Cybersecurity by Design Framework for Wireless Technologies for Safety Functions of Advanced Reactors
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
MELCOR-TMAP is a combined thermal-hydraulics and tritium tracking code developed to simulate severe accident scenarios in fission and fusion power plants. Here, we demonstrate the results of MELCOR-TMAP analyses on historical ARIES program reference designs. By coupling MELCOR-TMAP with the open source RAVEN probabilistic risk analysis framework’s Bayesian UQ capabilities, we also demonstrate key uncertainties in material properties with the highest impact on tritium inventory and plant risk.
Integral criticality safety and reactor physics benchmark experiments from the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (ICSBEP Handbook) and the International Handbook of Reactor Physics Experiments (IRPhE Handbook) are essential for nuclear data validation and testing
An innovative small thermal reactor concept named LOTUS, which is a pool-type reactor aimed at heat supply. The passive concept applied in the LOTUS and it has a separable core. It means that its core can passively unfold into four parts along its central axis only with the buoyancy and gravity when some accidents happen, especially the wall rupture of the pool caused by earthquake, aircraft impact and so on. This idea can effectively enhance the ability of pool-type reactor for resisting some severe accidents. We have executed some pre-computations in order to check a non-supercritical system for the transient simulation. In this paper, the development of k{sub eff} have been calculated by both stepwise steady-state and transient modes using Serpent, as well as including some sensitivity analyses about the k{sub eff} to unfolding velocity, inserting velocity of control rod (CR) and time step. The result showed that k{sub eff} value decreased definitely as the reactor unfolded and the consistent change exposed between the stepwise steady state and transient result when the unfolding angle varied from 0 to 1 degree. However, the stepwise steady state k{sub eff} negatively declined after that angle, which demonstrated that for such a dynamic unfolding change the transient mode was more suitable, peculiarly for considering delayed neutrons and neutron moderation. For sensitivity calculation, the k{sub eff} decreased more rapidly as the unfolding velocity and inserting velocity of CR increased, and a smaller time step corresponded to a more stable change. (authors)
This paper presents the results of High-burnup Experiments for Reactivity-initiated Accident (HERA) Modeling & Simulation (M&S) exercise. The HERA project under the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Second Framework for Irradiation Experiments (FIDES-II) program is focused on studying Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel behavior during Reactivity-Initiated Accident (RIA) conditions. The Part I M&S cases are based on a series of tests in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility in the United States and the Nuclear Safety Research Reactor (NSRR) in Japan. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the test design to accomplish its goals in establishing clearer understanding of the effects of power pulse width during RIA conditions. Further, the blind predictions using various computational tools have been performed and compared amongst to interpret the behaviors of high burnup fuels during RIA. While many international participants evaluate the thermal–mechanical behavior of fuel rod under different conditions, a considerable scatter of outputs comes out for the cases due to the disparity between codes in predicting mechanical behaviors. In general, however, the results of thermal–mechanical analysis elaborate that nominal design conditions the shorter pulse width tests in NSRR should cause cladding failures while the TREAT tests appear to have more split prediction of failure or not. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis varying key testing parameters reveals the considerable effect of power pulse width and total energy deposition on prediction of fuel rod failure.
High-burnup Experiments in Reactivity-initiated Accidents (HERA) is a joint experimental program (JEEP) operating within the United States (U.S.) Nuclear Energy Agency’s (NEA’s) framework for irradiation experiments (FIDES). HERA is dedicated to the understanding of light water reactor (LWR) fuel performance at high burnup under reactivity-initiated accidents (RIA). In-pile RIA experiments have been performed on high-burnup fuels (e.g., above 60 gigawatt days per metric ton of uranium [GWd/MTU]) in the CABRI reactor at the Cadarache site in southern France, and the Nuclear Safety Research Reactor (NSRR) in Japan. However, most of these experiments have taken place with heavily corroded Zircaloy claddings with pulse widths that are narrower (e.g., 5 ms – 30 ms full-width-half-max [FWHM]) than what would be likely in a commercial LWR (e.g., 30 ms – 80 ms FWHM). A few tests were performed in the CABRI facility with FWHM up to 76 ms, though only one “blistered” rod experienced cladding failure. Heavy waterside corrosion and narrow pulse widths are both known to increase the vulnerability of LWR fuel to pellet cladding mechanical interaction (PCMI). The HERA proposal is designed to: (1) quantify the impact of pulse width on fuel performance, offering new insight into the applicability of existing data; (2) generate new data on high burnup fuel under pulse conditions prototypic of LWRs; (3) quantify the additional margin provided by modern cladding alloys to PCMI failure limits; and (4) offer improved data for modelers using specially designed tests that eliminate key uncertainties in high-burnup fuel tests.
