Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Advanced Test Reactor (ATR)”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

UNIRRADIATED

This is the mechanical testing data archive from a neutron irradiation campaign of nuclear structural alloys fabricated by powder metallurgy with hot isostatic pressing (PM-HIP). Data in this archive include uniaxial tensile testing data, fractography of selected tensile bars, and nanoindentation. The irradiation campaign was designed to facilitate a direct comparison of PM-HIP to conventional casting or forging. Five common nuclear structural alloys were included in the campaign: 316L stainless steel, SA508 pressure vessel steel, Grade 91 ferritic steel, and Ni-base alloys 625 and 690. Irradiations were carried out in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to target doses of 1 and 3 displacements per atom (dpa) at target temperatures of 300ºC and 400ºC through the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) project 15-8242.

Wharry, Janelle↗
DOE OSTI2020

As-Run Physics Analysis for the EPRI-1 Experiment

The purpose of this ECAR is to document the as-run physics analysis for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)-1 experiment located in the Center Flux Trap (CFT). EPRI-1 was irradiated during cycle 157C. The experiment irradiation ended on February 15, 2015. The as-run heat rates, DPA, and flux/fluence results were calculated using the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) full core model. The heat rates, DPA, and flux are calculated based on an average center lobe power of 21.1 MW. The fluence and DPA is based on the operating time of 5.4 days. ORIGEN2 Version 2.2 was used to calculate the isotopic concentration in grams for the EPRI-1 experiment. The source term analysis was performed as requested by the project staff. The results of this analysis may be used to support Post-Irradiation Examination (PIE)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Codisposal Waste Package Loading Options for DOE SNF and HLW PPT

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for managing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) that is currently in, or will in the future come into, its possession. DOE must continue to safely store that SNF, transport it to an interim storage site or a repository, and dispose of it. These fuels come from a wide range of reactor types with various cladding materials and enrichments. Many of these reactors, now decommissioned, had unique design features, such as core configuration, fuel element and assembly geometry, moderator and coolant materials, operational characteristics, and neutron spatial and spectral properties, resulting in a large diversity of reactor and fuel designs. Because of the wide variety and conditions of SNF, a robust DOE Standard Canister was proposed that would confine radionuclides and preclude moderator. The DOE Standard Canister had four variations: 3.05-meter (10-foot) or 4.57-meter (15-foot) length, and 45.7-cm (18-inch) or 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter. For ultimate disposal in the Yucca Mountain Repository, these canisters were to be grouped with 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter high level waste (HLW) canisters in a 2.13-meter (84-inch) diameter co-disposal waste package. The smaller 45.7-cm (18-inch) diameter DOE Standard Canister could be placed in the middle of five HLW canisters. The larger 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter DOE Standard Canister would take the place of one of the five HLW canisters on the outer ring in the co-disposal waste package. No DOE Standard Canisters have been loaded. A preliminary evaluation has estimated the number of elements of a fuel type that can fit into the different sizes of the DOE Standard Canister, but no definitive loading configuration has been selected. Changing the loading configuration could impact the number of loadable DOE Standard Canisters and the number of co-disposal waste packages needed for eventual disposition. This paper conveys the ranges of DOE Standard Canisters and HLW canisters that may be produced under certain conditions. It also examines the differences in the estimated number of co-disposal waste packages produced for eventual disposal when using different loading strategies in the DOE Standard Canister for Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), Peach Bottom, and High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) SNF. Changing the loading configurations of ATR, Peach Bottom, and HFIR SNF slightly impacted the number of co-disposal waste packages that may be needed for ultimate disposal. The change in loading configuration was more impactful when a different canister was used, as opposed to varying the number of elements that could fit inside the same size canister. In one case, a reduction of co-disposal waste packages could be achieved by allowing mixing of short HLW canisters with long DOE Standard Canisters. The main conclusion from this analysis is that the ratio between HLW canisters and DOE Standard Canisters will drive the total number of co-disposal waste packages. If too many HLW canisters (i.e., more than five times the number of 18-inch DOE standard canisters) or DOE Standard Canisters are produced, some co-disposal waste packages may not have all positions filled. A co-disposal waste package may be filled with all HLW with no DOE Standard Canister, or a co-disposal waste package could be filled with a single DOE Standard Canister. A ratio that does not closely align to optimum could allow for the design of waste packages that hold just HLW canisters or just DOE SNF canisters.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Retractable Sensor for Reactor Experiments

