Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Haynes 282: A Comparative Analysis between L-PBF and LP-DED Technologies

This study compares the microstructure and tensile properties of Haynes 282 fabricated using laser powder bed fusion and laser powder directed energy deposition. Both sets underwent stress-relieving, followed by hot isostatic pressing, and the standard double aging heat treatment. Tensile testing was conducted at room temperature on specimens fabricated with both technologies to evaluate and compare their tensile behaviors. Results show that the ultimate tensile and yield strengths of laser powder bed fused specimens were 18% and 57% higher, respectively than those of laser powder directed energy deposited ones, whereas the elongation to failure was similar in both. The difference in strengths is attributed to the differences in the size of ɣ' precipitates and grains, i.e., those in the LP-DED specimens being larger, whereas similar elongation to failure is attributed to the carbide debonding dominating the fracture mechanism in both batches.

Additive manufacturing↗

M2 Selective Laser Melting GRCop-42 Recycling Study

A powder recycling study was conducted to examine the effects of powder reuse on physical and mechanical properties of SLM GRCop-42. Twelve sequential builds were conducted, each reusing powder from the previous build topped off with virgin powder to fill the powder chamber. Powder morphology, particle size distribution, flowability, and chemistry were examined for each subsequent build, along with the mechanical properties of tensile and LCF specimens built with each powder batch. It was found that only powder flowability demonstrated a trend with increasing reuse, with flowability and cohesiveness generally decreasing over the course of the 12 builds. Minor variation in powder chemistry was observed throughout the study, however, the variations did not correlate with increasing powder reuse

Additive Manufacturing↗

Cluster Dynamics Modeling Needs for the Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Program

This milestone report aims to identify and assess the cluster dynamics (CD) modeling requirements within the Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies (AMMT) program and to communicate these needs to the DOE-NE Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program. The goal is to ensure NEAMS is well-informed about the CD modeling requirements to support AMMT's mission of accelerating the development, qualification, demonstration, and deployment of advanced structural materials and manufacturing for nuclear energy applications. CD modeling is an essential tool for predicting the degradation of structural materials under irradiation, which is a key component of AMMT's accelerated qualification process. The AMMT program focuses on both additively manufactured and wrought structural alloys, such as laser powder-bed fusion 316H austenitic stainless steel, alloy 709, Haynes 244, and alloy 617. These materials require a generalized CD modeling framework to facilitate rapid model development and computational simulation. A flexible, generalized CD software, similar to the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) finite element framework, would enable modeling of various cluster types, including defect clusters, defect-solute clusters, and multicomponent clusters, incorporating thermodynamics and kinetics parameters. Radiation effects, microstructural feature evolution, and multi-dimensional modeling are critical considerations for the CD model. The usability of the CD code should allow for easy modification and coupling with MOOSE-based simulations. Additionally, the software should adhere to Nuclear Quality Assurance-1 standards, include a testing suite for verification and validation, and be version-controlled within a national laboratory-managed Git repository. Benchmark problems are needed to assess code predictions and performance.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Investigation of Additive Manufactured GRCop-42 Alloy Developed by Directed Energy Deposition Methods

GRCop is an alloy family constructed of copper, chromium, and niobium and was developed by NASA for high heat flux applications. GRCop-alloys were specifically formulated for the requirements in channel-cooled main combustion chambers allowing for repeat use in high heat flux environments[1]. GRCop-84 was evolved using additive manufacturing techniques under a NASA development program. To further increase thermal conductivity while maintaining material strength characteristics, the percentage of alloying elements were cut in half and GRCop-42 was developed. In recent years, NASA has successfully additively manufactured GRCop-42 with comparable material characteristics to extrudedGRCop-42 using a Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) process. Benefits of this process include fabrication of intricate internal cooling channels as well as a decrease in manufacturing time. However, there are some large disadvantages in using this process. The nature of the powder bed process imposes a strict volume constraint as well as an excessive amount of material inventory required. A Directed Energy Deposition (DED) process addresses these limitations while also speeding up the manufacturing process. With little data on how DED performs with GRCop-42, an investigation into the mechanical properties was conducted. More specifically, Blown Powder Directed Energy Deposition (BPD), was used to compare material properties to that of the L-PBF manufactured GRCop-42. The DED manufactured material was found to have less than 0.1% porosity. Tensile tests concluded that the DED manufactured GRCop-42 had lower tensile strengths at room temperature. The results point towards a process capable of producing fully dense parts capable of meeting mechanical strength requirements with some possible refinement of printing parameters.

