Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LINAC”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Fundamental R&D for high-Q0 650 MHz SRF cavities for hadron linacs

Upcoming projects requiring high-Q0 ~650 MHz elliptical cavities, such as MSU’s Facility for Rare Isotope Beams’ energy upgrade and Fermilab’s PIP-II, drive a need to better understand RF losses due to magnetic flux. With sample sets from two different Niobium vendors, we explore the efficacy of the fast-cooldown method, and high- temperature annealing in promoting flux expulsion. Additionally, we report the results of vertical tests comparing the effect of electropolishing and furnace baking treatments on the cavity flux sensitivity. We also directly measure the flux pinning force in niobium samples, and correlate it with different heat treatments, and flux expulsion performance.

K.McGee, K.McGee↗
DOE OSTI2023

Controls at the Fermilab PIP-II Superconducting Linac

PIP-II is an 800 MeV superconducting RF linear accelerator under development at Fermilab. As the new first stage in our accelerator chain, it will deliver high-power beam to multiple experiments simultaneously and thus drive Fermilab's particle physics program for years to come. In a pivot for Fermilab, controls for PIP-II are based on EPICS instead of ACNET, the legacy control system for accelerators at the lab. This paper discusses the status of the EPICS controls work for PIP-II. We describe the EPICS tools selected for our system and the experience of operators new to EPICS. We introduce our continuous integration / continuous development environment. We also describe some efforts at cooperation between EPICS and ACNET, or efforts to move towards a unified interface that can apply to both control systems.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

LLRF System Analysis for the Fermilab PIP-II LINAC

Developing long-lived quantum processing units (QPUs) capable of supporting high-fidelity quantum operations is a crucial challenge on the path toward fault-tolerant quantum computing. TESLA-shaped superconducting RF (SRF) cavities, known for photon relaxation times on the order of seconds, provide an excellent foundation for 3D QPUs and quantum memory. This talk presents a novel design that leverages TESLA cavity modes coupled to ancillary transmon qubits, optimized to preserve coherence and control. By carefully engineering the package geometry, optimizing Hamiltonian parameters, and minimizing lossy participation ratios, we achieve photon relaxation times of over 16 ms and 20 ms for the two cavity modes, representing a significant improvement over previous multimode quantum memories. Despite the reduced coupling between the qubit and cavity modes, which is necessary to preserve long lifetimes, the platform supports robust and universal control schemes that are not limited by low coupling strength. We will also discuss how this architecture can lead to scalable, modular quantum computing systems.

Varghese, P. [Fermilab]↗
DOE OSTI2021

Autoencoder Based Analysis of RF Parameters in the Fermilab Low Energy Linac

Machine learning (ML) has the potential for significant impact on the modeling, operation, and control of particle accelerators due to its ability to model nonlinear behavior, interpolate on complicated surfaces, and adapt to system changes over time. Anomaly detection in particular has been highlighted as an area where ML can significantly impact the operation of accelerators. These algorithms work by identifying subtle behaviors of key variables prior to negative events. Efforts to apply ML to anomaly detection have largely focused on subsystems such as RF cavities, superconducting magnets, and losses in rings. However, dedicated efforts to understand how to apply ML for anomaly detection in linear accelerators have been limited. In this paper the use of autoencoders is explored to identify anomalous behavior in measured data from the Fermilab low-energy linear accelerator.

Edelen, Jonathan P. (ORCID:0000000215180652)↗
DOE OSTI2022

High efficiency normal conducting linac for environmental water remediation

A continuous wave (CW) electron accelerator for the treatment of industrial streams including an electron beam source, a modified high efficiency slot coupled cavity, at least one focusing magnet positioned surrounding the accelerator to contain the beam in the accelerator, an efficient radio frequency power supply means for supplying power of a radio frequency to the cavity to induce a TM01 accelerating mode in the cavity, an electron beam spreader or raster, a fixed magnet array or two-dimensional scanning magnet for deflecting the accelerated beam into a desired shape, and an exit window for extracting the deflected electron beam. The accelerator includes a graded-beta cavity to enable use with a low-power pulsed electron source. The accelerator benefits from a low wall-power loss accelerating cavity that is energized with efficient RF sources, enabling it to be operated in continuous wave mode.

