SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “CRYOGENIC PROPELLANT”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Cryogenic Propellant Tank Sub-Surface Pressurization with Bang-bang Control
No abstract available
Validation of High-Resolution CFD Method for Slosh Damping Extraction of Baffled Cryogenic Propellant Tanks
Propellant slosh is a potential source of disturbance critical to the stability of space vehicles. The slosh dynamics are typically represented by a mechanical model of a spring-mass-damper. This mechanical model is then included in the equation of motion of the entire vehicle for Guidance, Navigation and Control analysis. A Volume-Of-Fluid (VOF) based Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) program developed at MSFC was applied to extract slosh damping in the baffled tank from the first principle. First the experimental data using water with sub-scale smooth wall tank were used as the baseline validation. It is demonstrated that CFD can indeed accurately predict low damping values from the smooth wall at different fill levels. The damping due to a ring baffles at different depths from the free surface was then simulated, and fairly good agreement with experimental measurement was observed. Comparison with an empirical correlation of Miles equation is also made.
Numerical Modeling of Thermal Stratification in Cryogenic Propellant Tanks
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis is performed to investigate liquid blockage in the helium pressure line associated with the propellant (MMH) tank. If a certain amount of propellant is trapped within the helium pressure line, the question is whether the given amount of helium that is available can provide a clear helium flow path with no adverse consequences such as over pressurization of the pressure line.
Cryogenic Propellant Storage and Transfer (CPST) Engineering Development Unit (EDU) Multilayer Insulation (MLI) Installation Overview
No abstract available
The Pursuit of In-Space Cryogenic Propellant Storage and Transfer
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Development of a Surface Cryogenic Propellant Transfer Concept for Martian Operations
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Numerical Modeling of Helium Bubbling in a Cryogenic Propellant Tank
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A Transient Hydrodynamic Model of Screen Channel Liquid Acquisition Devices for In-Space Cryogenic Propellant Management
Screen channel liquid acquisition devices (LADs) will play a crucial role in future deep space travel. It is essential that vapor-free delivery of propellants during tank-to-tank transfer is ensured to maximize yield from storage tanks and prevent potential combustion instabilities. The screen channel LAD utilizes a fine screen wire mesh that can separate phases in a low Bond number (i.e. microgravity) environment using surface tension forces. This study presents the development and verification of a new model for transient screen compliance, one of the influential factors for screen channel LAD design. Screen compliance is crucial during LAD channel outflow transients because the slight deflection of the screen can provide needed mass to satisfy rapid outflow demands and reduce the pressure difference across the screen. The model is successfully verified against CFD simulations. In addition, the characteristic speed for the governing screen compliance equations is derived which allows for numerical stability criteria to be established. As shown in this study, the transient maximum pressure difference across the screen can greatly exceed the steady state maximum pressure difference across the screen in many cases.
Hydrodynamic model of screen channel liquid acquisition devices for in-space cryogenic propellant management
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Storable orbit transfer vehicle
Orbit transfer vehicles (OTV) are evaluated against mission model requirement. Mission suitability of OTVs using storable propellant, cryogenic propellant, and electric propulsion systems is outlined. Energy required, g-level, spacecraft deploy/return, operational constraints, mission duration, and packaging are considered.
Zero-g propellant gauging of cryogenics
Measurement of cryogenic propellant quantities under conditions of weightlessness
Advanced Chemical Propulsion Study
A study was performed of advanced chemical propulsion technology application to space science (Code S) missions. The purpose was to begin the process of selecting chemical propulsion technology advancement activities that would provide greatest benefits to Code S missions. Several missions were selected from Code S planning data, and a range of advanced chemical propulsion options was analyzed to assess capabilities and benefits re these missions. Selected beneficial applications were found for higher-performing bipropellants, gelled propellants, and cryogenic propellants. Technology advancement recommendations included cryocoolers and small turbopump engines for cryogenic propellants; space storable propellants such as LOX-hydrazine; and advanced monopropellants. It was noted that fluorine-bearing oxidizers offer performance gains over more benign oxidizers. Potential benefits were observed for gelled propellants that could be allowed to freeze, then thawed for use.
Advanced Chemical Propulsion Study
A study was performed of advanced chemical propulsion technology application to space science (Code S) missions. The purpose was to begin the process of selecting chemical propulsion technology advancement activities that would provide greatest benefits to Code S missions. Several missions were selected from Code S planning data, and a range of advanced chemical propulsion options was analyzed to assess capabilities and benefits re these missions. Selected beneficial applications were found for higher-performing bipropellants, gelled propellants, and cryogenic propellants. Technology advancement recommendations included cryocoolers and small turbopump engines for cryogenic propellants; space storable propellants such as LOX-hydrazine; and advanced monopropellants. It was noted that fluorine-bearing oxidizers offer performance gains over more benign oxidizers. Potential benefits were observed for gelled propellants that could be allowed to freeze, then thawed for use.
Reliable Ignition of LOX-LCH4 Propellants
No cryogenic Reaction Control System (RCS) has ever flown in space. Cryogenic propellants are baselined by HLS and CLPS partners and are the key use case for future ISRU manufactured propellants. A reliable LOX/LCH 4 RCS is an enabling technology for human Lunar and Mars exploration. In previous thermal vacuum (<275 F, <10 torr) testing at NASA GRC Plum Brook, the team uncovered anomalous LOX/LCH4 engine ignition phenomena where flame kernels quenched at these ultra cold hardware temperatures, leading to many pulses where the engines would not light. In 2022, the project was able to recreate the no light condition with an upgraded Frost-Mint test stand at JSC. This project implemented test stand improvements and procured propellants and follow on engine components for a hot fire campaign beginning in November 2024 which will attempt to ignite the RCS engine at ultra cold vacuum conditions by modifying the engine mixture ratio. New modeling techniques were implemented to account for past no lights and are an enabling method to make lunar surface go no go predictions based on hardware conditions. This was enabled by significant improvements to the Frost Mint system, which reduced moisture build up and leaks, increased propellant availability, leading to more attempts at thermal vacuum hot-fires.
Integrated Ground Operations Demonstration for Responsive Space Access
Integrated Ground Operations Demonstration Units (IGODU) project developed to mature, integrate and demonstrate advancements in cryogenics, system health management and command and control technologies. Two Distinct Testing Environments: a) GODU Integrated Refrigeration and Storage - GODU LH2; b) GODU Autonomous Control - GODU LO2. Scope: I. GODU LH2: a) Investigate alternative storage and distribution architecture for future cryogenic propellant operations. b) Demonstrate advanced cryogenic propellant handling operations (liquefaction, storage and distribution) of normal boiling point and sub-cooled cryogenic propellants. II. GODU L02: a) Develop and demonstrate advanced control and health management technologies and techniques to autonomously control cryogenic propellant servicing operations. b) Investigate modern COTS hardware and control systems in an effort to reduce the "standing army" of engineers associated with maintaining and operating ground systems through the use of health management and autonomous control technologies. Goals: a) Raise Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) and Integration Readiness Levels (IRL) of several key technology development areas. b) Reduce operations lifecycle costs of future test programs and launch complexes. c) Demonstrate technologies for future exploration beyond low earth orbit. d) Serve as test environments for extraterrestrial surface operations.