This presentation is to orient a mechanical or nuclear engineering senior design team so that they can help solve an instrumentation problem found in high power test reactors. Test reactors such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory are used to irradiate nuclear fuels and materials to evaluate performance after high levels of exposure to a reactor in-pile environment. The purpose of the experiments is to determine property changes as the materials or fuels are bombarded with fast neutrons (and thermal (slow) neutrons as well). Typically, the irradiation must take place at a very specific temperature. Sometimes other parameters are monitored as well as properties such as creep, or gas composition, etc. However, the fast neutrons cause changes in not only the materials, but also in the transducers that are placed in the neutron flux, e.g., thermocouples or optical fibers. This task will be limited to considering temperature measurements. Thermocouples experience decalibration from not only the neutron flux, but also from the very high temperatures that are sometimes measured. Optical fibers darken in a neutron or gamma flux. However, it takes quite a few hours, or days for these changes to manifest. High power test reactors typically run at a constant power and so the temperature in an experiment is fairly stable over time. Because the changes are typically very slow, even a single temperature measurement per day, would provide 95% of a perfect data set. The basic concept of this effort is to push a very small diameter thermocouple or optical fiber into the location to be measured, leave it for 30 seconds or so for it to come to equilibrium, and transmit the signal, and then pull it up and away from the high neutron flux and high temperature region. The distance the thermocouple or fiber would need to move is on the order of 50 – 100 cm. By doing this, the thermocouple junction or optical fiber would spend only a few hours in the high flux/high temperature environment over the life of the irradiation.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2020

Comparison between PARFUME and Bison Using the AGR-2 Irradiation Experiment

This report documents comparisons between Fuel Model (PARFUME) model predictions versus Bison for selected compacts from the second irradiation test of the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program that occurred from June 2010 to October 2013 in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). PARFUME is a fuel performance analysis and modeling code, used for evaluating gas-reactor tristructural isotropic (TRISO) coated particle fuel for prismatic, pebble bed, plate, and cylindrical type fuel geometries. PARFUME is an integrated mechanistic computer code that evaluates the thermal, mechanical, and physico-chemical behavior of TRISO coated-fuel particles and the probability for fuel failure given the particle-to-particle statistical variations in physical dimensions and material properties that arise during the fuel fabrication process. Bison is a nuclear fuel performance application built using the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) finite element library (Permann 2020). Bison is capable of modeling multiple fuel forms in a wide variety of dimensions and geometries. It solves coupled nonlinear partial differential equations, including heat conduction, mechanics, fission product species transport etc., in a fully implicit manner. Comparisons between PARFUME and Bison were performed using four compacts from the AGR-2 experiment. Selected outputs were chosen based on their impact on the probability of the SiC layer failing. In general there was good agreement between PARFUME and Bison with the exception of predicting the gap formed between the buffer and IPyC. Further comparisons between PARFUME and Bison are planned to further develop Bison’s capabilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

