Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Microcalorimeter”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

238 records · Page 14
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Status of the Micro-X Sounding Rocket X-Ray Spectrometer

Micro-X is a sounding rocket borne X-ray telescope that utilizes transition edge sensors to perform imaging spectroscopy with a high level of energy resolution. Its 2.1m focal length X-ray optic has an effective area of 300 sq cm, a field of view of 11.8 arcmin, and a bandpass of 0.12.5 keV. The detector array has 128 pixels and an intrinsic energy resolution of 4.5 eV FWHM. The integration of the system has progressed with functional tests of the detectors and electronics complete, and performance characterization of the detectors is underway. We present an update of ongoing progress in preparation for the upcoming launch of the instrument.

X-ray astronomy↗
NASA NTRS2016

Vibration Isolation System for Cryocoolers of Soft X-Ray Spectrometer (SXS) Onboard ASTRO-H (Hitomi)

Soft X-ray Spectrometer (SXS) onboard ASTRO-H (named Hitomi after launch) is a micro-calorimeter-type spectrometer, installed in a dewar to be cooled at 50 mK. The energy resolution of the SXS engineering model suffered from micro-vibration from cryocoolers mounted on the dewar. This is mitigated for the flight model by introducing vibration isolation systems between the cryocoolers and the dewar. The detector performance of the flight model was verified before launch of the spacecraft in both ambient condition and thermal-vac condition, showing no detectable degradation in energy resolution. The in-orbit performance was also consistent with that on ground, indicating that the cryocoolers were not damaged by launch environment. The design and performance of the vibration isolation system along with the mechanism of how the micro-vibration could degrade the cryogenic detector is shown.

Microcalorimeter↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In-Orbit Selection of Cryocooler Drive Frequencies for XRISM/Resolve

The XRISM/Resolve instrument cooling system uses adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators (ADRs) to cool the detectors to 50 mK and Joule-Thomson and Stirling cryocoolers to reduce heat load on the He tank supporting the ADRs. Resolve was designed with tunable cryocooler drive frequencies so that interference could be avoided. The cryocooler generated micro-vibration changes with drive frequency and that micro-vibration causes interference and degrades instrument performance. Poor drive frequency choices have been shown to dramatically impact ADR cooling power, temperature stability, detector noise, and degrading spectroscopic performance. However, some choices are free of these features, allowing the instrument to satisfy its performance requirements with significant margin. Thus, the choice of drive frequencies is critical to achieving peak instrument performance. The drive frequencies of the Joule-Thomson cooler, near 52 Hz, and the Stirling coolers, near 15 Hz, were adjusted in three scan sequences while measuring interference to narrow candidate frequency options. Choices were based on stability of the 50 mK control thermometer, changes in the ADR demagnetization rate, and changes in detector noise. These scans were performed routinely during ground testing. Surprisingly though, the results were not repeatable after the Dewar was warmed and re-cooled but were repeatable when remeasured during the same test campaign. Since the good/bad drive frequencies change during Dewar warmup/cooldown, and possibly after vibration events, the drive frequencies could not be finalized before launch. This paper describes the cryocooler frequency scan measurements and compares the results during instrument commissioning to those performed during ground tests.

XRISM↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In-Orbit Selection of Cryocooler Drive Frequencies for XRISM/Resolve

The XRISM/Resolve instrument cooling system uses adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators (ADRs) to cool the detectors to 50 mK and two types of cryocoolers to reduce heat load on the He tank, Joule-Thomson and Stirling cryocoolers. Resolve was designed with tunable cryocooler frequencies so that any mechanical interference and its effect on performance could be minimized. Measurements at different cryocooler drive frequencies were used to quantify the interference and narrow the acceptable range of frequency options. For Resolve the choice of cryocooler drive frequencies dramatically influences the instrument performance. Poor choices have been shown to degrade ADR cooling power and degrade the spectroscopic performance of the instrument. However, good choices have been shown to be free of undesirable features, allowing the instrument to satisfy its performance requirements with significant margin. Thus, the choice of drive frequencies is a critical factor for overall instrument performance. The drive frequencies of the Joule-Thomson cooler operating near 52 Hz, and the Stirling coolers operating near 15 Hz were adjusted in three distinct scan sequences to efficiently narrow the candidate frequency options. The frequency choices were based on stability of the 50 mK control thermometer, changes in the ADR demagnetization rate, and changes in detector noise. Scans across the drive frequency range of each cryocooler were performed multiple times during ground testing. Surprisingly, the results were not repeatable across test campaigns and did not conform to any discernable trend, but they were repeatable when remeasured within a single cool-down cycle. The conclusion was that the good/bad drive frequencies changed during Dewar warmup/cooldown, and possibly after mechanical vibration tests. Therefore, the settings could not be finalized before launch, and scans during instrument commissioning were necessary. This paper describes the cryocooler frequency scan measurements and compares the results during instrument commissioning to those performed during ground tests.

XRISM↗