Results for “DESCENT” — Page 13

NASA NTRS2016

Mars 2020 Entry, Descent and Landing Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2)

The Mars Entry Descent and Landing Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2) sensor suite will measure aerodynamic, aerothermodynamic, and TPS performance during the atmospheric entry, descent, and landing phases of the Mars 2020 mission. The key objectives are to reduce design margin and prediction uncertainties for the aerothermal environments and aerodynamic database. For MEDLI2, the sensors are installed on both the heatshield and backshell, and include 7 pressure transducers, 17 thermal plugs, and 3 heat flux sensors (including a radiometer). These sensors will expand the set of measurements collected by the highly successful MEDLI suite, collecting supersonic pressure measurements on the forebody, a pressure measurement on the aftbody, direct heat flux measurements on the aftbody, a radiative heating measurement on the aftbody, and multiple near-surface thermal measurements on the thermal protection system (TPS) materials on both the forebody and aftbody. To meet the science objectives, supersonic pressure transducers and heat flux sensors are currently being developed and their qualification and calibration plans are presented. Finally, the reconstruction targets for data accuracy are presented, along with the planned methodologies for achieving the targets.

Aerodynamics↗

NASA NTRS2015

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Navigation Strategy for Dual Support of Insight and ExoMars Entry, Descent and Landing Demonstrator Module in 2016

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) will support NASA's InSight Mission and ESA's ExoMars Entry, Descent and Landing Demonstrator Module (EDM) in the fall of 2016 when both landers arrive at Mars. MRO provided relay support during the Entry, Descent and Landing (EDL) sequences of Mars Phoenix Lander in 2008 and the Mars Science Laboratory in 2012. Unlike these missions, MRO will coordinate between two EDL events separated by only three weeks: InSight on September 28, 2016 and EDM on October 19, 2016. This paper describes MRO Navigation's maneuver strategy to move MRO's ascending node to meet the In- Sight EDL phasing requirement and support EDM.

EDM↗

NASA NTRS2017

Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2) Sensor Suite

The Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2) sensor suite seeks to address the aerodynamic, aerothermodynamic, and thermal protection system (TPS) performance issues during atmospheric entry, descent, and landing of the Mars 2020 mission. Based on the highly successful instrumentation suite that flew on Mars Science Laboratory (MEDLI), the new sensor suite expands on the types of measurements and also seeks to answer questions not fully addressed by the previous mission. Sensor Package: MEDLI2 consists of 7 pressure transducers, 17 thermal plugs, 2 heat flux sensors, and one radiometer. The sensors are distributed across both the heatshield and backshell, unlike MEDLI (the first sensor suite), which was located solely on the heat-shield. The sensors will measure supersonic pressure on the forebody, a pressure measurement on the aftbody, near-surface and in-depth temperatures in the heatshield and backshell TPS materials, direct total heat flux on the aftbody, and direct radiative heating on the aftbody. Instrument Development: The supersonic pressure transducers, the direct heat flux sensors, and the radiometer all were tested during the development phase. The status of these sensors, including the piezo-resistive pressure sensors, will be presented. The current plans for qualification and calibration for all of the sensors will also be discussed. Post-Flight Data Analysis: Similar to MEDLI, the estimated flight trajectory will be reconstructed from the data. The aerodynamic parameters that will be reconstructed will be the axial force coefficient, freestream Mach number, base pressure, atmospheric density, and winds. The aerothermal quantities that will be determined are the heatshield and backshell aero-heating, turbulence transition across the heatshield, and TPS in-depth performance of PICA. By directly measuring the radiative and total heat fluxes on the back-shell, the convective portion of the heat flux will be estimated. The status of the current tools to perform the post-flight data analysis will be presented, along with plans for model improvements.

Hwang, Helen H.↗

NASA NTRS2017

Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2) Sensor Suite

The Mars 2020 Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2) sensor suite seeks to address the aerodynamic, aerothermodynamic, and thermal protection system (TPS) performance issues during atmospheric entry, descent, and landing of the Mars 2020 mission. Based on the highly successful instrumentation suite that flew on Mars Science Laboratory (MEDLI), the new sensor suite expands on the types of measurements and also seeks to answer questions not fully addressed by the previous mission. Sensor Package: MEDLI2 consists of 7 pressure transducers, 17 thermal plugs, 2 heat flux sensors, and one radiometer. The sensors are distributed across both the heatshield and backshell, unlike MEDLI (the first sensor suite), which was located solely on the heat-shield. The sensors will measure supersonic pressure on the forebody, a pressure measurement on the aftbody, near-surface and in-depth temperatures in the heatshield and backshell TPS materials, direct total heat flux on the aftbody, and direct radiative heating on the aftbody. Instrument Development: The supersonic pressure transducers, the direct heat flux sensors, and the radiometer all were tested during the development phase. The status of these sensors, including the piezo-resistive pressure sensors, will be presented. The current plans for qualification and calibration for all of the sensors will also be discussed. Post-Flight Data Analysis: Similar to MEDLI, the estimated flight trajectory will be reconstructed from the data. The aerodynamic parameters that will be reconstructed will be the axial force coefficient, freestream Mach number, base pressure, atmospheric density, and winds. The aerothermal quantities that will be determined are the heatshield and backshell aero-heating, turbulence transition across the heatshield, and TPS in-depth performance of PICA. By directly measuring the radiative and total heat fluxes on the back-shell, the convective portion of the heat flux will be estimated. The status of the current tools to perform the post-flight data analysis will be presented, along with plans for model improvements.

