Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Websites”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program (FY 2019 Annual Summary of Completed Projects)

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is the US Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) largest multiprogram science, technology, and energy laboratory with distinctive capabilities in neutron science, computing, advanced materials, and nuclear science and technology. Using these capabilities, ORNL conducts basic and applied research and development (R&D) to support DOE’s overarching mission to “ensure America’s security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions.” As a national resource, ORNL also applies its capabilities and skills to specific needs of other federal agencies and customers through the DOE Strategic Partnership Projects (SPP) program. Information about the laboratory and its programs is available at the ORNL website. The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at ORNL operates under the authority of the DOE Order 413.2C, “Laboratory Directed Research and Development,” which establishes DOE’s requirements for the program while providing the laboratory director broad flexibility for program implementation. The LDRD program funds are obtained through a charge to all laboratory programs. ORNL reports on the program status to DOE each year.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2021

A Hierarchical Gibbs Sampler for Spatially Varying Multi-Regularization Image Reconstructions

This is a presentation for SIAM's (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) conference on computational science and engineering. This presentation describes research on novel techniques to deblur images under a Bayesian framework. The title of the conference is SIAM Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE21). This is a VIRTUAL conference; it was originally scheduled in Fort Worth, TX. The conference dates are March 1-5, 2021. The link to the conference's website is https://www.siam.org/conferences/cm/conference/cse21

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Site-Directed Research & Development Annual Report Overview FY 2020

The SDRD program’s annual report for fiscal year 2020 consists of two parts: the program overview, which contains three major sections, Program Description, Program Accomplishments, and Program Value, and individual project report summaries published electronically on the Nevada National Security Site’s website, www.nnss.gov/pages/programs/sdrd.html. Complete technical reports for concluding projects are available from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) or the principal investigator.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2021

Program Overview Laboratory Directed Research and Development FY2020 (Annual Report)

Throughout this year’s report, we highlight how the LDRD program invests in ideas that make the world a safer place. We review key accomplishments and performance indicators, and we share snapshots of some of our talented staff. I also encourage you to visit our LDRD website and learn more about the 244 projects that we supported during fiscal year 2020. Looking to the future, I am confident that LDRD investments will continue to help LLNL remain at the forefront of innovative research.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2021

Forming a National Consortium of University Energy Centers [Workshop]

With this support, CMU facilitated and supported a series of ongoing meetings and related activities surrounding the founding of the University Energy Institute Collective (UEIC). These activities included: (1) Multiple organizational meetings, (2) launching and support of a website for tue UEIC, (3) facilitating the 2020 Energy Institute Leadership Summit, and (4) proposing for and winning follow-on support from the Sloan Foundation to continue to grow the UEIC.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2021

On-line Waste Library Supporting Information

The On-Line Waste Library is a website that contains information regarding United States Department of Energy-managed high-level waste, spent nuclear fuel, and other wastes that are likely candidates for deep geologic disposal, with links to supporting documents for the data. This report provides supporting information for the data for which an already published source was not available.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

High-order algorithmic developments and optimizations for large-scale GPU-accelerated simulations (Milestone CEED-MS36)

The goal of this milestone was to improve the high-order software ecosystem for CEED-enabled ECP applications by making progress on efficient matrix-free kernels targeting forthcoming ECP architectures. These kernels included matrix-free preconditioning and the development of new set of CEED solver bake-off problems. As part of this milestone, we also released the next version of the CEED software stack, CEED-4.0, reported on results from several application collaborations, and documented the efforts of porting to AMD GPUs for Frontier and other modern architectures, such as Fugaku. The specific tasks addressed in this milestone were: (1) Port and run CEED benchmarks/miniapps on Frontier EA systems; (2) Demonstrate performant libCEED integration in MFEM, Nek and applications; (3) Matrix-free preconditioning of high-order operators; (4) Benchmark problems for fast high-order solvers on GPU platforms; and (5) Public release of CEED-4.0. The artifacts delivered include the next version of the CEED software stack, CEED-4.0, the next libCEED release, libCEED-0.8, and a number of developments integrated within applications to improve their GPU and CPU performance and capabilities. See the CEED website, https://ceed.exascaleproject.org and the CEED GitHub organization, https://github.com/ceed for more details.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2020

