Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ARTEMIS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Developmental Flight Instrumentation: Review of Space Shuttle, Ares I-X, and Artemis I

Ascent vehicles in the developmental stages of the program are instrumented with Developmental Flight Instrumentation (DFI) sensors. These sensors establish a link between a vehicle and engineers on the ground to communicate conditions experienced during the ascent. These data are then compared to pre-flight predictions used in the design process. The aerodynamic, acoustic, thermal, and structural data are either telemetered to ground stations during the ascent or stored on the vehicle for post-flight recovery and archived at the Huntsville Operations Support Center (HOSC). Following NASA's Artemis I Space Launch System (SLS) launch on November 16, 2020, data from three separate programs are available at the HOSC: Space Shuttle Program (Space Transport System (STS)), Constellation Program (Ares I-X), and Artemis Program (SLS). Availability of these data presents a unique opportunity to examine DFI data from three distinct vehicles and analyze the broad impact of the DFI data on the understanding of transonic aerodynamics. Classical spectrogram and Empirical Mode Decomposition techniques were used to present data in aerodynamically analogous regions on each vehicle. On the SLS and Ares I-X, a region downstream of the Launch Abort System motors was chosen. Comparing SLS and the STS, a region downstream of booster Froward Attach Hardware was selected as analogous flow region. Some other regions of interest were also identified. Although similarities in flow features on three vehicles were identified, some challenges in the comparison were also encountered, especially due to poor temporal and spatial resolution of Shuttle measurements.

Space Shuttle↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Wind-Tunnel and Flight Unsteady Pressure Stochastic Characteristics for the Space Launch System Artemis I Flight

Over the course of more than ten years, numerous wind-tunnel tests have been conducted to acquire data for characterizing the unsteady pressure environments expected to act on the Space Launch System Block 1 crew launch vehicle during ascent. These wind-tunnel tests of highly-instrumented rigid models are the current standard for the estimation of unsteady environments. Following the successful launch of the Artemis I mission, the extensive flight data acquired can be analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of unsteady pressure environments predicted in subscale wind-tunnel testing in comparison to the flight test data. In this paper, analyses focusing on data from several Space Launch System wind-tunnel tests and the Artemis I flight test are presented, including assessments of test-to-test, tunnel-to-tunnel, and tunnel-to-flight stochastic characteristics and preflight modeling validity based on wind-tunnel testing. In general, the fluctuating pressure environments measured during the several preflight subscale wind-tunnel tests compare favorably and provide relatively accurate estimates of the environments measured during flight. Discrepancies in fluctuating magnitudes, spatial extent of regions of unsteadiness, and narrowband frequency peaks are noted in the multibody region aft of the solid rocket booster forward attachment to the core stage.

wind-tunnel↗
NASA NTRS2024

Quantifying Risk to Improve Medical System Design for Long Duration Artemis Missions: A Demonstration of NASA's IMPACT Tradespace Analysis Tool

BACKGROUND NASA’s human exploration spaceflight missions to the Moon and Mars present unprecedented challenges for in-mission medical care. A greater distance from Earth will mean increased mission durations, communication delays, limited to no resupply opportunities, and constraints on the evacuation of ill or injured crew. Mass, volume, and power will be limited while higher demands will be placed on the crews to manage medical events. NASA’s Moon to Mars exploration strategy outlines increasingly complex Artemis missions both in terms of duration and operations. In these more challenging deep space missions, it is important to quantitatively estimate the human system risk attributable to medical conditions and use these estimates to advance medical system design. METHODS IMPACT (Informing Mission Planning via Analysis of Complex Tradespaces) is a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and tradespace analysis tool developed by NASA to advance exploration mission medical system design. IMPACT v1.0 includes a novel evidence library baselined to exploration environments; an expanded list of 119 medical conditions; a large increase in the number of medical resources and the flexibility of their use; and the ability for rapid and iterative analysis. Medical system risk estimates include loss of crew life, consideration of the need for return to definitive care (medical evacuation), and an estimate of crew time affected due to medical conditions. A notional long duration lunar orbit and lunar surface design reference mission (DRM) was chosen with a 4-astronaut crew to mimic a foundational exploration Artemis mission. The DRM profile includes outbound transit on Orion, Gateway space station rendezvous in lunar orbit, 6 months on the Lunar surface with extravehicular activity (EVA), return rendezvous with Gateway, and transit back to Earth. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Overall, IMPACT successfully quantified medical risk and derived an optimal medical system to support crew on a long duration lunar mission. In this DRM, the calculated loss of crew life from a medical event was 0.008 events per mission, risk of potential need for evacuation was 0.30 events per mission, and cumulative crew time affected by medical conditions was 103 days. The medical conditions that most contributed to medical risk were decompression sickness, trauma, and respiratory failure. The conditions that had the largest effects on crew performance included musculoskeletal injuries and lunar dust exposure. The IMPACT-generated medical system included resources that target the most common and highest risk conditions and performed as expected. This demonstrates the value of the IMPACT tool in medical system design for human exploration spaceflight missions.

