Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Launch Methods”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2011

Calculating Launch Vehicle Flight Performance Reserve

This paper addresses different methods for determining the amount of extra propellant (flight performance reserve or FPR) that is necessary to reach orbit with a high probability of success. One approach involves assuming that the various influential parameters are independent and that the result behaves as a Gaussian. Alternatively, probabilistic models may be used to determine the vehicle and environmental models that will be available (estimated) for a launch day go/no go decision. High-fidelity closed-loop Monte Carlo simulation determines the amount of propellant used with each random combination of parameters that are still unknown at the time of launch. Using the results of the Monte Carlo simulation, several methods were used to calculate the FPR. The final chosen solution involves determining distributions for the pertinent outputs and running a separate Monte Carlo simulation to obtain a best estimate of the required FPR. This result differs from the result obtained using the other methods sufficiently that the higher fidelity is warranted.

Hanson, John M.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Menagerie: an Automated Approach to Launch Vehicle Design

The Advanced Concepts Office (ACO) at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC)has been performing conceptual design of launch vehicles since the Space Transportation System Program. As part of its duties ACO has been tasked with investigating the effects of known and potential threats and opportunities to a myriad of launch vehicle concepts, launch sites, and mission profiles known as the launch space. As the launch space becomes more crowded and busy with launch providers and their vehicles, the legacy method of prescribing each design discipline to a single human Subject Matter Expert (SME) has become infeasible. Rapidly changing launch, economical, and political constraints require rapid evaluation of their effects. While moving into this future of rapid response does require streamlining of data and processes, it does not however lead directly to reinventing the wheel. Flight-validated analysis tools, procedures, and lessons learned can be effectively leveraged to bring the experience from decades of government and commercial flight programs to the new paradigm. In this publication we describe the aggregation of all previous launch vehicle design efforts of ACO into an automated and integrated toolchain called menagerie. The toolchain utilizes a suite of NASA, Air Force Research Lab (AFRL), and ACO-developed tools and processes to evaluate launch vehicle concepts, mission profiles, and trades in a fraction of the time previously required.

launch vehicle↗
NASA NTRS2017

Time Domain Stability Margin Assessment Method

The baseline stability margins for NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) launch vehicle were generated via the classical approach of linearizing the system equations of motion and determining the gain and phase margins from the resulting frequency domain model. To improve the fidelity of the classical methods, the linear frequency domain approach can be extended by replacing static, memoryless nonlinearities with describing functions. This technique, however, does not address the time varying nature of the dynamics of a launch vehicle in flight. An alternative technique for the evaluation of the stability of the nonlinear launch vehicle dynamics along its trajectory is to incrementally adjust the gain and/or time delay in the time domain simulation until the system exhibits unstable behavior. This technique has the added benefit of providing a direct comparison between the time domain and frequency domain tools in support of simulation validation.

Clements, Keith↗
NASA NTRS2018

An Examination of Launch Vehicle Loads Reanalysis Techniques

The typical approach to calculating dynamic launch loads in aerospace applications is coupled loads analysis (CLA). A component mode model of the launch vehicle is coupled with a component mode model of a payload, system modes are calculated, forcing functions are applied, and the dynamic responses are computed. This approach requires the explicit knowledge of the component models for the launch vehicle and payload, as well as the forcing functions. In many situations, the launch vehicle and forcing functions do not change from one analysis to the next only the payload is different. For this type of application, a method called reanalysis was developed to compute the response of a modified payload on the same launch vehicle. If the launch forcing functions are also the same, the approach eliminates the need for the launch vehicle model and the forcing functions and dramatically reduces the computation time. This work investigates the application and accuracy of three previously developed reanalysis methods using a typical launch vehicle and two different payloads. All three methods are based on knowledge of system modes from the original CLA, and Hurty/Craig-Bampton (HCB) models of the original and new payloads. The first method was developed at JPL (Jet Propulsion Lab) and is often referred to as substitution. It is a frequency-domain method, which requires transformation of time signals to and from the frequency domain. The other two methods are time-domain methods that more closely mimic the CLA process. The three methods were applied to two simple examples and a more complex one. The results indicate that the time-domain methods are considerably more robust with respect to modal truncation and other numerical errors than the frequency-domain JPL method.

