplane controls to achieve cooperative operation is presented. The method eliminates conflicting control motions, minimizes the number of feedback control gains, and reduces the complication of feedback gain schedules. The method is applied to the lateral/directional controls of a modified high-performance airplane. The airplane has a conventional set of aerodynamic controls, an experimental set of thrust-vectoring controls, and an experimental set of actuated forebody strakes. The experimental controls give the airplane additional control power for enhanced stability and maneuvering capabilities while flying over an expanded envelope, especially at high angles of attack. The flight controls are scheduled to generate independent body-axis control moments. These control moments are coordinated to produce stability-axis angular accelerations. Inertial coupling moments are compensated. Thrust-vectoring controls are engaged according to their effectiveness relative to that of the aerodynamic controls. Vane-relief logic removes steady and slowly varying commands from the thrust-vectoring controls to alleviate heating of the thrust turning devices. The actuated forebody strakes are engaged at high angles of attack. This report presents the forward-loop elements of a flight control system that positions the flight controls according to the desired stability-axis accelerations. This report does not include the generation of the required angular acceleration commands by means of pilot controls or the feedback of sensed airplane motions.

Lallman, Frederick J.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Interstage Flammability Analysis Approach

The Interstage of the Ares I launch platform houses several key components which are on standby during First Stage operation: the Reaction Control System (ReCS), the Upper Stage (US) Thrust Vector Control (TVC) and the J-2X with the Main Propulsion System (MPS) propellant feed system. Therefore potentially dangerous leaks of propellants could develop. The Interstage leaks analysis addresses the concerns of localized mixing of hydrogen and oxygen gases to produce deflagration zones in the Interstage of the Ares I launch vehicle during First Stage operation. This report details the approach taken to accomplish the analysis. Specified leakage profiles and actual flammability results are not presented due to proprietary and security restrictions. The interior volume formed by the Interstage walls, bounding interfaces with the Upper and First Stages, and surrounding the J2-X engine was modeled using Loci-CHEM to assess the potential for flammable gas mixtures to develop during First Stage operations. The transient analysis included a derived flammability indicator based on mixture ratios to maintain achievable simulation times. Validation of results was based on a comparison to Interstage pressure profiles outlined in prior NASA studies. The approach proved useful in the bounding of flammability risk in supporting program hazard reviews.

Little, Jeffrey K.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Generic Control Allocation Toolbox for Preliminary Vehicle Design

This paper describes the development and application of a Generic Control Allocation Toolbox developed at NASA Langley Research Center (LGCAT) intended to aid engineers during the preliminary design phase of an aerospace vehicle. The static controllability space in the forms of a Theoretical Attainable Moment Set, Φ, or Theoretical Attainable Force Set, φ is difficult to visualize for modern vehicles with multiple types of redundant control effectors. The objective of LGCAT is to provide system engineers and designers early in the vehicle design phase with quick insights on how control effector parameters such as quantity, sizing, location, orientation, redundancy, etc., affect the overall controllability and other performance metrics. Having such information in hand allows system engineers to make more informed decisions on overall mission objectives such as performance vs. reliability vs. cost, etc. early in a vehicle design phase and reduce the number of iterations necessary in the design and analysis cycles. LGCAT can accept a variety of control effector types including aerodynamic surfaces, rotors, thrust vector control (TVC) engines, and reaction control systems (RCS). LGCAT is MATLAB based, user friendly, and is capable of performing the analysis in the Graphical User Interface (GUI) or script mode. Current add-on features include interfacing with engineering level codes such as Vehicle Sketch Pad (VSP) and generating the corresponding Φ and φ for an arbitrary vehicle design. These capabilities potentially make LGCAT an integral part of the preliminary design phase for any vehicle.

Pei, Jing↗
NASA NTRS1974

Verification test results of Apollo stabilization and control systems during undocked operations

The results are presented of analysis and simulation testing of both the Skylark 1 reaction control system digital autopilot (RCS DAP) and the thrust vector control (TVC) autopilot for use during the undocked portions of the Apollo/Soyuz Test Project Mission. The RCS DAP testing was performed using the Skylab Functional Simulator (SLFS), a digital computer program capable of simulating the Apollo and Skylab autopilots along with vehicle dynamics including bending and sloshing. The model is used to simulate three-axis automatic maneuvers along with pilot controlled manual maneuvers using the RCS DAP. The TVC autopilot was tested in two parts. A classical stability analysis was performed on the vehicle considering the effects of structural bending and sloshing when under control of the TVC autopilot. The time response of the TVC autopilot was tested using the SLFS. Results indicate that adequate performance stability margins can be expected for the CSM/DM configuration when under the control of the Apollo control systems tested.