Arian Anderson↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Orion Artemis I As Flown MMOD Analysis

Introduction The Lockheed Martin Orion spacecraft conducted the Artemis I flight around the Moon from November 16 through December 11, 2022. After the flight, an engineer from the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) Hypervelocity Impact Technology (HVIT) Group performed a Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris MMOD analysis using the Bumper 3 risk assessment tool to predict the number of small impacts that would likely have occurred during the mission. Separately, a team from the same group inspected the Orion capsule for hypervelocity impact damage features. The results of the inspection were compared to those of the analysis to aid in improving the analysis, including the environment models. Scope of Work The spacecraft geometry model was created by Lockheed Martin during construction of the Artemis I Orion vehicle based on Computer Aided Design (CAD) models of the vehicle. New hypervelocity impact testing was performed to verify Ballistic Limit Equations (BLEs) used in the analysis to link impactor size and damage to the Thermal Protection System (TPS). The exact trajectory flown was recorded during the flight, including vehicle attitude. This data was used in conjunction with the ORDEM 3.2 and MEM 3 environment modeling tools to create models of particle flux impacting the spacecraft throughout the mission. Meteoroid shower forecast information was also included to account for additional particle flux associated with meteoroid showers. Inspection of the Orion capsule included the Backshell thermal tiles and the tape covering it, windows, fabric thermal materials, and small areas of other materials. Potential MMOD damage found was characterized using various techniques, including optical microscopy, computed tomography scanning, and X-ray spectroscopy. Findings The number of craters found in the Backshell tile, and their size distribution, matches well with the Bumper analysis prediction. Tape, window, and other material impacts recorded similarly align to Bumper analysis predictions. Conclusions and Recommendations This comparison of analysis with inspection of the hardware provides valuable insight into the MMOD environment and how accurately analysis tools assess the impact risk to spacecraft. As this was the first large, non-ablative returned surface from a lunar mission, this analysis extends the MMOD community’s insight beyond low Earth orbit into cis-lunar space.

MMOD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Power Generation Impacts of Spacecraft Albedo During the Artemis I Mission

The Orion spacecraft is a deep space, crewed vehicle designed to support NASA’s Artemis exploration campaign. NASA successfully completed an uncrewed test flight of the Orion spacecraft during the 26-day Artemis I mission in November and December 2022. At numerous points during the mission, a small but measurable amount of power was generated by a solar array wing (SAW) while pointed away from the sun. This presentation discusses an analysis of in-flight telemetry data to characterize this condition. Various potential sources of reflected light were examined, with self-reflection off the spacecraft itself having the largest impact. Different array and attitude configurations were studied to characterize the array response to this spacecraft albedo.

Albedo↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SLS First Flight: Assessment of Artemis-I Motor Performance

NASA’s Artemis-I mission, which launched from Kennedy Space Center on November 16, 2022 and lasted 25 days, was the first flight test of the new Space Launch System vehicle as well as its twin solid rocket boosters. This flight test was the culmination of many years of development, testing, construction, and assembly completed by NASA and a large consortium of corporate partners, including Northrop Grumman. The solid rocket boosters are updated five-segment versions of those used during the Space Shuttle program, re-designed to provide enhanced performance and lifting capability. Booster motor performance had been characterized over the course of seven ground static tests conducted between 2009 and 2022, including three development tests, two qualification tests, and two supplemental flight support tests. The Artemis-I flight provided the first opportunity to assess solid rocket motor performance in a flight environment for any potential flight-ground biases and to ensure that measured flight performance was within requirement and analytical model limits and expectations.

