SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Geolocation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

219 records · Page 13

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2017

Altitude Registration of Limb-Scattered Radiation

One of the largest constraints to the retrieval of accurate ozone profiles from UV backscatter limb sounding sensors is altitude registration. Two methods, the Rayleigh scattering attitude sensing (RSAS) and absolute radiance residual method (ARRM), are able to determine altitude registration to the accuracy necessary for long-term ozone monitoring. The methods compare model calculations of radiances to measured radiances and are independent of onboard tracking devices. RSAS determines absolute altitude errors, but, because the method is susceptible to aerosol interference, it is limited to latitudes and time periods with minimal aerosol contamination. ARRM, a new technique introduced in this paper, can be applied across all seasons and altitudes. However, it is only appropriate for relative altitude error estimates. The application of RSAS to Limb Profiler (LP) measurements from the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) on board the Suomi NPP (SNPP) satellite indicates tangent height (TH) errors greater than 1 km with an absolute accuracy of +/-200 m. Results using ARRM indicate a approx. 300 to 400m intra-orbital TH change varying seasonally +/-100 m, likely due to either errors in the spacecraft pointing or in the geopotential height (GPH) data that we use in our analysis. ARRM shows a change of approx. 200m over 5 years with a relative accuracy (a long-term accuracy) of 100m outside the polar regions.

Ozone profiles↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS)-3 VIIRS Prelaunch Geometric Calibration and Characterization Status

The NASA/NOAA Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) is a key instrument in the JPSS missions (SNPP, JPSS-1-4). Being part of the calibration and validation process, JPSS-3 VIIRS prelaunch geometric performance assessment focuses on the sensor’s spatial response, band-to-band co-registration (BBR), and pointing knowledge. In general, JPSS-3 VIIRS’ prelaunch geometric performance is very good, and consistent with SNPP and JPSS-1-2 VIIRS sensors. This paper highlights some specific key findings from the JPSS-3 VIIRS’ prelaunch tests. We first show that with timing adjustments, JPSS-3 VIIRS scan BBR error between VisNIR and S/M/LWIR bands has been reduced from 0.12/0.03 M sampling intervals to 0.005/0.002 M sampling intervals, respectively. Focal Plane Assembly (FPA) rotations have been changed from 0.1 degree to 0.04 degree in VisVIR, from 0.18 degree to 0.09 degree in S/MWIR, and 0.16 degree to 0.08 degree in LWIR. Another finding from the prelaunch test is that JPSS-3 VIIRS has relatively large band-to-band co-registration errors between VisNIR and S/M/LWIR bands in the track direction. This BBR mis-registration increases when aft‐optics assembly (AOA) temperature decreases. The BBR mis-registration is about 0.10 M sampling intervals between VisNIR and S/MWIR bands, and 0.08 M sampling intervals between VisNIR and LWIR bands. By comparison, the track BBR offset in JPSS-2 is less than 0.02 M sampling intervals between VisNIR and S/M/LWIR bands. We also notice that the unsymmetrical Day Night Band (DNB) scan-direction Line Spread Function (LSF) of JPSS-2 VIIRS at different gain stages and aggregation modes have been corrected in J3 VIIRS.

VIIRS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Monocular Horizon Navigation

The Artemis program advances towards operations on the lunar surface, where precise surface localization is a driving need for safety and science. Using the observable horizon as an image landmark allows for estimating the photographer’s position. This work analyzes the application of Perspective-n-Point (PnP) algorithms to this lunar localization problem. Batch simulations using lunar topography display the accuracy and drawbacks of these methods. Monte Carlo techniques show the pipeline’s solutions as measurements provided to a navigation filter. When filtered, these solutions have position errors of 50 meters or better, which is similar to or better than the performance of other methods of surface localization.

optical navigation↗