Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Booster Separation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1991

STS-37 Breakfast / Ingress / Launch & ISO Camera Views

The primary objective of the STS-37 mission was to deploy the Gamma Ray Observatory. The mission was launched at 9:22:44 am on April 5, 1991, onboard the space shuttle Atlantis. The mission was led by Commander Steven Nagel. The crew was Pilot Kenneth Cameron and Mission Specialists Jerry Ross, Jay Apt, and Linda Godwing. This videotape shows the crew having breakfast on the launch day, with the narrator introducing them. It then shows the crew's final preparations and the entry into the shuttle, while the narrator gives information about each of the crew members. The countdown and launch is shown including the shuttle separation from the solid rocket boosters. The launch is reshown from 17 different camera views. Some of the other camera views were in black and white.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1991

STS-37/Atlantis/GRO

The primary objective of the STS-37 mission was to deploy the Gamma Ray Observatory. The mission was launched at 9:22:44 am on April 5, 1991, onboard the space shuttle Atlantis. The mission was led by Commander Steven Nagel. The crew was Pilot Kenneth Cameron and Mission Specialists Jerry Ross, Jay Apt, and Linda Godwing. This videotape shows the crew having breakfast on the launch day. It then shows the crew's final preparations and the entry into the shuttle. The countdown and launch is shown including the shuttle separation from the solid rocket boosters. The launch is reshown from several different camera views. Some of the other camera views were in black and white. The deployment of the Gamma Ray Observatory is shown, including an unscheduled spacewalk to deploy the high gain antenna. The landing at Edwards Air Force Base is shown. The landing is also shown from several different cameras views.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

STS-103 Mission Highlights Resource Tape (1 of 2)

The STS-103 flight crew, Commander Curtis L. Brown, Pilot Scott J. Kelly, Mission Specialists Steven L. Smith, C. Michael Foale, John M. Grunsfeld, Claude Nicollier, and Jean-Francois Clervoy, are seen performing pre-launch activities such as crew suit-up, and ride out to the launch pad for a night launch. Also, included are various panoramic views of the shuttle on the pad. The crew is readied in the White Room for their mission. After the closing of the hatch and arm retraction, launch activities are shown including countdown, engine ignition, launch, and the separation of the Solid Rocket Boosters. Once on-orbit the primary objective is to capture and service the Hubble Space Telescope. Included are various live shots of the payload bay showing the flight support system, the orbiter replacement unit carrier and the forward fixture that house the new Fine Guidance System (FGS). Smith and Grunsfeld replaces and changes the sensor units during the first space walk of this mission. The second space walk by Nicollier and Foale includes the changing of the computer and installation of the FGS. This is tape 1 of 2, tape 2 has a report number of NONP-NASA-VT-2000036031.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

Aerodynamic Database Development for the Hyper-X Airframe Integrated Scramjet Propulsion Experiments

This paper provides an overview of the activities associated with the aerodynamic database which is being developed in support of NASA's Hyper-X scramjet flight experiments. Three flight tests are planned as part of the Hyper-X program. Each will utilize a small, nonrecoverable research vehicle with an airframe integrated scramjet propulsion engine. The research vehicles will be individually rocket boosted to the scramjet engine test points at Mach 7 and Mach 10. The research vehicles will then separate from the first stage booster vehicle and the scramjet engine test will be conducted prior to the terminal decent phase of the flight. An overview is provided of the activities associated with the development of the Hyper-X aerodynamic database, including wind tunnel test activities and parallel CFD analysis efforts for all phases of the Hyper-X flight tests. A brief summary of the Hyper-X research vehicle aerodynamic characteristics is provided, including the direct and indirect effects of the airframe integrated scramjet propulsion system operation on the basic airframe stability and control characteristics. Brief comments on the planned post flight data analysis efforts are also included.

