Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ATLAS LAUNCH VEHICLE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1962

Mission Capabilities of Ion Engines. Phase II

Payloads and mission times were calculated for space vehicles propelled by ion rockets using nuclear power supplies having specific weights from 10 t o 50 lb/kw. Included in the study were five missions: low-altitude lunar satellite, low-altitude Venus satellite, solar probe, Saturn probe, and a Jupiter satellite with a circular orbit at the altitude of Jupiter's fourth moon. The variation of payload with the ration of power supply weight to gross weight was studied and the optimum power levels thereby determined. The ion rocket payload capabilities were compared with those of high-thrust vehicles using hydrogen-oxygen rockets and tungsten-core nuclear rockets; in addition the performance of high- and low-thrust systems staged in combination has been investigated. Launch vehicles considered in this study were the Atlas-Centaur, the Saturn C-1, and the Saturn C-5.

IONIC PROPULSION↗
NASA NTRS2009

Analysis of architectures for the scientific exploration of Enceladus

In 2007, a JPL Rapid Mission Architecture (RMA) analysis team identified and evaluated a broad set of mission architecture options for a suite of scientific exploration objectives targeting the Saturnian moon Enceladus. Primary science objectives were largely focused on examination of the driving mechanisms and extent of interactions by the plumes of Enceladus recently discovered by Cassini. Investigation of the architectural trade space spanned a wide range of options, from high-energy flybys of Enceladus as a re-instrumented expansion on the Cassini mission, to more complex, multi-element combinations of Enceladus orbiters carrying multiple variants of in-situ deployable systems. Trajectory design emerged as a critical element of the mission concepts, enabling challenging missions on Atlas V and Delta IV-Heavy class launch vehicles. Various Enceladus Flagship-class mission concepts identified were analyzed and compared against several first-order figures of merit, including mass, cost, risk, mission timeline, and associated science value with respect to accomplishment of the full set of science objectives. Results are presented for these comparative analyses and the characterization of the explored trade space.

Strange, N.↗
NASA NTRS1994

(abstract) Saturn Mini-Probes Mission

The original Cassini mission concept for intensive Saturn exploration included dual atmospheric probes - to Titan and Saturn. The Saturn probe was lost in Cassini Project cost reduction, but the Saturn atmospheric goals are still important to the planetary science community - especially it measurements can be acquired during synoptic coverage by the Cassini Orbiter. New advanced technology and design heritage from the Pluto Fast Flyby mission permit a low cost mission concept for launch early in the first decade of the 21st century, in time to take advantage of the Cassini spacecraft being in orbit around Saturn. This paper will describe such a concept. The mini-probe carrier can be a relatively simple design, depending on a solar array/battery power system design instead of Radioactive Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) with their attendant programmatic complexities, costs, and constraints. The Atlas IIAS/Star 48B, Proton, and STS with upper stage are launch vehicle options which permit modest payload deliveries to Saturn with relatively short flight times (3 to 4 years) such that the mini-probes arrive in the time period when the Cassini Orbiter is operating at Saturn. The Cassini time-line with a compatible SMP mission sequence is described. An example mission concept includes a carrier spacecraft with three 10 to 20 kg mini-probes, launched in the late summer of 2001 by an Atlas IIAS/Star 48B on a 3.8 year trip to Saturn. Preliminary evaluation of the Cassini time-line suggests compatibility of the probe entries with collecting the data for Earth-return.

Saturn Cassini miniprobes cost Pluto Fast Flyby↗
NASA NTRS1993

Low power pulsed MPD thruster system analysis and applications

Pulsed MPD thruster systems were analyzed for application to solar-electric orbit transfer vehicles at power levels ranging from 10 to 40 kW. Potential system level benefits of pulsed propulsion technology include ease of power scaling without thruster performance changes, improved transportability from low power flight experiments to operational systems, and reduced ground qualification costs. Required pulsed propulsion system components include a pulsed applied-field MPD thruster, a pulse-forming network, a charge control unit, a cathode heater supply, and high speed valves. Mass estimates were obtained for each propulsion subsystem and spacecraft component. Results indicate that for payloads of 1000 and 2000 kg, pulsed MPD thrusters can reduce launch mass by between 1000 and 2500 kg relative to hydrogen arcjets, reducing launch vehicle class and launch cost. While the achievable mass savings depends on the trip time allowed for the mission, cases are shown in which the launch vehicle required for a mission is decreased from an Atlas IIAS to an Atlas I or Delta 7920.

