Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LIFTING BODY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1968

Aircraft without wings.

Lifting body type M2-F1 and M2-F2 aircraft enabling astronauts to make own landings at choice airport

Syvertson, C. A.↗
NASA NTRS1970

Flight test results pertaining to the space shuttlecraft Symposium papers

This compilation consists of papers presented at the NASA Symposium on Flight Test Results Pertaining to the Space Shuttlecraft, held at the NASA Flight Research Center, Edwards, Calif., on June 30, 1970. The symposium was divided into the following sessions. I. Lifting Body Flight Test Results and II. Additional Space Shuttle Oriented Studies. Papers were presented by representatives from the NASA Flight Research Center and the U. S. Air Force Flight Test Center. A list of attendees is included.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1970

Approach and landing studies

This paper will discuss the application of recent approach and landing studies to the proposed space shuttle. These studies were conducted basically in two areas: powered approaches with the HL-10 lifting body, and unpowered types of approaches with shuttle -size vehicles, the B -52 and CV -990 airplanes.

Berwin M Kock↗
NASA NTRS1972

Determination of stability derivatives from flight data using a Newton-Raphson minimization technique

A modified Newton-Raphson or quasilinearization minimization technique for determining stability derivatives from flight data was developed and compared with simple-equations, analog-matching, least-squares, and Shinbrot methods of analysis. For the data analyzed, the solutions computed by using the estimates obtained from the Newton-Raphson technique fit the data and determined coefficients adequately. A further modification to include a priori information was found to be useful. A model statistically similar to the flight data was analyzed using the same methods (excluding analog matching), and the Newton-Raphson technique was found to yield superior estimates. An approximate Cramer-Rao bound was compared with the error covariance matrix of the model and was found to provide information about the reliability of the individual estimates obtained. The technique was successfully applied to data obtained from a light airplane, a large supersonic airplane, and a lifting body vehicle. It was shown that the reliability of the estimates of a given coefficient obtained from these vehicles depends upon the data analyzed.

Iliff, K. W.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Ground and flight test methods for determining limit cycle and structural resonance characteristics of aircraft stability augmentation systems

Performance criteria and test techniques are applied to stability augmentation systems (SAS) during ground testing to predict objectionable limit cycles and preclude structural resonance during flight. Factors that give rise to these problems, means of suppressing their effects, trade-offs to be considered, and ground test methods that have been developed are discussed. SAS performance predicted on the basis of these tests is compared with flight data obtained from three lifting body vehicles and the X-15 research airplane. Limit cycle and structural resonance test criteria, based upon ground and flight experience and data, were successfully applied to these vehicles. The criteria used were: The limit cycle amplitude (SAS gain multiplied by peak-to-peak angular rate) shall not exceed 0.5 deg for the highest product of control power and SAS gain that will be used in flight; the maximum in-flight SAS gain should never exceed 50 percent of the value at which a structural resonance can be sustained during ground test.

Painter, W. D.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Sonic-boom calculation in a stratified atmosphere.

For a lifting body of revolution, the exact solutions to the gas dynamical equation are given for the flow field in a stratified atmosphere. The boundary condition is satisfied by using the (linearized) slender-body theory. The solution allows one to make a prediction of the magnitude and the location of the sonic boom in a stratified atmosphere as well as to handle cutoff effects.

Schorling, M.↗
NASA NTRS1972

A generalized method for the identification of aircraft stability and control derivatives from flight test data.

This paper discusses the application of a generalized identification method for flight test data analysis. The method is based on the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion and includes output error and equation error methods as special cases. Both the linear and nonlinear models with and without process noise are considered. The flight test data from lateral maneuvers of HL-10 and M2/F3 lifting bodies are processed to determine the lateral stability and control derivatives, instrumentation accuracies and biases. A comparison is made between the results of the output error method and the generalized ML method for M2/F3 data containing gusts. It is shown that better fits to time histories are obtained by using the generalized ML method.

Mehra, R. K.↗
NASA NTRS1973

A nonlinear theory for sonic-boom calculations in a stratified atmosphere

The exact solutions to the equations of gas dynamics are given with respect to the axis of slender lifting bodies in a stratified atmosphere. The boundary condition is satisfied by using slender-body theory. The solution predicts the magnitude of the pressure rise of the sonic boom and estimates the nonlinear effects in the vicinity of the cutoff point.

Schorling, M.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Maximum likelihood identification and optimal input design for identifying aircraft stability and control derivatives

A new method of extracting aircraft stability and control derivatives from flight test data is developed based on the maximum likelihood cirterion. It is shown that this new method is capable of processing data from both linear and nonlinear models, both with and without process noise and includes output error and equation error methods as special cases. The first application of this method to flight test data is reported for lateral maneuvers of the HL-10 and M2/F3 lifting bodies, including the extraction of stability and control derivatives in the presence of wind gusts. All the problems encountered in this identification study are discussed. Several different methods (including a priori weighting, parameter fixing and constrained parameter values) for dealing with identifiability and uniqueness problems are introduced and the results given. The method for the design of optimal inputs for identifying the parameters of linear dynamic systems is also given. The criterion used for the optimization is the sensitivity of the system output to the unknown parameters. Several simple examples are first given and then the results of an extensive stability and control dervative identification simulation for a C-8 aircraft are detailed.

Stepner, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS1974

A comparison of two methods of extracting stability derivatives from flight test data

Two methods for extracting stability derivatives from flight data are compared. A modified Newton-Raphson quasilinearization minimization technique and a digital-analog (hybrid) matching technique were used to analyze the same data maneuvers obtained from two aircraft. About 70 maneuvers from an F-111E aircraft were analyzed over a Mach number range of 0.3 to 2.0 and an angle of attack range of 3 to 19 degrees. About 20 maneuvers were analyzed for the X-24A lifting body at Mach numbers of 0.5, 0.8, and 0.9, and an angle of attack range of 4 to 13 degrees. Stability derivatives were extracted from these maneuvers and the results from the two techniques, along with wind tunnel results, were compared.

Kirsten, P. W.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Identification of M2/F3 stability and control derivatives from flight data containing gust effects

The application of the maximum likelihood identification technique to M2/F3 lifting body flight data containing wind gust effects is discussed. With the objective of this effort being the identification of the stability and control derivatives, it is shown first that the output error technique (or modified Newton-Raphson) fails to fit the recorded data accurately. The means of applying the maximum likelihood technique to this problem are then discussed and the results given which indicate an accurate fit to the data. The question of derivative signs opposite to the wind tunnel values is then addressed and the results of three techniques for dealing with this problem are presented. These techniques are a priori weighting, fixing parameter values, and rank deficient inverses.

Stepner, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Subsonic potential aerodynamics for complex configurations - A general theory

A general theory of subsonic potential aerodynamic flow around a lifting body having arbitrary shape and motion is presented. By using the Green function method, an integral representation for the velocity potential is obtained for both supersonic and subsonic flow. Under the small perturbation assumption, the potential at any point in the field depends only upon the values of the potential and its normal derivative on the surface of the body. On the surface of the body, this representation reduces to an integro-differential equation relating the potential and its normal derivative (which is known from the boundary conditions) on the surface. The theory is applied to finite-thickness wings in subsonic steady and oscillatory flows.

Morino, L.↗