Support CEED-enabled ECP applications in their preparation for Aurora/Frontier

The goal of this milestone was to help CEED-enabled ECP applications (particularly ExaSMR, MARBL, ExaAM, ExaWind and E3SM) in their preparations for the Aurora and Frontier architectures. This work included collaboration with ECP vendors and porting and optimization of CEED’s benchmarks and miniapps to early access hardware. As part of this milestone, we also made the best bake-off problems and bake-off kernel implementation from Nek, MFEM, libParanumal and the external community available in the latest libCEED release, libCEED-0.7. During the milestone period we also organized, in virtual form, the fourth CEED Annual meeting (CEED4AM) which included representatives from ECP applications, vendors and software technology projects. The specific tasks addressed in this milestone were to: (1) Work with vendors to port and run CEED benchmarks on early access systems for Aurora and Frontier; (2) Make the best BP/BK implementations from Nek, MFEM, libParanumal and external community available in libCEED; (3) Organize the next CEED Annual meeting (CEED4AM); and (4) Optimize CEED applications and miniapps for Aurora and Frontier architectures. The artifacts delivered include the next libCEED release, libCEED-0.7, and a number of developments integrated within applications to improve their GPU performance and capabilities. See the CEED website, http://ceed.exascaleproject.org and the CEED GitHub organization, http://github.com/ceed for more details.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

2020 ASER Supplemental Tables

This pdf contains the data tables that will be posted on the LANL external website as a supplement to the Los Alamos National Laboratory 2020 Annual Site Environmental Report for Chapters 4 and 7.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Support of US Burning Plasma Organization (Final Technical Report)

The objective of the project described here was to support and increase the effectiveness of the US Burning Plasma Organization. This a national organization of scientists and engineers in magnetic fusion energy, established in 2005 at the request of the DOE Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, which serves to “Advance the scientific understanding of burning plasmas and ensure the greatest benefit from a burning plasma experiment by coordinating relevant U.S. fusion research with broad community participation.” It has grown to over 420 members from over 70 institutions, primarily across the US but with some associate members from other countries. The project was divided into two tasks. The first supported leadership activities in the USBPO by the Deputy Director, Dr. Amanda Hubbard. Responsibilities included chairing regular meetings of the USBPO Research Committee, communicating with the USBPO membership via emails and web seminars, forming and overseeing activities of Task Groups, and ensuring good communication about activities of the International Tokamak Physics Activity. A task group report on ‘Recommendations for ITER Experimental Operation, U.S. Team Formation and Participation’ was completed. Hubbard organized a series of highly popular web seminars for the burning plasma community, on a range of topics attracting a large number of participants from diverse institutions. Hubbard ended her term as Deputy Director in May, 2020. She subsequently received the Secretary of Energy’s Appreciation award for her service to USBPO. The second task supported the communications functions of the USBPO, led by Communications Coordinator, Mark London. Communications are critical for the effective operation of the USBPO, given it consists of members at many widely scattered institutions, and conducts its business almost entirely using remote tools. MIT has hosted and maintained the USBPO website, mailing lists, and discussion forums and provided member support, and videoconferencing support. MIT has continued this support following this grant, with funding incorporated into a broader Cooperative Agreement.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

LaserNetUS Collaboration Network—University of Rochester (Final Report)

LaserNetUS Collaborative Network established in 2018 is a network of high-power laser facilities supported by the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) and operating effectively as a user facility. Its mission is to advance and promote intense laser science and applications by providing scientists and students with broad access to unique facilities and enabling technologies, advancing the frontiers of laser-science research, and fostering collaboration among researchers and networks from around the world. Users who submit proposals through an annual call are selected by an external and independent proposal review panel (PRP) not involving personnel from any of the facilities. Besides the Omega Laser Facility at the University of Rochester’s Laboratory for Laser Energetics (UR/LLE), the network during this project period includes high-intensity laser facilities from six other universities and three national laboratories, namely, the Colorado State University (CSU), the University of Michigan (UM), the University of Nebraska at Lincoln (UNL), The Ohio State University (OSU), Université du Québec, the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), respectively. The network facilities span a wide range in laser pulse energy, pulse duration, repetition rate, and experimental diagnostic equipment enabling innovative research in a variety of exciting areas. Details of the LaserNetUS facilities, organization and committees, events, and accomplishments can be found at the network website (https://lasernetus.org/). A very important role that the LaserNetUS fulfills is the training of students and young scientists who will be key for the future development of laser-plasma science and high-power laser technology itself. The network provides these students not only with access to the most advanced instrumentation and laser facilities, but also the opportunities to interact and collaborate with students from other institutions and with a large group of experienced scientists. As the largest university-based laser users’ facility in the world, the Omega Laser Facility at the UR/LLE has served the high-energy-density physics (HEDP) and inertial fusion science community for nearly 40 years. The multi-beam multi-kJ OMEGA EP Laser System brings unique capabilities to the LaserNetUS network. The combination of high intensity and high energy in short- and long-pulse operation together with solid or gas-jet targets and externally applied magnetic fields provides users a wide domain of experimental conditions. This award provides a total of eight shot days on OMEGA EP for LaserNetUS users. During the award period of performance (June 2019–November 2021), seven teams have fully utilized the eight shot days for their unique science experiments on OMEGA EP with a total of 83 target shots. These experiments involve 13 graduate students, two undergraduate students and six postdoctoral researchers. Results have been widely disseminated at international conferences including LaserNetUS annual meeting (~20 presentations including three invited), and in peer-reviewed journal publications (three published with several manuscripts in preparation).