Copeland, E. L.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Aerodynamic flight control to increase payload capability of future launch vehicles

In this report, we provide some examples of French, Russian, Chinese, and Japanese launch vehicles that have utilized fins in their designs. Next, the aerodynamic design of the fins is considered in Section 3. Some comments on basic static stability and control theory are followed by a brief description of an aerodynamic characteristics prediction code that was used to estimate the characteristics of a modified NLS 1.5 Stage vehicle. Alternative fin designs are proposed and some estimated aerodynamic characteristics presented and discussed. Also included in Section 3 is a discussion of possible methods of enhancement of the aerodynamic efficiency of fins, such as vortex generators and jet flaps. We consider the construction of fins for launch vehicles in Section 4 and offer an assessment of the state-of-the-art in the use of composites for aerodynamic control surfaces on high speed vehicles. We also comment on the use of smart materials for launch vehicle fins. The dynamic stability and control of a launch vehicle that utilizes both thrust vector control (engine nozzle gimballing) and movable fins is the subject addressed in Section 5. We give a short derivation of equations of motion for a launch vehicle moving in a vertical plane above a spherical earth, discuss the use of a gravity-turn nominal trajectory, and give the form of the period equations linearized about such a nominal. We then consider feedback control of vehicle attitude using both engine gimballing and fin deflection. Conclusions are stated and recommendations made in Section 6. An appendix contains aerodynamic data in tabular and graphical formats.

Cochran, John E., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Controller Design for EMA in TVC Incorporating Force Feedback

The objective of this research was to develop control schemes and control design procedures for electromechanical actuators (EMA) in thrust vector control (TVC) applications. For a variety of reasons, there is a tendency within the aerospace community to use electromechanical actuators in applications where hydraulics have traditionally been employed. TVC of rocket engines is one such application. However, there is considerable research, development, and testing to be done before EMA will be accepted by the community at large for these types of applications. Besides the development of design procedures for the basic position controller, two major concerns are dealt with in this research by incorporating force feedback: 1) the effects of resonance on the performance of EMA-TVC-rocket-engine systems, and 2) the effects of engine start transients on EMA. This report only highlights the major contributions of this research.

Schinstock, Dale E.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analytical Investigation of Propellant Slosh Stability Boundary on a Space Vehicle

The effect of propellant sloshing upon the stability of a liquid-propelled space vehicle has been studied extensively. For a typical space vehicle with thrust vector control and a single slosh tank, the slosh danger zone is located between the vehicle center of mass and the center of percussion. If the slosh mass is located between these two locations, baffles may be required to provide additional damping for stability. In this work, the methodology behind the classic single tank solution analytical is extended to a tandem tank configuration where the tanks are located along the vehicle centerline or symmetrically offset from the centerline. Secondly, the slosh stability boundary for a vehicle with pairs of outboard reaction jets, rather than thrust vectoring, for attitude control is studied. Finally, the impact of aerodynamics and vehicle axial acceleration on the classic danger zone solution are analyzed.

Jing Pei↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analytical Investigation of Propellant Slosh Stability Boundary on a Space Vehicle

The effect of propellant sloshing upon the stability of a liquid-propelled space vehicle has been studied extensively. For a typical space vehicle with thrust vector control and asingle slosh tank, the Bauer slosh danger zone is located between the vehicle center of mass and the center of percussion while ignoring effects like aerodynamics and axial acceleration. If the slosh mass is located between these two locations, baffles may be required toprovide additional damping for stability. Although this criteria is widely used in the launch vehicle flight controls community, its application is limited to the aforementioned configuration and assumptions. In this work, the methodology behind the classic single-tank criteria is extended to other tank configurations and includes previously ignored effects. First, the variation of the classic danger zone for a tandem tank configuration where the tanks are located along the vehicle centerline or symmetrically offset from the centerline is investigated. Second, a vehicle with a single centerline tank and pair of outboard reaction jets, rather than thrust vectoring, for attitude control is studied. Finally, the impacts of aerodynamics and vehicle axial acceleration on the classic single-tank criteria are analyzed.

