Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Geolocation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluating SAR Radiometric Terrain Correction products: Optimal products for applied users

Operational applications for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) are under development around the world, driven by the free-and-open access of SAR C-band observations that Sentinel-1 of Copernicus has been providing since 2014. Groups like SERVIR, a joint initiative between NASA and USAID, are at the forefront of remote sensing applied uses, and have made many significant contributions to lower the barrier to access, process, and apply SAR for ecosystem services. A takeaway from the SERVIR experience in using SAR is the need to use the appropriate SAR polarimetric product. Radiometric Terrain Correction (RTC) is a key entry-level product for multiple applications that range from ecosystems to hazards. Many software packages exist to create RTC products from SLC or GRD-type Level-1 SAR data, some of which were released only recently, e.g. Interferometric SAR Computing Environment (ISCE) added an RTC module in April 2020. In addition, new versions of open source softwares are expected to address known issues from previous versions, such as Sentinel-1 Toolbox from the European Space Agency (SNAP-7). Despite the growing availability of RTC software solutions, little work has been done to identify differences between RTC products from different softwares. And to address the question, which open-source software produces the most accurate RTC product? This work evaluates Sentinel-1 RTC products created with three different softwares and approaches, including SNAP-7, ISCE-2, and a pseudo RTC product derived from GEE. The GAMMA-derived RTC product, a known optimal RTC and implemented by Alaska Satellite Facility (ASF), is used as a reference. Time series stacks over ten different sites representing varied terrain and ecosystems are evaluated. Products are evaluated for geolocation quality, absolute radiometric calibration, and for the fidelity of the radiometric terrain flattening. The results provide direct guidance and recommendations about the quality of the RTC products obtained from open source methods. This understanding is key to develop operational applications that rely on SAR Sentinel-1 data that need affordable and scalable solutions.

Africa Flores-Anderson↗
NASA NTRS2022

Assessment of ICESat-2’s Horizontal Accuracy Using Precisely Surveyed Terrains in McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica

This article presents an assessment of the horizontal accuracy and precision of the laser altimetry observations collected by NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) mission. We selected the terrain-matching method to determine the position of laser altimeter profiles within a precisely known surface, represented by a digital elevation model (DEM). We took this classical approach a step further, approximated the DEM by planar surfaces, and calculated the optimal position of the laser profile by minimizing the square sum of the elevation differences between reference DEMs and ICESat-2 profiles. We found the highly accurate DEMs of the McMurdo Dry Valleys (DV), Antarctica, ideal for this research because of their stable landscape and rugged topography. We computed the 3-D shift parameters of 379 different laser altimeter profiles along two reference ground tracks collected within the first two years of the mission. Analyzing these results revealed a total geolocation error (mean +1 σ ) of 4.93 m for version 3 and 4.66 m for version 4 data. These numbers are the averages of the six beams, expressed as mean +1 σ and lie well within the mission requirement of 6.5 m.

calibration↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

ICESat-2 Mission: Status, Outlook, and Contributions to Polar Science

The Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) mission carries the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) lidar to measure the changing height of Earth surface. After more than 3 years of science data collection, ATLAS has emitted well over a trillion laser pulses and continues to operate nominally. The ICESat-2 data products were initially released in May 2019, and have been used in over 150 peer-reviewed publications to date. Recent community white papers have noted the importance of ice elevation measurements for the coming decades, and as CryoSat-2 has entered it’s second decade and future missions are uncertain, ICESat-2 will be a critical part of the Earth System Observatory for the 2020s. In the polar regions, ICESat-2 has enabled year-round sea ice freeboard measurements as well as ice sheet elevation changes on seasonal, annual, and decadal time scales when combined with other missions. These data enable measurement of change at fine spatial and temporal scales to help understand or characterize the processes driving these observations. As of this presentation, Release 005 is the current version of the along-track data products, including surface-specific products for sea ice, land ice, ground and canopy height, ocean, and inland water heights. In addition, first versions of gridded data products for land ice, sea ice, and ocean are all available. Data spans the start of the mission (14 October 2018) through early 2022. The ICESat-2 project has also begun to produce and distribute QuickLook products with a nominal 3-day latency (as opposed to the ~45-day latency of the final data products). Initial versions of these QuickLook products have elevation accuracy of ~3 meters, and geolocation accuracy of ~50 meters. All products are available through the National Snow and Ice Data Center (nsidc.org). This presentation will summarize the current state and health of the observatory, current state of the ICESat-2 data products, data product quality assessment, and outlook for the future.