Nikolas Ciaston↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flight Dynamics Analysis of Lunar Fly-By Altitudes and Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) Resonances With Applications to NASA's Artemis Program

As the interest in lunar exploration grows exponentially, many companies and government agencies around the world are looking to establish presence on the lunar surface. With NASA’s Artemis program and Lunar Gateway, NASA seeks to return to the moon and for exploration. To achieve such goals, many orbit regimes and patterns were explored. Due to its minimal station keeping requirements and communications access, a specific set of Halo Orbits known as Near Rectilinear Halo Orbits (NRHO) was selected for use cases in both NASA’s Artemis Program as well as Lunar Gateway. The primary objective of this effort is to perform a flight dynamics analysis, which analyzes trajectories targeting specific lunar fly-by altitudes and NRHO Resonances in the L2 Southern Family.

NASA↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Real-Time Dose Prediction for Artemis Missions

As large solar energetic particle (SEP) events can add significant radiation dose to astronauts in a short period of time and even induce acute clinical responses during missions, they present a concern for manned space flight operation. To assist the operations team in modeling and monitoring organ doses and any possible acute radiation-induced risks to astronauts during SEP events in real time, ARRT (Acute Radiation Risks Tool) 1.0 has been developed and successfully tested for Artemis I mission. The ARRT 2.0 described in this work integrates an established SEP forecasting model – UMASEP-100, further enabling real-time dose prediction for the upcoming Artemis II and following missions. With the new module linking with UMASEP-100 outputs in real time, the total BFO doses of most significant events can be communicated at the time of onset and hours before the peak. This is based on a flux-dose formula identified from comparing UMASEP-100 results with transport calculation for the events during 1994-2013 and validated with events outside that period. ARRT 2.0 also shows capability to distinguish minor events from significant ones to screen false alarms that will cause disruptions for space activities. This improvement provides additional information for operational teams to make timely decisions in contingent scenarios of severe SEP events to mitigate radiation exposure.

S Hu↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

HERA in the Artemis ERA

As NASA shifts its mission objectives to the lunar surface and the return of humans to the moon in the next few years, analogs that simulate lunar transit or surface exploration are in a unique position to support spaceflight research that is aligned with future Artemis missions, especially a sustained lunar presence. NASA’s spaceflight analogs have historically focused on mission scenarios and operations for Mars exploration, including recent campaigns staged at the Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) analog at Johnson Space Center. However, beginning in Campaign 8, future HERA missions are planned to mimic lunar operations and support research objectives that directly address knowledge gaps for lunar exploration and habitation. The Research Operations and Integration (ROI) HERA team will present a look-back over HERA mission scenarios and operations supporting NASA’s Human Research Program and international partners’ spaceflight research. An overview of critical capabilities in HERA and other similar analogs will also be presented, such as methods of simulating EVAs. Presenters will then discuss the transition to a high-fidelity lunar surface exploration mission scenario envisioned for Campaign 8, slated to begin in 2026. Operations changes that will be discussed will include simulated lunar surface exploration using a two-person simulated pressurized rover in combination with virtual reality, lunar-relevant communication delays, changes to concepts of how crew communicate with Earth-based mission supports, increased access to family & friends’ communication compared to prior campaigns, and a new mission scenario referencing Artemis mission objectives and tasks. ROI analog mission designs are driven by science objectives. The ROI HERA team will describe how the changes for Campaign 8 support ongoing spaceflight research interests and provide opportunities for investigators to design experiments more closely aligned to lunar missions. A questions and answers session will follow with attendees encouraged to ask questions.

B J Caldwell↗
NASA NTRS2024

Real-Time Dose Prediction for Artemis Missions

As large solar energetic particle (SEP) events can add significant radiation dose to astronauts in a short period of time and even induce acute clinical responses during missions, they present a concern for manned space flight operation. To assist the operations team in modeling and monitoring organ doses and any possible acute radiation-induced risks to astronauts during SEP events in real time, ARRT (Acute Radiation Risks Tool) 1.0 has been developed and successfully tested for Artemis I mission. The ARRT 2.0 described in this work integrates an established SEP forecasting model – UMASEP-100, further enabling real-time dose prediction for the upcoming Artemis II and following missions. With the new module linking with UMASEP-100 outputs in real time, the total BFO doses of most significant events can be communicated at the time of onset and hours before the peak. This is based on a flux-dose formula identified from comparing UMASEP-100 results with transport calculation for the events during 1994-2013 and validated with events outside that period. ARRT 2.0 also shows capability to distinguish minor events from significant ones to screen false alarms that will cause disruptions for space activities. This improvement provides additional information for operational teams to make timely decisions in contingent scenarios of severe SEP events to mitigate radiation exposure.