What is the meaning of risk as it applies to the design of advanced reactors in the disciplines of safety, security, and safeguards? How can we find common terminology for the concept of risk and how can we find interfaces between these disciplines? These are important questions that should be explored in order that they may be applied in an integrated manner for the most effective and efficient design approaches. Eliminating or minimizing risks is a key design driver that motivates and informs the development of nuclear reactors. For safety, risk is well understood and applied in Probabilistic Risk Assessments. For security, the risk-based concepts of vulnerability assessments and vital areas are all considered in designing security systems. For safeguards, the concept of risk is not formally defined, as it relates to the design and operation of nuclear reactors. International nuclear safeguards seek to reduce the risk of proliferation in the nuclear fuel cycle and as such the concept of risk does exist. Therefore, the current understanding of the “3S’ approach, which seeks to find the interfaces and conflicts between safety, security, and safeguards requires a thorough understanding of the role that the reduction of risk plays in all three disciplines. The intersection of risk for safety and security is now being developed as there is a strong correlation between reactor design and operations and their vulnerability to sabotage. The intersection of risk for security and safeguards has to date chiefly been focused on the nuclear material control and accounting systems, which are relied on by both the operator (State) and the IAEA. This paper explores the concept of risk in each of the three disciplines, how they interact, potential conflicts and interfaces , how these might be addressed and leveraged, and a notional framework for how this could be achieved.
In the near future, experiments on HBu fuel under loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and reactivity-initiated accident (RIA) conditions will be performed within the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). These experiments will be performed using the Transient Water Irradiation System for TREAT (TWIST) experiment vehicle. To support these experiments, analysis of fuel-coolant interaction (FCI) energetics is underway. This paper discusses FCIs in the context of light water reactor (LWR) safety, differentiating between the severe accident focus of commercial reactors and experimental RIA test programs where FCIs have occurred. However, it is highlighted that as the nuclear industry aims for increased burnup limits, the FCI events observed in RIA test programs may become relevant to commercial LWR safety analysis. The paper then presents developments to the UW-FCI computer program to enable simulation of FCIs initiated by solid fuel particles dispersing into the coolant during RIAs.
The NUBOW-3D software was developed to assist in designing a core restraint system for sodium-cooled fast spectrum reactors. Originally conceived during the FFTF design activities, the United States has been a proponent of limited free bow reactor design ever since to improve safety performance. In fast spectrum reactors, successful safety performance during reactor transients requires favorable reactivity feedback that leads to safe power stabilization or even natural system shutdown. In fast spectrum reactors, one key mechanism that designers use to improve the performance is to make thermal expansion inject negative feedback into the reactor system. While most fast reactor systems generally have a negative reactivity response to geometric expansion, the NUBOW-3D software allows the designers to better explore the impact on reactivity and optimize the system to maximize its impact.
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) personnel operate a low power research reactor (the Annular Core Research Reactor, or ACRR), and a zero-power critical experiment assembly referred to as CX. In accordance with 10 CFR 830, Subpart B, Appendix A, the acceptable methodology for developing a Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) for DOE nuclear reactors is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) Regulatory Guide 1.70 (RG 1.70). RG 1.70 does not address certain areas required by 10 CFR 830 and expected by DOE (e.g., full facility hazard analysis).Thus, the current DSAs for SNL’s reactor nuclear facilities are based on RG 1.70, but also of necessity supplemented by DOE-STD-3009-94 methods. SNL personnel, in consultation with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Sandia Field Office (SFO), have concluded that an alternate methodology is preferred to RG 1.70. The details of the proposal, and the reasons motivating its development, are discussed in the order described below. The proposed alternate methodology will be applicable to the ACRR and the CX (i.e., it will be applicable to nuclear facilities in which a reactor and/or a critical assembly will be operated).