GRCop-42↗

Investigating the Potential and Limitations of Fast Scanning Calorimetry to Simulate the Laser Power Bed Fusion Coalescence Process

Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB) • PBF-LB is part of one of seven additive manufacturing techniques • Layer wise printing that selectively coalesces discrete powder particles into a solid object o Advantages: Low anisotropy, use of engineering grade materials o Weaknesses: lack of method standardization, challenges in controlled post print quality

Blackman, Malik A. [Georgia Inst. of Technology, A↗

Long-term thermal aging behavior and strength reduction in a laser powder bed fusion 316H stainless steel

The long-term thermal stability of structural alloys is essential for ensuring the safe and reliable operation of nuclear reactors and other power plants. While extensive research has explored the effects of thermal aging on conventional stainless steels, the behavior of additively manufactured (AM) alloys remains less understood. This study examines the thermal aging response of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 316H stainless steel (SS) at temperatures ranging from 550 °C to 750 °C over durations of up to 10,000 h (approximately 1.14 years). Advanced characterization techniques, including electron microscopy and synchrotron X-ray diffraction, were used to investigate dislocation recovery and phase evolution. Based on these findings, a time-temperature-precipitation (TTP) diagram was developed for LPBF 316H SS, revealing a 10- to100-fold acceleration in precipitation kinetics compared to wrought 316H SS. A physics-informed model was calibrated using the short-term experimental data, enabling predictions of average precipitate sizes, volume fractions of M 23 C 6 and Laves phases, and changes in molybdenum solute concentration for aging up to 1 × 10⁶ h (114 years). These microstructural insights were further utilized to estimate yield strength and extrapolate strength reduction factors over the extended aging period. Despite the accelerated aging kinetics, LPBF 316H SS demonstrated superior yield strength retention compared to its wrought counterpart. In conclusion, this study establishes a framework for evaluating long-term performance using short-term experimental data and supports the accelerated qualification of AM materials for high-temperature structural applications.

Laser powder bed fusion↗

Strength and ductility of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: Impact of neutron irradiation and data variability

Here, this article presents the mechanical properties of additively manufactured (AM) 316L stainless steel processed via the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) method, focusing on the effects of neutron irradiation on mechanical properties and the variability in strength and ductility data. The rapid melting-solidification process and multiple heating-cooling cycles inherent in LPBF typically result in a fine, metastable microstructure with significant local variability. AM 316L builds of varying thicknesses were fabricated, and SS-J3 miniature tensile specimens were machined from six different locations. These specimens were irradiated with fast neutrons to doses of 2 and 10 dpa at target temperatures of 300 °C and 600 °C. Post-irradiation tensile tests were conducted at room temperature, 300 °C, and 600 °C. Compared to conventional 316L stainless steel, AM 316L exhibited higher initial strength but lower ductility. Irradiation at 300 °C caused significant hardening and prompt necking at yield, with limited uniform ductility, although embrittlement was not observed up to 10 dpa. While neutron irradiation, particularly at 600 °C, increased the variability in strength and ductility data, no clear dependence of mechanical properties on build thickness or sampling location was found—contrary to the conventional perception that AM materials may exhibit high property variability. Furthermore, we observed that the variability in property data for LPBF-processed 316L was relatively low compared to that of wrought 316L stainless steel. This reduced variability in AM 316L steel may be attributed to its highly metastable, stress-containing microstructure, which is discussed in the context of general tensile property variations.

Additively manufactured 316L stainless steel↗

Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development Lifecycle for Propulsion Components

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is a generic term that captures a variety of fabrication processes. Each of these manufacturing process has unique advantages and challenges for use in aerospace propulsion applications. The most commonly used AM processes include Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), Directed Energy Deposition (DED), and solid-state processes as in Cold Spray, Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing, and Additive Friction Stir Deposition. While detailed research has been conducted among many of the AM processes to mature processing parameters and material properties, navigating which processes are best to select is difficult as it is based on specific component requirements. The focus of this presentation is to provide an overview of considerations for each of metal AM process selection for aerospace components based on various key attributes. These key attributes include geometric considerations, metallurgical characteristics, cost basis, post-processing and maturity of the processes. The data for these trade selections are based on studies that NASA as performed internally and with academic and industry partners. These studies include multiple AM build experiments to evaluate (1) geometric variations and constraints within the processes, (2) alloy characterization and mechanical testing, (3) pathfinder component development and hot-fire evaluations, and (4) certification approaches. This presentation summarizes these results and is meant to introduce specific examples which show what to consider when designing a metal AM component for aerospace propulsion applications.