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Calibrating the SPECTACULAR constitutive model using legacy Sandia data for two filled epoxy systems: 828/CTBN/DEA/GMB and 828/DEA/GMB

The SPECTACULAR model is a development extension of the Simplified Potential Energy Clock (SPEC) model. Both models are nonlinear viscoelastic constitutive models used to predict a wide range of time-dependent behaviors in epoxies and other glass-forming materials. This report documents the procedures used to generate SPECTACULAR calibrations for two particulate-filled epoxy systems, 828/CTBN/DEA/GMB and 828/DEA/GMB. No previous SPECTACULAR or SPEC calibration exists for 828/CTBN/DEA/GMB, while a legacy SPEC calibration exists for 828/DEA/GMB. To generate the SPECTACULAR calibrations, a step-by-step procedure was executed to determine parameters in groups with minimal coupling between parameter groups. This procedure has often been deployed to calibrate SPEC, therefore the resulting SPECTACULAR calibration is backwards compatible with SPEC (i.e. none of the extensions specific to SPECTACULAR are used). The calibration procedure used legacy Sandia experimental data stored on the Polymer Properties Database website. The experiments used for calibration included shear master curves, isofrequency temperature sweeps under oscillatory shear, the bulk modulus at room temperature, the thermal strain during a temperature sweep, and compression through yield at multiple temperatures below the glass transition temperature. Overall, the calibrated models fit the experimental data remarkably well. However, the glassy shear modulus varies depending on the experiment used to calibrate it. For instance, the shear master curve, isofrequency temperature sweep under oscillatory shear, and the Young's modulus in glassy compression yield values for the glassy shear modulus at the reference temperature that vary by as much as 15 %. Also, for 828/CTBN/DEA/GMB, the temperature dependence of the glassy shear modulus when fit to the Young's modulus at different temperatures is approximately four times larger than when it is determined from the isofrequency temperature sweep under oscillatory shear. For 828/DEA/GMB, the temperature dependence of the shear modulus determined from the isofrequency temperature sweep under oscillatory shear accurately predicts the Young's modulus at different temperatures. When choosing values for the shear modulus, fitting the glassy compression data was prioritized. The new and legacy calibrations for 828/DEA/GMB are similar and appear to have been calibrated from the same data. However, the new calibration improves the fit to the thermal strain data. In addition to the standard calibrations, development calibrations were produced that take advantage of development features of SPECTACULAR , including an updated equilibrium Helmholtz free energy that eliminates undesirable behavior found in previous work. In addition to the previously mentioned experimental data, the development calibrations require data for the heat capacity during a stress-free temperature sweep to calibrate thermal terms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

August @theBradbury

This content is for the LANL Discover website and a monthly email newsletter to members of the public.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Nuclear Data Activities Supporting MCNP [Slides]

Nuclear Data Team at LANL is working to improve nuclear data availability. These efforts include an updated, modernized, and improved website and a new, dynamic tool for examining what ACE data is on your machine.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Research and Test Reactor Fuels

PRO-RR is the research reactor focused program element of the broader Proliferation Resistance Optimization program (PRO-X) under the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). PRO-X provides a framework for integrating proliferation resistance in nuclear system designs to minimize weapons usable nuclear materials (WUNM) production and diversion pathways while optimizing systems performance for peaceful use missions. PRO-RR applies the PRO-X mission objectives to research reactor system design. This document serves as one of the foundational documents for the PRO-RR-Fuel System Design technical team by documenting current research reactor fuels usage. The PRO-RR-Fuel System Design technical team consists of subject matter experts from Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) and Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). In order to determine the preferred fuel of use in upcoming research and test reactors to optimize proliferation resistance, performance, and safety, it is useful to assess the fuels that have been used in the past, or are currently in use. This report reviews the historical and current fuels used in research and test reactors to inform future fuel selection. Chapter 2 discusses the low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuels currently in use in terms of thermal power level and utilization of the reactor. Chapter 3 summarizes the fabrication processes for common fuel types. Chapter 4 discusses in detail the fuel types in use in research and test reactors. A review of the cladding types in use is presented in Chapter 5, and a historical review of research and test reactor fuel fabricators is presented in Chapter 6. The data collection strategy used the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) research reactor database [1] as a starting point. Information on the fuel used was gathered on research reactors (other than critical assemblies) that were listed as operational, planned, or in temporary shutdown in the IAEA database. Data on the fuel type, geometry, enrichment, uranium loading, cladding type, and fabricator were collected for each of the reactors available in the public domain. Sources of data included conference papers, journal articles, and facility and fabricator websites. Data on research reactors operating on LEU fuels are presented in Appendix A, while Appendix B presents data collected on all reactors at the time of publication of this report. Appendix C presents data collected on reactors that were part of the M3 research and test reactor conversion program.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