AGC-4 Experiment Irradiation Monitoring Data Qualification Final Report

The Graphite Technology Development Program ran a series of six experiments to quantify the effects of irradiation on nuclear grade graphite. This report focuses on the fourth experiment, Advanced Graphite Creep 4 (AGC 4). The Advanced Reactor Development (ARD) Technology Development Office (TDO) Program for research and development activities require documentation of qualified monitoring data to design and license the first high-temperature reactor nuclear plant. Qualified data meets the requirements for use as described in the experiment planning and quality assurance documents. Failed data do not meet the requirements and provide no useable information. Trend data may not meet all requirements but still provide some useable information. Use of Trend data requires assessment of how any deficiencies affect a particular use of the data. AGC-4 began with Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Cycle 157D on May 30, 2015. After irradiating the graphite for two cycles, the capsule was removed from the reactor after ATR Cycle 158A, which ended on January 2, 2016, due to interference with another experiment. Irradiation was resumed with Cycle 162A on October 7, 2017 after the interfering experiment was removed from the reactor. AGC-4 irradiation completed by the end of Cycle 166B on January 10, 2020. Between Cycles 162A and 166B, AGC-4 capsule was removed from the reactor core during two Powered Axial Locator Mechanism (PALM) Cycles 163A and 165A to avoid overheating. All thermocouples (TCs) have functioned throughout the AGC-4 experiment. A total of 9,256,184 out of all 11,167,213 temperature records (or 82.9%) are Qualified for use by the ARD Program and 1,911,029 missing values are Failed. Argon, helium, and total gas flow data were within expected ranges, except only eight out-of-range values occurred during outages. A total of 21,240,627 out of all 22,288,5103 gas flow rates (or 92.8%) are Qualified for use by the ARD Program and 1,644,476 are Failed records mostly due to missing values. Discharge gas line moisture values were consistently low during full ATR power, except for 162B, when moisture content was increasing to more than 200 ppmv by the end of this cycle. During outages, moisture content reached as high as 700 ppmv. 1,089,941 out of a total of 1,107,331 moisture values (or 98.4%) are within the measurement range of the instrument and are Qualified for use by the ARD Program and 17,390 missing moisture values are Failed. Graphite creep specimens were subjected to one of three loads: 393, 491, or 589 lbf. For a brief period during Cycle 157D between 12:19 on June 2, 2015, and 08:23 on June 11, 2015, the load cells were wired incorrectly, resulting in missing stack load data. Missing stack loads were estimated from measured ram pressures using regression equations developed from the existing data from Cycle 157D. Estimated stack loads during this period are considered to be an accurate representation of actual load applied to the stacks. These loads deviate slightly from the planned loads. This deviation does not prevent the data from being Qualified for use but must be taken into account when analyzing the effect of load on creep. 6,095,728 out of a total of 6,403,985 moisture values (or 95.2%) are within the measurement range of the instrument and are Qualified for use by the ARD Program and 308,257 missing load values are Failed. Stack displacement increased consistently throughout the eight cycles, with total displacement reached highest value of 2.4 in by the end of irradiation. During ATR outages, a set of pneumatic rams raised the stacks of graphite creep specimens to ensure the specimens were not stuck within the test train. This stack raising was performed seven times throughout irradiation. All stacks were raised successfully each time. 4,744,974 out of a total of 6,094,513 displacement values (or 77.9%) are within the measurement range of the instrument and are Qualified for use by the ARD Program and 1,349,539 displacement values are Failed mostly due to missing values. Analyses were conducted on correlations between TCs to look for trends and step changes that might indicate instrument degradation or failure. Correlation analysis was used to identify instances when TCs form short circuits, referred to as virtual junctions, which result in TCs reporting temperatures from some location in the capsule other than the location where they were intended to read. No evidence of virtual junctions was found. Analyses were also conducted on control charts of temperature differences of between two TCs, which are expected to behave consistently throughout the entire irradiation period. Upward or downward trend over time indicates at least one TC in the pair was drifted. Examining control charts for all 66 possible pairs out of twelve TCs installed in the AGC-4 capsules reveal no clear drift failures occurred, except unstable behavior of two TCs in Zone 3, TC-7 and TC-8, over irradiation time. In conclus

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Yttrium Hydride Post-Irradiation Examination Plan

