Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “rodent”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12

Bion-M2

Bion-M2, scheduled to launch in April 2023, continues the 30+ year collaboration between the Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBMP RAS) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Bion-M2 is the second biosatellite in the Bion-M series and its goal is to investigate how the space environment affects living organisms, with emphasis on physiological changes in rodents, gravitational biology using a wide variety of specimens, and radiation biology. The Bion-M2 biosatellite will complete a 30-day low earth orbit (LEO) flight to study the combined effects of microgravity and ionizing radiation (IR) on multiple organisms, where the payload may be exposed to IR at 20-30 times thedose rate seen on the International Space Station. Following return, nine U.S. collaborators selected through the NASA Space Biology Research Announcement will conduct post-flight rodent experiments using male C57BL/6 mice. The post-flight experiments will investigate the effects of the space environment on bone and skeletal muscle health, cardiac function, reproductive system function, neurovascular systems, protein composition in plasma, and thermoregulation in the mice. Currently, the Bion-M2 mission is in the development phase of theproject lifecycle. The mission objectives, constraints, requirements, and timeline have been defined in the project plan and contracts. Technology for the mission is under development and science procedures will be finalized by FY22. The aim of this presentation is to highlight the importance of the Bion-M2 mission and provide insight into the mission development process, including an overview of the project plan and the tissue sharing plan that will be utilized during the post-flight dissection procedures.

Bion-M2↗

NSCOR for Evaluating Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Adaptation and Resilience to Spaceflight: Emotional Valence and Social Processes in ICC/ICE Environments

Space exploration class missions, such as a mission to Mars, will require optimization of human performance, adaptability, and resilience. This NASA Specialized Center of Research (NSCOR) utilizes the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework to identify biological and behavioral markers of individual social adaptation and emotional resilience (as well as vulnerability) to spaceflight-relevant stressors such as living in extended isolation. The overarching goal of this NSCOR is to obtain novel information to help identify biomarkers of individuals who are resilient and/or adaptable to the stressors of isolated, confined, and controlled (ICC) and isolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) environments.A total of N=90 healthy adult astronaut surrogates are being studied in three spaceflight-analog environments: (1) n=40 healthy adults in the Isolation and Confinement Analog Research Unit (ICARUS), an ICC at the University of Pennsylvania, during 7-day missions, for a target total of 280 subject days; (2) n=32 healthy adult astronaut surrogates studied in NASA’s Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA), an ICC at Johnson Space Center during 45-day missions, for a target total of 2,112 subject days; and (3) n=18 healthy adults in the Alfred-Wegener-Institute’s Neumayer Station III, an ICE in Antarctica, during 14-month missions, for a target total of 7,560 subject days. Dr. Nindl’s Laboratory at the University of Pittsburgh is analyzing a priori selected protein biomarkers in blood, saliva, and urine. Complementary rodent models of exposure to early life stressors, confinement, and isolation are being evaluated at Dr. Hensch’s Laboratory to further validate the neurobehavioral and biological findings from the human studies.Given the inconsistency and varied definition of resilience/adaptation in the scientific literature, the NSCOR team developed a composite resilience/adaptation measure that reflects the most relevant outcomes to resilience/adaptation across psychosocial and neurobehavioral functions, as well as neurocognitive and spaceflight-relevant operational performance. To achieve this, group consensus was attained from subject matter experts to produce a rank-order of importance for each input variable. The final resilience/adaptation score included 36 variables that were collected across spaceflight analogs. As of 10/1/2021, the NSCOR project acquired data on n=27 subjects at ICARUS, n=16 at HERA, and n=18 at Neumayer. The COVID-19 pandemic delayed data acquisition at ICARUS and HERA.Among subjects studied to date, 99% of neural and neurobehavioral data (e.g., neuroimaging for structure and function, behavioral measures) as well as blood, saliva, and urine for biochemical assays have been acquired. For rodent models, Dr. Hensch’s laboratory has established biochemical and behavioral parameters reflecting confinement stress in social networks of mice for comparison to stress responses in the human spaceflight analog environments.Group social behaviors were measured with a Social Network Analysis (SNA) approach to define objective parameters associated with sociability and its plasticity by sex. This analytic approach may help identify a network of individuals who are more effective teammates or more likely to generate new social relationships. Data acquisition, biomarker assessment, and data quality control will continue through September 2022.

