Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SPACE STATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1987

Science on Space Station

Plans for space science activities on the International Space Station are reviewed from a NASA perspective. The present Station reference configuration is based on a dual-keel core unit (one habitation module and three laboratory modules supplied by NASA, ESA, and Japan) and provides for five attached systems (with up to four payloads each to be exposed to space) and several free-flying platforms (both polar orbiters and coorbiters). Particular attention is given to the space science aspects of the primary Station objectives defined by NASA (servicing and repair, platforms, pressurized modules, and attached payloads). Also discussed are the work of the Task Force on Scientific Uses of Space Station, the need for operational flexibility, the value of a continuous manned presence for experimental science, and the skills needed from the Station crew.

Black, David C.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Efficient placement of structural dynamics sensors on the space station

System identification of the space station dynamic model will require flight data from a finite number of judiciously placed sensors on it. The placement of structural dynamics sensors on the space station is a particularly challenging problem because the station will not be deployed in a single mission. Given that the build-up sequence and the final configuration for the space station are currently undetermined, a procedure for sensor placement was developed using the assembly flights 1 to 7 of the rephased dual keel space station as an example. The procedure presented approaches the problem of placing the sensors from an engineering, as opposed to a mathematical, point of view. In addition to locating a finite number of sensors, the procedure addresses the issues of unobserved structural modes, dominant structural modes, and the trade-offs involved in sensor placement for space station. This procedure for sensor placement will be applied to revised, and potentially more detailed, finite element models of the space station configuration and assembly sequence.

Lepanto, Janet A.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Real-time simulation for Space Station

Development of a new Space Station simulation designed to provide long-term support to the Space Station Program is well under way. A description of the two Engineering Directorate simulation facilities, the Systems Engineering Simulator and the Shuttle Avionics Integration Laboratory, is presented. The function of each in support of the Space Shuttle Program is discussed, with emphasis on functions applicable to Space Station. The function of the Systems Engineering Simulator in Space Station development is described. Finally, a comprehensive and detailed description of the new Space Station simulation under development on the System Engineering Simulator is presented.

St. John, Robert H.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Some instrumentation requirement issues for the Space Station structural characterization experiment

The Space Station will provide unique opportunities to the research and technology community as a national in-space research facility. Opportunities will exist for technology experiments in a variety of disciplines, including dynamics and control of large space structures (LSS). The Space Station Structural Characterization Experiment (SSSCE) is an early space station technology experiment now under development. The objective of the experiment is to instrument and use the Space Station as a generic research test article, in support of research and technology activities in the areas of structural dynamics and control/structure interaction (CSI). Tests will be conducted, potentially, on each assembly flight configuration, as well as on the phase 1 configuration. Structural dynamic response data will be measured and transferred to the ground for analysis. These measurements will support the development and in-space verification of system identification and analytical modeling techniques for future LSS, including the evolutionary Space Station. The paper begins by restating the principal objective of SSSCE, along with the basic approach that will be used. The body of the paper deals with instrumentation requirement issues. The paper closes with several questions concerning modal-testing objectives and limitations, a brief review of a previous on-orbit experiment, the Solar Array Flight Experiment, and concluding remarks.

Pappa, Richard S.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Update of Space Station Freedom design

The Space Station system baseline concept and various development scenarios that would meet the Space Station design requirements are examined. Consideration is given to the rephrasing of the Space Station assembly process to provide a permanently-manned station with reduced early year funding, resulting in a completed assembly which includes the expected station capabilities. The contents of the baseline concept and the proposed assembly plan are compared. Configurational, functional, and assembly tradeoffs are discussed. The baseline configuration and rephased configurations are illustrated and the flight sequence and launch dates of the rephased assembly sequence are listed.

Sisson, James M.↗
NASA NTRS1985

A dual spin space station design

A dual spin space station design is described. The space station has a cylindrical solar array that is spun to provide both gyroscopic stiffness to the space station and to stiffen the array structure. The platform is spun at the orbital angular rate. The space station is designed to have gravity gradient and aerodynamic restoring torques. An active control system is used to stabilize the station and store excess angular momentum until it can be removed from the station by magnetic torques.