Reanalysis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Predicting SLS Launch Environment using a Novel Multiphase Formulation

Powerful acoustic waves generated during ignition of launch vehicles may be dangerous to the vehicle, its payload, or the surrounding structures. The water-based Ignition Overpressure and Sound Suppression (IOP/SS) system at Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) Launch Complex 39B (LC-39B) will be used to protect the Space Launch System (SLS) from the acoustic vibrations generated during launch. The IOP/SS system uses enormous amounts of water to dampen and attenuate these sound waves. To better understand the launch environment risks and to study the effectiveness of the IOP/SS system it is desirable to have time-accurate unsteady simulations of the vehicle ignition with water-based sound suppression. This paper presents results obtained with a novel, high-order accurate, and robust numerical method designed for simulating compressible multiphase flows. A positivity-preserving finite difference scheme is utilized which is formally high-order accurate and also provably robust. Robustness is critical due to the extreme nature of the flow which exhibits highly nonlinear shock and rarefaction waves interacting with liquid-gas interfaces with density ratios of the order of 1000:1. Furthermore, the high-order accuracy (and the high resolution property) is desirable for predicting wave phenomena like IOP waves since the signal can be resolved accurately and propagated long distances with fewer grid points. This finite-difference method was developed using NASA’s Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) Cartesian immersed boundary framework. We present a validation case by applying our solver to the SLS Scale Model Acoustic Test (SMAT). The SLS SMAT is a well-instrumented 5% scale model test meant to represent the SLS at NASA KSC’s LC-39B pad. Scale IOP tests were performed with and without the sound suppression water and included many sensors which recorded the pressure waves produced during ignition. For this validation case we conduct two simulations, likewise with and without sound suppression water, and compare the SLS SMAT pressure sensor signals with our numerical signals at identical locations. Following this validation case we present a study of the SLS launch environment to examine engineering safety concerns about the mobile launch pad. Engineers at KSC redesigned the main flame deflector at LC-39B anticipating the increased loads from the SLS and to repair damage from prior Shuttle missions. This deflector redesign made use of surface pressure and temperature data from LAVA full-scale SLS simulations without the sound suppression system. The engineers were questioning the possibility of increased pressure loads on the underside of the mobile launcher due to the water in the flame trench. Based on the results established in our simulations of the SLS SMAT, we performed updated calculations for SLS at LC-39B with and without water systems active to assess the readiness of the launch pad for Artemis I launch. Our results show that the IOP/SS system is effective at reducing the overpressure signal and overall sound pressure levels felt by the vehicle and additionally that the pressure loads experienced by the mobile launcher (ML) during engine startup is not increased by the presence of water.

EGS↗
NASA NTRS2005

Non-Intrusive Techniques of Inspections During the Pre-Launch Phase of Space Vehicle

This paper addresses a method of non-intrusive local inspection of surface and sub-surface conditions, interfaces, laminations and seals in both space vehicle and ground operations with an integrated suite of imaging sensors during pre-launch operations. It employs an advanced Raman spectrophotometer with additional spectrophotometers and lidar mounted on a flying robot to constantly monitor the space hardware as well as inner surface of the vehicle and ground operations hardware. This paper addresses a team of micro flying robots with necessary sensors and photometers to monitor the entire space vehicle internally and externally. The micro flying robots can reach altitude with least amount of energy, where astronauts have difficulty in reaching and monitoring the materials and subsurface faults. The micro flying robot has an embedded fault detection system which acts as an advisory system and in many cases micro flying robots act as a Supervisor to fix the problems. As missions expand to a sustainable presence in the Moon, and extend for durations longer than one year in lunar outpost, the effectiveness of the instrumentation and hardware has to be revolutionized if NASA is to meet high levels of mission safety, reliability, and overall success. The micro flying robot uses contra-rotating propellers powered by an ultra-thin, ultrasonic motor with currently the world's highest power weight ratio, and is balanced in mid-air by means of the world's first stabilizing mechanism using a linear actuator. The essence of micromechatronics has been brought together in high-density mounting technology to minimize the size and weight. The robot can take suitable payloads of photometers, embedded chips for image analysis and micro pumps for sealing cracks or fixing other material problems. This paper also highlights advantages that this type of non-intrusive techniques offer over costly and monolithic traditional techniques.