Micro nuclear reactors are expected to use metal hydride moderators to ensure thier compact design for the flexible operational purposes. Department of Energy’s Microreactor program therefore aims to provide infrasture and qualification bed for the development of micro nuclear reactors. Because micro nuclear reactors must be compact to offer a flexible operational purposes, metal hydrides are expected to be used as neutron moderator materials due to their high hydrogen number density. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) directed by the DOE to provide a qualified fabrication techniques of metals hydride, especially the yttrium hydride (YHx) which provides advantages over other metal hydride candiates. Qualification of YHx involves fabrication, property, and performance pillars, which must be met for the deployment of microreactors. In the support of the qualification process metal hydride, LANL has developed fabrication techniques based in direct hydriding and powder compacting. For both manufacturing techniques, fresh material properties of metal hydrides have been reported in the literature. To establish the performance limits and the qualification parameters, an irradiation campaign has been initated at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The irradation campaign aims to investigate the critical irradiated YHx properties as a function of neutron fluence and temperaute. The first phase of the irradiation campaign includes the effect of the operating temperature under neutron irradiation which provides initial data on the metal hydrides and informs the manufacturing processes. So that, drop-in irradations in Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) has been designed. This document depicts the post-irradation examination (PIE) plan of the ATR irradiated YHx. Objective of the PIE plan is to serve as a qualification basis for YHx as a neutron moderator material by understanding the impacts irradiation has on the physical and thermophysical properties; to establish a link between fabrication and the irradiated YHx properties; to institute a PIE strategy for other solid-state neutron moderator candidates, and; to inform micro nuclear reactor fuel performance and safety codes.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

OVERVIEW OF RECENT PU-238 PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES AT IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY

The Plutonium Fuel Services (PFS) program at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is active in the qualification of irradiation targets containing Np-237 for irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) to produce Pu-238 for future NASA missions. INL qualified and loaded 7 targets in ATR’s South Flux Trap (SFT) for cycle 169A, which occurred in Spring 2021. This program was reinitiated after two baseline production targets in three positions validated significant production of Pu-238 [ref.1]. The validation model was followed by the PFS-1 experimental test in the ATRC (Critical) facility [ref.2]. This paper outlines the progress and status of the PFS program. The qualification effort, safety analysis, hardware status, and future activities for qualification of an updated target design for use in the ATR will be discussed.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Interoffice Memorandum RE-04-21 "Advanced Test Reactor Power History Through Cycle 169A-1"

Table 1 lists the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) N-16 constrained power history data since the Beryllium VI Core Internals Changeout (CIC) Cycle 134A-1 through Cycle 169A-1. The powers tabulated for Cycles 159A-1, 163A-1, and 167A-1 are higher than powers observed during operation, because powers are computed from cycle exposure, which for these cycles includes operation during the low-power “soak” portion of each cycle; whereas cycle length in Effective Full Power Days (EFPD) includes only the high-power “casualty” portion occurring after NF is established. Table 2 lists the accumulated N-16 lobe and total core exposure, as obtained from the ATR Data Acquisition System (RDAS) for Cycles 134A-1 through 169A-1. Table 3 lists the startup and shutdown dates and times, as obtained from logbooks or RDAS, depending on availability. The ATR power history prior to Cycle 134A 1 is presented in references (a) through (d).