Engelund, Walter C.↗
NASA NTRS2000

STS-106 Crew Activity Report/Flight Day 1 Highlights

On this first day of the STS-106 Atlantis mission, the flight crew, Commander Terrence W. Wilcutt, Pilot Scott D. Altman, and Mission Specialists Daniel C. Burbank, Edward T. Lu, Richard A. Mastracchio, Yuri Ivanovich Malenchenko, and Boris V. Morukov are seen performing pre-launch activities. They are shown sitting around the breakfast table with the traditional cake, suiting-up, and riding out to the launch pad. The final inspection team is seen as they conduct their final check of the space shuttle on the launch complex. Also, included are various panoramic views of the shuttle on the pad. The crew is readied in the 'white room' for their mission. After the closing of the hatch and arm retraction, launch activities are shown including countdown, engine ignition, launch, and the separation of the Solid Rocket Boosters.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2003

STS-112 Mission Highlights Resource Tape, Part 1 of 3

This video, Part 1 of 3, shows the activities of the STS-112 crew on flight days 1 - 3. The crew included Commander Jeff Ashby, Pilot Pam Melroy, and Mission Specialists Sandy Magnus, David Wolf, Piers Sellers, and Fyodor Yurchikhin. Flight day 1 begins with an introduction of the astronauts, seen during their pre-flight banquet, and suit-up. The ingress of some of the crew into the Space Shuttle Atlantis is shown. The launch footage includes the view from a camera mounted on the shuttle's external fuel tank, as well as replays. The separation of the shuttle's booster rockets is also shown. On flight day 2 a view of the payload bay and orbiter docking mechanism on Atlantis is shown from a camera on the shuttle's robotic arm. The footage of flight day 3 includes the docking of Atlantis and the International Space Station (ISS), and the exchange of greetings between the two spacecrews. Views of Earth include a pass over the western United States on flight day 2, and a night view of China on flight day 3.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2002

STS-111/Endeavour/ISS UF2 Pre-Launch Activities: Launch with Playbacks

This video of the preflight preparations for and launch of Space Shuttle Endeavour on STS-111 begins with a view of Endeavour on the launch pad. Additional launch pad views leading up to liftoff are interspersed with footage from the Firing Room at Kennedy Space Center, the crew's prelaunch activities, and inspection of the crew members in the White Room before boarding Endeavour. The crew is introduced by a narrator during the preflight banquet and suiting up, and a later clip shows them departing to the launch site. The crew consists of Commander Kenneth Cockrell, Pilot Paul Lockhart, Mission Specialists Philippe Perrin and Franklin Chang-Diaz, and the Expedition 5 crew of the International Space Station (ISS) (Commander Valery Korzun and Flight Engineers Peggy Whitsun and Sergei Treschev). The nozzles on Endeavour's Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) are swiveled before liftoff, and the launch is shown past the separation of the solid rocket boosters. After a brief clip from the Mission Control Center at Johnson Space Center, the following launch replays are shown: Beach Tracker, VAB, Pad A, Tower 1, UCS-15, Grandstand, Cocoa Beach DOAMS, Playalinda DOAMS, UCS-23, and OTV-070.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2006

Simulation Assisted Risk Assessment: Blast Overpressure Modeling

A probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) approach has been developed and applied to the risk analysis of capsule abort during ascent. The PRA is used to assist in the identification of modeling and simulation applications that can significantly impact the understanding of crew risk during this potentially dangerous maneuver. The PRA approach is also being used to identify the appropriate level of fidelity for the modeling of those critical failure modes. The Apollo launch escape system (LES) was chosen as a test problem for application of this approach. Failure modes that have been modeled and/or simulated to date include explosive overpressure-based failure, explosive fragment-based failure, land landing failures (range limits exceeded either near launch or Mode III trajectories ending on the African continent), capsule-booster re-contact during separation, and failure due to plume-induced instability. These failure modes have been investigated using analysis tools in a variety of technical disciplines at various levels of fidelity. The current paper focuses on the development and application of a blast overpressure model for the prediction of structural failure due to overpressure, including the application of high-fidelity analysis to predict near-field and headwinds effects.