D F Dinges↗

Chimeric Mouse Models for Space Radiation Risk Investigations

Assessment of human health risks associated with space radiation exposure is based largely on the knowledge learned from studies in which animals, mostly rodents, are exposed to high-LET radiation on the ground. It has been recognized that translation of animal results to meaningful implications for human disease can be challenging, particularly for certain risk categories such as the high-LET radiation effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Considering limitations in utilizing non-human primates and clinical studies in humans, chimeric animals can potentially bridge the knowledge gap between rodents and humans. In a chimeric animal, a specific organ or a cell type is replaced with respective human cells that are functional. A number of chimeric mouse models have been developed in the medical research community to study human diseases, and some of the models can potentially be used for NASA applications. For instance, mice engrafted with human hepatocytes, which have been used in studies of genotoxicity from carcinogen exposures, can be used for quantification of space radiation damage. A chimeric brain model, which was shown to perform superiorly in memory and cognitive tests, can also be a candidate for studying the CNS effects of radiation. It has also been reported that mice engrafted with human hematopoietic progenitor cells were exposed to X-rays and high-LET Si ions to investigate the radiation effects in the immune system. In a pilot study, we use PXB mice whose livers contain >90% human cells. These mice are exposed to gamma rays for investigations of DNA damage and transcriptomics changes in the humanized livers. Results obtained from PXB mice will be compared non-engrafted control animals from the same background strain that are exposed to identical conditions. The aim of the study is to determine whether chimeric mouse models are suitable for investigations of space radiation risks.

Honglu Wu↗

Chimeric Mouse Models for Space Radiation Risk Investigations

Assessment of human health risks associated with space radiation exposure is based largely on the knowledge learned from studies in which animals, mostly rodents, are exposed to high-LET radiation on the ground. It has been recognized that translation of animal results to meaningful implications for human disease can be challenging, particularly for certain risk categories such as the high-LET radiation effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Considering limitations in utilizing non-human primates and clinical studies in humans, chimeric animals can potentially bridge the knowledge gap between rodents and humans. In a chimeric animal, a specific organ or a cell type is replaced with respective human cells that are functional. A number of chimeric mouse models have been developed in the medical research community to study human diseases, and some of the models can potentially be used for NASA applications. For instance, mice engrafted with human hepatocytes, which have been used in studies of genotoxicity from carcinogen exposures, can be used for quantification of space radiation damage. A chimeric brain model, which was shown to perform superiorly in memory and cognitive tests, can also be a candidate for studying the CNS effects of radiation. It has also been reported that mice engrafted with human hematopoietic progenitor cells were exposed to X-rays and high-LET Si ions to investigate the radiation effects in the immune system. In a pilot study, we use PXB mice whose livers contain >90% human cells. These mice are exposed to gamma rays for investigations of DNA damage and transcriptomics changes in the humanized livers. Results obtained from PXB mice will be compared non-engrafted control animals from the same background strain that are exposed to identical conditions. The aim of the study is to determine whether chimeric mouse models are suitable for investigations of space radiation risks.

Honglu Wu↗

Chimeric Mouse Models for Space Radiation Risk Investigations

Assessment of human health risks associated with space radiation exposure is based largely on the knowledge learned from studies in which animals, mostly rodents, are exposed to high-LET radiation on the ground. It has been recognized that translation of animal results to meaningful implications for human disease can be challenging, particularly for certain risk categories such as the high-LET radiation effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Considering limitations in utilizing non-human primates and clinical studies in humans, chimeric animals can potentially bridge the knowledge gap between rodents and humans. In a chimeric animal, a specific organ or a cell type is replaced with respective human cells that are functional. A number of chimeric mouse models have been developed in the medical research community to study human diseases, and some of the models can potentially be used for NASA applications. Here we investigate use of mice engrafted with human hepatocytes, which have been used in studies of genotoxicity from carcinogen exposures, for assessment of space radiation damage. In a pilot study, we use PXB mice whose livers contain >90% human cells and have been found to function nearly identically to human liver tissues. These mice were exposed to gamma rays for investigations of DNA damage, transcriptomics, and histopathological changes in the humanized livers. Results obtained from PXB mice were compared non-engrafted control animals from the same background strain that are exposed to identical conditions. Preliminary data from histopathological analysis suggest chimeric mouse models are suitable for investigations of space radiation risks, as the humanized liver tissue exhibited changes induced by radiation and was markedly distinct from the liver tissue from the control animals (Fox Chase SCID mice).