Thirumalainambi, Rejkumar↗
NASA NTRS1989

LEO/GSO cyclic depot transfer

This paper investigates the development and use of semi-analytic methods for propellant depot orbit selection in cyclic, coplanar, Keplerian GSO missions. The cyclic depot transfer strategy which allows for non-optimum (e.g. non-Hohmann) transfer, is constrained by resonance requirements allowing for descent rendezvous/refueling with fuel depots positioned during the ascent phase of the mission. The mission benefit using this transfer technique allows an improvement in propulsion system efficiency which can lead to approximately 43 percent reduction in initial launch mass when compared to traditional methods, but with the trade-off of longer mission timelines. A family of potential transfers is identified with an 'optimum' selection not based on conventional delta V minimization. The results of this analysis include reduced transfer times and greater potential initial launch mass savings over previous work.

Coffey, Randall E.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Specification and correlation of the sine vibration environment for Viking '75

Two Viking spacecraft will be individually launched on a new Titan IIIE/Centaur D-1T launch vehicle in August 1975. The method for the establishment of spacecraft sine vibration test levels prior to availability of any Titan IIIE/Centaur D-1T flight data by use of both computer simulations and data from previous Titan and Atlas Centaur vehicles is described. The specification level is compared with actual flight data obtained from a proof flight launch of the Titan IIIE/Centaur D-1T and a Viking dynamic simulator in January 1974. An objective of the proof flight launch was to obtain estimates of the flight loads and environments. The criteria used to minimize the structural weight that would result from an unmodified application of a sine test environment are described.

Snyder, R. E.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Non-destructive ultrasonic measurements of case depth

Two ultrasonic methods for nondestructive measurements of the depth of a case-hardened layer in steel are described. One method involves analysis of ultrasonic waves diffused back from the bulk of the workpiece. The other method involves finding the speed of propagation of ultrasonic waves launched on the surface of the work. Procedures followed in the two methods for measuring case depth are described.

Flambard, C.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cumulative Distribution Overlap Technique for Artemis Mission Public Entry Risk Assessment

The Artemis missions use a skip-entry profile to accomplish a recovery near the western US coastline, however, the service module debris must still be disposed of safely. For certain contingency return scenarios, the expected dispersed entry profile is biased from the well-analyzed corridor. A novel method is presented for assessing the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of these biased results to ensure they do not contribute additional probabilistic risk to the public. More specifically, the weight of the flight path angle dispersion "tail" of the CDF needs to remain below the well-assessed region. The details of how this method was actually used to screen and plan entry profiles for specific launch windows during the Artemis I mission are shown. This method has potential applicability in other problems where a biased distribution needs to be assessed against a well-defined "core" region.

Reentry↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cumulative Distribution Overlap Technique for Artemis Mission Public Entry Risk Assessment

The Artemis missions use a skip-entry profile to accomplish a recovery near the western US coastline, however, the service module debris must still be disposed of safely. For certain contingency return scenarios, the expected dispersed entry profile is biased from the well-analyzed corridor. A novel method is presented for assessing the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of these biased results to ensure they do not contribute additional probabilistic risk to the public. More specifically, the weight of the flight path angle dispersion "tail" of the CDF needs to remain below the well-assessed region. The details of how this method was actually used to screen and plan entry profiles for specific launch windows during the Artemis I mission are shown. This method has potential applicability in other problems where a biased distribution needs to be assessed against a well-defined "core" region.

Reentry↗
NASA NTRS2011

Monitoring Spacecraft Telemetry Via Optical or RF Link

A patent disclosure document discusses a photonic method for connecting a spacecraft with a launch vehicle upper-stage telemetry system as a means for monitoring a spacecraft fs health and status during and right after separation and deployment. This method also provides an efficient opto-coupled capability for prelaunch built-in-test (BIT) on the ground to enable more efficient and timely integration, preflight checkout, and a means to obviate any local EMI (electromagnetic interference) during integration and test. Additional utility can be envisioned for BIT on other platforms, such as the International Space Station (ISS). The photonic telemetry system implements an optical free-space link with a divergent laser transmitter beam spoiled over a significant cone angle to accommodate changes in spacecraft position without having to angle track it during deployment. Since the spacecraft may lose attitude control and tumble during deployment, the transmitted laser beam interrogates any one of several low-profile meso-scale retro-reflective spatial light modulators (SLMs) deployed over the surface of the spacecraft. The return signal beam, modulated by the SLMs, contains health, status, and attitude information received back at the launch vehicle. Very compact low-power opto-coupler technology already exists for the received signal (requiring relatively low bandwidths, e.g., .200 kbps) to enable transfer to a forward pass RF relay from the launch vehicle to TDRSS (Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System) or another recipient. The link would be active during separation and post-separation to monitor spacecraft health, status, attitude, or other data inventories until attitude recovery and ground control can be re-established. An optical link would not interfere with the existing upper stage telemetry and beacon systems, thus meeting launch vehicle EMI environmental constraints.