Myers, Roger M.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Low power pulsed MPD thruster system analysis and applications

Pulsed magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) thruster systems were analyzed for application to solar-electric orbit transfer vehicles at power levels ranging from 10 to 40 kW. Potential system level benefits of pulsed propulsion technology include ease of power scaling without thruster performance changes, improved transportability from low power flight experiments to operational systems, and reduced ground qualification costs. Required pulsed propulsion system components include a pulsed applied-field MPD thruster, a pulse-forming network, a charge control unit, a cathode heater supply, and high speed valves. Mass estimates were obtained for each propulsion subsystem and spacecraft component using off-the-shelf technology whenever possible. Results indicate that for payloads of 1000 and 2000 kg pulsed MPD thrusters can reduce launch mass by between 1000 and 2500 kg over those achievable with hydrogen arcjets, which can be used to reduce launch vehicle class and the associated launch cost. While the achievable mass savings depends on the trip time allowed for the mission, cases are shown in which the launch vehicle required for a mission is decreased from an Atlas IIAS to an Atlas I or Delta 7920.

Myers, Roger M.↗
NASA NTRS2017

Carbon-Carbon Nozzle Extension Development in Support of In-Space and Upper-Stage Liquid Rocket Engines

Upper stage and in-space liquid rocket engines are optimized for performance through the use of high area ratio nozzles to fully expand combustion gases to low exit pressures, increasing exhaust velocities. Due to the large size of such nozzles, and the related engine performance requirements, carbon-carbon (C-C) composite nozzle extensions are being considered to reduce weight impacts. Currently, the state-of-the-art is represented by the metallic and foreign composite nozzle extensions limited to approximately 2000 degrees F. used on the Atlas V, Delta IV, Falcon 9, and Ariane 5 launch vehicles. NASA and industry partners are working towards advancing the domestic supply chain for C-C composite nozzle extensions. These development efforts are primarily being conducted through the NASA Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program in addition to other low level internal research efforts. This has allowed for the initial material development and characterization, subscale hardware fabrication, and completion of hot-fire testing in relevant environments. NASA and industry partners have designed, fabricated and hot-fire tested several subscale domestically produced C-C extensions to advance the material and coatings fabrication technology for use with a variety of liquid rocket and scramjet engines. Testing at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) evaluated heritage and state-of-the-art C-C materials and coatings, demonstrating the initial capabilities of the high temperature materials and their fabrication methods. This paper discusses the initial material development, design and fabrication of the subscale carbon-carbon nozzle extensions, provides an overview of the test campaign, presents results of the hot fire testing, and discusses potential follow-on development work. The follow on work includes the fabrication of ultra-high temperature materials, larger C-C nozzle extensions, material characterization, sub-element testing and hot-fire testing at larger scale.

Gradl, Paul R.↗
NASA NTRS2020

TPSAS-NF1676L-35670-DND

We demonstrate that a low-cost spacecraft bus based on the Propulsive ESPA architecture, launched as a directed facility alongside a mission to the outer solar system, enables innovative and viable SIMPLEx-class missions to the outer solar system and achieve high-value science objectives. As a case study, we present a Propulsive ESPA bus that could be launched with the Dragonfly mission toward the Saturn System and carry two small spacecraft weighing up to 130 kg each. We advocate a mission architecture that enables delivering multiple small missions to the Saturn System on a stand-alone Carrier-Relay Spacecraft (CRSC) that flies independently, and poses zero impact on the Dragonfly Mission. To accommodate this architecture, the launch vehicle will require an upgrade from Dragonfly's notional Atlas V 411 to Atlas V 541. Raising the SIMPLEx cost cap from the current $55M, and excluding Phase E costs will also make outer-planet missions viable in the SIMPLEx program. We have identified multiple high-value mission concepts that fit within the 130 kg limit. As examples, we present concepts for Saturn Probe, Saturn Ring In-Situ Explorer, Magnetospheric Explorer, and Enceladus Plume Sampler.

Kunio M Sayanagi↗
NASA NTRS2019

Navigating MarCO, the first interplanetary CubeSats

The NASA’s Mars Cube One (MarCO) probes are twin 6U CubeSats that were launched into space on May 5, 2018. The MarCOs shared a launch vehicle with NASA’s InSight mission, separating from the Atlas V Centaur upper stage after InSight. The MarCOs were injected into an Earth-Mars transfer trajectory and were independently navigated to the proximity of Mars. On 26 November, 2018 the MarCO probes flew by Mars as the InSight lander descended to the surface, providing real-time relay of InSight UHF data back to the Earth. This paper describes the approaches used to design the MarCOs’ trajectories and to navigate them to Mars, presenting the challenges of navigating and operating CubeSats in deep space, and the technological firsts achieved by the MarCO mission.

Young, Brian↗
NASA NTRS2014

Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures

Launch vehicles within the international community vary greatly in their configuration and processing. Each launch site has a unique processing flow based on the specific launch vehicle configuration. Launch and flight operations are managed through a set of control centers associated with each launch site. Each launch site has a control center for launch operations; however flight operations support varies from being co-located with the launch site to being shared with the space vehicle control center. There is also a nuance of some having an engineering support center which may be co-located with either the launch or flight control center, or in a separate geographical location altogether. A survey of control center architectures is presented for various launch vehicles including the NASA Space Launch System (SLS), United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V and Delta IV, and the European Space Agency (ESA) Ariane 5. Each of these control center architectures shares some similarities in basic structure while differences in functional distribution also exist. The driving functions which lead to these factors are considered and a model of control center architectures is proposed which supports these commonalities and variations.

