Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SUPERSONIC WIND TUNNEL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1965

Research Facilities Summary: Wind Tunnels: Subsonic, Transonic and Supersonic - Volume 2

This volume describes subsonic, transonic, and supersonic facilities called wind tunnels in the classical sense; that is, facilities which provide essentially continuous steady streams of gas which are cool enough so there is no significant dissociation, and in which test models are generally stationary translationally. Ames facilities for gasdynamic tests in which model translation provides a significant portion of the test speed are described in Volume I, "Guns and Ranges." For quick reference, this volume includes a tabular summary of Ames subsonic, transonic, and supersonic wind tunnels. The table is followed by more detailed descriptions. Tabulated information on most major wind tunnels in the United States can be found in Reference 1.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2020

Utilizing Modal Testing for Monitoring the Structural Health of Wind Tunnel Facility Hardware

The 10- by 10-Foot Abe Silverstein Supersonic Wind Tunnel (10×10) is the largest and fastest wind tunnel facility at NASA’s Glenn Research Center(GRC) and is specifically designed to test supersonic propulsion components from inlets and nozzles to full-scale jet and rocket engines[1]. Recently, a critical part of the wind tunnel failed and required a redesign before reintegrating into the facility. The design requirements of this new component required that clearances between large metallic components exist, which have the potential for undesirable nonlinear dynamics to occur, in particular rattling. Rattling is feared to occur when the wind tunnel is being operated in certain flow regimes that induce cyclic aero loads on the new component near its natural frequencies. This paper describes the approach taken to better understand and resolve this vibration problem using modal testing. A modal test was developed and executed by GRC’s Structural Dynamics Lab to quantify the modal parameters of the structure, namely which specific excitation frequencies caused the structure to rattle. These results were shared with facility operators as frequency ranges that should be avoided to ensure maximum lifespan of the new structure. Additional means of structural health monitoring (SHM) as well as Vortex shedding are briefly discussed in this paper.

Pederson, Kenneth↗
NASA NTRS1986

Feasibility study of optical boundary layer transition detection method

A high sensitivity differential interferometer was developed to locate the region where the boundary layer flow undergoes transition from laminar to turbulent. Two laboratory experimental configurations were used to evaluate the performance of the interferometer: open shear layer, and low speed wind tunnel turbulent spot configuration. In each experiment, small temperature fluctuations were introduced as the signal source. Simultaneous cold wire measurements were compared with the interferometer data. The comparison shows that the interferometer is sensitive to very weak phase variations in the order of 0.001 the laser wavelength. An attempt to detect boundary layer transition over a flat plate at NASA-Langley Unitary Supersonic Wind Tunnel using the interferometer system was performed. The phase variations during boundary layer transition in the supersonic wind tunnel were beyond the minimum signal-to-noise level of the instrument.

Azzazy, M.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Overall fluctuating pressure levels on prospective space shuttle launch configurations at Mach numbers from 0.8 to 2.2

Overall fluctuating pressure levels of seven space shuttle launch configurations are presented. The model was a 4-percent-scale space shuttle vehicle, tested in both a 11- by 11-foot transonic wind tunnel and a 9- by 7-foot supersonic wind tunnel. Mach numbers varied from 0.8 to 2.2, and the angle of attack range was from -8 deg to 8 deg at angles of sideslip of -5 deg, and 5 deg. The model configurations included both series-burn and parallel-burn configurations, two canopy configurations, two positions of the orbiter nose relative to the HO tank nose and two HO tank nose-cone angles (15 deg and 20 deg). The fluctuating pressure levels are presented in three forms.

Dods, J. B., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2021

NASA Ames Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel Fall 2018 Outage - Motor 1 Activity: Stator Shift

The Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel consists of the 11 x 11- Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel and the 9 x 7 foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel. The four 65,000hp electric motors that drive the wind tunnel compressors require periodic maintenance. In order to inspect the motors without the removal of drive shaft components, the stator must be shifted away from the motor. This process is referred to as "Stator Shift". Video is mp4 formatted with runtime of 2 mins 54 secs.

Wind Tunnel↗
NASA NTRS1979

Tone Noise of Three Supersonic Helical Tip Speed Propellers in a Wind Tunnel

Three supersonic helical tip speed propellers were tested in the NASA Lewis 8- by 6-foot wind tunnel. This is a perforated-wall wind tunnel but it does not have acoustic damping material on its walls. The propellers were tested at tunnel through flow Mach numbers of 0.6, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, and 0.85 with different rotational speeds and blade setting angles. The three propellers, which had approximately the same aerodynamic performance, incorporated different plan forms and different amounts of sweep and yielded different near field noise levels. The acoustically designed propeller had 45 deg of tip sweep and was significantly quieter at M = 0.8 cruise than the straight bladed propeller. The intermediate 30 deg tip sweep propeller, which was swept for aerodynamic purposes, exhibited noise that was between the other two propellers. Noise trends with varying helical tip Mach number and blade loading were also observed.