Lawrence, Scott L.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Study of Uncertainties of Predicting Space Shuttle Thermal Environment

Quantitative estimates of the uncertainty in predicting aerodynamic heating rates for a fully reusable space shuttle system are developed and the impact of these uncertainties on Thermal Protection System (TPS) weight are discussed. The study approach consisted of statistical evaluations of the scatter of heating data on shuttle configurations about state-of-the-art heating prediction methods to define the uncertainty in these heating predictions. The uncertainties were then applied as heating rate increments to the nominal predicted heating rate to define the uncertainty in TPS weight. Separate evaluations were made for the booster and orbiter, for trajectories which included boost through reentry and touchdown. For purposes of analysis, the vehicle configuration is divided into areas in which a given prediction method is expected to apply, and separate uncertainty factors and corresponding uncertainty in TPS weight derived for each area.

Fehrman, A. L.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Overview of Experimental Investigations for Ares I Launch Vehicle Development

Another concern for the vehicle during its design trajectory was the separation of the first stage solid rocket booster from the upper stage component after it had depleted its solid fuel propellant. There has been some concern about the interstage of the first stage from clearing the nozzle of the J2-X engine. A detailed separation aerodynamic wind tunnel investigation was conducted in the AEDC VKF Tunnel A to help to investigate the interaction aerodynamic effects5. A comparison of the separation plane details between the Ares I architecture and the Ares I-X demonstration flight architecture is shown in figure 12. The Ares I design requires a more complex separation sequence and requires better control in order to avoid contact with the nozzle of the upper stage engine. The interstage, which houses the J2-X engine for the Ares I vehicle, must be able to separate cleanly to avoid contact of the J2-X engine. There is only about approximately 18 inches of buffer inside the interstage on each size of the nozzle so this is a challenging controlled separation event. This complex experimental investigation required two separate Ares I models (upper stage and first stage with interstage attached) with independent strain gauge balances installed in each model. It also required the Captive Trajectory System (CTS) that was needed to precisely locate the components in space relative to each other to fill out the planned test matrix. The model setup in the AEDC VKF Tunnel A is shown in figure 13. The CTS remotely positioned the first stage at the required x, y, and z positions and was able to provide interactions within 0.2" of the upper stage. A sample of the axial force on the first stage booster is shown in figure 14. These results, as a function of separation distance between the two stages, are compared to pre-test CFD results. Since this is a very challenging, highly unsteady flow field for CFD to correctly model, the experimental results have been utilized by GN&C discipline to more accurately represent the interaction aerodynamics. In addition to the integrated forces and moments obtained from the test, flow visualization data was obtained from this test in the form of Schlieren photographs, as shown in figure 15, which show the shock structure and interaction effects after the two stages separate during flight. This separation test was crucial in the successful flight test of the Ares I-X vehicle and provided the GN&C discipline with the unpowered proximity aerodynamic effect for a separation of the Ares I vehicle.

Tomek, William G.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Delta II Mars Pathfinder

Final preparations for lift off of the DELTA II Mars Pathfinder Rocket are shown. Activities include loading the liquid oxygen, completing the construction of the Rover, and placing the Rover into the Lander. After the countdown, important visual events include the launch of the Delta Rocket, burnout and separation of the three Solid Rocket Boosters, and the main engine cutoff. The cutoff of the main engine marks the beginning of the second stage engine. After the completion of the second stage, the third stage engine ignites and then cuts off. Once the third stage engine cuts off spacecraft separation occurs.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1986

Analysis of separation of a two-stage winged launch vehicle

The feasibility of separating a two-stage winged, parallel configured launch vehicle at Mach 3 has been determined. The two-stage fully-reusable launch vehicle is comprised of an orbiter, which can be used alone as a single-stage-to-orbit vehicle, and a booster which is identical to the baseline orbiter design. A three-degree-of-freedom analysis was conducted on the ascent trajectory of the two-stage concept to determine the optimum staging conditions. The booster provides all propellant for both stages using a crossfeed system until staging occurs. After staging, the empty booster glides back to the launch site for a horizontal landing. To analyze the separation maneuver, the six-degree-of-freedom equations of motion for both stages were numerically integrated using a computer program which incorporates analytically derived interference aerodynamic data. The necessary conditions for a successful separation were determined and required the use of active controls on both the orbiter and booster. Once the booster and orbiter were separated, a three-degree-of-freedom analysis was conducted on the booster's glideback trajectory.