Paluszek, M. A.↗
NASA NTRS1993

External induced contamination environment assessment for Space Station Freedom

An assessment of the Space Station Freedom performance as affected by the external induced contamination environment is in progress. The assessment procedure involves comparing the Space Station Freedom external contamination requirements, SSP 30426, Revision B (1991), with calculated molecular deposition, molecular column density, and other effects from potential sources of contamination. The current assessment comprises discussions of Space Shuttle proximity operations, Space Shuttle waste-water dumps (while docked to the Space Station), Space Station fluid and waste-gas venting, system gas leakage, external material outgassing, and a combined contamination assessment. This performance assessment indicates that Space Station Freedom contamination requirements are realistic and can be satisfied when all contamination sources are included.

Leger, Lubert↗
NASA NTRS1985

The Space Station as a Construction Base for Large Space Structures

The feasibility of using the Space Station as a construction site for large space structures is examined. An overview is presented of the results of a program entitled Definition of Technology Development Missions (TDM's) for Early Space Stations - Large Space Structures. The definition of LSS technology development missions must be responsive to the needs of future space missions which require large space structures. Long range plans for space were assembled by reviewing Space System Technology Models (SSTM) and other published sources. Those missions which will use large space structures were reviewed to determine the objectives which must be demonstrated by technology development missions. The three TDM's defined during this study are: (1) a construction storage/hangar facility; (2) a passive microwave radiometer; and (3) a precision optical system.

Gates, R. M.↗
NASA NTRS1987

TAVERNS and the space station software support environment

The Space Station Information System (SSIS) provides the data processing capability for the Space Station Program (SSP). The Software Support Environment (SSE) System for the SSP is the collection of software, procedures, standards, hardware specification, documentation, policy, and training materials. The Ada programming language was baselined by the Space Station Program Office as the language for development and maintenance of all space station software including the software of the SSE itself. The Test And Validation Environment for Remote Networked Systems (TAVERNS) is a distributed philosophy for development and validation of Ada applications software for the space station and as such is closely related to the SSE. An overview of the system is provided.

Howes, Norman R.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Beyond the Space Station

The significance of the Space Station is examined with regard to the possibilities it will open. The Space Station, as a unique R&D facility, operation base, and transportation node, will not only enhance deeper-space ventures but also enable entirely new initiatives for man's advancement in space not possible before. One large goal enabled by the Space Station could be a manned Mars landing mission as a major national objective some time beyond the year 2000. Since its principal themes would be joint exploration and advancement of mankind in space, its scientific, technical and sociological benefits would be of unprecedented scope and magnitude. The Space Station should be regarded as having a 'beachhead' role in supporting multiple goals and multiple users. Commonalities and possible synergisms between program and mission systems, elements, and technologies of large new initiatives beyond the Space Station should be assessed.

Von Puttkamer, J.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Space Station power system

A Space Station Task Force was established by the NASA Administrator in May 1982 to provide focus and direction for Space Station planning activities. The Task Force also provides Congress and the Administration with sufficient information to allow them to make an informed decision on whether the United States should proceed with a Space Station as the next major national initiative in space. This paper will present the status of planning activities to date, with major emphasis on the power system. Technology options, power requirements, and schedule will be discussed.

Forestieri, A. F.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Evolution of the Space Station Robotic Manipulator

The Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS), Canadarm2, was launched in 2001 and deployed on the International Space Station (ISS). The Canadarm2 has been instrumental in ISS assembly and maintenance. Canadarm2 shares its heritage with the Space Shuttle Arm (Canadarm). This article explores the evolution from the Shuttle Canadarm to the Space Station Canadarm2 design, which incorporates a 7 degree of freedom design, larger joints, and changeable operating base. This article also addresses phased design, redundancy, life and maintainability requirements. The design of Canadarm2 meets unique ISS requirements, including expanded handling capability and the ability to be maintained on orbit. The size of ISS necessitated a mobile manipulator, resulting in the unique capability of Canadarm2 to relocate by performing a walk off to base points located along the Station, and interchanging the tip and base of the manipulator. This provides the manipulator with reach and access to a large part of the Station, enabling on-orbit assembly of the Station and providing support to Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA). Canadarm2 is evolving based on on-orbit operational experience and new functionality requirements. SSRMS functionality is being developed in phases to support evolving ISS assembly and operation as modules are added and the Station becomes more complex. Changes to sustaining software, hardware architecture, and operations have significantly enhanced SSRMS capability to support ISS mission requirements. As a result of operational experience, SSRMS changes have been implemented for Degraded Joint Operations, Force Moment Sensor Thermal Protection, Enabling Ground Controlled Operations, and Software Commutation. Planned Canadarm2 design modifications include: Force Moment Accommodation, Smart Safing, Separate Safing, and Hot Backup. In summary, Canadarm2 continues to evolve in support of new ISS requirements and improved operations. It is a tribute to the design that this evolution can be accomplished while conducting critical on-orbit operations with minimal hardware changes.

