Lunar Orbiter gravity analysis
Moon gravity field model derived from long-arc analysis of Lunar Orbiters tracking data, considering lunar mass distribution role
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Moon gravity field model derived from long-arc analysis of Lunar Orbiters tracking data, considering lunar mass distribution role
Adaptability of Lunar Orbiter to surface experiments using flyby and earth return trajectory
Trajectory calculation, reentry conditions, landing site, and injection conditions for return-to-earth from lunar orbit
Optimization of confidence levels in detecting lunar surface detail in terms of viewing geometry and camera shutter speeds for Lunar Orbiter missions
Explorer 35 measurements of low energy plasma during lunar orbit
Penetration flux calculation for multiwall structure on Lunar Orbiter spacecraft missions
Explorer 35 measurements of low energy plasma in lunar orbit made by planar multigrid sensor programmed as retarding potential analyzer
Lunar Orbiter tracking data for long term selenodesy
Tracking and data systems for five Lunar Orbiter missions
Fuel requirements of CSM for LM rescue in lunar orbit
Preliminary lunar orbit attitude sequence for mission F
Lunar Orbiter flight vibration measurements compared with flight acceptance test data
A microwave beam power system using lunar orbiting solar powered satellite(s) and surface rectenna(s) was investigated as a possible energy source for the Moon's surface. The concept has the potential of reduced system mass by placing the power source in orbit. This can greatly reduce and/or eliminate the 14 day energy storage requirement of a lunar surface solar system. Also propellants required to de-orbit to the surface are greatly reduced. To determine the practicality of the concept and the most important factors, a zero-th order feasibility analysis was performed. Three different operational scenarios employing state of the art technology and forecasts for two different sets of advanced technologies were investigated. To reduce the complexity of the problem, satellite(s) were assumed in circular equatorial orbits around the Moon, supplying continuous power to a single equatorial base through a fixed horizontal rectenna on the surface. State of the art technology yielded specific masses greater than 2500 kg/kw, well above projections for surface systems. Using advanced technologies the specific masses are on the order of 100 kg/kw which is within the range of projections for surface nuclear (20 kg/kw) and solar systems (500 kg/kw). Further studies examining optimization of the scenarios, other technologies such as lasers transmitters and nuclear sources, and operational issues such as logistics, maintenance and support are being carried out to support the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI) to the Moon and Mars.
Feasibility of Extended Lunar Orbital Rendezvous /ELOR/ for use in lunar application programs
This is the fourth publication of the 'Monographs in Aerospace History' series, prepared by the NASA History Office. These publications are intended to be tightly focused in terms of subject, relatively short in length, and reproduced to allow timely and broad dissemination to researchers in aerospace history. This publication details the arguments of John C. Houbolt, an engineer at the Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, in his 1961-1962 campaign to support the lunar-orbit rendezvous (LOR). The LOR was eventually selected during Project Apollo as the method of flying to the Moon, landing on the surface, and returning to Earth. The LOR opted to send the entire lunar spacecraft up in one launch, enter into the lunar orbit, and dispatch a small lander to the lunar surface. It was the simplest of the various methods, both in terms of development and operational costs, but it was risky. There was no room for error or the crew could not get home; and the more difficult maneuvers had to be done when the spacecraft was committed to a circumlunar flight. Houbolt was one of the most vocal people supporting the LOR.