Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Panelized”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

MO-F-201-00: PANEL DISCUSSION: Preparing for Parts 2 and 3 of the ABR Therapy Medical Physics Exam

The goal of this session is to provide guidance to medical physicists undergoing the American Board of Radiology certification process in therapeutic medical physics. This panel discussion will focus on parts 2 (computer-based) and 3 (oral) of the examination. Unlike the latter portions of the exam which are specialty-driven, part 1 is universal for all medical physics fields and will not be addressed. This session is structured into different topics that aim to guide the participants on how to successfully prepare for the board exams. The subjects of discussion will include timing and strategies for exam preparation, crucial differences in preparing for the clinical computer-based exam versus the oral exam, what study tools are currently available for each, etc. The panel discussion format will allow the speakers to collectively present their experience and advice relating to each topic and foment audience participation. Learning Objectives: Know the main differences between what is expected for parts 2 and 3 Know different resources for test preparation Know how to formulate a plan to best study for each part based on the specific skill set the two parts require Know how to best present his/her answers during the oral examination – demeanor, answer structure, etc.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2016

MO-F-201-01: Panel Member

The goal of this session is to provide guidance to medical physicists undergoing the American Board of Radiology certification process in therapeutic medical physics. This panel discussion will focus on parts 2 (computer-based) and 3 (oral) of the examination. Unlike the latter portions of the exam which are specialty-driven, part 1 is universal for all medical physics fields and will not be addressed. This session is structured into different topics that aim to guide the participants on how to successfully prepare for the board exams. The subjects of discussion will include timing and strategies for exam preparation, crucial differences in preparing for the clinical computer-based exam versus the oral exam, what study tools are currently available for each, etc. The panel discussion format will allow the speakers to collectively present their experience and advice relating to each topic and foment audience participation. Learning Objectives: Know the main differences between what is expected for parts 2 and 3 Know different resources for test preparation Know how to formulate a plan to best study for each part based on the specific skill set the two parts require Know how to best present his/her answers during the oral examination – demeanor, answer structure, etc.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2016

MO-F-201-03: Panel Member

The goal of this session is to provide guidance to medical physicists undergoing the American Board of Radiology certification process in therapeutic medical physics. This panel discussion will focus on parts 2 (computer-based) and 3 (oral) of the examination. Unlike the latter portions of the exam which are specialty-driven, part 1 is universal for all medical physics fields and will not be addressed. This session is structured into different topics that aim to guide the participants on how to successfully prepare for the board exams. The subjects of discussion will include timing and strategies for exam preparation, crucial differences in preparing for the clinical computer-based exam versus the oral exam, what study tools are currently available for each, etc. The panel discussion format will allow the speakers to collectively present their experience and advice relating to each topic and foment audience participation. Learning Objectives: Know the main differences between what is expected for parts 2 and 3 Know different resources for test preparation Know how to formulate a plan to best study for each part based on the specific skill set the two parts require Know how to best present his/her answers during the oral examination – demeanor, answer structure, etc.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel-Segmentation [SWR-21-18]

Panel-Segmentation contains the scripts for automated metadata extraction of solar PV installations, using satellite imagery coupled with computer vision techniques. In this package, the user can perform the following actions: *Automatically generate a satellite image using a set of lat-long coordinates, and a Google Maps API key. Users would need to set up a Google Cloud account and get a Maps Static API key. Please refer to Setting Up Google Maps Static API Key section for this process. *Perform image segmentation on the satellite image, to locate the solar array(s) in the image on a pixel-by-pixel basis, using an image segmentation model (panel_detection_model.pth). Get classification of the installation (rooftop, ground mounted fixed-tilt or tracking, carport, etc). *Perform azimuth estimation on each solar array cluster in the masked image. *Detect solar panels and get its latitude, longitude, and address within a geographic bounding box through the SOL-Searcher Pipeline. *Detect and calculate hurricane damage on solar installations given pre-hurricane and post-hurricane satellite imagery through the Hurricane Detection Pipeline. *Detect and calculate hail damage on solar installations given satellite imagery through the Hail Detection pipeline. *Convert NOAA MESH (Maximum Estimated Size of Hail) grib2 files into kml or geojson files. *Estimate tilt and azimuth of a solar array by processing USGS LiDAR data for the array’s location.

Edun, Ayobami↗
DOE OSTI2011

EMSL Geochemistry, Biogeochemistry and Subsurface Science-Science Theme Advisory Panel Meeting

This report covers the topics of discussion and the recommendations of the panel members. On December 8 and 9, 2010, the Geochemistry, Biogeochemistry, and Subsurface Science (GBSS) Science Theme Advisory Panel (STAP) convened for a more in-depth exploration of the five Science Theme focus areas developed at a similar meeting held in 2009. The goal for the fiscal year (FY) 2011 meeting was to identify potential topical areas for science campaigns, necessary experimental development needs, and scientific members for potential research teams. After a review of the current science in each of the five focus areas, the 2010 STAP discussions successfully led to the identification of one well focused campaign idea in pore-scale modeling and five longer-term potential research campaign ideas that would likely require additional workshops to identify specific research thrusts. These five campaign areas can be grouped into two categories: (1) the application of advanced high-resolution, high mass accuracy experimental techniques to elucidate the interplay between geochemistry and microbial communities in terrestrial ecosystems and (2) coupled computation/experimental investigations of the electron transfer reactions either between mineral surfaces and outer membranes of microbial cells or between the outer and inner membranes of microbial cells.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2012