Razvi, Shakeel↗
NASA NTRS2019

International Space Station Multilateral Medical Policy Board Transitions in Space Medicine: 25 Years in Photos

This collection of photographic highlights covers the past 25 years of international collaboration in human space flight. Beginning in 1993, the international community came together to develop the medical systems for an international space station. Initially, this collaboration was bilateral in support of the Shuttle / Mir Space Station (Phase 1). However, the framework that was established to serve as the medical authority structure provided a foundation for the multilateral boards and panel, which were codified in the memoranda of understanding. The Multilateral Medical Policy Board, the Multilateral Space Medicine Board, and the Multilateral Medical Operations Panel were developed in a collegial and mutually beneficial environment by the men and women of the space agencies of Canada, Europe, Japan, Russia, and the United States. This collection of photographs from official and personal collections captures the spirit and collegiality to which we have grown accustomed. They are also presented to commemorate the integrity, professionalism, tenacity, and dedication to human space exploration consistently demonstrated by individuals involved in this amazing effort.

photographs↗
NASA NTRS1990

Space teleoperations technology for Space Station evolution

Viewgraphs on space teleoperations technology for space station evolution are presented. Topics covered include: shuttle remote manipulator system; mobile servicing center functions; mobile servicing center technology; flight telerobotic servicer-telerobot; flight telerobotic servicer technology; technologies required for space station assembly; teleoperation applications; and technology needs for space station evolution.

Reuter, Gerald J.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Alternate assembly sequence databook for the Tier 2 Bus-1 option of the International Space Station

The JSC International Space Station program office requested that SSB prepare a databook to document the alternate space station assembly sequence known as Tier 2, which assumes that the Russian participation has been eliminated and that the functions that were supplied by the Russians (propulsion, resupply, initial attitude control, communications, etc.) are now supplied by the U.S. Tier 2 utilizes the Lockheed Bus-l to replace much of the missing Russian functionality. The space station at each stage of its buildup during the Tier 2 assembly sequence is characterized in terms of of properties, functionality, resource balances, operations, logistics, attitude control, microgravity environment and propellant usage. The assembly sequence as analyzed was defined by JSC as a first iteration, with subsequent iterations required to address some of the issues that the analysis in this databook identified. Several significant issues were identified, including: less than desirable orbit lifetimes, shortage of EVA, large flight attitudes, poor microgravity environments, and reboost propellant shortages. Many of these issues can be resolved but at the cost of possible baseline modifications and revisions in the proposed Tier 2 assembly sequence.

Brewer, L. M.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Maintainability planning for the Space Station

The planned NASA Space Station, which is expected to have many years of on-orbit operation, for the first time confronts spacecraft designers with major questions of maintainability in design. A Maintainability Guidelines Document has been distributed to all Space Station Definition and Preliminary Design personnel of the Space Station Program Office. Trade studies are being performed to determine the most economical balance between initial (reliability) cost and life cycle cost (crew time and replacement hardware) costs.

Egan, G. R.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Dynamic modeling and adaptive control for space stations

Of all large space structural systems, space stations present a unique challenge and requirement to advanced control technology. Their operations require control system stability over an extremely broad range of parameter changes and high level of disturbances. During shuttle docking the system mass may suddenly increase by more than 100% and during station assembly the mass may vary even more drastically. These coupled with the inherent dynamic model uncertainties associated with large space structural systems require highly sophisticated control systems that can grow as the stations evolve and cope with the uncertainties and time-varying elements to maintain the stability and pointing of the space stations. The aspects of space station operational properties are first examined, including configurations, dynamic models, shuttle docking contact dynamics, solar panel interaction, and load reduction to yield a set of system models and conditions. A model reference adaptive control algorithm along with the inner-loop plant augmentation design for controlling the space stations under severe operational conditions of shuttle docking, excessive model parameter errors, and model truncation are then investigated. The instability problem caused by the zero-frequency rigid body modes and a proposed solution using plant augmentation are addressed. Two sets of sufficient conditions which guarantee the globablly asymptotic stability for the space station systems are obtained.

Ih, C. H. C.↗