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

AGR-5/6/7 Irradiation Test Final As-run Report

This document presents the as-run analysis of the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) 5/6/7 irradiation experiment. AGR-5/6/7 is the last of a series of experiments conducted in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in support of the development and qualification of tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) low enriched fuel for use in high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGR). The test train contained five separate capsules that were independently controlled and monitored. Each capsule contained multiple 24.91-mm-long and 12.25-mm-dimeter compacts filled with low-enriched uranium carbide/oxide tri-structural isotropic fuel particles. The objectives of the AGR 5/6/7 experiment were to: 1. Irradiate reference-design fuel particles to support fuel qualification. 2. Establish operating margins for the fuel, beyond normal operating conditions. 3. Provide irradiated-fuel performance data and irradiated-fuel samples for post irradiation examination and safety testing. The primary objective of the AGR-5/6 test (Capsules 1, 2, 4, and 5) was to verify the successful performance of the reference-design fuel under normal operating conditions. The AGR-7 test (Capsule 3) was designed to explore fuel performance at higher temperatures. Its primary objective is to demonstrate the capability of the fuel to withstand conditions beyond normal operating conditions, in support of plant design and licensing. AGR 5/6/7 will also provide irradiated-fuel performance data based on the fission gas release from particles during irradiation. To achieve the test objectives, the AGR-5/6/7 experiment was irradiated in the northeast (NE) flux trap of the ATR with a planned duration of 500 effective full-power days (EFPDs). The NE flux trap was selected because its larger diameter provided greater flexibility for test-train design compared to the Large B positions used for the AGR-1 and AGR-2 irradiations, significantly enhancing test capabilities for the combined irradiation campaigns. Due to delays in the ATR schedule, the AGR-5/6/7 irradiation was significantly shorter than the originally planned 13-cycle schedule. Irradiation began on February 16, 2018 and ended on July 22, 2020, spanning nine ATR cycles (162B?168A) over two and a half years. Thus, the AGR-5/6/7 fuel compacts were irradiated for a total of approximately 360.9 EFPDs. Final burnup values, on a per-compact basis, ranged from 5.66% to 15.26% fissions per initial heavy metal atom, while fast fluence values ranged from 1.62 to 5.55 × 1025 n/m2 (E >0.18 MeV). Time-averaged volume-averaged fuel temperatures on a capsule basis at the end of irradiation ranged from 756°C in Capsule 5 to 1313°C in Capsule 3 excluding days with significantly lower temperature during the two short powered axial locator mechanism cycles, 163A and 167A. By the end of irradiation, 48 out of 54 installed thermocouples (TC) had failed (the bottom three capsules lost all TCs). During the first five cycles (162B ? 165A), fission-gas isotope release-rate-to-birthrate (R/B) ratios were stable in the 10-8?10-6 range, and no in-pile particle failures were observed based on the gross gamma counts. During this time, the high exposed kernel fraction and high fuel particle temperatures in Capsule 1 led to the maximum R/B value of around 2 ? 10-6 for Kr-85m. The fission gas release in all capsules started to increase from the second half of Cycle 166A, when a large number of in-pile particle failures occurred in Capsule 1 and a gas line problem in this capsule caused fission gas leakage at various degrees into the other four capsules. This gas line problem also prevented fission gas release measurement for Capsule 1 during the last three cycles due to gas flow isolation. By the end of irradiation, it is estimated that approximately 15 particle failures in Capsule 3, which was considered possible at the start of the irradiation, since the experiment was designed to operate beyond the high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) normal operating temperature range. A few hundred in-pile particle failures were estimated for Capsule 1 by the end of Cycle 166A, but the total number of failures is unknown due to lack of fission gas release data in the later cycles. Additionally, four potential in-pile failures were identified for Capsule 2 during the last cycle, 168A. In contrast, no in-pile failures were identified in the top two capsules (4 and 5) based on absence of the typical spikes in gross gamma counts and low failure estimates using the AGR-3/4 R/B per exposed kernel model.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

NSUF BRR Cask Shipment Summary Report

On September 16, 2021 the Idaho National Laboratory shipped a Battelle Research Reactor (BRR) cask loaded with five Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) experiments and one Accident Tolerant Fuels (ATF) experiment from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) to the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) at the INL Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) for post-irradiation examination.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