ICESat-2↗
NASA NTRS2022

An Evaluation of NOAA-20 ATMS Instrument Pre-Launch and On-Orbit Performance Characterization

Passive microwave sounders provide the highest-impact observations ingested by major numerical weather prediction (NWP) forecast models. The Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS), built by Northrop Grumman, Azusa, CA, USA, is the latest operational microwave sounder series being launched by the United States to provide both temperature and water vapor soundings of the atmosphere. The first ATMS was launched on the Suomi National Polarorbiting Partnership (SNPP) satellite in 2011. This article focuses on the details of the on-orbit performance characterization of the second ATMS, which launched on November 18, 2017, on the Joint Polar Satellite System-1 (JPSS-1) satellite. After successful commissioning, JPSS-1 was renamed National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-20 (N-20). We present performance characterizations from prelaunch and postlaunch tests, including the thermal vacuum (TVAC) campaign, and postlaunch activities that contribute to the radiance data products. Significant improvements were found for reflector emissivity, 1/ f noise performance, antenna beam efficiency, inter-channel noise correlation, and scan drive bearing design. New geolocation and pointing algorithms were evaluated. The N-20 ATMS has the same channel set, polarizations, scan geometry, and calibration approach as the SNPP ATMS. The N-20 ATMS meets all performance requirements with margin.

Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS)↗
NASA NTRS2021

Improving Cross-track Scanning Radiometers’ Precipitation Retrieval over Ocean by Morphing

Previous studies showed that conical scanning radiometers greatly outperform cross-track scanning radiometers for precipitation retrieval over ocean. This study demonstrates a novel approach to improve precipitation rates at the cross-track scanning radiometers’ observation time by propagating the conical scanning radiometers’ retrievals to the cross-track scanning radiometers’ observation time. The improved precipitation rate is a weighted average of original cross-track radiometers’ retrievals and retrievals propagated from a conical scanning radiometer. The cross-track scanning radiometers include the Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) on board the SNPP satellite and four Microwave Humidity Sounders (MHSs). The conical scanning radiometers include the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) and three Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounders (SSMISs), while the precipitation retrievals from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Microwave Imager (GMI) are taken as the reference. Results show that the morphed precipitation rates agree much better with the reference. The degree of improvement depends on several factors, including the propagated precipitation source, the time interval between the cross-track scanning radiometer and the conical scanning radiometer, the precipitation type (convective versus stratiform), the precipitation events’ size, and the geolocation. The study has potential to greatly improve high-impact weather systems monitoring (e.g., hurricanes) and multisatellite precipitation products. It may also enhance the usefulness of future satellite missions with cross-track scanning radiometers on board.

Yalei You↗
NASA NTRS2022

Terra and Aqua MODIS Collection 7 Level 1B Algorithm

MODIS continues to be an important instrument for NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS). Terra and Aqua MODIS have produced more than 22 and 20 years of global datasets that have significantly helped scientists better understand the Earth’s systems respectively. The MODIS Level-1B (L1B) algorithms use the uncalibrated, geolocated Earth scene observations as input and convert the instrument response into calibrated reflectance and radiance, which are used to generate the downstream science products. The sustained calibration and characterization activities undertaken by the MODIS Characterization Support Team have resulted in several upgrades to the L1B algorithms in order to maintain accurate calibration in the data products. In this paper, we present an overview of the L1B algorithm designated as Collection 7. Various algorithm enhancements both in the reflective bands and thermal bands characterization, are currently under science testing and evaluation. Once applied in data processing (projected in early 2023), they are expected to manifest in improved science products, both in terms of radiometric accuracy and long-term stability.