Naftel, J. C.↗
NASA NTRS2003

Stage Separation Wind Tunnel Tests of a Generic Two-Stage-to-Orbit Launch Vehicle

In support of NASA s Space Launch Initiative Program, stage separation wind tunnel tests of a generic two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) launch vehicle were conducted to determine the interference aerodynamic forces and moments and to determine the proximity flow environment. The tests were conducted in the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center s Aerodynamic Research Facility using a manual separation fixture for a Mach number range of 2.74 to 4.96 and separation distances up to 80 percent and 35 percent of the body length in the vehicle X and Z coordinates, respectively. For the TSTO bimese, winged-body vehicle configuration, both wing-to-wing and wing-to-fuselage configurations were tested. Individual-body force and moment, schlieren, and surface pressure data were acquired. The results showed that the proximity aerodynamics were dominated by complex bow shock interactions, and that he booster was statically unstable at several separation positions. As compared to the isolated body, the proximity normal force change with pitch angle was found to be nearly the same, and the proximity axial force increased, in general, by 3% for both bodies.

Bordelon, Wayne J., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Calibration of propulsion simulation nozzles for space shuttle booster and orbiter models for the abort/separation staging experimental program

An experimental program to determine the power-on aerodynamic flight characteristics of the booster and orbiter vehicles during the abort separation maneuver is reported. An essential contribution to such a test program is the gas dynamic simulation of the size and shape of the plumes emitting from the full-scale orbiter and booster main propulsion systems. The two major effects of the plume which must be simulated are: the interaction of the plume with the external flow field, and the direct impingement of the plumes on surfaces which are enveloped by the plume. To accomplish the objective of correct plume simulation, the similarity parameters developed by Herron and the requirement to match momentum flux per unit area between the model and the full-scale systems, were applied to the orbiter and booster propulsion systems.

Baker, L. R., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Vibration analysis of a 1/15 scale dynamic model of a space shuttle configuration

The natural frequencies and mode shapes of a 1/15 scale space shuttle dynamics model are analytically determined. The model, a parallel beam type structure with delta wings, is dynamically representative of the stiffness and mass properties of an early space shuttle design. Important characteristics of the model are elastic interfaces with adjustable spring rates. Normal mode computations are made using the finite element modeling technique as implemented in the NASTRAN (NASA Structural Analysis) computer program. The feasibility of neglecting elastic deformations in the lower modes was investigated using a rigid body model. Using NASTRAN, natural frequencies and mode shapes were first calculated for the booster fuselage, orbiter fuselage, and both delta wings in a free-free condition. Next, the fuselages were connected for various spring rates. Then the wings were attached to each fuselage, and the booster and orbiter were analyzed as separate airplanes. Finally, the two airplanes were elastically joined, and the complete model was analyzed.

Thornton, E. A.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Summary of results of parametric studies of space shuttle booster, orbiter, and launch vehicle concepts

The results of analytical and experimental parametric studies of space shuttle booster, orbiter and launch vehicle aerodynamics are described. During this study over 1700 hours of experimental wind tunnel tests were conducted on several versions of the shuttle booster, orbiter and launch vehicle. Fifteen separate tests were conducted in three different test facilities. Due to the number of test programs conducted and the time required for test preparation, analysis of the test data has been limited to that required to drive the experimental program. A brief description of each of the experimental tests conducted including the test purpose and approach is included. Several test models were designed and fabricated in support of the experimental program. These models are described.

Bradley, D.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Space Shuttle Program Progress Report

A status report is presented on progress in the design, manufacturing and testing of components of the space transportation system (STS), and primarily the Space Shuttle vehicles. Project landmarks from 1969 to 1981 are indicated, fabrication of the Shuttle Orbiter and rollout of the first prototype are described, fabrication and assembly of some Orbiter parts are sketched, and some of the subsystems (thermal protection, avionics, maneuvering aids, reaction control, remote manipulator) are described. Also discussed are: Orbiter carrier aircraft, Shuttle main engine and tests, external fuel tank, solid rocket booster, launch and landing facilities. A separate section is devoted to ground tests (vibration, propulsion, electronics, avionics integration), trainers and simulators, and flight tests (captive flight, free flight, landing and approach, orbital flight).

Thompson, R. F.↗