Hydraulic ground support for saturn v.
Hydraulic ground support for saturn v, supplying fluid power to actuate engine gimbal system and operate engine valves
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Hydraulic ground support for saturn v, supplying fluid power to actuate engine gimbal system and operate engine valves
Automatic information forms of orbital data, data recorder fabrication, data output buffer development, and operational engineering research in orbital operations control study
Ground support equipment and facilities for deep space network
Flight project support for Surveyor III, Lunar Orbiter, Pioneer VII, and Mariner IV MISSIONS, facility construction and equipment for deep space network, and system reliability
Manned testing of EVA equipment in thermal-vacuum environment for qualification of Apollo extravehicular mobility unit, using lunar surface thermal simulator
A small-scale wind tunnel test of a two engine hybrid model with upper surface blowing on a simulated expandable duct internally blown flap was accomplished in a two phase program. The low wing Phase I model utilized 0.126c radius Jacobs/Hurkamp flaps and 0.337c radius Coanda flaps. The high wing Phase II model was utilized for continued studies on the Jacobs/Hurkamp flap. Principal study areas included: basic data both engines operative and with an engine out, control flap utilization, horizontal tail effectiveness, spoiler effectiveness, USB nacelle deflector study and USB/IBF pressure ratio effects.
There are six cases considered: (1) no updates made during the flight, (2) one ground update in the vertical components only at the first practice separation minus 15 minutes, (3) one ground update in all components at the first practice separation minus 5 minutes, (4) updates 2 and 3 applied successively, (5) Case 4 plus an update in all components at the second separation attempt minus 3 minutes, and (6) one ground update at first separation attempt minus 5 minutes and a second update at second separation minus two minutes. The mission control simulation program, GROPER, was run using as radar input a tape containing radar derived state vectors for the trajectory.
A dispersion analysis considering 3—sigma (3σ) uncertainties (or perturbations) in platform, vehicle, and environmental parameters has been performed for the first orbital flight test (OFT-1) mission. The dispersion analysis is based on the nominal trajectory for the OFT-1 reference flight profile (RFP) which is described in Reference 1. The analysis has been performed to determine state vector and performance dispersions (or variations) which result from the indicated 3σ uncertainties. The dispersions are determined at major mission events and fixed times from Liftoff (time slices). The dispersion results will be used to evaluate the capability of the vehicle to perform the mission within a 3σ Level of confidence and to determine flight performance reserves. (FPR).
The orbiter/SCA separation operational limits for the current target conditions of ALT free flights 1 through 5 are analyzed. The separation operational limits are used to verify that no separation design constraints are violated. The operational limits represent the acceptable dispersions in attainment of separation target conditions which assure safe separation. Safe separation is based on satisfying all specified separation design criteria except orbiter altitude at ALT interface airspeed. Separation operational limits are defined for each of the five orbiter tailcones on ALT free flight missions based upon preflight aerodynamics. The effect of carrier pilot steering compensation due to off-nominal flight conditions is determined to be within the separation operational limits.
A preflight analysis of the ALT separation reference trajectories for the tailcone on, forward, and aft cg orbiter configurations is documented. The ALT separation reference trajectories encompass the time from physical separation of the orbiter from the carrier to orbiter attainment of the maximum ALT interface airspeed. The trajectories include post separation roll maneuvers by both vehicles and are generated using the final preflight data base. The trajectories so generated satisfy all known separation design criteria and violate no known constraints. The requirement for this analysis is given along with the specifications, assumptions, and analytical approach used to generate the separation trajectories. The results of the analytical approach are evaluated, and conclusions and recommendations are summarized.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A study of the interaction between the orbiter primary reaction control system (PRCS) and the remote manipulator system (RMS) with a loaded arm is documented. This analysis was performed with the Payload Deployment and Retrieval Systems Simulation (PDRSS) program with the passive arm bending option. The passive-arm model simulates the arm as massless elastic links with locked joints. The study was divided into two parts. The first part was the evaluation of the response of the arm to step inputs (i.e. constant jet torques) about each of the orbiter body axes. The second part of the study was the evaluation of the response of the arm to minimum impulse primary RCS jet firings with both single pulse and pulse train inputs.
The engine operating characteristics were examined. Inlet pressure effects, tank pressurization effects, steady-state specific impulse, and the steady-state cycle were studied. The propellant flow schematic and operating sequence are presented. Engine hardware drawings are included.
Measurements of the drag and of the nacelle internal pressures on a wing and nacelle that housed a horizontally opposed piston engine were made in the 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel at Ames Research Center. These tests are follow-ons to earlier tests made with the same wing and nacelle but in which the engine was replaced with an electric motor and an adjustable orifice plate. In the initial tests the orifice plate was used to control the rate of cooling-air flow through the nacelle and thereby to simulate a range of gasoline engine types. Good agreement was found between the results of those tests and of the test reported here. Also, the upper and lower plenum pressure and cooling-air flow rate were found to be related by conventional equations used to represent the flow through orifices. Tests were run with three cooling air inlet sizes over a free-stream velocity range from 50 to 150 knots, an angle of attack range from 0 deg to 10 deg, and a cowl-flap deflection range from 0 deg to 30 deg. The data were analyzed by computing a flow coefficient similar to that used in the analysis of orifices. It was found that all of the flow coefficient values fell within a band that varied linearly with inlet area. The linear mean line through this band provides an estimate of the relationship between cooling-air flow rate and upper plenum pressure over a wide range of test conditions.
This paper discusses the Space Station assembly sequence planning and development process. It presents the planning methodologies from both historial and current perspectives. It is shown that planning the assembly sequence is a new and unique challenge and its solution requires the simultaneous satisfaction of many diverse variables and constants. The considerations which influence the development of the assembly sequence include launch vehicle integration and lift capabilities, on-orbit assembly flight operations, vehicle flight dynamics, spacecraft system capabilities and resource availability. Many of these considerations are described in this paper. In addition, the examples presented demonstrate the current process for assembly sequence planning and show many of the complex trade-offs that must be performed.
A program is being pursued to lengthen the mission duration of the Space Shuttle from 10 days to 16 days, with future plans to increase the on-orbit stay time to 28 days. Presently, the length of the mission is limited by fuel cell reactants, stowage constraints, and life-support system consumables. In December 1988, NASA gained approval to begin the design and development of the extensive modifications to OV-102 Columbia required to extend its mission duration to 16 days. Additionally, OV-105 Endeavour is now being manufactured so as not to preclude its transformation to a 28-day vehicle in the future, should that program gain subsequent approval and funding. The first extended duration orbiter (EDO) launch of Columbia is slated for March 1992 with the US microgravity laboratory (USML) as its payload. Scientific payloads such as the USML and Spacelab, which require longer periods of zero gravity or the vacuum of space, will greatly benefit from the EDO program.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A study is presented of inlet designs and aerodynamic characteristics of air-induction systems intended for operation with a turbojet engine operating with a constant-volume air-flow process. Two-dimensional inlet designs similar to those discussed in NACA RM A52C14, plus a fixed-geometry inlet with a convergent-divergent diffuser, and an additional variable-geometry inlet are considered for Mach numbers from 0.85 to 2.0 from sea level to the stratosphere. For best performance throughout this range of Mach numbers and altitudes, it was shown that the geometry of the inlet must be such as to insure a high pressure recovery, as well as to provide for a variable entrance area. The inlets are compared on the basis of a drag evaluation neglecting viscosity.