MODIS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Topographic Products for the Lunar South Pole from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA)

Due to the Moon’s low obliquity and highly cratered topography, its polar environments host regions of extreme illumination conditions. Multiple lines of evidence indicate the presence of geologically stable ice and other volatiles on or below the surface within polar permanently shadowed regions (PSRs). These regions are valuable targets for science and exploration as they hold clues to the history of water in the inner solar system and may hold sufficient reserves for in-situ resource utilization. Standing high above the PSRs, peaks of long-duration sunlight are oases where landed assets can easily generate power and communicate. For these reasons, the lunar south pole is the target of many upcoming missions including NASA’s Artemis program. The Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) onboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) provides the global geodetic framework with which past, present, and future missions can accurately geolocate their data. Laser altimeters like LOLA are unaffected by shadows and, therefore, provide the most direct measurements of topography within PSRs. Here we present the latest work to improve LOLA’s polar topographic maps and resulting derived products, such as PSR maps, which are crucial tools for science and exploration of the polar regions

Michael K Barker↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Quality Assurance of ISS LIS lightning Data

Optical lighting detection from space has been ongoing since 1995 from the Optical Transient detector (1995-2000), then later by the Lightning Imaging Sensors (LIS) on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite (1997-2015) and the International Space Station (ISS) (ISS 2017-present). A rapid readout (2 ms) 128x128 pixel CCD (Charge-coupled Device) array detects optical transients from lightning (events) and transmits the observations to ground. Ground processing determines whether individual events are likely due to lightning or noise. Likely lightning events are then grouped into groups, flashes, and areas and their location on the earth are determined. The lightning data are saved in orbit files; each file containing the time, location, and intensity of the lightning events, groups, flashes, and areas detected during one orbit. Even after this processing anomalies may exist in some of the orbits. A manual quality assurance (QA) procedure is performed monthly to assess the data and omit orbits with obvious anomalies from the dataset. These files are not included in the final dataset that has undergone QA. The manual QA was developed during the OTD mission to identify artifacts that made it through ground processing algorithms. The manual QA process was continued for the TRMM and ISS LIS missions. Many anomalies have been identified and software updates now address many of them. However, some anomalies still occur in the processed datasets. The manual QA process examines the data for obvious issues in the lightning files that passed through the processing algorithms. These files are considered anomalous and are not included in the final QA dataset. Some issues that may cause an orbit to be considered anomalous include: obvious noise (excess events that make it through the processing), suspect geolocation, and excessive missing data packets. As an example, one way noise manifests is as “streaks” in lightning climatology plots. These streaks are especially apparent in low lightning rate regions (eg., over oceans). Since there is no method at present to extract these anomalies during processing, orbit files with significant anomalies are identified and removed from the final QA ISS LIS dataset. The final QA dataset can be obtained files from the Global Hydrometeorological Resource Center (GHRC). This presentation will provide examples of the various anomalies and examine how often the various anomalies occur and how much data is lost due to the omission of the anomalous orbits. Comparisons with OTD and TRMM LIS will also be examined.