The Serpent2/RINNOVO nodal core analysis code system, a dedicated tool for modeling research reactors, has the capability to accurately predict important core physics parameters involved in the safety of reactor operation, such as various reactivity coefficients, control rod and bank worths including the shutdown margin, power distributions as well as local neutron flux predictions at various core locations of high importance, e.g., at irradiation rigs. In this work, a hexagonal model of the unrodded initial core of the Brazilian IPR-R1 Mark I type TRIGA nuclear reactor has been created using the Serpent2/RINNOVO code system. The choice of employing a hexagonal core geometry representation has mainly been made to facilitate subsequent fuel shuffling operations and core follow calculations of this reactor. Numerical results in terms of the core eigenvalue and the assembly power distribution have then been compared against corresponding full core Serpent2 results to prove feasibility of using the Serpent2/RINNOVO code system for modeling small and highly heterogeneous TRIGA reactors. Overall, RINNOVO predicts the power distribution very accurately but the eigenvalue error still remains quite large. In light of being the very first evaluation of a TRIGA reactor with the RINNOVO nodal core simulator, these results are also considered to be very preliminary. Improved accuracy is expected by incorporating a proper methodology in the current code system for computing discontinuity factors for multi-assembly configurations. Furthermore, improved results are expected by increasing the number of energy groups used by RINNOVO in these core calculations.
Argonne’s advanced high-pressure, high-temperature gas enclosures solutions were developed and tested for Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel applications wherein pressure, temperature, fuel and working fluid are substantially different when compared to the operating conditions typical of gas cooled reactors (GCR). For LWR applications the coolant sleeve pressure exerted on the inner and outer walls of the sleeve may be equalized by pressurizing the fuel rod (e.g., with helium gas) to compensate for the coolant high pressure exerted on the outer walls of the sleeve. This results in a lower differential pressure. Micro-GCRs are reactor systems operated at elevated temperatures and pressure with gas as a working fluid. HolosGen’s Holos-Quad represent a type of Micro-GCR wherein the core is sleeved to segregate the fuel and other components from the working fluid.
The U.S. Department of Energy's Microreactor Program, with Idaho National Laboratory's development of a nuclear microreactor applications test bed named MARVEL, aims to support R&D for the deployment of small, transportable reactors across civilian, industrial, and defense sectors. The MARVEL microreactor, an 85-kWth thermal fission reactor, incorporates TRIGA nuclear fuel and a sodium-potassium eutectic as its primary coolant, designed for safety and efficiency, with natural circulation eliminating the risk of critical heat flux conditions. The reliance on natural circulation for primary cooling means the reactor avoids using fuel spacers to minimize core pressure drop, which could disrupt the primary coolant's natural flow. However, the reactor core’s tight P/D ratio of 1.05, in the absence of fuel spacers, could pose a risk of fuel rod contact and increased peak cladding temperatures. To ensure the reactor safety, this study conducted computational modeling and simulations to investigate the reactor's thermal-hydraulic-mechanical characteristics, including the reactor core heat transfer coefficients, the potential for rod-to-rod contact, and assessed its impact on peak cladding temperature and overall reactor safety. The computational analyses of the MARVEL microreactor core revealed that the thermal deformation of fuel rods under worst-case scenario may lead to the fuel rod contact, but the peak cladding temperatures will remain significantly lower than the safety criteria, ensuring the safety operation reactor without fuel spacers under normal operating conditions.
Not Available
Design manual and hazards analysis for in-pile water cooled capsule in HT-1 tube of Plum Brook reactor facility for testing instrument actuation in radiation environment
Accident mitigation based safety adequacy evaluation is anticipated to be less costly and time consuming than accident prevention for molten salt reactors due characteristics of the reactor class. The presentation provides an overview of the technical basis for developing accident mitigation-based regulatory guidance for future commercial molten salt reactor nuclear power plants.
Cost remains a substantial impediment to nuclear power plant (NPP) deployment. The origin of the multifold cost difference between NPPs and other industrial facilities is in their unique potential for societally disruptive accidents. Consequently, one means to substantially reduce NPP costs would be to provide a transparent means of demonstrating that a plant’s potential for land-contamination accidents is so remote to amount to a practical certainty that no significant quantity of radionuclides would ever reach the public. The necessary confidence can be developed through employing a containment capable of withstanding both a complete internal energy release accident along with credible external events with ample margin. This paper provides an overview of a path forward to develop a technology-neutral, containment-based safety-adequacy demonstration method.
There has been a resurgence in global interest in advanced reactor technology, with a variety of innovative concepts being proposed and developed. Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors (SFRs) have garnered considerable attention given their beneficial characteristics and extensive historical development programs and operating experience. Central to the licensing of non-light water reactor (non-LWR) technology is the characterization of the safety case. At its basics, reactor safety focuses on the prevention and mitigation of the release of radioactive material to the environment.