Hwang, Helen↗

NASA NTRS2010

Failure Bounding And Sensitivity Analysis Applied To Monte Carlo Entry, Descent, And Landing Simulations

In the study of entry, descent, and landing, Monte Carlo sampling methods are often employed to study the uncertainty in the designed trajectory. The large number of uncertain inputs and outputs, coupled with complicated non-linear models, can make interpretation of the results difficult. Three methods that provide statistical insights are applied to an entry, descent, and landing simulation. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed in terms of the insights gained versus the computational cost. The first method investigated was failure domain bounding which aims to reduce the computational cost of assessing the failure probability. Next a variance-based sensitivity analysis was studied for the ability to identify which input variable uncertainty has the greatest impact on the uncertainty of an output. Finally, probabilistic sensitivity analysis is used to calculate certain sensitivities at a reduced computational cost. These methods produce valuable information that identifies critical mission parameters and needs for new technology, but generally at a significant computational cost.

Gaebler, John A.↗

NASA NTRS2018

Human Mars Entry, Descent and Landing Architecture Study: Rigid Decelerators

Several technology investments are required to develop Mars human scale Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) systems. Studies play the critical role of identifying the most feasible technical paths and high payoff investments. The goal of NASA's Entry, Descent and Landing Architecture Study is to inform those technology investments. In Phase 1 of the study, a point design for one lifting-body-like rigid decelerator vehicle, was developed. In Phase 2, a capsule concept was also considered to determine how it accommodated the human mission requirements. This paper summarizes the concept of operations for both rigid vehicles to deliver a 20-metric ton (t) payload to the surface of Mars. Details of the vehicle designs and flight performance are presented along with a packaging, mass sizing, and a launch vehicle fairing assessment. Finally, recommended technology investments based on the analysis of the rigid vehicles are provided.

Polsgrove, Tara P.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Mars 2020 Entry, Descent and Landing Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2)

This paper introduces the Mars Entry Descent and Landing Instrumentation 2 (MEDLI2) concept for NASAs Mars 2020 mission. Mars 2020 is a flagship-class mission, scheduled for launch in 2020, with science and technology objectives to help answer questions about habitability of Mars as well as to demonstrate technologies for future human expedition. MEDLI2 is a suite of instruments embedded in the heatshield and backshell thermal protection systems (TPS) of the Mars 2020 entry vehicle. The objectives of MEDLI2 are to gather critical aerodynamics, aerothermodynamics and TPS (Thermal Protective System) performance data during the Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) phase of the mission.

Aerothermodynamics↗

NASA NTRS2016

Thermal Response of the Mars Science Laboratory Spacecraft During Entry, Descent and Landing

NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) spacecraft successfully performed its Entry, Descent & Landing (EDL) phase on August 6, 2012. This paper presents the thermal response of the MSL spacecraft from EDL Initialization (5 days prior to Entry) to Rover touchdown on the surface of Mars. Temperature telemetry recorded during EDL is used to reconstruct the thermal response of the spacecraft to each EDL event. Temperature profiles for the Descent Stage and Rover hardware are presented and explained in the context of the changing EDL environments (aerothermal heating and convective cooling) and power states.

Novak, Keith S.↗

NASA NTRS2017

Guidance, Navigation and Control for the Entry, Descent, and Landing of the Mars 2020 Mission

This paper presents an overview of the Guidance, Navigation and Control (GNC) system for the Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) phases of the Mars 2020 Mission. The EDL GNC system adds Terrain Relative Navigation to the MSL EDL GNC system1 to enable landing on landing sites with landing hazards within the landing ellipse. This paper describes the GNC architecture, including sensors, actuators and algorithms, for the entry, parachute descent, and powered flight phases of the mission.

Brugarolas, Paul↗

NASA NTRS2020

Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation

The first purpose of this white paper is to summarize the state-of-the-art of engineering instrumentation available for atmospheric Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) vehicles. Capabilities of the various types of measurements, along with recent examples from human and robotic EDL missions and technology development programs, significance to planetary science, and current challenges are discussed. Second, this paper provides recommendations for continuing to collect data on future missions with an EDL phase. Although the focus of this paper will be primarily on entry, instrumentation for descent and landing are also recognized to be important areas of future investment.