ISS↗
NASA NTRS2023

Commercial Smallsat Data Acquisition Program On-ramp #2 Airbus U.S. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Evaluation Report

In 2017, NASA’s Earth Science Division (ESD) launched the Private-Sector Small Constellation Satellite Data Product Pilot, now referred to as the Commercial Smallsat Data Acquisition (CSDA) program. The objective of CSDA is to identify, evaluate, and acquire commercial remote sensing data that support NASA’s Earth science research and application activities. The Pilot successfully concluded in early 2020, when CSDA transitioned into a sustained program with on-ramping opportunities for new vendors as the industry emerges with new candidates and capabilities. In October 2019, a Request for Information (RFI) seeking capability statements from parties interested in providing data from spaceborne platforms was released for the CSDA on-ramp #2 evaluations. To be responsive to the RFI, the commercial satellite constellations had to consist of three or more operating spacecraft actively collecting data in a non-geostationary orbit with full latitudinal coverage and be U.S. companies. Two vendors responded to the RFI and were evaluated by a committee composed of NASA ESD leadership, program managers, and scientists. Both vendors satisfied the RFI requirements and were asked to respond to a Request for Proposal (RFP). After review of the proposals, NASA entered into a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) with Airbus Defense and Space GEO, Inc. (Airbus) U.S. in September 2021 and with BlackSky Geospatial Solutions, Inc. (BlackSky) in November 2021. In this report, CSDA provides an evaluation of the usefulness of data provided by the Airbus U.S. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite constellation, consisting of TerraSAR-X (launched in 2007), TanDEM-X (launched in 2010), and PAZ (launched in 2018), for advancing NASA’s Earth system science research and applications. The evaluation of the BlackSky commercial data will be provided in a separate report. To conduct the Airbus evaluation, NASA’s ESD augmented 13 existing research projects that could potentially benefit from, and had the expertise to evaluate, the commercial data being considered for longer-term purchase. Investigators from NASA’s Research and Analysis Program science focus areas and from NASA’s Applied Sciences Program elements participated in the evaluation. A summary of the research areas evaluated by the Principal Investigator (PI) teams is presented in Figure 3. CSDA also funded a dedicated activity to evaluate the satellite data quality (calibration and geolocation) independently by assessing the accuracy of data from Airbus. Evaluation activities were carried out by the selected PIs from December 7, 2022, to December 7, 2023. Delivery of datasets requested by the researchers began in January 2023. The vendors were evaluated on the accessibility of data, accuracy and completeness of metadata, and promptness and quality of user support services. Datasets purchased during the evaluation have been archived by NASA and will be made available to current and future government-funded researchers in accordance with the End User License Agreement (EULA). This synthesis report distills and integrates the findings of research reports commissioned by NASA for the Airbus evaluation. This report also includes recommendations that inform the way ahead for the program. The scientific results from the evaluations demonstrated that the commercial data from Airbus were able to advance NASA research and applications. However, the PIs encountered limitations that diminished the usefulness of the data due to the amount of effort that was required to access, preprocess, and analyze these data. One significant issue encountered was the limited spatial and temporal coverage of the data in the Airbus archive that could be used to conduct time series analyses or assessments over large spatial scales. Overall, however, the utility and the quality of the evaluated data outweighed the difficulties encountered, and NASA has concluded that the Airbus SAR data would complement NASA’s existing Earth observation capabilities and Airbus U.S. would qualify to participate in the sustained phase of the program.

Batuhan Osmanoglu↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

U.S. IMERG Status

The U.S. Science Team’s Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission (IMERG) product provides estimates of surface precipitation rate and related information on a global 0.1° half-hour grid. It is run three times at increasingly longer latency and higher information input to serve different communities. This presentation will briefly summarize the major upgrades included in Version 07. The Goddard Profiling (GPROF) algorithm (applied to passive microwave sensor data from the GPM virtual constellation) and the Combined Radar-Radiometer Algorithm (CORRA) that provide input to IMERG V07 are both improved, and the new Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks–Dynamic Infrared Rain Rate (PDIR) algorithm is being applied to infrared data, which employs an additional, warmer infrared temperature threshold than the previous infrared scheme and a deep neural network. V07 has improved bias performance as a result of calibrations that now employ the entire swath widths of CORRA and GPROF GPM Microwave Imager precipitation estimates. As well, time continuity in precipitation features is improved as a result of changes to the Kalman filter that approximately preserve the local histogram of precipitation rates (Scheme for Histogram Adjustment with Ranked Precipitation Estimates in the Neighborhood, or SHARPEN), and that better account for differences in sensor performance. A long-standing bug in the geolocation that shifted grid values 0.1° to the east in the latitude band 70°N-S has been corrected. Other changes in V07 include a hierarchical selection among motion vector sources to address deficiencies in the precipitation propagation near orography, an update to the precipitation phase specification for improved consistency with current inputs, and a renewed effort to implement climatological gauge adjustment to the near-real-time Runs. Early evaluations of V07 IMERG show interesting behavior across the TRMM orbit boost that is highly relevant to the planned orbit boost for the GPM Core observatory.