Radiation effects↗

Histological and Transcriptomic Analysis of Spaceflight-Induced Ocular Changes in the Mouse Retina

Anatomical changes have been observed in astronauts’ eyes after long duration spaceflight missions. These alterations can lead to visual impairment which in part constitutes the spaceflight-associated neuroocular syndrome (SANS), one of the top risk priorities for deep space missions. The HRP Systems Biology (SysBio) Translation Project will apply systems biology approaches utilizing current human physiological spaceflight data, molecular results from rodents, and future research with a multi-level, multi-system, and multi-species perspective to augment the existing research plan to resolve the SANS risk. Not much is known about SANS at the cellular and molecular level, but studies in mice and rats have recently begun to determine how spaceflight might affect the biology of the eye. Preliminary studies of mice that flew on the Space Shuttle, and more recently the International Space Station (ISS), have shown changes in retinal physiology as assessed by histology and gene expression analysis. The study presented here obtained samples from the CASIS sponsored Rodent Research 8 Experiment delivered to the ISS by SpaceX CRS-16 on 12/08/2018. Female BALB/cAnNTac mice flew on the ISS for 45 days, while ground controls were housed in a standard vivarium or animal enclosure module. Sacrifice and sample acquisition occurred once mice returned to Earth, possibly allowing for readaptation affecting retinal homeostasis. We applied standard transcriptomic (RNAseq) and histological approaches to characterize genes and pathways in the mouse retina affected by spaceflight or age. The differentially expressed gene (DEG) data was analyzed using Galaxy (GeneLab) and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Significant DEGs between flight and ground samples were relatively few but biologically meaningful. Pathways identified related to neuronal differentiation, cellular transport/movement, and wound healing. Age effects were detected between the young (10–12 weeks) and old (32 weeks) groups and between the baseline and end of experiment (~46 days). The biological relevance of specific DEGs were confirmed through immunohistochemical evaluation using fixed histological sections of the eye from four flight group mice and four habitat control mice. Staining was performed specific for synaptophysin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament in the retinal periphery, equator, and peripapillary regions. For synaptophysin staining, the innerplexiform and outerplexiform layers were scored; for GFAP staining, Mueller cells and perivascular astrocytes were scored. Results show flight samples typically had more staining of GFAP and neurofilament while, conversely, the habitat control group had more staining of synaptophysin.

C. Perez↗

Comparison of Radiation-induced Damage Between Livers from Control and Chimeric Mice

Assessment of human health risks associated with space radiation exposure is based largely on the knowledge learned from studies in which animals, mostly rodents, are exposed to high-LET radiation on the ground. It has been recognized that translation of animal results to meaningful implications for human disease can be challenging, particularly for certain risk categories such as the high-LET radiation effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Considering limitations in utilizing non-human primates and clinical studies in humans, chimeric animals can potentially bridge the knowledge gap between rodents and humans. In a chimeric animal, a specific organ or a cell type is replaced with respective human cells that are functional. In this pilot study, we use PXB mice whose livers contain >90% human cells. These mice are exposed to gamma rays for investigations of DNA damage and transcriptomics changes in the humanized livers. Results obtained from PXB mice were compared non-engrafted control animals from the same background strain that are exposed to identical conditions. Staining of the liver tissues with H&E indicated that the human liver tissue in chimeric mice responds differently than the mouse liver tissue to gamma radiation on the cellular level, as evidenced by differences in inflammation and cellular damage seen on histopathology. The gene expression data collected from the liver samples will also be presented, which potentially offers an explanation for the differential responses.