EDL↗

NASA NTRS2002

Descent-speed testing of a hazard detection system for safe landing on Mars

In a previous paper we described an approach for testing a prototype system designed to detect hazards during the terminal descent phase of a mission to Mars. The system under development at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) utilizes a scanning laser radar and an inertial measurement unit to map the landing zone, identify hazards, and thenguide the vehicle to a safe landing site. The test approach consisted of a placing this system on a rocket sled, accelerating the sled to typical descent speeds, and mapping a simulated Martian terrain. The data would then be processed to identify hazards and locate a safe landing site. Since ref. 1 was written several such tests have been performed. In this paper we provide an update on the testing methodology and we present preliminary results from one of the tests.

hazard↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Interpretation of Vehicle Tumbling Predictions from 6-DOF Entry and Descent Simulation

Blunt body entry vehicles are subject to dynamic instability during terminal descent. This often manifests as limit cycle oscillations in total angle of attack, but can diverge into tumbling behavior under certain conditions. For the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry Vehicle (MSR EEV), there is a constraint on the orientation of the sample tubes so backward impact is impermissible. Past missions have chosen to deploy parachutes to preclude tumbling, but active events after release of MSR EEV have been ground-ruled out with the intent to maximize system reliability. Prevention of tumbling during subsonic descent is a design driver for MSR EEV. During preliminary design of the MSR EEV, six degree-of-freedom numerical simulations indicated an unacceptably high probability of tumbling for a 60degree sphere-cone forebody geometry, which necessitated a design change. Decreasing the forebody angle was expected to improve dynamic stability, but would also adversely impact mass, aeroheating, and manufacturing risk. Hence there was strong motivation to understand the physical drivers for the onset of tumbling, and to determine: (a) whether the causes of tumbling are representative of physically realizable vehicle entry configurations and (b) what changes can be made to existing design and analysis practices to ensure a stable vehicle.

Entry Vehicle↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Demonstration of Linear Covariance Analysis Techniques to Evaluate Entry Descent and Landing Guidance Algorithms, Vehicle Configurations, Analysis Techniques, and Trajectory Profiles

Linear covariance analysis techniques have been previously developed to analyze closed-loop entry, descent, and landing (EDL) scenarios and the initial validation efforts are under-way confirming the generated GN&C system performance results. Given both the theoretical foundation and previous conceptual demonstration, this work begins to flex the potential of linear covariance analysis for atmospheric flight and highlight its versatility and reliability by evaluating multiple entry guidance algorithms, vehicle configurations, trajectory profiles, environment conditions, and analysis techniques for a variety of trade studies. To demonstrate the benefit linear covariance analysis can provide in producing rapid yet accurate performance data, two entry profiles are adopted including the NASA Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) and Exploration Flight Test-1 (EFT-1) while utilizing two different guidance algorithms, the Apollo Final Phase (AFP) and the Fully Numeric Predictor-Corrector Entry Guidance (FNPEG) with different navigation sensor suites in a 6 degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) simulation environment. Results are shown using both linear covariance and Monte Carlo analysis techniques to high-light the consistency between the two methodologies and continue the validation maturation of linear covariance analysis for entry, descent, and landing.

EDL↗

NASA NTRS2020

Challenges of Mars Sample Return Lander Entry, Descent, and Landing

The proposed Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign would be perhaps the most ambitious robotic mission ever attempted in space exploration. The notional cam-paign consists of three Flagship-class missions operating in cooperation for over a decade in order to return samples of the Martian surface and atmosphere to Earth for analysis. The Mars 2020 rover, scheduled to launch in July 2020, will cache samples and place them on the surface for possible return. The second mission would be a Sample Return Lander (SRL) that consists of a small Sample Fetch Rover (SFR) to gather the samples, a Sample Transfer Arm (STA) to load the samples into a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), and the MAV itself to launch the samples into orbit around Mars. The third mission would be an Earth Return Or-biter (ERO) designed to rendezvous and capture the Orbiting Sample (OS), return to Earth, and separate the Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) for Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) at a location to be determined. This paper will focus on the SRL mission concept, specifically the EDL phase. Given the ambitious SRL sample re-trieval baseline surface mission, including a rocket launch of the samples into Mars orbit, it is estimated that the EDL system may be required to deliver as much as 2100 kg of dry mass to the surface. This represents an approximate 20-25% in-crease in mass capability over previous landed Mars missions. Additionally, there is a high probability that SRL would have to land very close to the samples on the surface to expedite retrieval operations; therefore, Pin Point Landing (PPL) accu-racy may be required. To address these challenges, promising EDL configuration augmentations were studied to include larger forebody/higher drag entry capsules, hypersonic/supersonic inflatable/non-inflatable aerodynamic decelerators, hypersonic trim tabs, ballute drag devices, larger parachutes, higher Mach and higher dynamic pressure parachute deployments, lower parachute deployment altitudes having shorter chute timelines necessitating more efficient terrain sensor strategies, and ad-ditional fuel for longer powered descent diverts to the target landing site. Over-arching the entire trade study was an attempt to stay as close to the experience base of past successful missions as possible to reduce implementation cost and risk. This paper will discuss the entire SRL EDL trade study in detail. The information presented about the potential MSR campaign is pre-decisional and is provided for planning and discussion purposes only.