GPM↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Climate Absolute Radiance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) Pathfinder Intercalibration Data Analysis Strategy

One of the prime science objectives of NASA’s Climate Absolute Radiance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) Pathfinder (CPF) mission is to acquire unprecedentedly accurate Système Internationale (SI)-traceable Earth-view measurements that can be used as reference for intercalibrating the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instruments onboard NOAA-20 satellite. The hyperspectral nature of CPF measurements will significantly reduce spectrally induced biases when intercalibrating multiband or broadband satellite instruments with CPF. This advancement eliminates the requirement for spectral band adjustment factors, representing a substantial improvement in sensor intercalibration studies. The CPF intercalibration team is aiming to achieve a maximum intercalibration methodology uncertainty of 0.3 % (k=1). Our studies have revealed that the most significant contribution to the targeted uncertainty budget originates from the combined effects of spatial and temporal matching errors. Spatial matching error arises from discrepancies in CPF and target instrument pixel resolution and geolocation uncertainty, while temporal matching error is caused by changes in scene radiances over time, occurring between when the target and reference instruments observe the same scenes. To estimate the maximum expected uncertainty contribution from these sources, spatial and temporal matching noise analyses were conducted using algorithmically filtered Landsat 9 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-16 ABI CONUS scan data as proxies for CPF and target instruments. In the upcoming conference presentation, we will elaborate on the methodology employed in these experiments, provide details of the data filtering algorithms, and present results of the spatial and temporal matching uncertainty analyses.

Intercalibration↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Automation of Geometric Accuracy Assessment Algorithm

When end-users are using multiple satellite images for a study the first step is often the assessment and rectification of geolocation offsets. We have developed an automated algorithm to calculate the geometric offsets between two satellite images. It splits both images into subset images (chips) and resamples them to a common resolution. Offsets are imposed on matching chips and the Pearson Cross Correlation (PCC) value calculated for each offset, where the best PCC gives the true offsets. With the true offsets corrected for, a quality of image registration is calculated, measurement uncertainty (MU). The MU threshold value is non-uniform across sensors because it depends on spectral characteristics of each sensor. Previously, the MU threshold was determined by manual inspection for each new sensor assessed. In this study, we automated MU threshold determination. 1/MU vs calculated offset approximates a Gaussian function in shape, see abstract image. A Gaussian function is fit to this dataset, and the root of the third derivative is calculated and applied as a quality threshold, removing the data of lower quality from the final assessment of image offsets. We apply this algorithm to commercial satellite data for proof of concept.

Alana Semple↗
NASA NTRS2023

SuperDove Geometric Quality Assessment Summary

We have evaluated Planet’s SuperDove series spatial performance, relative geolocation accuracy over 25 globally distributed locations, band-to-band registration (BBR), and temporal stability at one USA city.