Honglu Wu↗

Chimeric Mouse Models for Space Radiation Risk Investigations

Assessment of human health risks associated with space radiation exposure is based largely on the knowledge learned from studies in which animals, mostly rodents, are exposed to high-LET radiation on the ground. It has been recognized that translation of animal results to meaningful implications for human disease can be challenging, particularly for certain risk categories such as the high-LET radiation effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Considering limitations in utilizing non-human primates and clinical studies in humans, chimeric animals can potentially bridge the knowledge gap between rodents and humans. In a chimeric animal, a specific organ or a cell type is replaced with respective human cells that are functional. A number of chimeric mouse models have been developed in the medical research community to study human diseases, and some of the models can potentially be used for NASA applications. Here we investigate use of mice engrafted with human hepatocytes, which have been used in studies of genotoxicity from carcinogen exposures, for assessment of space radiation damage. In a pilot study, we use PXB mice whose livers contain >90% human cells and have been found to function nearly identically to human liver tissues. These mice were exposed to gamma rays for investigations of DNA damage, transcriptomics, and histopathological changes in the humanized livers. Results obtained from PXB mice were compared non-engrafted control animals from the same background strain that are exposed to identical conditions. Preliminary data from histopathological analysis suggest chimeric mouse models are suitable for investigations of space radiation risks, as the humanized liver tissue exhibited changes induced by radiation and was markedly distinct from the liver tissue from the control animals (Fox Chase SCID mice).

Radiation effects↗

Murine Host-gut Microbiota Interactions are Modulated During Spaceflight

The rodent habitat on the International Space Station has provided critical insight into the impact of spaceflight on mammalian physiology. These effects include dysfunction of carbohydrate, steroid and lipid metabolism, and immune response, as well as induction of symptoms characteristic of liver disease, insulin resistance, osteopenia and myopathy, which are anticipated to intensify over long-duration spaceflight. Although these physiological responses can involve the microbiome, the host-microorganism interactions during spaceflight are still largely unknown. NASA GeneLab curates a wide range of space research data and the current work harnesses GeneLab multi’omic data from recent Rodent Research studies to explore changes to gut microbiota during spaceflight and their associations with host physiology when compared to ground controls. Using a hybrid analysis of DNA barcoding and whole genome shotgun data, an array of bacteria, fungi and nematodes could be identified at species level, and significant differences in relative abundances associated with spaceflight. Functional prediction based on differential abundance of species and metagenome gene inventories as well as metatranscriptomic gene expression at the host-gut microbiome interface implicate microbiota interactions could contribute to spaceflight pathology. Harnessing carefully curated publicly available data, such as from Genelab, to generate multi‘omic space science discoveries can help decipher the complex host-microbiome interactions that influence both health on Earth and the feasibility of long-duration spaceflight.

Microbiome↗

Effects of a 33-Ion Sequential Beam Galactic Cosmic Ray Analog on Male Mouse Behavior and Evaluation of CDDO-EA as a Radiation Countermeasure

In long-term spaceflight, astronauts will face unique cognitive loads and social challenges which will be complicated by communication delays with Earth. It is important to understand the central nervous system (CNS) effects of deep spaceflight and the associated unavoidable exposure to galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). Rodent studies show single- or simple-particle combination exposure alters CNS endpoints, including hippocampal-dependent behavior. An even better Earth-based simulation of GCR is now available, consisting of a 33-beam (33-GCR) exposure. However, the effect of whole-body 33-GCR exposure on rodent behavior is unknown, and no 33-GCR CNS countermeasures have been tested. Here astronaut-age-equivalent (6mo-old) C57BL/6J male mice were exposed to 33-GCR (75cGy, a Mars mission dose). Pre-/during/post-Sham or 33-GCR exposure, mice received a diet containing a ‘vehicle’ formulation alone or with the antioxidant/anti-inflammatory compound CDDO-EA as a potential countermeasure. Behavioral testing beginning 4mo post-irradiation suggested radiation and diet did not affect measures of exploration/anxiety-like behaviors (open field, elevated plus maze) or recognition of a novel object. However, in 3-Chamber Social Interaction (3-CSI), CDDO-EA/33-GCR mice failed to spend more time exploring a holder containing a novel mouse vs. a novel object (empty holder), suggesting sociability deficits. Also, Vehicle/33-GCR and CDDO-EA/Sham mice failed to discriminate between a novel stranger vs. familiarized stranger mouse, suggesting blunted preference for social novelty. CDDO-EA given pre-/ during/post-irradiation did not attenuate the 33-GCR-induced blunting of preference for social novelty. Future elucidation of the mechanisms underlying 33-GCR-induced blunting of preference for social novelty will improve risk analysis for astronauts which may in-turn improve countermeasures.

