Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “6-dof”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

203 records · Page 12

NASA LaRC Contribution to the High Angle Working Group of the Third Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop: BSCW Shock Buffet

FUN3D Core Capabilities - Established as a research code in late 1980s; now supports numerous internal and external efforts across the speed range - Solves 2D/3D steady and unsteady Euler and RANS equations on node-based mixed element grids for compressible and incompressible flows - General dynamic mesh capability: any combination of rigid / overset / morphing grids, including 6-DOF effects - Aeroelastic modeling using mode shapes, full FEM, etc. - Constrained / multipoint adjoint-based design and mesh adaptation - Distributed development team using agile/extreme software practices including 24/7 regression, performance testing - Capabilities fully integrated, online documentation, training videos, tutorials

Pawel Chwalowski↗

Performance Analysis of A Dual Quaternion Guidance Algorithm Applicable During Lunar Approach With A Hazard Avoidance Maneuver

There is currently a need for advanced guidance and targeting algorithms that can provide real-time trajectories in the presence of state and vehicle constraints during powered descent. The Safe & Precise Landing Integrated Capabilities Evolution (SPLICE) program aims to mature Hazard Detection (HD) technology along with advanced navigation and guidance algorithms. This paper will report the overall performance of the SPLICE Dual Quaternion Guidance (DQG) algorithm which is a 6-Degree-of-Freedom (6-DOF) convex optimization-based guidance algorithm that can enforce multiple vehicle and state constraints required for Hazard Detection Lidar (HDL) scans during the approach phase. DQG was tested in a closed-loop lunar descent simulation with realistic HDL sensing constraints in a Monte Carlo assessment of 1000 dispersed runs.

Guidance↗

Advanced Supersonic Parachute Inflation Research Experiment 2 (ASPIRE2) Flight Mechanics and Parachute Performance

The Advanced Supersonic Parachute Inflation Re-search Experiment-2 (ASPIRE2) program consists of a sounding rocket flight test to be launched at Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) in 2025. This effort seeks to qualify the supersonic parachute for the Sample Retrieval Lander (SRL) under the Mars Sample Return (MSR) program, building off the successes of its predecessor program, ASPIRE, which launched in both 2017 and 2018. The conops for the ASPIRE2 mission are shown in Figure 1 relative to its predecessor. While the ASPIRE pro-gram qualified a 21.5 m diameter disk-gap band parachute deployed at Mach 1.7, the SRL parachute will be increased to 24 m in diameter and target a Mach 2.1 parachute deployment condition, the largest diameter supersonic parachute deployed at the highest Mach number to date. These requirements are driven by the increased landing mass of the sample retrieval lander, which is roughly a 50% increase over that of the Mars2020 entry vehicle. These changes necessitate ASPIRE2 to certify the parachute performance under similar deployment conditions. This work will cover the 6-DoF para-chute model implementation and flight mechanics performance for the ASPIRE2 campaign and discuss how these results will impact the design of the test article. The ASPIRE2 trajectory is simulated using a multi-body flight dynamics tool, Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories II (POST2). This work will summarize both the flight mechanics and parachute modeling (from payload separation until splashdown) and performance for this mission. Various design trades will be assessed such as para-chute tuning parameters as well as vehicle center of gravity location.

Evan Roelke↗

Weight and Balance Considerations for Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Applied to the Parallel Electric-Gas Architecture with Synergistic Utilization Scheme (PEGASUS) Concept

The focus of this research was to understand the impact of batteries and electric motors on the weight and balance of the Parallel Electric-Gas Architecture with Synergistic Utilization Scheme (PEGASUS) concept. Because electrified aircraft propulsion components can comprise a large part of an aircraft’s weight, their integration has a significant impact on the center of gravity location and the related stability characteristics of the aircraft. We developed an analysis framework that enabled estimating the weight and volume of electrified aircraft components, their contribution to the center of gravity location, and the stability and performance of the aircraft. Trades were performed on battery placement, wing attachment point, and electric motor power to determine their impact on figures of merit such as maximum takeoff weight and block fuel. We identified batteries, and to a lesser extent electric motors, as having a large impact on aircraft center of gravity and the required horizontal tail size for longitudinal static stability. Placing electric component weight as far forward as possible resulted in reductions in the horizontal tail size required to maintain static stability. Configurations output from this framework were also evaluated using a six-degree-of-freedom simulation to quantify dynamic stability characteristics. Although shifting weight forward reduced horizontal tail size, it negatively impacted dynamic stability. This study confirms that mass property modeling and dynamic simulation, which are usually limited in conceptual design, are important for electrified aircraft concepts.

electrified aircraft propulsion↗

Evaluation of Precision Landing Performance Using A Generalized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink Framework

NASA’s science and exploration goals to return to the Moon and beyond will need to perform precision landings to place humans and cargo supplies near places of scientific interest, surface resources, or pre-established basecamps. With the maturation of new navigation technology, such as terrain relative navigation, precision landing is now feasible, enabling new exploration sites, such as the lunar poles. However, verification of precision landing performance becomes crucial since not reaching the designated landing site would have a high risk of loss of mission. Therefore, having a high-fidelity simulation platform to evaluate six degrees of freedom vehicle performance during high-risk phases of flight such landing is a fundamental part of the system verification and risk reduction. The NASA Marshall Space Flight Center has developed the GeneraLized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink® (GLASS) tool which incorporates guidance, navigation, and control algorithms, as well as vehicle and environmental models, such as gravity, vehicle mass properties, navigation sensors, propulsion, and terrain models. GLASS uses the MathWorks® Simulink® environment which provides a model-based design framework that allows the incorporation of vehicle models in a modular architecture. The Simulink® environment provides seamless integration with all the MathWorks® capabilities and toolboxes, such as control design toolboxes and Simscape™ Multibody™ dynamics toolbox. The MathWorks® environment also allows for guidance, navigation, and control algorithms to be auto coded in C language, enabling quick software and hardware in the loop testing. This paper provides an overview of GLASS capabilities for analyzing precision landing performance, including navigation trades applied to a NASA human lander reference design architecture.

Guidance↗