Paul Gradl↗

Thermodynamics of Bimetallic Joints between Titanium and Tantalum Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Laser powder bed fusion (LBPF) is currently the most mature metal additive manufacturing (AM) technology. While it does not have the same flexibility as directed energy deposition techniques to produce compositional gradients, LPBF can still be used to generate bimetallic parts by depositing one metal on a build plate made of another. Here, in this study, we print combinations of Ti-6Al-4V with Ta and characterize defects that occur at the interface. We use thermodynamic modeling to explain the formation of keyhole porosity and solidification cracks when Ta is built on a Ti baseplate, and the lack of defects when the materials are reversed. By understanding the mechanisms that lead to defect formation, the methodology demonstrated here can be applied to other material systems to efficiently design bimetallic LPBF processes.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Additive Manufacturing of Oxide Dispersion Strengthened (ODS) Nickel-Based Superalloys

Additive manufacturing of oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) Ni-based superalloys, via powder bed techniques, could enable near-net-shape manufacturing of intricately shaped components for aerospace applications. This has the potential to transform the design and manufacturing of hot sections of engines which face demands for ever-rising operating temperatures. The goal of this project is to lay the scientific foundation for additive manufacturing of ODS alloys. The objective of this poster is to present work to date as well as proposed future work.

Wilson, Laura G.↗

Surface smoothing for laser powder-bed Ti-6Al-4V by a transient liquid phase

Surface roughness is the primary driver of fatigue for additively manufactured metals. To address surface roughness, this work introduces a new method to smooth features beyond line-of-sight without material removal. The method applies a coating that triggers local surface remelting by activating a eutectic reaction during heat treatment. The associated liquid phase then wets and isothermally solidifies into a smoother surface. For Ti-6Al-4V fabricated with laser powder bed fusion, samples with and without TLP smoothing (using a Cu coating) were characterized with a suite of techniques, including mechanical testing, electron backscatter diffraction, synchrotron X-ray tomography, and fractography. TLP smoothing reduced surface roughness by 80% and amplified compressive residual stress at the surface by about 50%. With statistically equivalent virtual microstructures, crystal plasticity scrutinized the roles of phases, porosity, and surface roughness. Although the tensile strain-to-failure was reduced to 1% strain, the TLP smoothing process increased high-cycle fatigue strength by about 20% compared to control samples, pointing to future opportunities to optimize the new process through various coating compositions and heat treatment schedules. Overall, this work establishes a new paradigm for treating surfaces of materials for smoothness and compressive residual stress.

Additive manufacturing↗

Development of Laser Powder Bed Fusion NASA HR-2 for Hydrogen Sensitive Liquid Rocket Engine Applications

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been involved in the development and maturation of metal additive manufacturing (AM) for space applications since the late 2000s. AM has provided new design and manufacturing opportunities to reduce cost and schedule, consolidate parts, and optimize performance. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) is one of the most commonly used AM processes to fabricate components of complex shape requiring fine feature resolution. Due to exposure to high-pressure gaseous hydrogen, mechanical property degradation caused by hydrogen environment embrittlement (HEE) is a critical concern for many materials in liquid hydrogen propulsion systems. NASA has identified the need to develop and advance new materials in unique engine applications using liquid hydrogen as a propellant. One such material being developed at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center is L-PBF NASA HR-2 (Hydrogen Resistant-2), a high-strength Fe-Ni-based superalloy resistant to HEE. The chemistry of NASA HR-2 was formulated to meet requirements for key liquid rocket engine (LRE) components that operate in high-pressure hydrogen environments. Initial development and material characterization found that NASA HR-2 has excellent L-PBF printability, and its microstructure evolves well after heat treatment. This new alloy has undergone fundamental metallurgical evaluations, heat treatment studies, detailed microstructure characterization, and mechanical testing across a range of temperatures. Tensile testing was performed in a pressurized gaseous hydrogen (GH2) environment to assess its resistance to HEE. L-PBF NASA HR-2 has an average yield stress of 95 ksi, an ultimate tensile stress of 165 ksi, and a very high fracture elongation of 34 - 36% when tested in a high-pressure (5 ksi) hydrogen environment. The tensile property data confirms hydrogen has little influence on HR-2’s ductility, strength, and fracture behavior. L-PBF NASA HR-2 is a promising option for many hydrogen-sensitive LRE components that require exceptional resistance to HEE. This paper will provide an overview of the L-PBF process development, material characterization, mechanical and thermophysical properties, and LRE hardware development for NASA HR-2.

Po S Chen↗

Fatigue behavior of low-cost, non-spherical Ti-6Al-4V powder processed via laser powder bed fusion

Hydride-dehydride Ti-6Al-4V powder with particle size distribution of 75–175 μm were used to manufacture fatigue samples. Optimized processing parameters were used to maintain a relative density of >99.5% in the samples. Fatigue tests were carried out in R = σ min /σ max = -1 condition under stresses ranging from 150 to 500 MPa and the results were compared to samples that were additively manufactured using spherical powders. The fatigue lives were similar between the two types of powder; i.e., powder morphology has no effect on fatigue performance. However, the high surface roughness and martensitic microstructure resulting from the laser powder bed fusion process result in poor performance compared to samples machined from conventionally produced materials. In conclusion, crack initiation occurred consistently from surface defects because of high surface roughness of the additively manufactured parts.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