Space radiation↗

Effects of A 33-Ion Sequential Beam Galactic Cosmic Ray Analog on Male Mouse Behavior and Evaluation of CDDO-EA as A Radiation Countermeasure

In long-term spaceflight, astronauts will face unique cognitive loads and social challenges which will be complicated by communication delays with Earth. It is important to understand the central nervous system (CNS) effects of deep spaceflight and the associated unavoidable exposure to galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). Rodent studies show single- or simple-particle combination exposure alters CNS endpoints, including hippocampal-dependent behavior. An even better Earth-based simulation of GCR is now available, consisting of a 33-beam (33-GCR) exposure. However, the effect of whole-body 33-GCR exposure on rodent behavior is unknown, and no 33-GCR CNS countermeasures have been tested. Here astronaut-age-equivalent (6mo-old) C57BL/6J male mice were exposed to 33-GCR (75cGy, a Mars mission dose). Pre-/during/post-Sham or 33-GCR exposure, mice received a diet containing a ‘vehicle’ formulation alone or with the antioxidant/anti-inflammatory compound CDDO-EA as a potential countermeasure. Behavioral testing beginning 4mo post-irradiation suggested radiation and diet did not affect measures of exploration/anxiety-like behaviors (open field, elevated plus maze) or recognition of a novel object. However, in 3-Chamber Social Interaction (3-CSI), CDDO-EA/33-GCR mice failed to spend more time exploring a holder containing a novel mouse vs. a novel object (empty holder), suggesting sociability deficits. Also, Vehicle/33-GCR and CDDO-EA/Sham mice failed to discriminate between a novel stranger vs. familiarized stranger mouse, suggesting blunted preference for social novelty. CDDO-EA given pre-/ during/post-irradiation did not attenuate the 33-GCR-induced blunting of preference for social novelty. Future elucidation of the mechanisms underlying 33-GCR-induced blunting of preference for social novelty will improve risk analysis for astronauts which may in-turn improve countermeasures.

Space radiation↗

Comparison of Radiation-Induced Damage Between Livers From Control and Chimeric Mice

Assessment of human health risks associated with space radiation exposure is based largely on the knowledge gained from studies in which animals, mostly rodents, are exposed to high-LET radiation on the ground. It has been recognized that translation of animal results to meaningful implications for human disease can be challenging, particularly for certain risk categories such as the high-LET radiation effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Considering limitations in utilizing non-human primates and clinical studies in humans, chimeric animals can potentially bridge the knowledge gap between rodents and humans. In a chimeric animal, a specific organ or a cell type is replaced with respective human cells that are functional. In this pilot study, we used PXB mice whose livers contain >90% human cells. These mice were exposed to gamma rays to investigate DNA damage and transcriptomics changes in the chimeric livers. Results obtained from PXB mice were compared to non-engrafted control animals from the same background strain that were exposed to identical conditions. Staining of the liver tissues with H&E indicated that the human liver tissue in chimeric mice responded differently than the mouse liver tissue to gamma radiation on the cellular level, as evidenced by differences in inflammation and cellular damage seen on histopathology. The gene expression data collected from the liver samples will also be presented, which potentially offers an explanation for the differential responses.