Alana G. Semple↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

AMSR-2 Daily Snow Depth Data Product Using a Neural Network Algorithm Trained by Collocated ICESat-2 Measurements

By using diffusion theory and Monte Carlo lidar radiative transfer simulations, Hu 1 et al. (2022b) has derived snow depth from the first-, second- and third-order moments of the lidar backscattering pathlength distribution. Lu 2 et al. (2022,2024) calculated the snow depth by applying the methods to the satellite ICESat-2 lidar measurements over the Arctic sea ice, as well as land surfaces of Northern Hemisphere. In this paper, a neural network (NN) algorithm, employing several channels from AMSR-2 and the humidity vertical profiles GMAO GEOS-IT, is trained to determine snow depth identified by time and geolocation matched 2019 ICESat-2 snow-depth data during winter months over the Arctic sea ice. The trained NN snow-depth was applied to 2014-2020 AMSR-2 clear pixel data, although the algorithms perform reasonably well in thinner clouds. This paper used AMSR-2 data, a passive microwave instrument to generate a wide range of snow depth data, covering extensive spatial areas in the cross-orbit direction.

Neural Network↗
NASA NTRS2024

PACE Technical Report Series, Volume 12: The PACE Level 1C data format

NASA's Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) mission will make global ocean color and atmospheric measurements to provide extended data records of ocean ecology and global biogeochemistry, along with polarimetric measurements for advanced observations of aerosols, clouds and the ocean. PACE will contain three instruments: the primary Ocean Color Instrument (OCI), and two multi-angle polarimeters (MAPs). The latter instruments are contributed under a ‘Do-No-Harm’ (to the rest of the PACE mission) principle, and the PACE Science Data Processing System (SDPS) is only required to produce Level-1b (geolocated radiances with calibration applied) data without performance requirements. However, there is a strong desire to produce data in a format that merges the disparate spatial resolutions, viewing geometry and sampling nature of the three instruments. Our terminology for this format is Level 1c (L1C). This format will be an input to Level 2 algorithms produced from standalone MAP instrument observations, or from algorithms employing multi-sensor fusion. Creating the L1C format has several components. This includes choice of projection method, the means by which multi-angle views are properly incorporated into that projection (‘aggregation’) the means to represent wavelength and light polarization state, the selection of data to be included within the L1C file, and the handling of ancillary data either required for L1C file generation or needed in that format for L2 processing.

PACE↗
NASA NTRS2023

The 50-Year Landsat Collection 2 Archive

The Landsat global consolidated data archive now exceeds 50 years. In recognition of the need for consistently processed data across the Landsat satellite series, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) initiated collection-based processing of the entire archive that was processed as Collection 1 in 2016. In preparation for the data from the now successfully launched Landsat 9, the USGS reprocessed the Landsat archive as Collection 2 in 2020. This paper describes the rationale for, and the contents and advancements provided by Collection 2, and highlights the differences between the Collection 1 and Collection 2 products. Notably, the Collection 2 products have improved geolocation and, for the first time, the USGS provides a global inventory of Level 2 surface reflectance and surface temperature products. Also for the first time, the USGS used a commercial cloud computing architecture to efficiently process the archive and enable direct cloud access of the Landsat products. The paper concludes with discussion of likely improvements expected in Collection 3 in preparation for the Landsat Next mission that is planned for launch in the early 2030s.

Christopher J Crawford↗
NASA NTRS2016

Initial Navigation Alignment of Optical Instruments on GOES-R

Post-launch alignment errors for the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) and Geospatial Lightning Mapper (GLM) on GOES-R may be too large for the image navigation and registration (INR) processing algorithms to function without an initial adjustment to calibration parameters. We present an approach that leverages a combination of user-selected image-to-image tie points and image correlation algorithms to estimate this initial launch-induced offset and calculate adjustments to the Line of Sight Motion Compensation (LMC) parameters. We also present an approach to generate synthetic test images, to which shifts and rotations of known magnitude are applied. Results of applying the initial alignment tools to a subset of these synthetic test images are presented. The results for both ABI and GLM are within the specifications established for these tools, and indicate that application of these tools during the post-launch test (PLT) phase of GOES-R operations will enable the automated INR algorithms for both instruments to function as intended.

geolocation↗