AGR-5/6/7 Irradiation As Run Predictions Using PARFUME

The PARticle FUel ModEl (PARFUME), a fuel performance modeling code used for high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, was used to model the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR)-5/6/7 irradiation test using as-run physics and thermal data. The AGR-5/6/7 irradiation test consists of the combined fifth, sixth, and seventh planned irradiations of the AGR Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The AGR-5/6/7 test train is a multi-capsule, instrumented experiment that is designed for irradiation in the 133.4-mm diameter northeast flux trap position of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory. Each capsule contains compacts filled with uranium oxycarbide unaltered fuel particles. This report documents the calculations performed to predict the failure probability of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles during the AGR-5/6/7 experiment. In addition, this report documents the calculated fission product release fraction from the fuel. The calculations include modeling of the AGR 5/6/7 irradiation that occurred from February 2018 to July 2020 over nine ATR cycles, including six normal cycles and three power axial locator mechanism cycles, for a total of approximately 376 effective full power days (EFPD). The irradiation conditions and material properties of the AGR-5/6/7 test predicted zero fuel particle failures in Capsules 1, 3, and 4. Fuel particle failures were predicted in two of the compacts in Capsule 2 and one particle failure is predicted in each one of the compacts in Capsule 5. All compacts that exhibited fuel particle failures predicted by PARFUME were caused by localized stress concentrations in the silicon carbide (SiC) layer caused by cracking in the inner pyrolytic (IPyC) layer. In addition, shrinkage of the buffer and IPyC layer during irradiation resulted in formation of a buffer-IPyC gap. Compacts with a lower irradiation temperature and fluence experienced the smallest buffer-IPyC gap formation. Conversely, higher irradiated temperature compacts with a high fluence experienced the largest buffer-IPyC gap formation. Compact 3-6-3 experienced the largest buffer IPyC gap formation of just under 21.7 µm. The release fraction of fission products silver (Ag), cesium (Cs), and strontium (Sr) vary depending on capsule location and irradiation temperature. The maximum release fraction of Ag occurs in Capsule 3, reaching up to 59.5% for the TRISO fuel particles (compact 3-6-3). The release fraction of the other two fission products, Cs and Sr, are much smaller. A maximum Cs release fraction of 1.1% occurred in compact 3-4-3 and 4.4% for Sr in compact 3-6-3.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Gamma Spectrometry Examination of the AGR-3/4 Irradiation

The results from gamma spectrometry examination of the different components from the combined third and fourth U.S. Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) TRISO-coated particle fuel irradiation tests (AGR-3/4) have been analyzed. This experiment was designed to provide information about in-pile fission product migration. In each of the 12 capsules, a single stack of four compacts with designed-to-fail (DTF) particles surrounded by inner and outer graphite and/or graphitic matrix rings and a graphite sink ring were irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Gamma spectrometry has been used to evaluate the gamma-emitting fission product inventory of compacts from the irradiation and evaluate the burnup of these compacts based on the activity of the radioactive cesium isotopes (i.e., Cs-134 and Cs-137) in the compacts. Burnup from gamma spectrometry compares well with predicted burnup from simulations. The inner and outer rings were also examined by gamma spectrometry to evaluate the total fission product inventory of the rings, and gamma emission computed tomography (GECT) was used to investigate the spatial distribution of gamma-emitting fission products within the rings. This report focuses on results obtained via the Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS) for the compacts and inner and outer rings. These non-destructive gamma measurements are currently being compared to recent destructive measurements of spatial fission product distributions in the rings and to predictions made via mathematical modeling. A separate report discusses the entire AGR-3/4 fission product mass balance for all irradiation capsule components including the inner and outer rings, graphite sink rings, capsule spacers, capsule foils, through tubes, and felts. This report is similar to the conference proceedings: Harp, J.M., Demkowicz, P.A., and Stempien, J.D., “Initial gamma spectrometry examination of the AGR-3/4 irradiation,” International Topical Meeting High Temperature Reactor Technology (HTR 2016), Las Vegas, NV, USA, November 2016, Paper HTR2016-18593, but it has been updated to reflect all the data that has been collected on AGR-3/4 using PGS. The Appendices contain extensive data from the collected gamma spectra.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Release-to-Birth Ratios for AGR-5/6/7 Operating Cycles 162B–168A

This engineering calculations and analysis report (ECAR) documents the release-to-birth ratios of the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) experiment, AGR-5/6/7, which was irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Northeast Flux Trap from February 16, 2018 to July 22, 2020.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