Honglu Wu↗

Biological Research and Space Health Enabled by Machine Learning to Support Deep Space Missions

A key science goal of the NASA “Moon to Mars” campaign is to understand how biology responds to the Lunar, Martian, and deep space environments in order to advance fundamental knowledge, reduce risk, and support safe, productive human space missions. Through the powerful emerging computer science approaches of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), a paradigm shift has begun in biomedical science and engineered astronaut health systems, to enable Earth-independence and autonomy of mission operations. We present a decadal view of AI/ML architecture to support deep space mission goals, developed in concert with leaders in the field. We describe current AI/ML methods to support 1) fundamental biology, 2) in situ analytics, 3) high performance computing hardware, 4) automated science, 5) self-driving labs, 6) remote data management, 7) integrated real-time mission biomonitoring, and 8) a Precision Space Health system. Cutting-edge AI/ML approaches that can be integrated to support these domains include active learning, explainable AI, adaptive learning, causal inference, knowledge graphs, federated learning, transfer learning, and large language models. Finally, we present results from several current ML projects that are underway in the field to address key challenges of small sample n, high feature count, heterogeneity, and sparse data. These include 1) connecting omics data to phenotypic data using an ensemble model to infer causality of spaceflight rodent liver health disruption, 2) usage of explainable ML to interrogate the muscular underpinnings of spaceflight muscle atrophy, 3) ML models analyzing and determining directed acyclic graphs of human space health risk leveraging rodent bone datasets, 4) usage of large pre-trained models connecting biomedical knowledgebases with small spaceflight datasets to understand gene-to-gene interaction networks, and 5) a suite of benchmarked open science datasets (spaceflight mouse liver; radiation DNA damage) enabling programmers to identify the best ML algorithms to answer space biological science questions.

space biology↗

Biological Research and Space Health Enabled by Machine Learning to Support Deep Space Missions

A key science goal of the NASA “Moon to Mars” campaign is to understand how biology responds to the Lunar, Martian, and deep space environments in order to advance fundamental knowledge and support human space missions. Through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), a paradigm shift has begun in space biosciences and engineered astronaut health systems, to enable Earth-independence and mission operations autonomy. We describe current AI/ML methods to support 1) fundamental biology, 2) in situ analytics, 3) high performance computing, 4) automated science, 5) self-driving labs, 6) remote data management, 7) integrated mission biomonitoring, and 8) a Precision Space Health system. AI/ML approaches that can be integrated to support these domains include active learning, explainable AI, adaptive learning, causal inference, knowledge graphs, federated learning, transfer learning, and large language models. Finally, we present results from several current ML projects that are underway in the space biology field to address key challenges of small sample n, high feature count, heterogeneity, and sparse data. These include 1) connecting omics to phenotypic data using an ensemble model to infer causality of rodent liver health disruption, 2) usage of explainable ML to interrogate muscular underpinnings of muscle atrophy, 3) ML models analyzing and determining directed acyclic graphs of human health risk leveraging rodent bone datasets, 4) usage of large pre-trained models connecting biomedical knowledgebases with small spaceflight datasets to understand gene-to-gene interactions, and 5) a suite of benchmarked open science datasets enabling programmers to identify best algorithms to answer space biology questions.

space biology↗

Murine Spine Composition and Mechanics are Maintained After 30-Days of Spaceflight

As NASA prepares to send astronauts on deep space missions, understanding the detrimental effects of spaceflight on the body is imperative. Spaceflight is known to negatively affect the spine, with astronauts experiencing systemic bone loss and increased post-flight risk of intervertebral disc herniation. Space investigations with rodent models have characterized some of the effects of spaceflight on the mammalian body, but variable experimental conditions have made it difficult to cohesively interpret results. These conditions include housing, flight duration, and for the spine, anatomical location. Thus, the objective of this study was to comprehensively characterize the effects of spaceflight on the bulk properties of the murine lumbar spine. To do this, we examined the lumbar spine of mice flown on the NASA Rodent Research 10 mission and analyzed disc biochemical content, disc joint material properties, lumbar vertebral body microarchitecture, and proximal tibia microarchitecture. Finally, we qualitatively examined bone growth in the vertebral bodies using confocal microscopy and on-orbit injections of calcein. Contrary to prior results, we found little to no effect of spaceflight on lumbar spine properties. Spaceflight, however, did negatively affect both cortical and trabecular bone properties of the proximal tibia load-bearing site. We hypothesize that this may be due to loading associated with increased physical activity in the second half of the mission, observed on in-flight videos, that reload the lumbar spine as mice utilize quadruped ambulation. This increased activity occurs after an initial period of relative inactivity in microgravity. In support of this hypothesis, we observed new L5 bone formation in the last seven days of spaceflight, suggesting that current 30-day experimental flight conditions may not be as effective at lumbar spine unloading as previous shorter flights.

