Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “AeroAcoustics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14

Leveraging Large Eddy Simulations to Characterize Aeroacoustic Environments on Launch Vehicles

NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) program has relied on multiple wind tunnel campaigns to predict expected aeroacoustic environments. Time, cost, Reynolds number matching, contamination from test section acoustics, and limitations in spatial resolution are all factors that impact the use experimental data for development of launch vehicle environments. Methodological and computational advances over the last decade are enabling scale resolving computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to be completed that can address some the challenges with conventional datasets, enabling more complete/accurate modeling of dynamic loading events on ascent. These simulations are classified as so-called "Large-Eddy Simulations" (LES). As the name implies, these simulations seek to directly resolve the turbulence in the largest, most-energetic turbulent structures, or eddies, and the dissipation of the smallest eddies in the flow field, is modeled. Like anything else, these simulations still must undergo rigorous testing and validation for the results to ultimately be trusted in the analysis of a launch vehicle. EV33 has begun to conduct some of this early-stage testing and validation to better support NASA missions in the future.

Jonathan Boustani↗

Preliminary Aeroacoustic Measurements from the AART in the NFAC 40-by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel

The primary objective: determine the aerodynamics and acoustics related to an auxiliary propulsor mounted behind an isolated wing in the National Full Scale Aerodynamic Complex 40-by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. The primary data points match test conditions for in-flow stereo PIV measurements completed in the Ames 7x10 in 2018. The propeller consists of a Sensenich L26H commercial off the shelf blade set and hub, with a 26 inch diameter; propeller performance is measured with an internal balance integrated in the test stand. The wing is a NACA 0015 with a 12 inch chord; 58.5 inches in height for full wing configuration; 40.5 inches in height for the half wing configuration.

Aeroacoustics↗

Optimized Combined Compact Differencing Methods for Computational Aeroacoustics

The sixth order Combined Compact Differencing (CCD) scheme of Chu and Fan is optimized, resulting in exceptional performance. Results indicate that the best of these optimized schemes can accurately propagate linear simple harmonic waves with fewer than three points per wavelength, while using a three point differencing stencil. Stable and accurate boundary treatments for these schemes are given, and the performance of these schemes is assessed using a benchmark problem.

Computational Aeroacoustics↗

Aeroacoustic Computations of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft: Part 1 – Aero-dynamic and Airframe Noise Simulations

Computational results are presented for an 8%-scale, full-span, transonic truss-braced wing (TTBW) model simulated as installed in the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel and in free-air conditions. The simulations were conducted with the lat-tice Boltzmann solver PowerFLOW® to capture the time-accurate characteristics of the flow. The aerodynamic behavior of the aircraft was investigated in the landing configuration, with high-lift devices and landing gear deployed, as well as in the clean (cruise) configuration, with these components stowed. Analyses were performed on local flow quantities, global forces, and time-averaged surface pressures. Aerodynamic quantities were shown to be sensitive to mesh resolution levels, driven by small geometric features inherent to the TTBW model. Flow features of the TTBW model were examined, with the wing/strut configuration of this model presenting unique behaviors generally not found in conventional transport aircraft. Near-field, time-dependent flow quantities obtained from the scale-resolving simulations were used in conjunction with a Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings integral approach to predict the far-field airframe noise signature of this advanced concept. The effects of permeable data sur-face end caps on the far-field noise spectrum in the flyover direction were determined to be negligible.

Transonic Truss-Braced Wing↗

Aeroacoustic Computations of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft: Part 2 – Acoustic Signature and Noise Source Identification

High-fidelity, time-dependent simulations of a Boeing-designed, transonic, truss-braced-wing aircraft in cruise (clean) and landing configurations are leveraged to generate synthetic microphone-phased-array data for airframe noise prediction and assessment. These data sets are used to compute source localization (beamform) maps to determine the location and strength of primary and secondary airframe noise sources associated with this unique configuration. The synthetic phased-array implementation mimics the setup of a flight test. As this study is ongoing, preliminary integrated far-field spectra for the cruise configuration obtained at multiple spatial resolutions revealed significant tonal content that lacked convergence with increased resolution. The origin of several of these tones and their unusual convergence behavior was traced to the larger-than-normal trailing-edge thickness of the “as-tested” cruise model being simulated. Reducing the trailing-edge thickness to more realistic values eliminated most of the tones at low to moderate frequencies and improved spectrum convergence significantly. Applying lessons learned from the cruise simulations, several modifications to the geometry of the landing configuration were made and are described in this work. Results from permeable and solid Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings surfaces at two different spatial resolutions (coarse and medium) are used to illustrate the major noise sources and determine convergence of the CLEAN integrated noise levels for the entire aircraft as well as major subcomponents. We demonstrate that the low-frequency content of the far-field spectrum is dominated by noise generated from the main landing gear, while the medium- and high-frequency content is dominated by the wing-leading-edge Krueger flaps. Since analysis of the acoustic maps for the landing configuration revealed several clusters of multiple sources along the wing leading edge, “high resolution” processing of the array data was used to distinguish more accurately the locations of sources.

Transonic Truss-Braced Wing↗