Jing Pei↗
NASA NTRS1993

Design and application of electromechanical actuators for deep space missions

The annual report Design and Application of Electromechanical Actuators for Deep Space Missions is presented. The reporting period is 16 Aug. 1992 to 15 Aug. 1993. However, the primary focus will be work performed since submission of our semi-annual progress report in Feb. 1993. Substantial progress was made. We currently feel confident in providing guidelines for motor and control strategy selection in electromechanical actuators to be used in thrust vector control (TVC) applications. A small portion was presented in the semi-annual report. At this point, we have implemented highly detailed simulations of various motor/drive systems. The primary motor candidates were the brushless dc machine, permanent magnet synchronous machine, and the induction machine. The primary control implementations were pulse width modulation and hysteresis current control. Each of the two control strategies were applied to each of the three motor choices. With either pulse width modulation or hysteresis current control, the induction machine was always vector controlled. A standard test position command sequence for system performance evaluation is defined. Currently, we are gathering all of the necessary data for formal presentation of the results. Briefly stated for TVC application, we feel that the brushless dc machine operating under PWM current control is the best option. Substantial details on the topic, with supporting simulation results, will be provided later, in the form of a technical paper prepared for submission and also in the next progress report with more detail than allowed for paper publication.

Haskew, Tim A.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Guidance, Navigation, and Control for NASA Lunar Pallet Lander

The NASA Lander Technology project is leading the development and integration of the Lunar Pallet Lander (LPL) concept. The objective is to demonstrate precision landing by delivering a payload to the lunar surface within 100 meters of a landing target. Potential landing sites are selected near the lunar pole where water may be present in permanently shadowed regions that could enable future in-situ resource utilization. The LPL is part of a sequence of missions aimed at maturing the necessary technologies, such as lunar precision landing sensors, that will enable the next generation of multi-ton lunar payloads and human landers. This paper provides an overview of the Mission Design, Guidance Navigation and Control (GNC) algorithms, and sensor suite. The results show the LPL simulated trajectory and landing precision performance under nominal and dispersed conditions. The landing precision simulation confirms the need to rely on high-accuracy navigation techniques and sensors such as Terrain Relative Navigation (TRN) and the Navigation Doppler Lidar (NDL), currently being developed for space applications. The results also demonstrate the ability of the guidance and control system to perform a soft lunar touchdown by combining thrust vector control during the solid rocket motor deceleration phase, and pulse engine control, for the liquid powered descent phase.

Orphee, Juan↗
NASA NTRS1972

Use of the flight simulator in the design of a STOL research aircraft.

Piloted simulator tests on the NASA-Ames Flight Simulator for Advanced Aircraft motion base played a major role in guiding the design of the Modified C-8A 'Buffalo' augmentor wing jet flap STOL research airplane. Design results are presented for the flight control systems, lateral-directional SAS, hydraulic systems, and engine and thrust vector controls. Emphasis is given to lateral control characteristics on STOL landing approach, engine-out control and recovery techniques in the powered-lift regime, and operational flight procedures which affected airplane design.

Spitzer, R. E.↗
NASA NTRS1999

Force and Moment Approach for Achievable Dynamics Using Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion

This paper describes a general form of nonlinear dynamic inversion control for use in a generic nonlinear simulation to evaluate candidate augmented aircraft dynamics. The implementation is specifically tailored to the task of quickly assessing an aircraft's control power requirements and defining the achievable dynamic set. The achievable set is evaluated while undergoing complex mission maneuvers, and perfect tracking will be accomplished when the desired dynamics are achievable. Variables are extracted directly from the simulation model each iteration, so robustness is not an issue. Included in this paper is a description of the implementation of the forces and moments from simulation variables, the calculation of control effectiveness coefficients, methods for implementing different types of aerodynamic and thrust vectoring controls, adjustments for control effector failures, and the allocation approach used. A few examples illustrate the perfect tracking results obtained.

Ostroff, Aaron J.↗