PLN-6268 Yttrium Hydride Post Irradiation Examination Plan

The overarching goal of the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) microreactor program is to develop technologies for the deployment of civilian microreactors by stakeholders1. Microreactors are expressed as advanced transportable nuclear reactors operating at low power (<20MWth) but high temperatures (>600°C), as well as plug-and-play and inherently safe designs. One prerequisite of a microreactor is the compactness, so that a truck can transport the reactor under safe conditions with the current road infrastructure1,2. The compactness of these reactors likely can be attainable by use of solid components for the essentials of the nuclear core, such as fuel, core heat removal components, reflectors, and moderators. Among these essentials, where fuel enrichment must remain < 20% to meet High Assay Low Enrichment Uranium criteria (HALEU), the largest contribution to the compactness is offered by use of solid moderators which benefit from light atomic weight elements, such as hydrogen, carbon, and beryllium2. Among these, hydrogen-bearing materials, such as metal hydrides, are superior to other options from the lowest critical mass standpoint. Noting that, factors other than critical mass should be considered for a specific reactor design. Yttrium- or zirconium-based metal hydrides have been down-selected due to their neutronic performance. In addition to the neutronic perspective, maintaining hydrogen within the metal hydride is important at the high operating temperatures proposed by advanced reactors. Yttrium hydride (YHx) is, therefore, a proposed moderator material that offers better hydrogen retention at higher operating temperatures than zirconium hydrides due to higher retention and thermal stability of hydrogen in the metal3. The irradiated materials properties of metal hydrides, in this case YHx, must be assessed for the qualification of these moderators. Material testing and inspection processes must illustrate that the effects of dimensional and property changes on thermophysical and mechanical properties do not cause any significant changes on the microreactor safety, and the moderating power is maintained within design limits. Thus, the effect of irradiation on the thermophysical and mechanical properties must be determined. This post-irradiation examination (PIE) plan specifically aims to determine these properties for YHx following Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) irradiation.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Initial Observations from AGR 5/6/7 Capsule 1

The fourth and final irradiation experiment in the Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) fuel development and qualification program is designated as AGR-5/6/7. Data collected from the fabrication, irradiation, and post-irradiation examination (PIE) of this tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel are intended to serve as the primary data set for the qualification of this fuel for use in high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (INL 2021, Collin 2018b). However, data collected from the three preceding irradiations (i.e., AGR-1, AGR-2, and AGR-3/4) may also be used to supplement data collected from AGR-5/6/7. All components of the AGR-5/6/7 fuel (i.e., UCO kernels, TRISO coatings, and fuel compacts) were produced on an engineering scale at BWXT (Lynchburg, Virginia USA) according to the fuel specification (Marshall 2017). This fuel was irradiated in the northeast flux trap (NEFT) at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho national Laboratory (INL) from February 16, 2018 to July 22, 2020 (Pham et al. 2021). Measurements in the fission product monitoring system (FPMS) indicated unexpected and significant numbers of failures of TRISO particles in Capsule 1 near the end of the sixth irradiation cycle (ATR Cycle 166A). In the fourth cycle (ATR Cycle 164B) and beyond, the sweep gas flow became very low (presumably from degradation of the capsule gas outlet line via an unidentified mechanism), and the program deliberately isolated Capsule 1 from gas flow periodically. In later cycles, attempts to reestablish any kind of flow in Capsule 1 were unsuccessful. With little or no flow through Capsule 1, FPMS measurements and enumerations of failed particles in Capsule 1 were difficult or impossible as was the ability to control the helium/neon gas mixture used for temperature control. Gas flows and fission gas activity in the effluent gas from the other AGR-5/6/7 capsules were also impacted by the Capsule 1 gas flow issues and the large increase in fission gas released from the Capsule 1.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Pu-238 Production Calculator and Estimation Tool in the Advanced Test Reactor

A MS Excel tool was created to help track Pu-238 production, Np-237 feedstock use, estimate production scenarios, and coordinate planning for shipments at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). As-run estimates were used as a basis for beginning and end of life isotopic concentrations. Multiple target types were created to demonstrate a proof of concept while actual results were not yet available.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