Study Involving IRSN, LANL, & PRNL Sensitivity/Uncertainty Tools to Support Validation [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Abstract not provided.
Racks in the New Fuel Vault (NFV) and Spent Fuel Pool (SFP) and accompanying fuel handling procedures are currently designed with a maximum enrichment of 5.0 wt. %. Publicly available source documents were used to develop baseline models of fresh fuel storage configurations.
The goal of this experiment was to calculate time-to-boil (TTB) for a Spent Fuel Pool (SFP). TTB is important for SFP management that represents the amount of time available to address loss of forced cooling. Researchers calculated and compared TTB for two cases using SCALE: SFP containing representative LEU fuel (≤ 5 wt %) and SFP containing representative LEU+ fuel (5 – 8 wt %). There were approximately 2300 fuel assemblies in the SFP for each case. Researchers concluded that the impact of LEU+ core on time-to-boil is very small. At such low cooling times, the impact of increased decay heat is not significant. Decay heat of SFP assemblies is small compared to discharge core decay heat.
A range of fuel arrays has been examined for both fuel types and representative arrays were selected. Temperature dependent calculations were performed to show the performance of the arrays. Modification to the SPRF/CX facility has been proposed to aid SNL staff in the execution of temperature dependent experiments.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
This report documents the second phase of the critical experiment design process (CED-2) conducted as part of integral experiment request (IER) 304. The purpose of IER-304 is to develop a temperature-dependent critical experiment capability at the Sandia National Laboratories critical experiment facility using low-enriched uranium oxide fuel. Only a few benchmark quality critical experiments are currently available to validate criticality safety computational methods at temperatures other than room temperature. Recent advancements in computational techniques such as implementation of on-the-fly Doppler broadening techniques and advanced treatment of thermal scattering data necessitate the development of additional experimental capabilities in this area. The work described in this report developed representative configurations using 7uPCX and BUCCX fuels, analyzed the physics exercised by the different arrays, and analyzed the estimated experimental uncertainties. This report also scopes the information necessary for performing modifications to the reactor to accommodate operation at elevated and reduced temperatures.
The current spent nuclear fuel (SNF) management strategy includes reliance on dry storage. Utilities are meeting their interim storage needs on an individual basis with use of large-capacity dry storage casks, with a current focus on meeting existing storage and transportation requirements, as disposal requirements are not currently available. These casks are commonly known as dual-purpose (i.e., storage and transportation) canisters (DPCs). However, a small percentage of single-purpose (storage only) systems is also being used to meet storage needs. These are included under the “DPC” heading. This report investigates the postclosure criticality safety aspects of DPCs. Placing large, heavy waste packages containing DPCs into a repository for direct disposal has not yet been implemented domestically or internationally. Therefore, direct disposal of DPCs represents new engineering and scientific challenges. Some of the engineering challenges that have already been addressed include handling and placement, use of ramps vs. shafts, use of hoists, use of transport equipment, and thermal management. Additionally, some studies have been conducted in the past regarding the feasibility of direct disposal from a criticality analysis perspective and have concluded that while possible, demonstrating subcriticality over the disposal time period is a challenge. The alternative to direct disposal of DPCs into a repository is to repackage the SNF into different canisters. The direct disposal of DPCs without cutting them open and repackaging is appealing because it could be more cost-effective, reduce the complexity of fuel management operations both in and outside reactor facilities, and result in less cumulative worker dose during interim storage and handling before eventual disposal in a deep geologic repository.
The Used Nuclear Fuel-Storage, Transportation & Disposal Analysis Resource and Data System (UNF-ST&DARDS) is a software tool that integrates a used nuclear fuel (UNF) or spent nuclear fuel (SNF) relational database and key analysis capabilities to simplify and automate numerous UNF management and fuel cycle–related activities. UNF-ST&DARDS is being developed for the US Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition program. UNF-ST&DARDS provides an integrated framework that uses advanced modeling and simulation to predict the behavior of SNF over the timescales associated with permanent disposal in a geologic repository. After leaving the spent fuel pool, SNF is transferred to dry storage in a dual-purpose canister (DPC). DPCs are considered “dual purpose” because they are designed for both storage and transportation, removing the need to transfer the fuel to a separate transportation cask. However, much research has been conducted investigating the feasibility of directly disposing of DPCs in geologic repositories. Direct disposal of DPCs could reduce worker exposure during repackaging, reducing the amount of low-level waste from the discarded DPCs and potentially saving billions of dollars. Therefore, direct disposal of as-loaded DPCs is desirable if it can be done safely.