Dittmar, J. H.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Molecular velocimetry using stimulated Raman spectroscopy

Molecular flow velocity of N2 was measured in a supersonic wind tunnel using inverse Raman spectroscopy. This technique employs the large Doppler shift exhibited by the molecules when the pump and probe laser beams are counter-propagating (backward scattering). A retrometer system is employed to yield a vibration-free optical configuration which has the additional advantage of obtaining both the forward and backward scattered spectra simultaneously. The linebreadths and their relative Doppler shift can be used to determine the static pressure, translational temperature, and molecular flow velocity. A demonstration of the concept was performed in a supersonic wind tunnel and included: (1) measurements over the Mach number range 2.50 to 4.63; (2) static pressure measurements (at Mach 2.50) corresponding to a Reynolds number per foot range of 1 to 5 x 10 to the 6th power; and (3) measurements behind the shock wave of a flat plate model.

Exton, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Raman Doppler velocimetry - A unified approach for measuring molecular flow velocity, temperature, and pressure

Molecular flow velocity (one component), translational temperature, and static pressure of N2 are measured in a supersonic wind tunnel using inverse Raman spectroscopy. For velocity, the technique employs the large Doppler shift exhibited by the molecules when the pump and probe laser beams are counterpropagating (backward scattering). A retrometer system is employed to yield an optical configuration insensitive to mechanical vibration, which has the additional advantage of simultaneously obtaining both the forward and backward scattered spectra. The forward and backward line breadths and their relative Doppler shift can be used to determine the static pressure, translational temperature, and molecular flow velocity. A demonstration of the technique was performed in a continuous airflow supersonic wind tunnel in which data were obtained under the following conditions: (1) free-stream operation at five set Mach number levels over the 2.50-4.63 range; (2) free-stream operation over a range of Reynolds number (at a fixed Mach number) to vary systematically the static pressure; and (3) operation in the flow field of a simple aerodynamic model to assess beam steering effects in traversing the attached shock layer.

Exton, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS2012

Computational Analyses of the LIMX TBCC Inlet High-Speed Flowpath

Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations were performed for the high-speed flowpath and isolator of a dual-flowpath Turbine-Based Combined-Cycle (TBCC) inlet using the Wind-US code. The RANS simulations were performed in preparation for the Large-scale Inlet for Mode Transition (LIMX) model tests in the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) 10- by 10-ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel. The LIMX inlet has a low-speed flowpath that is coupled to a turbine engine and a high-speed flowpath designed to be coupled to a Dual-Mode Scramjet (DMSJ) combustor. These RANS simulations were conducted at a simulated freestream Mach number of 4.0, which is the nominal Mach number for the planned wind tunnel testing with the LIMX model. For the simulation results presented in this paper, the back pressure, cowl angles, and freestream Mach number were each varied to assess the performance and robustness of the high-speed inlet and isolator. Under simulated wind tunnel conditions at maximum inlet mass flow rates, the high-speed flowpath pressure rise was found to be greater than a factor of four. Furthermore, at a simulated freestream Mach number of 4.0, the high-speed flowpath and isolator showed stability for freestream Mach number that drops 0.1 Mach below the design point. The RANS simulations indicate the yet-untested highspeed inlet and isolator flowpath should operate as designed. The RANS simulation results also provided important insight to researchers as they developed test plans for the LIMX experiment in GRC s 10- by 10-ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel.

Dippold, Vance F., III↗
NASA NTRS2001

Pressure Probe Designs for Dynamic Pressure Measurements in a Supersonic Flow Field

A series of dynamic flow field pressure probes were developed for use in large-scale supersonic wind tunnels at NASA Glenn Research Center. These flow field probes include pitot, static, and five-hole conical pressure probes that are capable of capturing fast acting flow field pressure transients that occur on a millisecond time scale. The pitot and static probes can be used to determine local Mach number time histories during a transient event. The five-hole conical pressure probes are used primarily to determine local flow angularity, but can also determine local Mach number. These probes were designed, developed, and tested at the NASA Glenn Research Center. They were also used in a NASA Glenn 10- by 10-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel (SWT) test program where they successfully acquired flow field pressure data in the vicinity of a propulsion system during an engine compressor stall and inlet unstart transient event. Details of the design, development, and subsequent use of these probes are discussed in this report.

Porro, A. Robert↗
NASA NTRS1960

Transonic and Supersonic Wind-Tunnel Tests of Wing-Body Combinations Designed for High Efficiency at a Mach Number of 1.41

Wind-tunnel force tests of a number of wing-body combinations designed for high lift-drag ratio at a Mach number of 1.41 are reported. Five wings and six bodies were used in making up the various wing-body combinations investigated. All the wings had the same highly swept dis- continuously tapered plan form with NACA 65A-series airfoil sections 4 percent thick at the root tapering linearly to 3 percent thick at the tip. The bodies were based on the area distribution of a Sears-Haack body of revolution for minimum drag with a given length and volume. These wings and bodies were used to determine the effects of wing twist., wing twist and camber, wing leading-edge droop, a change from circular to elliptical body cross-sectional shape, and body indentation by the area-rule and streamline methods. The supersonic test Mach numbers were 1.41 and 2.01. The transonic test Mach number range was from 0.6 to 1.2. For the transition-fixed condition and at a Reynolds number of 2.7 x 10(exp 6) based on the mean aerodynamic chord, the maximum value of lift- drag ratio at a Mach number of 1.41 was 9.6 for a combination with a twisted wing and an indented body of elliptical cross section. The tests indicated that the transonic rise in minimum drag was low and did not change appreciably up to the highest test Mach number of 2.01. The lower values of lift-drag ratio obtained at a Mach number of 2.01 can be attributed to the increase of drag due to lift with Mach number.

Grant, Frederick C.↗