mouse↗

37-Day Microgravity Exposure in 16-Week Female C57BL/6J Mice is Associated with Weight Bearing Site-Specific Bone Loss

Exposure to space environment factors, including microgravity unloading and space radiation, is well-known to be associated with rapid bone loss in mammals, but significant questions remain about mechanistic aspects of this process. Specifically, bone loss may vary depending on many interacting factors including age and skeletal maturity, physical activity, social versus individual housing, and habitat configuration. Likewise cellular tissue loss mechanisms in space may include changes to mineral homeostasis by activation of bone degradation by osteoclasts, or inhibition of bone formation by osteoblasts, and be caused by microgravity mechanical unloading or increased space radiation. In this study we used microcomputed tomography to quantify bone loss in multiple skeletal sites of group housed mice either exposed to 37 days in space on ISS during the Rodent Research 1, (RR1), experiments using the NASA Rodent Habitat, (RH), versus ground controls in the same habitats or standard vivarium cages. Our results in space versus matched RH ground controls show significant cancellous and cortical bone loss in the femur and tibia, but not in vertebrae, indicating that only weight-bearing bones experience significant bone loss during spaceflight. This finding suggests that space radiation at the low levels found in low Earth Orbit may not be a significant contributing factor to bone loss in space. Interestingly while mice maintained in the RH maintained or gained bone relative to Basal controls, mice kept in standard vivarium cages for 37 days showed significant loss in weight bearing bones, not as acute, but comparable in magnitude to spaceflight effects. These results suggest the RH configuration versus vivarium cages, may allow for greater mechanical loading of weight bearing bones as mice climb internal habitat surfaces, promoting maintenance of bone regenerative health.

mouse↗

Comparison of Radiation-Induced Damage Between Livers From Control and Chimeric Mice

Assessment of human health risks associated with space radiation exposure is based largely on the knowledge gained from studies in which animals, mostly rodents, are exposed to high-LET radiation on the ground. It has been recognized that translation of animal results to meaningful implications for human disease can be challenging, particularly for certain risk categories such as the high-LET radiation effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Considering limitations in utilizing non-human primates and clinical studies in humans, chimeric animals can potentially bridge the knowledge gap between rodents and humans. In a chimeric animal, a specific organ or a cell type is replaced with respective human cells that are functional. In this pilot study, we used PXB mice whose livers contain >90% human cells. These mice were exposed to gamma rays to investigate DNA damage and transcriptomics changes in the chimeric livers. Results obtained from PXB mice were compared to non-engrafted control animals from the same background strain that were exposed to identical conditions. Staining of the liver tissues with H&E indicated that the human liver tissue in chimeric mice responded differently than the mouse liver tissue to gamma radiation on the cellular level, as evidenced by differences in inflammation and cellular damage seen on histopathology. The gene expression data collected from the liver samples will also be presented, which potentially offers an explanation for the differential responses.

Honglu Wu↗

Comparison of Radiation-Induced Damage Between Livers From Control and Chimeric Mice

Assessment of human health risks associated with space radiation exposure is based largely on the knowledge gained from studies in which animals, mostly rodents, are exposed to high-LET radiation on the ground. It has been recognized that translation of animal results to meaningful implications for human disease can be challenging, particularly for certain risk categories such as the high-LET radiation effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Considering limitations in utilizing non-human primates and clinical studies in humans, chimeric animals can potentially bridge the knowledge gap between rodents and humans. In a chimeric animal, a specific organ or a cell type is replaced with respective human cells that are functional. In this pilot study, we used PXB mice whose livers contain >90% human cells. These mice were exposed to gamma rays to investigate DNA damage and transcriptomics changes in the chimeric livers. Results obtained from PXB mice were compared to non-engrafted control animals from the same background strain that were exposed to identical conditions. Staining of the liver tissues with H&E indicated that the human liver tissue in chimeric mice responded differently than the mouse liver tissue to gamma radiation on the cellular level, as evidenced by differences in inflammation and cellular damage seen on histopathology. The gene expression data collected from the liver samples will also be presented, which potentially offers an explanation for the differential responses.

Honglu Wu↗