Topics include: SGGP Array definition basics, what is meant by the "Inner" Boundary of an array, a critical experiment with flux filter, and NRC verification of criticality calculations with UNF-ST&DARDS.
Depending on the system, energy, and/or nuclide, altering the number of latent generations can significantly impact generated sensitivity coefficients. In general, as the number of latent generations increases, the accuracy of the generated sensitivity value compared with the DP value increases and there is a significant increase in the uncertainty with generated sensitivity values. IFP generated sensitivities appear to be more stable than those with CLUTCH. Complex systems, even with IFP and increased latent generations can still produce poor results (i.e., MPC- 32). This reiterates the importance of performing DPs to confirm sensitivities. IFP-Shift and CLUTCH can take advantage of parallel computing abilities. Work continues in this area as additional parameters and calculational methods are examined to provide analysts insights to successfully generating sensitivity coefficients for confirmatory analyses and validation efforts.
VALID continues as a library of high-quality models used for testing SCALE and nuclear data. Recent expansion of VALID was the largest impactful change in a decade. Adding 233 U experiments circa 2017 added more cases. There are a huge number of cases in the pipeline, but a lack of qualified staff and funding to complete reviews. Future plans should simplify the process and increase the availability of models and results for external users.
This presentation discusses the purpose of the criticality safety validation, decisions that were made during the validation exercise, the motivation that led to the creation of VADER, an explanation of USLSTATS, and an examination of VADER capabilities and interface.
This presentation discusses the programming languages TSUNAMI and TSAR. It also provides a review of experimental designs using sensitivity analysis in regard to 7uPCX fuel design, fission product experiment analysis, MIRTE, and temperature dependent experiments at the Sandia Pulsed Reactor Facility (SPRF).
Primers were developed and published for the use of the KENO V.a and KENO-VI codes in 2005 and 2008, respectively. These primers were both developed for SCALE 5 using the GeeWiz graphical user interface (GUI). Many new capabilities have been added to the transport codes since the release of these primers. The GUI was also changed to Fulcrum with the release of SCALE 6.2. For these reasons, updated versions of both primers were developed for a planned released in September 2020. The KENO V.a and KENO-VI codes are almost always run within the associated CSAS5 and CSAS6 sequences within SCALE, so the primers use the sequences and do not address running the codes in stand-alone mode.
This presentation discusses the UNF-ST&DARDS which performs many analyses for as-loaded SNF canisters, including criticality safety, shielding, thermal-hydraulic, and containment. It also discusses the experiment selection based on c k assessment of similarity and that the c k value of 0.8 or greater considered applicable for validation. 11 PWR SNF canisters (MPC-32) are used in this work. 1 model represents a failed fuel assembly as fresh, per the design basis and the remaining 10 models represent all 32 assemblies with depleted fuel. In conclusion, critical experiment selection can be performed with S/U techniques for as-loaded canisters in UNF-ST&DARDS. Sufficient benchmark experiments exist to support validation and additional MOX experiments that are a good match for commercial SNF would be a benefit to provide independent data. The presentations states that S/U techniques identify different pools of experiments for different systems and that the process is amenable to automation within UNF-ST&DARDS.
Abstract not provided.
Using low-enriched uranium with 235 U enrichment slightly greater than 5.0 wt % (LEU+) fuel is desirable for light water reactors (LWR) because it can enable longer cycles and/or smaller fresh fuel batches. This report analyzes the impact of LEU+ on back-end considerations, such as its impact on the spent fuel pool, and on the thermal and shielding performance of dry storage systems. For both pressurized water reactor (PWR) and boiling water reactor LEU+ fuel, this report concludes that additional cooling time or regionalized loading plans are required to maintain the same level of thermal and shielding performance of dry storage systems loaded with LEU fuel. For PWR fuel, this report concludes that the impact of LEU+ fuel on the time-to-boil of a spent fuel pool (SFP) is minimal and does not require considerable changes in SFP management.