Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “GASIFICATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Performance of hydrophobic physical solvents for pre-combustion CO 2 capture at a pilot scale coal gasification facility

Here, in this paper, we present the first pilot plant data for hydrophobic physical solvents for CO 2 and H 2 S removal from coal-derived H 2 -rich syngas. Four physical solvents were tested under pre-combustion CO 2 capture conditions at bench scale and pilot plant scale: one baseline hydrophilic solvent and three hydrophobic solvents. The solvents were: (1) polyethylene-glycol-dimethyl ether (PEGDME), a hydrophilic solvent analog for the commercial process Selexol, (2) tributyl- phosphate (TBP), a commercially available hydrophobic solvent, (3) polyethylene glycol-poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PEG-PDMS-3), and (4) diethyl sebacate (CASSH-1), a novel, computationally screened hydrophobic solvent developed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). All solvents were studied under pure gas (CO 2 /N 2 /H 2 /CH 4 ) equilibrium conditions at NETL followed by pilot plant testing with syngas at the University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (UND EERC). Long term performance of CASSH-1 and PEDGME was then assessed with results compared to process simulation predictions. Within experimental uncertainties, all solvents showed comparable CO 2 absorption performance at above room temperature operation while the hydrophobic solvents had limited water uptake and low vapor pressure, which alleviates concerns related to corrosion, water absorption, and solvent loss to evaporation. These results indicate low viscosity, low vapor pressure hydrophobic solvents are a promising option for lower cost CO 2 capture from high pressure syngas applications.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Multiphysics simulation of supercritical CO 2 gasification for hydrogen production

A bench-scale supercritical CO 2 gasifier is being considered by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). A reacting computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed using ANSYS/Fluent in order to investigate the impact of various operating parameters on syngas composition. The model was validated using available data in the literature. Simulations were conducted over a range of coal-slurry loadings, reaction temperatures, system pressures, and oxygen mass flowrates with the goal of optimizing hydrogen production for the considered reactor. The results from the simulations identified a positive correlation between slurry loading and hydrogen production, while reactor temperature and pressure had a limited impact on H 2 production at the conditions of interest. Additionally, the simulations indicated that oxygen mass flowrate has less of an impact on hydrogen production at higher slurry loadings.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2014

Research and development to prepare and characterize robust coal/biomass mixtures for direct co-feeding into gasification systems

This project was initiated on October 1, 2010 and utilizes equipment and research supported by the Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, under Award Number DE- FE0005349. It is also based upon previous work supported by the Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, under Award Numbers DOE-DE-FG36-01GOl1082, DE-FG36-02G012011 or DE-EE0000272. The overall goal of the work performed was to demonstrate and assess the economic viability of fast hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) for transforming lignocellulosic biomass into a densified, friable fuel to gasify like coal that can be easily blended with ground coal and coal fines and then be formed into robust, weather-resistant pellets and briquettes.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2014

Biomass Gasification Research and Development Project

The overall objective of the BioChemCat project was to demonstrate the feasibility of using Advanced Wet Oxidation Steam-Explosion (AWEx) process to open and solubilize lignocellulosic biomass (LBM) coupled to an innovative mixed culture fermentation technology capable of producing a wide range of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) from all sugars present in LBM. The VFAs will then be separated and converted to hydrocarbon biofuel through catalytic upgrading. By continuously removing VFAs as they are produced (extractive fermentation), we were able to recover the VFAs while both eliminating the need for pH adjustment and increasing the fermentation productivity. The recovered VFAs were then esterified and upgraded to hydrocarbon fuels through a parallel series of hydrogenolysis/decarboxylation and dehydration reactions. We also demonstrated that a portion of the residual lignin fraction was solubilized and converted into VFAs, also improving the yields of VFAs. The remaining lignin fraction was then shown to be available (after dewatering and drying) for use as a lignin-enriched fuel pellet or as a feedstock for further processing.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Gasification Combined Heat and Power from Coal Fines

The goal of this final project report is to comprehensively summarize the work for public domain conducted on project DE-FE 0031520. In accordance with the Statement of Project Objectives (SOPO), the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research (UKy-CAER) (Recipient) has completed a Front End Engineering Design (FEED) study 5 MWe polygeneration unit using the Coal Fields Regional Industrial Park in Hazard, Kentucky (KY) as a model location and using coal recovered from the adjacent Pads Branch Impoundment as feed. The scope of work is a thorough study that can be used as a template for the application of the proposed technology throughout Eastern KY and other coal communities nationwide. The Technology Design Basis was developed based on three elements: basic site characteristics; fuel feedstock; and environmental health and safety requirements. The Basic Engineering Design Elements include the preliminary process design (the process area descriptions; the Block Flow Diagram (BFD), Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs) and Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs), process simulation outputs and Heat and Mass Balance (H&MB) stream tables, the major process equipment and instrumentation lists which includes specifications and materials of construction); the cost estimate (capital cost estimate, operational cost estimate, and comparison with state-of-the-art commercial scale similar technologies, options to lower cost, construction cost and schedule estimate); and other supporting elements (guidelines for execution and management of the project), logistical summary, and balance of plant summary, the Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) assessment; and a Social and Economic Impact (S&EI) assessment. All project milestones, deliverables and success criteria were met. The proposed 5 MWe polygeneration facility being fed from impoundment recovered coal has been shown to be technically feasible. Annual revenues are estimated at $\$ $2.4M from electricity, steam and hydrocarbon production; annual operating expenses are $\$ $5.2M ($\$ $2.9 M in operating expenses, and $\$ $2.4M in indirect expenses). The gasifier facility, as configured during the FEED, will lose money when operating under commercial operating conditions and terms. However, eight options improving the economics can be considered during the detailed design phase to make the facility profitable by taking advantage of the positive differential of revenue to variable operating costs, and reducing the influence of fixed operating costs. Coupled with the findings from the S&EI assessment estimating a total economic impact of $\$ $374M for the proposed polygeneration facility at >$\$ $1.5B, if three additional such projects are implemented, clearly positive economics are demonstrated. No EH&S issues are identified that would prohibit proceeding with the project, although permitting efforts are estimated to take 3-5 years.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