Ivanov, Mark C.↗

NASA NTRS2021

Terminal Descent Radar System Testbed for Future Planetary Landers

Terminal Descent Radars (TDR), or landing radars, have been an integral element of Guidance, Navigation and Control (GN\&C) sensor suites of robotic exploration missions to the Moon and Mars. As plans for new, exciting exploration missions to the Moon, Mars and other planetary bodies are being developed, there is a need for a new generation of TDRs that are smaller, consume less power and are less expensive than previous sensors. The challenge of designing such a landing sensor is twofold: the first is to have well-vetted software tools that allow us to explore the design space for a particular mission scenario and analyze performance of relevant radar architectures. The second challenge is to reduce mass and power requirements of a landing radar without compromising reliability and performance. New design approaches that address these challenges need to be tested and demonstrated in realistic Entry-Descent-Landing (EDL)/Deorbit-Descent-Landing (DDL) scenarios. In this paper, we describe a TDR testbed developed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The testbed is a closed-loop design, analysis and verification capability used to design and evaluate the next generation of landing radars for a variety of EDL/DDL scenarios.

Tope, Michael↗

NASA NTRS2021

Terminal Descent Radar System Testbed for Future Planetary Landers

Terminal Descent Radars (TDR), or landing radars, have been an integral element of Guidance, Navigation and Control (GN\&C) sensor suites of robotic exploration missions to the Moon and Mars. As plans for new, exciting exploration missions to the Moon, Mars and other planetary bodies are being developed, there is a need for a new generation of TDRs that are smaller, consume less power and are less expensive than previous sensors. The challenge of designing such a landing sensor is twofold: the first is to have well-vetted software tools that allow us to explore the design space for a particular mission scenario and analyze performance of relevant radar architectures. The second challenge is to reduce mass and power requirements of a landing radar without compromising reliability and performance. New design approaches that address these challenges need to be tested and demonstrated in realistic Entry-Descent-Landing (EDL)/Deorbit-Descent-Landing (DDL) scenarios. In this paper, we describe a TDR testbed developed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The testbed is a closed-loop design, analysis and verification capability used to design and evaluate the next generation of landing radars for a variety of EDL/DDL scenarios.

Tope, Michael↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust Trajectory Optimization for Guided Powered Descent and Landing

A robust trajectory optimization approach for guidance algorithm gain selection for powered descent and landing is developed. This approach uses a genetic algorithm to determine optimal guidance algorithm parameters while incorporating uncertainty information from linear covariance analysis. The optimal guidance algorithm parameters are determined while accounting for environment, navigation, and vehicle property uncertainty and sensor suite fidelity. As a demonstration of this method, the optimal gains for the fractional polynomial powered descent guidance are found for the braking phase of a robotic lunar landing mission. Scenarios with differing sensor suites and sensor qualities are considered, with objective functions to minimize variability in propellant usage or terminal position. Results show that the optimal guidance algorithm gains for a given trajectory differ based on the sensor suite, and optimal guidance algorithm gains may result in up to 20% performance improvements over the baseline in propellant usage and landed accuracy.

Grace E Calkins↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Big Plunge at Venus: The DAVINCI Descent Phase

DAVINCI (Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble gases, Chemistry, and Imaging) was selected as one of two new Discovery missions in summer of 2021 with the primary goals are to study how the Venus atmosphere formed and changed over time. DAVINCI does this by making in situ measurements of the atmosphere and taking images below the cloud layer during the descent phase. The probe is neither designed nor required to land on the surface so all critical science data must be taken and transmitted to a relay spacecraft prior to impact. This architecture drives the mission to a carefully-crafted concept of operations; deployments, instrument operations, and communications are choreographed to ensure the right data is gathered at the right altitude given the uncertainties in the trajectory and timeline. A complex flow of analyses and tests throughout development will validate the system’s ability to execute the mission goals. In the end, DAVINCI will be ready for the one opportunity at one hour of descent time to meet its driving science goals.

DAVINCI↗