Fielhauer, K. B.↗
NASA NTRS2012

Launch Window Analysis for the Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission

The NASA Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission will fly four spinning spacecraft in formation in highly elliptical orbits to study the magnetosphere of the Earth. This paper describes the development of an MMS launch window tool that uses the orbitaveraged Variation of Parameter equations as the basis for a semi-analytic quantification of the dominant oblateness and lunisolar perturbation effects on the MMS orbit. This approach, coupled with a geometric interpretation of all of the MMS science and engineering constraints, allows a scan of 180(sup 2) = 32,400 different (RAAN, AOP) pairs to be carried out for a specified launch day in less than 10 s on a typical modern laptop. The resulting plot indicates the regions in (RAAN, AOP) space where each constraint is satisfied or violated: their intersection gives, in an easily interpreted graphical manner, the final solution space for the day considered. This tool, SWM76, is now used to provide launch conditions to the full fidelity (but far slower) MMS simulation code: very good agreement has been observed between the two methods.

MAGNETOSPHERIC↗
NASA NTRS2016

Characterizing Epistemic Uncertainty for Launch Vehicle Designs

NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) has the task of estimating the aleatory (randomness) and epistemic (lack of knowledge) uncertainty of launch vehicle loss of mission and crew risk, and communicating the results. Launch vehicles are complex engineered systems designed with sophisticated subsystems that are built to work together to accomplish mission success. Some of these systems or subsystems are in the form of heritage equipment, while some have never been previously launched. For these cases, characterizing the epistemic uncertainty is of foremost importance, and it is anticipated that the epistemic uncertainty of a modified launch vehicle design versus a design of well understood heritage equipment would be greater. For reasons that will be discussed, standard uncertainty propagation methods using Monte Carlo simulation produce counter intuitive results, and significantly underestimate epistemic uncertainty for launch vehicle models. Furthermore, standard PRA methods, such as Uncertainty-Importance analyses used to identify components that are significant contributors to uncertainty, are rendered obsolete, since sensitivity to uncertainty changes are not reflected in propagation of uncertainty using Monte Carlo methods. This paper provides a basis of the uncertainty underestimation for complex systems and especially, due to nuances of launch vehicle logic, for launch vehicles. It then suggests several alternative methods for estimating uncertainty and provides examples of estimation results. Lastly, the paper describes how to implement an Uncertainty-Importance analysis using one alternative approach, describes the results, and suggests ways to reduce epistemic uncertainty by focusing on additional data or testing of selected components.

Novack, Steven D.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Time-domain finite elements in optimal control with application to launch-vehicle guidance

A time-domain finite element method is developed for optimal control problems. The theory derived is general enough to handle a large class of problems including optimal control problems that are continuous in the states and controls, problems with discontinuities in the states and/or system equations, problems with control inequality constraints, problems with state inequality constraints, or problems involving any combination of the above. The theory is developed in such a way that no numerical quadrature is necessary regardless of the degree of nonlinearity in the equations. Also, the same shape functions may be employed for every problem because all strong boundary conditions are transformed into natural or weak boundary conditions. In addition, the resulting nonlinear algebraic equations are very sparse. Use of sparse matrix solvers allows for the rapid and accurate solution of very difficult optimization problems. The formulation is applied to launch-vehicle trajectory optimization problems, and results show that real-time optimal guidance is realizable with this method. Finally, a general problem solving environment is created for solving a large class of optimal control problems. The algorithm uses both FORTRAN and a symbolic computation program to solve problems with a minimum of user interaction. The use of symbolic computation eliminates the need for user-written subroutines which greatly reduces the setup time for solving problems.

Bless, Robert R.↗