Predictive Science Panel: LLNL Meeting, 9-11 October 2012 (Unclassified Report)

The Predictive Science Panel (PSP) held its annual meeting at LLNL on 9-11 October 2012. The meeting included a half day of overview presentations, following by 1 ½ days of "deep dive" sessions: NBI Reconfiguration, Transport Algorithms, Ignition Prediction, and Safety and Surety. There was also a discussion of LANL's feedback on the PSP's March 20212 report. This document provides an unclassified summary of the Panel's observations. Significantly more detail is provided in the PSP's classified report.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2013

Evaluation of Rupture Panels M1, M2, and M3

In December 2012, four rupture panels, from Q42T, Q22T, Q22B and Q45B, have been found leaking during inspection. Three of these panels, which have only been in service since April 2012, belong to the most recently purchased lots in 2011.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2013

2013 Predictive Science Panel Meeting Summary Report

The Predictive Science Panel (PSP) met at LANL on 12-14 March 2013. The Panel appreciated the frank and open discussion of some very difficult issues with which LANL is grappling with. The meeting consisted of four related deep-dive sessions: (1) Certification – Strategies and challenges for Reuse; (2) Certification – The impact of Pu aging; (3) Certification – The role of subcritical experiments; (4) Certification – First campaigns for MaRIE 1.0 There was also discussion of LLNL’s feedback from the October 2012 report and a poster session featuring excellent work by early-career scientists and engineers.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2013

Concentrating Solar Power Central Receiver Panel Component Fabrication and Testing (Final Report)

The objective of this project is to complete a design of an advanced concentrated solar panel and demonstrate the manufacturability of key components. Then confirm the operation of the key components under prototypic solar flux conditions. This work is an important step in reducing the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) from a central receiver solar power plant. The key technical risk to building larger power towers is building the larger receiver systems. Therefore, this proposed technology project includes the design of an advanced molten salt prototypic sub-scale receiver panel that can be utilized into a large receiver system. Then complete the fabrication and testing of key components of the receive design that will be used to validate the design.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2013

Electrohydraulic Forming of Near-Net Shape Automotive Panels

The objective of this project was to develop the electrohydraulic forming (EHF) process as a near-net shape automotive panel manufacturing technology that simultaneously reduces the energy embedded in vehicles and the energy consumed while producing automotive structures. Pulsed pressure is created via a shockwave generated by the discharge of high voltage capacitors through a pair of electrodes in a liquid-filled chamber. The shockwave in the liquid initiated by the expansion of the plasma channel formed between two electrodes propagates towards the blank and causes the blank to be deformed into a one-sided die cavity. The numerical model of the EHF process was validated experimentally and was successfully applied to the design of the electrode system and to a multi-electrode EHF chamber for full scale validation of the process. The numerical model was able to predict stresses in the dies during pulsed forming and was validated by the experimental study of the die insert failure mode for corner filling operations. The electrohydraulic forming process and its major subsystems, including durable electrodes, an EHF chamber, a water/air management system, a pulse generator and integrated process controls, were validated to be capable to operate in a fully automated, computer controlled mode for forming of a portion of a full-scale sheet metal component in laboratory conditions. Additionally, the novel processes of electrohydraulic trimming and electrohydraulic calibration were demonstrated at a reduced-scale component level. Furthermore, a hybrid process combining conventional stamping with EHF was demonstrated as a laboratory process for a full-scale automotive panel formed out of AHSS material. The economic feasibility of the developed EHF processes was defined by developing a cost model of the EHF process in comparison to the conventional stamping process.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2014