Shaowen Hu↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Return of the ICPS: A Statistical Perspective on Artemis Upper Stage Disposal

Prior to the launch of Artemis I, it was discovered that the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) of the Space Launch System may not dispose heliocentrically as intended. This paper summarizes the results of an investigation which looked into why the ICPS may return in less than a year for certain Launch Days. Evidence is presented showing the ICPS mimics the behavior of known Three-Body Periodic Orbits for certain Sun-Earth geometries. This paper discusses the primary mechanisms causing ICPS to return, describes the statistics of these returns, and also discusses interactions between Artemis I mission design and the lunar month.

W B Stein↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Return of the ICPS: A Statistical Perspective on Artemis Upper Stage Disposal

Prior to the launch of Artemis I, it was discovered that the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) of the Space Launch System may not dispose heliocentrically as intended. This paper summarizes the results of an investigation which looked into why the ICPS may return in less than a year for certain Launch Days. Evidence is presented showing the ICPS mimics the behavior of known Three-Body Periodic Orbits for certain Sun-Earth geometries. This paper discusses the primary mechanisms causing ICPS to return, describes the statistics of these returns, and also discusses interactions between Artemis I mission design and the lunar month.

W. B. Stein↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Performance Impacts to the NASA Artemis II Trajectory Correction Burn Placement

As NASA embarks to return humans to the lunar vicinity with the upcoming Artemis II mission, the selected free return trajectory taking the crew to the Moon in the Orion spacecraft is impacted by the execution of small trajectory correction burns to ensure the spacecraft stays on course for a successful return to Earth. The placement of these nominally zero translational maneuvers must account for the crew schedule, navigation tracking constraints, spacecraft venting, thermal and communication requirements, and a host of other programmatic factors. Understanding the influence the placement of these periodic burn corrections have on the integrated GN\&C performance can provide valuable insight to mission controllers and trajectory planning processes to untangle the complex trade space considered for both baseline and contingency scenarios. This sensitivity information can also be utilized to facilitate the optimized placement of these burns. This paper utilizes several techniques to systematically generate the performance impacts to the NASA Artemis II trajectory correction burn placement and demonstrate how to derive optimized locations that make the system robust to crew activity, maneuver execution errors, navigation uncertainty, orbit insertion errors, disturbance accelerations, and other system limitations.

GN&C↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis I Trajectory Design and Optimization

This paper presents the overall trajectory design and optimization process for NASA’s Artemis I mission to send an uncrewed Orion vehicle to a lunar Distant Retrograde Orbit (DRO). The on-orbit trajectory begins at the Space Launch System (SLS) core separation and ends at the Orion service module Earth Entry Interface (EI) point. The details of the trajectory optimization process are presented, including design of nominal and extended mission options, launch windows, and abort options. Novel design techniques are also discussed to account for contingencies, such as using auxiliary thrusters to protect against main engine failure and applying trajectory shaping to mitigate or reduce eclipse durations.

Artemis I↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis II Inertial Sensor Failure & Abort Condition Study

Given Artemis II as the first crewed lunar mission in decades, significant effort is directed towards understanding Space Launch System (SLS) response to failures of the three inertial sensors: two Ring-Laser Gyro Assemblies (RGAs) and the Redundant Inertial Navigation Unit (RINU). Parametric studies identify Loss of Mission (LOM) or Loss of Crew (LOC) sensitive mission phases. Fault Detection & Isolation (FDI) algorithms’ thresholds’ performance is assessed with respect to detecting LOM or LOC causing sensor failures. Monte Carlo studies are performed targeting specific trajectory phases for insight into re-optimizing FDI thresholds and improving knowledge of SLS sensor failure response statistics.

SLS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Artemis Gateway as a Cislunar Science Platform

The Artemis Gateway is a lunar orbiting platform that will enable a sustainable human presence on and around the Moon beginning in this decade. Along with serving as a habitat for astronauts in support of lunar landing missions, Gateway provides a unique opportunity for science and research within cislunar space, from human health to space weather, with an eye toward deep space human space flight. Payloads are planned to be manifested on a rotating basis both internally and externally on the Gateway as well as on visiting Logistics Modules. Similar to the International Space Station, the Gateway benefits from significant international cooperation, and partnering agencies are collaborating to facilitate multilateral research across disciplines. We will present an overview of the Gateway mission and its unique capabilities and rich exploration space.

Gateway↗