Watson, Michael D.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

LOFTID Surface Heating Reconstruction

On November 10, 2022, the Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) reentry vehicle launched to low-Earth orbit aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket out of Vandenberg Air Force Base. The aeroshell, the largest Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) ever flown, was inflated to its full 6-meter diameter before successful re-entry into the atmosphere. The aeroshell was heavily instrumented in order to understand its behavior during entry. There were 82 thermocouples (TCs) distributed across the aeroshell, with 22 integrated into the flexible thermal protection system (FTPS) on the rigid nose, 36 in the FTPS on the deployable structure, and 24 on the inflatable structure. TCs were placed at different depths throughout the FTPS. Those nearest to the surface were located just beneath the two SiC outer fabric layers. The near-surface TCs on the rigid nose were Type R with flame spray alumina insulation, while those on the flank were Type N with mica/ceramic insulation. Additionally, a radiometer was placed at the center of the nose surrounded by four total heat flux gauges in a cruciform configuration at a radius of 0.41 m. The nose instrumentation is shown in Fig. 1 and a cross-section of the aeroshell with all TC locations is shown in Fig. 2. The objective of this work was to use the temperatures measured by the TCs during flight to estimate the surface heat rate across the aeroshell throughout the period of re-entry by inverse analysis methodology. The results were used to evaluate the fidelity of measurements from the total heat flux gauges on the nose, determine the surface heat flux at aeroshell locations where gauges were not present, and compare to pre-flight CFD-based heating predictions. Inversely estimated surface heat flux continues to be used to correlate FTPS thermal models to reconstruct in-flight thermal response.

H S Alpert↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

LOFTID Surface Heating Reconstruction

On November 10, 2022, the Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) reentry vehicle launched to low-Earth orbit aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket out of Vandenberg Air Force Base. The aeroshell, the largest Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) ever flown, was inflated to its full 6-meter diameter before successful re-entry into the atmosphere. The aeroshell was heavily instrumented in order to understand its behavior during entry. There were 82 thermocouples (TCs) distributed across the aeroshell, with 22 integrated into the flexible thermal protection system (FTPS) on the rigid nose, 36 in the FTPS on the deployable structure, and 24 on the inflatable structure. TCs were placed at different depths throughout the FTPS. Those nearest to the surface were located just beneath the two SiC outer fabric layers. The near-surface TCs on the rigid nose were Type R with flame spray alumina insulation, while those on the flank were Type N with mica/ceramic insulation. Additionally, a radiometer was placed at the center of the nose surrounded by four total heat flux gauges in a cruciform configuration at a radius of 0.41 m. The nose instrumentation is shown in Fig. 1 and a cross-section of the aeroshell with all TC locations is shown in Fig. 2. The objective of this work was to use the temperatures measured by the TCs during flight to estimate the surface heat rate across the aeroshell throughout the period of re-entry by inverse analysis methodology. The results were used to evaluate the fidelity of measurements from the total heat flux gauges on the nose, determine the surface heat flux at aeroshell locations where gauges were not present, and compare to pre-flight CFD-based heating predictions. Inversely estimated surface heat flux continues to be used to correlate FTPS thermal models to reconstruct in-flight thermal response.

LOFTID↗
NASA NTRS1988

Expendable launch vehicle transportation for the Space Station

ELVs are presently evaluated as major components of the NASA Space Station's logistics transportation system, augmenting the cargo capacity of the Space Shuttle in support of Station productivity and operational flexibility. The ELVs in question are the Delta II, Atlas II, Titan III, Titan IV, Shuttle-C (unmanned cargo development), European Ariane 5, and Japanese H-II, as well as smaller launch vehicles and OTVs. Early definition of ELV program impacts will preclude the potentially excessive costs of future Space Station modifications.

Corban, Robert R.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Atlas Centaur 77 GOES-J Wet Dress Rehearsal at Cape Canaveral Air Station

A Wet Dress Rehearsal (WDR) was successfully run on Atlas/Centaur 77 launch vehicle. The WDR verifies the launch readiness of the vehicle, the launch support equipment at the pad and in the blockhouse, the countdown procedure, and the launch countdown operations of the Eastern Range. During this countdown test liquid hydrogen, liquid oxygen and RP-1 propellants are aboard the vehicle, verifying the structural integrity of the Atlas first stage and Centaur upper stage tanks.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1974

Specification and correlation of the sine vibration environment for Viking '75

Two Viking spacecraft will be individually launched on a new Titan IIIE/Centaur D-1T launch vehicle in August 1975. The method for the establishment of spacecraft sine vibration test levels prior to availability of any Titan IIIE/Centaur D-1T flight data by use of both computer simulations and data from previous Titan and Atlas Centaur vehicles is described. The specification level is compared with actual flight data obtained from a proof flight launch of the Titan IIIE/Centaur D-1T and a Viking dynamic simulator in January 1974. An objective of the proof flight launch was to obtain estimates of the flight loads and environments. The criteria used to minimize the structural weight that would result from an unmodified application of a sine test environment are described.