Initial report from the ICFA Neutrino Panel

The discovery of neutrino oscillations implies that neutrinos have mass and that the flavour eigenstates mix. Non-zero neutrino masses require new physics beyond the Standard Model. Revealing the physics behind neutrino masses and mixing is among the highest priorities for particle physics in the twenty-first century. Measurements of the parameters that govern neutrino oscillations will have a profound impact on our understanding of particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology. Such a breadth of impact justifies a far-reaching experimental programme by which the properties of the neutrino that are presently unknown are determined, the three-neutrino-mixing picture is tested and the properties of the neutrino are measured with a precision sufficient to allow the physics that explains these properties to be understood. Accelerator-based neutrino-oscillation experiments are an essential component of this programme as they are the only way in which oscillations between all known flavours can be studied precisely. The accelerator-based neutrino-oscillation programme is international in both scope and engagement. The approved programme will improve our knowledge of the mixing angles and the mass-squared differences and may be able to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy. In the medium term, the Long-baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) and the Tokai (J-PARC) to Hyper-Kamiokande experiment offer complementary approaches to searching for the violation of the matter-anti-matter symmetry in neutrino oscillations. For these experiments to realise their full potential coordinated programmes of hadro-production and neutrino-nucleus cross-section measurements are essential. A design study of an alternative wide-hand beam facility is underway: the Long-baseline Neutrino Observatory (LBNO) study will report by the end of 2014. New concepts such as the implementation of a neutrino beam on the European Spallation Source (ESSnuSB) and the use of muon decay-at-rest to search for the matter-anti-matter asymmetry (Daedalus) are also being studied. The Neutrino Factory, in which electron- and muon-neutrino beams are produced from the decay of muons confined within a storage ring, has been shown to offer the ultimate sensitivity and precision. The staged implementation of the facility has been studied. The attractive hrst stage, “nuSTORM”, has the potential to make detailed and precise studies of electron- and muon-neutrino-nucleus scattering and to make exquisitely sensitive searches for sterile neutrinos. A small number of measurements do not fit the elegant three-neutrino-mixing model. These measurements can be interpreted as evidence for new “sterile neutrino” states. If confirmed, these measurements will revolutionise the held. An experimental programme is underway to investigate these anomalies. It is important that these anomalies are addressed. Short-baseline contributions to this programme should have clear synergy with the long-baseline programme. This report presents the conclusions drawn by the Panel from three regional “Town Meetings” that took place between November 2013 and February 2014. The Panel recognises that to maximise the discovery potential of the accelerator-based neutrino-oscillation programme it will be essential to exploit the infrastructures that exist at CERN, FNAL and J-PARC and the expertise and resources that reside in laboratories and institutes around the world.

Cao, J.↗
DOE OSTI2014

Pantex Falling Man - Independent Review Panel Report.

Consolidated Nuclear Security (CNS) Pantex took the initiative to organize a Review Panel of subject matter experts to independently assess the adequacy of the Pantex Tripping Man Analysis methodology. The purpose of this report is to capture the details of the assessment including the scope, approach, results, and detailed Appendices. Along with the assessment of the analysis methodology, the panel evaluated the adequacy with which the methodology was applied as well as congruence with Department of Energy (DOE) standards 3009 and 3016. The approach included the review of relevant documentation, interactive discussion with Pantex staff, and the iterative process of evaluating critical lines of inquiry.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Optical Encoding Technology for Viral Screening Panels Final Report CRADA No TC02132.0

This was a collaborative effort between Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Parallel Synthesis Technologies, Inc. (PSTI), to develop Optical Encoding Technology for Viral Screening Panels. The goal for this effort was to prepare a portable bead reader system that would enable the development of viral and bacterial screening panels which could be used for the detection of any desired set of bacteria or viruses in any location. The main objective was to determine if the combination of a bead-based, PCR suspension array technology, formulated from Parallume encoded beads and PSTI’s multiplex assay reader system (MARS), could provide advantages in terms of the number of simultaneously measured samples, portability, ruggedness, ease of use, accuracy, precision or cost as compared to the Luminexbased system developed at LLNL. The project underwent several no cost extensions however the overall goal of demonstrating the utility of this new system was achieved. As a result of the project a significant change to the type of bead PSTI used for the suspension system was implemented allowing better performance than the commercial Luminex system.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2014

US NDC Modernization Project Expert Review Panel Report

AFTAC and the SNL US NDC modernization project team hosted a two-day expert review panel meeting September 30th & October 1st, 2014 to solicit input from subject matter experts regarding the technical direction and current design concepts proposed for the modernized US NDC system. This report documents the panel’s recommendations captured during the review.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Affordable Solid Panel “Perfect Wall” System

This report, Affordable Solid Panel “Perfect Wall” System , reviews and analyzes a novel building assembly—which features an innovative large format Solid Panel Structure and utilizes the “perfect wall” concept of having high-performance moisture and thermal control layers on the exterior of the structural components.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Radiation Panel design for applications in National Security and Food Safety

We describe a new concept for a basic radiation detection panel based on conventional scintillator technology and commercially available solid-state photo-detectors. The panels are simple in construction, robust, very efficient and cost-effective and are easily scalable in size, from tens of cm 2 to tens of m 2 . We describe two possible applications: flagging radioactive food coontamination and detection of illicit radio nucleides, such as those potentially used in a terrorist attack with a dirty bomb.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2023

Next Generation of Architectural Precast Insulated Wall Panels

Off-site building envelope construction or prefabrication has many benefits including fewer construction defects, fewer onsite workers, shorter onsite construction time, and less onsite waste. The off-site building construction approach with greatest market success to date is precast concrete. However, precast production needs to develop new technologies to capture a larger share of the construction market. More specifically, architectural precast insulated wall panels would be more widely used if they were lighter, had a shorter production time, and had higher thermal performance. This report summarizes the technologies that Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, and the University of Tennessee developed so that the next generation of architectural precast insulated wall panels are 50% lighter, 50% faster to produce, and/or have two times higher thermal performance.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