Hannon, Fay↗
DOE OSTI2023

Optics Studies for Multipass Energy Recovery at CEBAF: ER@CEBAF

Energy recovery linacs (ERLs), focus on recycling the kinetic energy of electron beam for the purpose of accelerating a newly injected beam within the same accelerating structure. The rising developments in the super conducting radio frequency technology, ERL technology has achieved several noteworthy milestones over the past few decades. In year 2003, Jefferson Lab has successfully demonstrated a single pass energy recovery at the CEBAF accelerator. Furthermore, they conducted successful experiments with IR-FEL demo and upgrades, as well as the UV FEL driver. This multi-pass, multi-GeV range energy recovery demonstration proposed to be carried out at CEBAF accelerator at Jefferson Lab focuses on demonstrating highest energy recovery in super conducting linac in the low-current range. Continuous electron beam accelerate up to 7.5 GeV within 5-passes and decelerate in the next 5-passes recovering RF energy and dumps at a low energy dump. The beamline optics design for recirculating linacs require special attention to avoid beam instabilities due to RF wakefields. Usually, multi-pass linac beam lines require stronger focusing at lower energies as that is necessary to avoid beam breakup (BBU) instabilities, even with this small beam current. The CEBAF linac optics optimization is focused on balancing over-focusing at higher energies and beta excursions at lower energies. The race-track-shaped geometry of CEBAF accelerator allows its linacs to accommodate multiple energy beams simultaneously, while individual recirculating arcs transporting one beam energy, are shared between accelerating/decelerating beams. For the linac optics optimization process, an extended strategy is used that is originally used in 6-pass Recirculating Linac design of the LHeC, to represent the ten passes through a single linac. Using proper mathematical expressions, linac optics optimization can be achieved with evolutionary genetic algorithms, with Multi-Objective optimization. This thesis introduces a CEBAF optics redesign tailored to accommodates the ER@CEBAF multi-pass ER scheme. The isochronous arcs were retuned to match into optics solutions for optimized 10-pass linacs. Within this work, a single bunch particle tracking analysis presented here focuses on the further improvements of the beamline and beam transportation.

Neththikumara, Isurumali↗
DOE OSTI2020

Design and Principles of Linear Accelerators and Colliders." in Particle Physics Reference Library, pp. 295-336. Springer, Cham, 2020.

Linear accelerators (linacs) use alternating radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields to accelerate charged particles in a straight line. Linacs were invented about 95 years ago and have seen many significant technical innovations since. A wide range of particle beams have been accelerated with linacs including beams of electrons, positrons, protons, antiprotons, and heavy ions. Linac parameter possibilities include pulsed versus continuous wave, low and high beam powers, low and high repetition rates, low transverse emittance beams, short bunches with small energy spreads, and accelerated multiple bunches in a single pulse. The number of linacs around the world has grown tremendously with thousands of linacs in present use, many for medical therapy, in industry, and for research and development in a broad spectrum of scientific fields. Researchers have developed accelerators for scientific tools in their own right, being awarded several Nobel prizes. Moreover, linacs and particle accelerators in general have enabled many discovery level science experiments in related fields, resulting in many Nobel prizes as well.

Seeman, John↗
DOE OSTI2026

Contextual modeling and Bayesian Optimization for Improved Injection at the Fermilab Booster

The Fermilab accelerator complex delivers high-intensity proton beams to serve the lab’s neutrino, muon, and fixed-target programs. A normal-conducting Linac accelerates H− beam to 400 MeV and injects into the Booster rapid cycling synchrotron via charge exchange, which accelerates protons to 8 GeV. Injection from the Linac into the Booster is a critical area for high-power performance of the Fermilab proton complex. The Booster is a high-intensity proton ring with extreme space-charge forces which necessitates precise control over the beam losses through the acceleration cycle. The main challenge for the reliability of Booster performance is compensating for drifting conditions in the beam from the Linac, which can drift daily in energy by up to O(1) MeV w.r.t. design. Drifts in Linac orbit and energy must be corrected to match the Booster, while simultaneously accommodating interdependent drifts in transverse and longitudinal beam quality. Operationally, compensation for these changes is addressed by manual tuning of the Linac output energy and/or Booster acceptance, which can be inefficient and time-consuming. This works describes contextual Bayesian Optimization for injection tuning that takes into account the state of Linac beam via information from instrumentation in the injection line (Beam position monitors (BPMs), beam loss monitors (BLMs), wire scanners for transverse profiles (WSs)), as well as RF cavity setting parameters from the Linac.

Sharankova, R. [Fermilab] (ORCID:000000027014593X)↗
DOE OSTI2025

Fermilab's controls development with virtual accelerator

Control Systems development is often the last thing considered when designing and building new equipment, e.g. a new detector or superconducting RF LINAC; however when the new equipment is installed, it is the first thing desired to be operational for testing. Due to frequent delays in building new equipment and project deadlines, control system development and testing is often curtailed. A way to alleviate this problem is to simulate the control system, though this will be challenging for complex systems.The Fermilab PIP-II (proton improvement plan - II) project is being constructed at Fermilab to deliver $800\,MeV$ protons of $>1\,MW$ beam power to replace the present LINAC for the remainder of the existing accelerator complex. The new LINAC consists of a warm front end (WFE), 23 superconducting RF cryomodules (of 5 types), and a beam transfer line (BTL) to the existing complex.The accelerator physics group has a parallel project to create a digital twin (DT) of the PIP-II accelerator. We have coupled the EPICS controls to this DT and are developing both the DT and EPICS software in parallel. This will allow us to develop the EPICS software framework, the HMIs, sequences, high level physics applications, and other services for use in a fully functional control system.This presentation will detail the work that we have performed to date and show demonstrations of controlling and monitoring the status of the accelerator, as well as future plans for this work.

Hanlet, Pierrick [Fermilab]↗