Snyder, R. E.↗
NASA NTRS2014

Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures

This analysis is a survey of control center architectures of the NASA Space Launch System (SLS), United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V and Delta IV, and the European Space Agency (ESA) Ariane 5. Each of these control center architectures have similarities in basic structure, and differences in functional distribution of responsibilities for the phases of operations: (a) Launch vehicles in the international community vary greatly in configuration and process; (b) Each launch site has a unique processing flow based on the specific configurations; (c) Launch and flight operations are managed through a set of control centers associated with each launch site, however the flight operations may be a different control center than the launch center; and (d) The engineering support centers are primarily located at the design center with a small engineering support team at the launch site.

Watson, Michael D.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Robot Rescue

Tests with robots and the high-fidelity Hubble Space Telescope mockup astronauts use to train for servicing missions have convinced NASA managers it may be possible to maintain and upgrade the orbiting observatory without sending a space shuttle to do the job. In a formal request last week, the agency gave bidders until July 16 to sub-mit proposals for a robotic mission to the space telescope before the end of 2007. At a minimum, the mission would attach a rocket motor to deorbit the telescope safely when its service life ends. In the best case, it would use state-of-the- art robotics to prolong its life on orbit and install new instruments. With the space shuttle off-limits for the job under strict post-Columbia safety policies set by Administrator Sean O'Keefe, NASA has designed a "straw- man" robotic mission that would use an Atlas V or Delta N to launch a 20,ooO-lb. "Hubble Robotic Vehicle" to service the telescope. There, a robotic arm would grapple it, much as the shuttle does.

Morring, Frank, Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2010

Lessons Learned in Launching Ares I-X

The Ares I-X flight test, scheduled for 2009, is the first opportunity for the Constellation Program and Ares Projects to obtain important data on the in-flight loads, first stage recovery, and ground-handling characteristics of the Ares I crew launch vehicle. The flight test vehicle will incorporate a mix of flight and mockup hardware, reflecting an acceptable representation of the mass and outer mold line characteristics of the operational Ares I vehicle. It will be powered by a four-segment solid rocket motor from the Space Shuttle inventory and will include a fifth, inert spacer segment and new forward structures to make it the same shape as the Ares I first stage. The vehicle also includes mass simulators for the upper stage, Orion crew module, and launch abort system to match the outer mold line of Ares I; an active roll control system; and avionics derived from Shuttle and Atlas hardware. This suborbital mission will take the flight test vehicle from stacking in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) through liftoff, maximum dynamic pressure, first stage separation, and recovery. Ares I-X presented NASA with unique project management challenges. This presentation will address those unique challenges, including managing a virtual nationwide team under a constrained timeline; designing and building the launch vehicle and ground systems; working concurrently with Space Shuttle activities; and integrating technical and management functions. It also will identify key data collected and lessons learned from the flight that will be applied to future exploration missions.

Davis, Stephan R.↗
NASA NTRS2006

System Architecture Modeling for Technology Portfolio Management using ATLAS

Strategic planners and technology portfolio managers have traditionally relied on consensus-based tools, such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in planning the funding of technology development. While useful to a certain extent, these tools are limited in the ability to fully quantify the impact of a technology choice on system mass, system reliability, project schedule, and lifecycle cost. The Advanced Technology Lifecycle Analysis System (ATLAS) aims to provide strategic planners a decision support tool for analyzing technology selections within a Space Exploration Architecture (SEA). Using ATLAS, strategic planners can select physics-based system models from a library, configure the systems with technologies and performance parameters, and plan the deployment of a SEA. Key parameters for current and future technologies have been collected from subject-matter experts and other documented sources in the Technology Tool Box (TTB). ATLAS can be used to compare the technical feasibility and economic viability of a set of technology choices for one SEA, and compare it against another set of technology choices or another SEA. System architecture modeling in ATLAS is a multi-step process. First, the modeler defines the system level requirements. Second, the modeler identifies technologies of interest whose impact on an SEA. Third, the system modeling team creates models of architecture elements (e.g. launch vehicles, in-space transfer vehicles, crew vehicles) if they are not already in the model library. Finally, the architecture modeler develops a script for the ATLAS tool to run, and the results for comparison are generated.

Thompson, Robert W.↗